The Official Angell Users Club

skfx said:
thanks for the input guys!!! Would you say tc97 is a tad more forgiving due to slightly larger head or they are on par pretty much?
Click to expand...

I don't really feel there is a difference when actually playing... at least for me. The actual head size difference is minimal and it's in places where I feel it doesn't really make a difference to the forgiveness of the stringbed.
 
Classic-TXP-IG MID said:
I don't really feel there is a difference when actually playing... at least for me. The actual head size difference is minimal and it's in places where I feel it doesn't really make a difference to the forgiveness of the stringbed.
Click to expand...
I agree.
String pattern plays an important role in this respect. For instance the TC95 16x19 is more forgiving than TC95 18x20 or TC97 18x20.
 
I already talked about this with @Gee once, but I'm really interested in hearing about the experiences from people who have played with both the 16x19 and 18x20 version of the TC95.
 
RF_PRO_STAFF said:
I already talked about this with @Gee once, but I'm really interested in hearing about the experiences from people who have played with both the 16x19 and 18x20 version of the TC95.
Click to expand...
Ive been playing w 2x copper tc95s 16x19 for a few years now, and just ordered 2x tc95 18x20 in octane will report my first impressions once I receive and hit w them.
 
Return_Ace said:
In what sense?

I have both, but the 16x19 is 70RA, whilst the 18x20 is 63RA.
Click to expand...
I was looking at the 63RA, just any useful comparisons. But I've come to the conclusion today that altogether (inclusing shipping) it's just too expensive for me, for 1 frame. At this time, I'd rather spend my money on another fun racquet, as I'm rather looking to add one to the collection than to have a possible switch-worthy frame. I've already found my ideal main racquets for the coming years but I'm always interested in trying out other ones and having fun tinkering around with them.

Maybe someday I'll be able to justify buying an Angell racquet. ;)
 
What are some good poly and hybrid recommendations for 18x20 TC95? Ive been using mostly Cyclone 1.25, HyperG 1.25 and WeissCannon Ultra Cable in my TC95 16x19 around 53/52 lbs. Ive ordered the Angell hybrid pack with the new racquets, and also will try nat gut and alu as well in them, but overall should I drop tension a little for 18x20? I usually enjoy deader feeling polys so Im able to take aggressive swings. Any input is appreciated.
 
RF_PRO_STAFF said:
I was looking at the 63RA, just any useful comparisons. But I've come to the conclusion today that altogether (inclusing shipping) it's just too expensive for me, for 1 frame. At this time, I'd rather spend my money on another fun racquet, as I'm rather looking to add one to the collection than to have a possible switch-worthy frame. I've already found my ideal main racquets for the coming years but I'm always interested in trying out other ones and having fun tinkering around with them.

Maybe someday I'll be able to justify buying an Angell racquet. ;)
Click to expand...
Don't give up. They are really worth a try!
You can also try to find used ones. For instance into the Classified forum.
 
RF_PRO_STAFF said:
I was looking at the 63RA, just any useful comparisons. But I've come to the conclusion today that altogether (inclusing shipping) it's just too expensive for me, for 1 frame. At this time, I'd rather spend my money on another fun racquet, as I'm rather looking to add one to the collection than to have a possible switch-worthy frame. I've already found my ideal main racquets for the coming years but I'm always interested in trying out other ones and having fun tinkering around with them.

Maybe someday I'll be able to justify buying an Angell racquet. ;)
Click to expand...
Gee said:
Don't give up. They are really worth a try!
You can also try to find used ones. For instance into the Classified forum.
Click to expand...

I'd definitely recommend getting a used one in your spec, or at least similar if you're not afraid of doing a bit of your own customising (remember, you can always remove/move the weights in the pallets).

In terms of comparisons, the only think I can really comment on is in terms of launch angle.... the 16x19 launch angle is ridiculous, I feel it has an even higher launch than when I used to play with my GrapheneXT Extreme Pro's.

The 18x20 is completely the opposite, super low launch angle which catches me off guard quite often (i haven't played enough with it to get used to it yet).

