Isner has to be the most boring to watch. Looks like a genuinely great guy but wow, his game puts you to sleep. Nothing but a serve and an occasional forehand.
I just thought of another one I find boring and that is Verdasco. To watch him play Raonic, for me it was not a real tennis match. Just rallies, no serves. It even made Raonic leave in disgust. I'd like to see Raonic play Verdasco on a real grass court with serves.
Interesting. I judge a player's entertainment value by how he plays the game, not by what his ranking is. In fact, to me, his ranking is irrelevant. There are exciting players throughout the rankings, just like there are some boring players throughput the rankings, including near the top.
What does preferring to watch paint dry instead of Nadal play on clay have anything to do with Federer? Watching Nadal on clay would be boring even if Federer never existed. In fact, it would be even more boring because he would never get to play against Federer on clay and also because he would then have even less competition on clay.
Interesting. I judge a player's entertainment value by how he plays the game, not by what his ranking is. In fact, to me, his ranking is irrelevant. There are exciting players throughout the rankings, just like there are some boring players throughput the rankings, including near the top.
Murray - I only watch Murray matches when he is playing either Fed or Nadal
Soderling - So one dimensional. he hits the ball so late and with that ugly forehand
Isner - I enjoy watching serve-fests but this guy has no personality or motivation at all
Hewitt - I switch the channel when he plays
Cilic - A guy his size should not be pushing so much
Murray - I only watch Murray matches when he is playing either Fed or Nadal
Soderling - So one dimensional. he hits the ball so late and with that ugly forehand
Isner - I enjoy watching serve-fests but this guy has no personality or motivation at all
Hewitt - I switch the channel when he plays Cilic - A guy his size should not be pushing so much
Yes, ksbh, you are a Sham-****. And he is the reason I stopped watching tennis in the 90's -- well I can't remember who exactly it was, perhaps some East European player ... one day i am gonna have to go back in time and pin down the culprit. Anyway, you get back to fawning over Sunny Deolight and Pete Sham pras, let me not hold you up.
Whatever, if it helps you get your mind off Federer for a few seconds, I'm willing to go with it! At the very least, please don't go any further and call me a Federer fan as well! LOL!
I actually like Karlovic, he rarely overhits and has a good slice, very different to Isner and the other big servers. Pluss he actually attacks the net a lot which i like a lot.