The Most Nutritionally Complete Food Source on The Planet

SteveI

Legend
The answer to the question is of course fruits and veggies. You get the most bag for the buck with "plant based" foods - greens and fruits. Add beans, seeds and nuts and you are all set to go.

Question for the OP:

That foods supply the most protein per calorie?

Answer:

Spinach
Broccoli
Tofu (soy)
Lentils

The answer is not hemp...LOL
 

Gut4Tennis

Hall of Fame
The answer to the question is of course fruits and veggies. You get the most bag for the buck with "plant based" foods - greens and fruits. Add beans, seeds and nuts and you are all set to go.

Question for the OP:

That foods supply the most protein per calorie?

Answer:

Spinach
Broccoli
Tofu (soy)
Lentils

The answer is not hemp...LOL

Hemp has the perfect balance of protein , fiber and healthy fats, NOBODY every said it had the most protein. who cares about that. Balance baby. pay attention

BTW:

Here is some real science:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868018/

Interesting but more study needed. The results seem to indicate that what they know is about the same is what do not know.

Stick with Greens, Fruits, Seeds, Beans, Nuts and lean meats in limited amounts.

I am not jumping on the Hemp bandwagon yet... :)

Thank you for your wonderful contribution. Hemp is not a fad. More for us
 

SteveI

Legend
Hemp has the perfect balance of protein , fiber and healthy fats, NOBODY every said it had the most protein. who cares about that. Balance baby. pay attention



Thank you for your wonderful contribution. Hemp is not a fad. More for us

I have been paying attention... :)

The bottom line for me....I live in the "Known" world. There is no clear and solid real science that supports the use of this product. More studies and long term studies need to be done to support the claims the Hemp Lobby before many will even try this product.

I will stick with what we know works.

Staying Lean
Exercise
Greens, Beans, Fruits, Seeds and Bean...and lean meat, dairy.

I will not be running out today to pick up some hemp...

End O Story
 
Last edited:

Gut4Tennis

Hall of Fame
I have been paying attention... :)

The bottom line for me....I live in the "Known" world. There is no clear and solid real science that supports the use of this product. More studies and long term studies need to be done to support the claims the Hemp Lobby before many will even try this product.

I will stick with what we know works.

Staying Lean
Exercise
Greens, Beans, Fruits, Seeds and Bean...and lean meat, dairy.

I will not be running out today to pick up some hemp...

End O Story

Cool. thanks for your valuable opinion

more hemp for the rest of us!!! Thank you thank you
 

Gut4Tennis

Hall of Fame
386ca23c9d55d385ee042c242b6eb61fea76328819f64ef57e77c6da7bbcc769.jpg


21bf347a0456f6a0d4ce8dd778c7aee93f5b09408580002e24d938b9a79f307e.jpg
 

racquetreligion

Hall of Fame
Thanks Gut4Tennis helping the otherwise Zombies from differentiating Hemp from Ganja. They are still brainwashed into modern BS but at least it provokes their thinking that is usually instilled by Murdoch media.

Here in Japan the only source of protein after the war for those far from the ocean besides some animals like cats, dogs, pidgeons, squirrels and the occasional Racoon were hemp seeds and spam but the Hemp seed consumers live a healthier and longer life while the Spam munchers are pushing daisies.

The lack of DHA in the mostly processed western diet of todays generations makes Japan one of the highest suicide rate countries in the world.
 

Gut4Tennis

Hall of Fame
So, is hemp better than eating eggs?
Seems in an egg, you get pretty much all you need.

If the egg is cooked the nutrition is dead.

Do eggs have any fiber? Hemp sure does.

You could live off raw hemp seeds much healthier and longer then off of eggs

I like raw organic eggs, and cooked from time to time.

Hemp is much healthier then eggs all factors considered
 

Gut4Tennis

Hall of Fame
Thanks Gut4Tennis helping the otherwise Zombies from differentiating Hemp from Ganja. They are still brainwashed into modern BS but at least it provokes their thinking that is usually instilled by Murdoch media.