Another point of reference would be to my Head 360 Radical Pro's 16x19, but I find the Gravity Tour 18x20 and 360+ Prestige Pro 16x19 to all fall around the same ballpark in terms of launch angle (at least, I can go between all of them without having to adjust too much), the Angell 18x20 is lower, and the 16x19 higher.

One thing I would consider is how much of a string breaker you are, the Angell 16x19 seems to absolutely chew through strings. I'm not a big string breaker by any means, it takes me about a month of hitting 3 times a week for ~2 hours to go through a poly/multi hybrid on my Radical Pros (so ~24 hours), on the Angell 16x19, i did it 2 weeks.

I'm planning on trying some much thicker gauges in the Angell to see if it can alleviate the string breakage and might even lower the launch angle a bit.
 
skfx said:
What are some good poly and hybrid recommendations for 18x20 TC95? Ive been using mostly Cyclone 1.25, HyperG 1.25 and WeissCannon Ultra Cable in my TC95 16x19 around 53/52 lbs. Ive ordered the Angell hybrid pack with the new racquets, and also will try nat gut and alu as well in them, but overall should I drop tension a little for 18x20? I usually enjoy deader feeling polys so Im able to take aggressive swings. Any input is appreciated.
Click to expand...

I string my TC95 63RA 18x20 at 46M/43C with FB of poly. The MSV Co-Focus 1.15mm in yellow/ gold (can't remember which) was fantastic. It allowed me to hit all my shots, all kinds of spin, and when I needed to put the hammer down... it just unloaded.

I would use thinner gauge strings... Weiss Cannon Scorpion makes a great cross string if you're looking to add a bit of power but want to still use poly in a hybrid set-up. I have also used Babolat Origin as a cross (but in the 16x19 version), and have tried Ashaway MonoGut as a cross as well in 1.22mm. You could also try Tourna Black Zone as a cross. For the Mains, I have liked Weiss Cannon Red Ghost, Tier 1 Black Knight (1.18mm), and Cyclone 18L (1.15mm). I'm sure Hyper G 1.15mm would play nicely as well.

I'm going to be trying a variety of Tier 1 and Grapplesnake strings soon, but can't comment on them yet.

Hope that helps.
 
Return_Ace said:
I'd definitely recommend getting a used one in your spec, or at least similar if you're not afraid of doing a bit of your own customising (remember, you can always remove/move the weights in the pallets).

In terms of comparisons, the only think I can really comment on is in terms of launch angle.... the 16x19 launch angle is ridiculous, I feel it has an even higher launch than when I used to play with my GrapheneXT Extreme Pro's.

The 18x20 is completely the opposite, super low launch angle which catches me off guard quite often (i haven't played enough with it to get used to it yet).

Another point of reference would be to my Head 360 Radical Pro's 16x19, but I find the Gravity Tour 18x20 and 360+ Prestige Pro 16x19 to all fall around the same ballpark in terms of launch angle (at least, I can go between all of them without having to adjust too much), the Angell 18x20 is lower, and the 16x19 higher.

One thing I would consider is how much of a string breaker you are, the Angell 16x19 seems to absolutely chew through strings. I'm not a big string breaker by any means, it takes me about a month of hitting 3 times a week for ~2 hours to go through a poly/multi hybrid on my Radical Pros (so ~24 hours), on the Angell 16x19, i did it 2 weeks.

I'm planning on trying some much thicker gauges in the Angell to see if it can alleviate the string breakage and might even lower the launch angle a bit.
Click to expand...
I guess it all depends on how you hit ball.

I can perfectly hit all of kind low flat strokes like slice backhands, flat serves, low fast flat backhand returns with my TC95 16x19. When I want to hit a deep high groundstroke I just brush the ball more while I use to hit through the ball more with flatter strokes.

So it is just a question of using the right technique.
 
Gee said:
Don't give up. They are really worth a try!
You can also try to find used ones. For instance into the Classified forum.
Click to expand...
I've looked at that one and other forums before but I haven't been able to find one that is in my spec. Maybe I just have to sacrifice one factor like grip size/shape or balance point to get a used one for a better price. Kind of really intrigued by ordering your own, perfect, custom made racquet as well though... I'll just keep checking the boards. I have a Duel G 310 coming in tomorrow so that has my attention now.

