The Masterpiece Collection: Nadal v. Laver: A Matter of Greatness

[8PAQ]

Everyone seems to be forgetting that Fed got to 10 slam finals in the row. Winning 8 of them. Losing two on clay against the clay GOAT. He did all of that while being non stop #1 for every week of each year. That right there is better than Nadal's entire career.

After that Fed got mono and ended up finally losing at a slam semi (2008 AO). Then got 7 more slam finals in the row (winning 4). Again better than 3 finals in the row for Nadal so far. So right now Nadal is not even close to Fed's 2nd best slam final streak.

So this thread is about #3 accomplishment at slams.

 

[Chopin]

the opinion of a ******* means little if that is being used for expert advice.

He is an expert though and a well-respected one at that. I'm by no means saying that we must agree with everything he says though. I suppose we'll just agree to disagree on this issue. Best of luck with your studies.

Best,
Chopin

 

[Forehand Avenger]

Both achievements are amazing feats. Why do they need to be compared? The fact is that they cannot. It's like the endless GOAT debate. There is no point, really.

 

[Deleted member 21996]

Still bitter about Spain's success Gorecki? Don't worry, chalk it up to steroids like you did the previous time to keep your conscience at peace

And how is that related with the ignorance in Statistics revealed by your fellow *******s.

please stay on topic.

ps: is that the only argument you have towards me? the so called portugal-spain rivalry? lol... goes to show how ignorant you are!