Here in Japan the only source of protein after the war for those far from the ocean besides some animals like cats, dogs, pidgeons, squirrels and the occasional Racoon were hemp seeds and spam but the Hemp seed consumers live a healthier and longer life while the Spam munchers are pushing daisies.

The lack of DHA in the mostly processed western diet of todays generations makes Japan one of the highest suicide rate countries in the world.

Thanks mate.

I always keep up the good fight, even though most are zombie sheeple.

No spam for me thanks :twisted:
 
S

Sirius Black

Guest
Nice to see that guts is promoting salmonella as the newest fad diet.
 

Gut4Tennis

Hall of Fame
Nice to see that guts is promoting salmonella as the newest fad diet.

you have only been taught what the fear lame steam teaches you

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2005/02/09/raw-eggs.aspx

By J. Mercola, D.O.

As many of you know, I am a fond proponent of using raw eggs as a major food in your diet.

Raw whole eggs are a phenomenally inexpensive and incredible source of high-quality nutrients that many of us are deficient in, especially high-quality protein and fat.

Eggs generally are one of the most allergic foods that are eaten, but I believe this is because they are cooked. If one consumes the eggs in their raw state the incidence of egg allergy virtually disappears. Heating the egg protein actually changes its chemical shape, and the distortion can easily lead to allergies.

So, if you have not been able to tolerate eggs before you will want to consider eating them uncooked.

But when one discusses raw eggs, the typical reaction is a fear of salmonella. So let me begin this update, my first that comprehensively addresses the immediate concern of nearly everyone who hears this recommendation.

"Well What About Salmonella? Won't I Get Sick If I Eat Raw Eggs?"

Salmonella is a serious infection, and it is believed that in the US over two-thirds of a million cases of human illnesses a year result from eating contaminated eggs. If you want more information on salmonella the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has an excellent page on this disease.

So why on earth would any competent health care professional ever recommend eating uncooked eggs?

When you carefully analyze the risk of contracting salmonella from raw eggs, you will find that it is actually quite low. A study by the U.S. Department of Agriculture earlier this year (Risk Analysis April 2002 22(2):203-18) showed that of the 69 billion eggs produced annually, only 2.3 million of them are contaminated with salmonella.

So simple math suggests that only 0.003 percent of eggs are infected. The translation is that only one in every 30,000 eggs is contaminated with salmonella. This gives you an idea of how uncommon this problem actually is.

While it is likely that I will consume more than 30,000 eggs in my lifetime, most of you will not. However, inevitably someone out there will find a salmonella-contaminated egg, so it is important to understand how to seriously decrease your risk of infection.

Salmonella infections are usually present only in traditionally raised commercial hens. If you are purchasing your eggs from healthy chickens this infection risk reduces dramatically. Remember, only sick chickens lay salmonella-contaminated eggs. If you are obtaining high quality, cage-free, organically fed, omega-3 enhanced chicken eggs as recommended above, the risk virtually disappears.

But let's say that for some reason, even after following that advice, you still obtain an egg that is infected. What do you do? Well, before you eat eggs - raw or not -- you should thoroughly examine them for signs of infection. I have provided some guidelines at the bottom of this section for you to use in this process.

You might still be a bit nervous and say, "What if I follow these guidelines and still get an infection?"

Salmonella Is Generally a Benign Self-Limiting Illness In Healthy People

The major principle to recognize here is that if you are healthy a salmonella infection is not a big deal. You may feel sick and have loose stools, but this infection is easily treated by using high-quality probiotics that have plenty of good bacteria. You can take a dose every 30 minutes until you start to feel better, and most people improve within a few hours.
 
S

Sirius Black

Guest
Are you okay with eggs being pasteurized to reduce the chance of contracting salmonella, guts?
 

Gut4Tennis

Hall of Fame

What do you have to say for yourself, gutter?