Return_Ace said:
I'd definitely recommend getting a used one in your spec, or at least similar if you're not afraid of doing a bit of your own customising (remember, you can always remove/move the weights in the pallets).

In terms of comparisons, the only think I can really comment on is in terms of launch angle.... the 16x19 launch angle is ridiculous, I feel it has an even higher launch than when I used to play with my GrapheneXT Extreme Pro's.

The 18x20 is completely the opposite, super low launch angle which catches me off guard quite often (i haven't played enough with it to get used to it yet).

Another point of reference would be to my Head 360 Radical Pro's 16x19, but I find the Gravity Tour 18x20 and 360+ Prestige Pro 16x19 to all fall around the same ballpark in terms of launch angle (at least, I can go between all of them without having to adjust too much), the Angell 18x20 is lower, and the 16x19 higher.

One thing I would consider is how much of a string breaker you are, the Angell 16x19 seems to absolutely chew through strings. I'm not a big string breaker by any means, it takes me about a month of hitting 3 times a week for ~2 hours to go through a poly/multi hybrid on my Radical Pros (so ~24 hours), on the Angell 16x19, i did it 2 weeks.

I'm planning on trying some much thicker gauges in the Angell to see if it can alleviate the string breakage and might even lower the launch angle a bit.
Click to expand...
I think I would able to tame the launch angle to my liking with strings, tension and technique, so that wouldn't scare me off of the 16x19. I like 18x20's too in general, but a bit more open patterns allow me to be a bit more creative in my game.
Fortunately, I'm not much of a string breaker, which I've always found a bit weird. I regularly hit with three high level guys and I hit just as hard and with similar amounts of spin. They just keep doing that a bit longer than I'm able to against them. Also mentally and physically they're stronger. One of 'em has a huge bomb of a serve, he's also around 2.05m tall. It's still great to practise with them, as my weaknesses get exposed and the overall skill difference makes me very concious of what I still need to work on to reach a similar level.

But, I'm sailing off topic. I think the 16x19 would suit me just a bit more then. Even if I would break strings quite early, I don't really mind too much. I'll keep checking the forums.

Thanks guys.
 
Gee said:
I guess it all depends on how you hit ball.

I can perfectly hit all of kind low flat strokes like slice backhands, flat serves, low fast flat backhand returns with my TC95 16x19. When I want to hit a deep high groundstroke I just brush the ball more while I use to hit through the ball more with flatter strokes.

So it is just a question of using the right technique.
Click to expand...

I mean, isn't that the whole point of commenting about the string pattern? I didn't say I couldn't hit flat with the 16x19, or that I can't hit loopy topspin with the 18x20, just that it requires more conscious effort in order to do either (and moreso the latter) with the way my stroke naturally has developed over the years.

RF asked for a comparison between the two string patterns, and since I can't comment on any differences in feel etc. since my versions are across two different RA values, the launch angle is the next most perceived difference I would say I have between the rackets (the first being stiffness).

Adjusting your technique to suit the racket is great and all, but most of the time we're just looking for a racket that suits our game the way it is, otherwise the whole notion of having different string patterns is moot, just adjust your technique.
 
Return_Ace said:
I mean, isn't that the whole point of commenting about the string pattern? I didn't say I couldn't hit flat with the 16x19, or that I can't hit loopy topspin with the 18x20, just that it requires more conscious effort in order to do either (and moreso the latter) with the way my stroke naturally has developed over the years.

RF asked for a comparison between the two string patterns, and since I can't comment on any differences in feel etc. since my versions are across two different RA values, the launch angle is the next most perceived difference I would say I have between the rackets (the first being stiffness).

Adjusting your technique to suit the racket is great and all, but most of the time we're just looking for a racket that suits our game the way it is, otherwise the whole notion of having different string patterns is moot, just adjust your technique.
Click to expand...
I agree.

BTW lately I saw this video from Intuitive Tennis.
 
RF_PRO_STAFF said:
I've looked at that one and other forums before but I haven't been able to find one that is in my spec. Maybe I just have to sacrifice one factor like grip size/shape or balance point to get a used one for a better price. Kind of really intrigued by ordering your own, perfect, custom made racquet as well though... I'll just keep checking the boards. I have a Duel G 310 coming in tomorrow so that has my attention now.


I think I would able to tame the launch angle to my liking with strings, tension and technique, so that wouldn't scare me off of the 16x19. I like 18x20's too in general, but a bit more open patterns allow me to be a bit more creative in my game.
Fortunately, I'm not much of a string breaker, which I've always found a bit weird. I regularly hit with three high level guys and I hit just as hard and with similar amounts of spin. They just keep doing that a bit longer than I'm able to against them. Also mentally and physically they're stronger. One of 'em has a huge bomb of a serve, he's also around 2.05m tall. It's still great to practise with them, as my weaknesses get exposed and the overall skill difference makes me very concious of what I still need to work on to reach a similar level.

But, I'm sailing off topic. I think the 16x19 would suit me just a bit more then. Even if I would break strings quite early, I don't really mind too much. I'll keep checking the forums.

Thanks guys.
Click to expand...

I have both string patterns of TC 95, 63 RA, and I have written this before: The biggest difference is the feel.

As you can expect, the 16x19 is more powerful and easy to hit spin with. The 18x20 is muted, low-powered and maybe better against very hard hitters (easier to keep the ball low).

But still, they don't play that different. I can switch back and forth between them. After all, they have identical specs except the string pattern.

Both are good serving racquets, but the 16x19 may be the best I've ever experienced. On the other hand, the 18x20 gives me better results on fast reaction shots (no idea why, but that's how it is).

So, which one is better, it depends. For me, mostly use 16x19 on clay and artificial grass, 18x20 on hard courts.
 
RF_PRO_STAFF said:
I have a Duel G 310 coming in tomorrow so that has my attention now.
Click to expand...
enjoy and good luck with the DG310. Hope you will find a setup you like.
IME - as much as it was a lovely frame, I also used the TC95 16m 63RA and K7 Red... the DG310 stayed in the bag most time.
the Angell feel is special:love:
 
Has anyone noticed that email response is super slow or non existent w angell? The FB messenger has been that way for a while too, how do people actually talk to Paul nowadays ?
 
skfx said:
Has anyone noticed that email response is super slow or non existent w angell? The FB messenger has been that way for a while too, how do people actually talk to Paul nowadays ?
Click to expand...
It is. England is still in COVID Lockdown mode and it's difficult to have a full crew. Best way is by phone. I'm in the USA central time zone, so I make sure to allow for the time difference and call early.
 
  • Like
Reactions: esm
topspn said:
So i ordered a Cyan to try out. I debated regular or XL since the SW is low but I play an all court style and don't want to be too hampered by extra length volleying from many spots. I'll just add SW to it and hope i made a good decision.
Click to expand...
OK, a last minute change and got XL
 
RF_PRO_STAFF said:
I was looking at the 63RA, just any useful comparisons. But I've come to the conclusion today that altogether (inclusing shipping) it's just too expensive for me, for 1 frame. At this time, I'd rather spend my money on another fun racquet, as I'm rather looking to add one to the collection than to have a possible switch-worthy frame. I've already found my ideal main racquets for the coming years but I'm always interested in trying out other ones and having fun tinkering around with them.

Maybe someday I'll be able to justify buying an Angell racquet. ;)
Click to expand...
Just to be the "bad influence" on your shoulder, a new Angell shipped to the US is still comparable to most brand new retail rackets. The exchange rate is the key. Today, 175 pounds (150 racket + 25 shipping) is about $225. I bought my Angells last year and was able to get them for about $200 because the dollar was about 10 cents stronger.
 