Stephen Barrett owns & operates Quackwatch.com

IMO this website is so dangerous it should be illegal. I don't even know where to start, but everything on the site is harmful & anyone w/ a brain needs to do the exact opposite of whatever he is saying. His arguments are so ridiculous it's laughable & really scary to me anyone takes this seriously. Come on, nobody profits off of telling people to eat healthy, get exercise or to take herbs which I know from friends and some family suffering from depression for 30 years is the only thing that has helped them...medicine the doctors gave me made them worse w/ numerous side effects requiring even more medication & turned moderate depression into severe psychotic depression & bipolar disorder. They didn't cure anything. It's really common sense once you study & learn about how our bodies work & what they actually need to function.

I found this from http://www.quackpotwatch.org/quackpots/quackpots/barrett.htm but after googling his name it's definitely not hard to figure out who the real quack is.

Stephen Barrett - Professional Crackpot...
The Internet needs health information it can trust. Stephen Barrett doesn't provide it...

Barrett is one of those people whose ambitions and opinions of himself far exceeds his abilities. Without ANY qualifications he has set himself up as an expert in just about everything having to do with health care - and more.

And this from a man who is a professional failure.

Records show that Barrett never achieved any success in the medical profession. His claim to being a "retired Psychiatrist" is laughable. He is, in fact, a "failed Psychiatrist," and a "failed MD."

The Psychiatric profession rejected Barrett years ago, for Barrett could NOT pass the examinations necessary to become "Board Certified." Which, is no doubt why Barrett was, throughout his career, relegated to lower level "part time" positions.

Barrett, we know, was forced to give up his medical license in Pennsylvania in 1993 when his "part-time" employment at the State Mental Hospital was terminated, and he had so few (nine) private patients during his last five years of practice, that he couldn't afford the Malpractice Insurance premiums Pennsylvania requires.

In a job market in the United States, where there is a "doctor shortage," Stephen Barrett, after his termination by the State mental Hospital, couldn't find employment. He was in his mid-50s at the time. He should have been at the top of his craft - yet, apparently, he couldn't find work.

It is obvious, that, after one humiliation after another, in 1993 Barrett simply gave up his medical aspirations, turned in his MD license, and retreated, in bitterness and frustration, to his basement.

It was in that basement, where Barrett took up "quackbusting" - which, in reality, means that Barrett attacks "cutting-edge" health professionals and paradigms - those that ARE achieving success in their segment of health care.

And there, in "quackbusting" is where Barrett finally found the attention and recognition he seems to crave - for, a while, that is, until three California Judges, in a PUBLISHED Appeals Court decision, took a HARD look at Barrett's activities, and declared him "biased, and unworthy of credibility."

Bitterness against successful health professionals is Barrett's hallmark. To him they're all "quacks." In this, his essays are repetitive and pedestrian.

Barrett, in his writings, says the same things, the same way, every time - change the victim and the subject, and still you yawn your way through his offerings. It's like he's filling out a form somebody gave him...

Take an overactive self importance, couple it with glaring failure and rejection in his chosen profession, add a cup of molten hatred for those that do succeed, pop it in the oven - and out comes Stephen Barrett - self-styled "expert in everything."

Barrett, we know, along with his website, was named, among other things, in a racketeering (RICO) case in Federal Court in Colorado.

He's also being sued for his nefarious activities in Ontario, Canada.

Barrett, in the Canadian case, has formally admitted, according to Canadian law, to a number of situations put to him by the Plaintiff, including:

"The sole purpose of the activities of Barrett & Baratz are to discredit and cause damage and harm to health care practitioners, businesses that make alternative health therapies or products available, and advocates of non-allopathic therapies and health freedom."

"Barrett has interfered with the civil rights of numerous Americans, in his efforts to have his critics silenced."

"Barrett has strategically orchestrated the filing of legal actions in improper jurisdictions for the purpose of frustrating the victims of such lawsuits and increasing his victims costs."