Nick777 said:
Hope you like it!More reviews i hope in the future for the standard version
Click to expand...
I was in between standard and XL. I've actually never owned an XL racquet and just tried a demo once of a PK XL and a friends racquet which was a PD+. So I thought i'd be very adventurous and try an XL. A low static weight and higher SW with some additional leverage. Will see how i adapt my all court style when i am volleying from a variety of places on the court or picking up 1/2 volleys. Also how will my 1hbh like it. I am currently playing BPs with 350 and 346 measured SW and they play great but i've never seen a frame before that hides high SW so well. Anyway, a new adventure with a new racquet and a new dimension i don't currently use.
 
topspn said:
I was in between standard and XL. I've actually never owned an XL racquet and just tried a demo once of a PK XL and a friends racquet which was a PD+. So I thought i'd be very adventurous and try an XL. A low static weight and higher SW with some additional leverage. Will see how i adapt my all court style when i am volleying from a variety of places on the court or picking up 1/2,the volleys. Also how will my 1hbh like it. I am currently playing BPs with 350 and 346 measured SW and they play great but i've never seen a frame before that hides high SW so well. Anyway, a new adventure with a new racquet and a new dimension i don't currently use.
Click to expand...
Based at what you say i am sure you wont have a problem with this xl,the only LB i played with was a prince graphite chang which was fun to hit and serve but not for playing tournament at hard courts,very demanding!
 
As usual, pretty stick

NVRwnBL.jpg
 
I am thinking about purchasing another Angell and wanted to reach out for advice. I am currently playing a K7 Lime and I am enjoying the frame but part of me wants to try another Custom frame. I have used a TC100 in the past but did not have the control I wanted due to the high launch angle. I hit very flat off both sides and hit too many balls long with the TC100. I did really like the feel of the frame (310/ 315) and felt it was very maneuverable and stable, but I much prefer the launch angle of the K7 Lime. I was contemplating trying the TC95 or TC97 in 18x20. I have played in the past with the IG Prestige MP so I doubt the flex would bother me either way. I could stay with the K7 since my biggest issue is really the grip shape and I much prefer the C shape of the custom line, however I like to try new racquets and I really like the Octane paint job. For those that have hit both, could you compare the launch angle or the TC95 or TC97 to that of the K7 Lime or to one another. I am currently leaning towards the 95 since I did like the feel of the 100. I am not sure if I would opt for the 310/315 or 320/310 with either option. I thought that the TC100 310/315 was very whippy but still stable. Thanks for any advice.
 
I can compare the launch angle of TC97 16x19 to the new prestige tour: it is the same. TC97 18x20 will have extremely low launch angle and less power than tc95. I guess it is the most control-oriented frame.
 
JLaw516 said:
I am thinking about purchasing another Angell and wanted to reach out for advice. I am currently playing a K7 Lime and I am enjoying the frame but part of me wants to try another Custom frame. I have used a TC100 in the past but did not have the control I wanted due to the high launch angle. I hit very flat off both sides and hit too many balls long with the TC100. I did really like the feel of the frame (310/ 315) and felt it was very maneuverable and stable, but I much prefer the launch angle of the K7 Lime. I was contemplating trying the TC95 or TC97 in 18x20. I have played in the past with the IG Prestige MP so I doubt the flex would bother me either way. I could stay with the K7 since my biggest issue is really the grip shape and I much prefer the C shape of the custom line, however I like to try new racquets and I really like the Octane paint job. For those that have hit both, could you compare the launch angle or the TC95 or TC97 to that of the K7 Lime or to one another. I am currently leaning towards the 95 since I did like the feel of the 100. I am not sure if I would opt for the 310/315 or 320/310 with either option. I thought that the TC100 310/315 was very whippy but still stable. Thanks for any advice.
Click to expand...

TC95 63RA 18x20 flexes from the throat to the tip evenly, while the TC97 18x20 flexes in the head and has a stiff throat area (more like a Prestige MP). The TC97 has a lower launch angle, but if you've played with a prestige mp before, it shouldn't be a problem. The TC97 is also slightly stiffer (approx 63RA strung Vs around 60-61 RA strung for the TC95).

I prefer the TC95 due to the flex profile, lower RA, and slightly higher launch angle. I have both versions though and intend to keep them.

I have never hit the K7 Lime, so can't compare to that one.
 
Hello Angell users, I’m very intrigued by Angell rackets based on things I’ve read and was looking for some help from the board if an Angell is right for me. I’m NTRP 4.5 level; my strength is my forehand and kick serve. I generally like frames with some mass, feel/control oriented but not power deficient, and open string patterns. Previous rackets I liked include:

Wilson 6.1 95 16x18
Volkl C10 Pro (great feel and control, slightly underpowered especially on serves)
Yonex Vcore Pro 330 (solid racket, enough power, good plow but unforgiving as the small sweet spot and heft of the racket made it difficult for me against hard hitting 5.0 type players)

My current racket which I recently got is the Pure Strike Tour 3rd gen which is not bad but noticeably has a tighter 16x19 pattern making it have the lowest launch angle of any racket I’ve used.

I’m leaning toward either the:
TC95 16x19, 63 RA, 330g/310mm
TC97 16x19, 66 RA, 330g/310mm

Based on what I read it seems the TC95 has better feel and a more open string pattern. The head size difference seems insignificant and which racket has more power seems to have mixed opinions. But the TC95 generally seems more popular than the TC97.

Any opinions or guidance would be greatly appreciated!
 
radicalpro said:
Hello Angell users, I’m very intrigued by Angell rackets based on things I’ve read and was looking for some help from the board if an Angell is right for me. I’m NTRP 4.5 level; my strength is my forehand and kick serve. I generally like frames with some mass, feel/control oriented but not power deficient, and open string patterns. Previous rackets I liked include:

Wilson 6.1 95 16x18
Volkl C10 Pro (great feel and control, slightly underpowered especially on serves)
Yonex Vcore Pro 330 (solid racket, enough power, good plow but unforgiving as the small sweet spot and heft of the racket made it difficult for me against hard hitting 5.0 type players)

My current racket which I recently got is the Pure Strike Tour 3rd gen which is not bad but noticeably has a tighter 16x19 pattern making it have the lowest launch angle of any racket I’ve used.

I’m leaning toward either the:
TC95 16x19, 63 RA, 330g/310mm
TC97 16x19, 66 RA, 330g/310mm

Based on what I read it seems the TC95 has better feel and a more open string pattern. The head size difference seems insignificant and which racket has more power seems to have mixed opinions. But the TC95 generally seems more popular than the TC97.

Any opinions or guidance would be greatly appreciated!
Click to expand...
you are pretty much spot, go w TC95 330g.
 
radicalpro said:
Hello Angell users, I’m very intrigued by Angell rackets based on things I’ve read and was looking for some help from the board if an Angell is right for me. I’m NTRP 4.5 level; my strength is my forehand and kick serve. I generally like frames with some mass, feel/control oriented but not power deficient, and open string patterns. Previous rackets I liked include:

Wilson 6.1 95 16x18
Volkl C10 Pro (great feel and control, slightly underpowered especially on serves)
Yonex Vcore Pro 330 (solid racket, enough power, good plow but unforgiving as the small sweet spot and heft of the racket made it difficult for me against hard hitting 5.0 type players)

My current racket which I recently got is the Pure Strike Tour 3rd gen which is not bad but noticeably has a tighter 16x19 pattern making it have the lowest launch angle of any racket I’ve used.

I’m leaning toward either the:
TC95 16x19, 63 RA, 330g/310mm
TC97 16x19, 66 RA, 330g/310mm

Based on what I read it seems the TC95 has better feel and a more open string pattern. The head size difference seems insignificant and which racket has more power seems to have mixed opinions. But the TC95 generally seems more popular than the TC97.

Any opinions or guidance would be greatly appreciated!
Click to expand...
the tc95 has a very unique feel, whereas the 97 is less idiomatic and familiar. Basically there is very little even similar to the 95 at 63ra... maybe some Angell era Dunlops but even then not many.

Looksing at sticks you like the tc95 63ra 16x19 might work ... trick is finding strings you like... Im about to go down that rabbit hole again myself. meh... i loved rs lyon. first up is yonex poly tour pro black 1.25. Ive always liked that string.
 