"Barrett failed the exams he was required to pass to become a Board Certified Medical Doctor."



Barrett's Funding - TOP SECRET...

Barrett was cornered in a Federal case in the State of Oregon not long ago, and asked about his income. He testified that over the past two years he made a TOTAL of $54,000.

How then does he afford to carry on fourteen (14) separate legal actions at one time?

If each legal action cost him $100,000, that would come to 1.4 million dollars ($1,400,000).

How do you squeeze 1.4 million out of a $54,000 total income?

Good question...
 
Last edited:

Ash_Smith

Legend
Last edited:

daniel42

Rookie
I used to get it from vitacost really cheap, it is a good addition to anyones diet! If you don't mind green taste.
 

Mac33

Professional
Gut4tennis------ you seem like a very switched on guy.

What is your diet?

Do you trust modern medicine,vaccines, big pharma drugs,x-rays etc?
 

Gut4Tennis

Hall of Fame
Gut4tennis------ you seem like a very switched on guy.

What is your diet?

Do you trust modern medicine,vaccines, big pharma drugs,x-rays etc?

I'm trying to maintain a raw organic diet with mostly fruit, clean chlorella(from natural news dot com), and hemp, but I love pizza too dam much!!!

I trust western medicine only if I have a broken bone and such...
 

Mac33

Professional
Yes,I only trust modern mediSIN ---- if I break bones!

All these 'appraisals' is just a way to administer more 'treatment'.

Author I can't remember his name, wrote a book about medicine.

Said in his 40 years in practice that he's never seen a patient with cancer who hasn't been vaccinated.
 
Last edited:

LuckyR

Legend
Yes,I only trust modern mediSIN ---- if I break bones!

All these 'appraisals' is just a way to administer more 'treatment'.

Author I can't remember his name, wrote a book about medicine.

Said in his 40 years in practice that he's never seen a patient with cancer who hasn't been vaccinated.

Western medicine is great if you're sick. It doesn't do very well at prevention of disease though, but then again it doesn't really claim to.
 

Gut4Tennis

Hall of Fame
Western medicine is great if you're sick. It doesn't do very well at prevention of disease though, but then again it doesn't really claim to.

they dont want to prevent, as they want to label you sick with a disease, so they can treat you forever

patented snake oil is all they got.
 

boramiNYC

Hall of Fame
Western medicine is great if you're sick. It doesn't do very well at prevention of disease though, but then again it doesn't really claim to.

Well it definitely implies it is the utmost authority about all things 'health'. And the general well educated public gives that trust to western medicine even though it can be misguided. There're a lot of nuances in discussing 'health'. Illness is only a part of many health issues.

The limits of science based medicine should be more clearly understood among public to help them make better choices.
 

mctennis

Legend
I like the oldness of this site. The new version was JUNK. Always s....l....o....w.... to load. I could not post items. It would sit and no nothing when you clicked something. A real mess. I like the old version the best.
 

Gut4Tennis

Hall of Fame
what happened? board is back to oldness?

I like the oldness of this site. The new version was JUNK. Always s....l....o....w.... to load. I could not post items. It would sit and no nothing when you clicked something. A real mess. I like the old version the best.

yes the old version that is back is 100x better

The new version of TT was just terrible , and would load sooo slow. what a mess that was
 

G A S

Hall of Fame
yes the old version that is back is 100x better

The new version of TT was just terrible , and would load sooo slow. what a mess that was

This old version of the site is just fine, hehe, but... my biggest gripe is the number of posts that never seem to be right....
 

G A S

Hall of Fame
I dont quite follow. can you explain ?

many times when I post the number of posts does not change at all.
if you click on my profile name and then click: find more posts by G A S, you'll see that in the results being shown the posts go untill 260, but here they are 195.

Showing results 1 to 25 of 260
Search took 0.03 seconds.
 
Last edited:
Top