Last edited:
radicalpro said:
Hello Angell users, I’m very intrigued by Angell rackets based on things I’ve read and was looking for some help from the board if an Angell is right for me. I’m NTRP 4.5 level; my strength is my forehand and kick serve. I generally like frames with some mass, feel/control oriented but not power deficient, and open string patterns. Previous rackets I liked include:

Wilson 6.1 95 16x18
Volkl C10 Pro (great feel and control, slightly underpowered especially on serves)
Yonex Vcore Pro 330 (solid racket, enough power, good plow but unforgiving as the small sweet spot and heft of the racket made it difficult for me against hard hitting 5.0 type players)

My current racket which I recently got is the Pure Strike Tour 3rd gen which is not bad but noticeably has a tighter 16x19 pattern making it have the lowest launch angle of any racket I’ve used.

I’m leaning toward either the:
TC95 16x19, 63 RA, 330g/310mm
TC97 16x19, 66 RA, 330g/310mm

Based on what I read it seems the TC95 has better feel and a more open string pattern. The head size difference seems insignificant and which racket has more power seems to have mixed opinions. But the TC95 generally seems more popular than the TC97.

Any opinions or guidance would be greatly appreciated!
Click to expand...

One thing to keep in mind with Angell's, is that their SW tend to be higher, especially the low RA ones, than the weight / balance would suggest. For instance my TC95 16x19 63 RA 310g / 315mm had an unstrung SW of 303, which would bring it to the low 330's once strung. A 330g / 310mm would be really beefy in this frame, and you might have the same issue you found with the Vcore Pro 330 and its heft. So you may want to go with a 320g / 310mm, or a 330g / 305mm instead to account for this. Then, you can always add a bit of lead to add a bit of plow through if you still need it.

PS: I have the same level, game and preferences as you, but went for a lighter package in the TC95 as I am getting older and I appreciate the fact that the 310g / 315mm configuration does not tire me too much in tough singles games. And it certainly does not get pushed around when I play higher level players. It's very stable.
 
Last edited:
Looking to maybe jump to the Angell club but unsure which frame or frames to start with... 5.0 all-court player former collegiate player currently playing with Ezone DR 98 weighted with leather grip and lead to a strung weight of 345 g and about 9pt HL. Had occasional shoulder and arm issues in the past so looking for an arm friendly frame, which I hear most are. Didn't know how the 66 RA frames felt compared to say a stiff 66 RA pro-staff frame.
 
Anyone have any string recommendations for my TC97 16x19? Been playing it with Ytex Quadro Twist which plays really nice but would like more options.
 
flanker2000fr said:
One thing to keep in mind with Angell's, is that their SW tend to be higher, especially the low RA ones, than the weight / balance would suggest. For instance my TC95 16x19 63 RA 310g / 315mm had an unstrung SW of 303, which would bring it to the low 330's once strung. A 330g / 310mm would be really beefy in this frame, and you might have the same issue you found with the Vcore Pro 330 and its heft. So you may want to go with a 320g / 310mm, or a 330g / 305mm instead to account for this. Then, you can always add a bit of lead to add a bit of plow through if you still need it.

PS: I have the same level, game and preferences as you, but went for a lighter package in the TC95 as I am getting older and I appreciate the fact that the 310g / 315mm configuration does not tire me too much in tough singles games. And it certainly does not get pushed around when I play higher level players. It's very stable.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the input! I actually have been deliberating quite a bit on the weight/balance options. I guess too many options is a good and bad thing :P Judging from some of the other rackets I have, a 330 SW sounds about right. Just for comparison my Wilson 6.1 95 with a leather grip added came out to 362g/311mm/326sw. My C10 Pro came out to 350g/324mm/338sw. I didn't have any swinging issues with these whatsoever. My Vcore came in at 347g although I never measured the balance and SW but TW lists them as 320mm and 330sw. I think the Vcore issue I mentioned also has a lot to do with the seemingly small sweetspot.

I'll think about it a bit more. Maybe I'll go with 330g/305.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top