Nothing is going to be quite as menacing as that TC95 16x19. It's been almost a year since I sold my TC95 18x20s, and all I wanted was to find something slightly more forgiving. The UT was that (arguably), but it didn't hit the same quality ball as the TC95. I've been on and off with a pair of Touch Prestige Pros of late, but the 95" head size becomes an issue once again if I'm not playing multiple times a week. You ask about the 360+ PMP? I don't know. Yeah, the head size is now 98", but it still seems spec'd out for control, control, control, which is fine, but I think I'd stick with your TC95 over it. If the swing weight of your v2 is too high, look into the black/copper v3. The average swing weight of those was around 295; mine were actually 293.
My main frames have a uniform flex (very similar to the TC95) with a 16x19 pattern that is more tempered than the TC95 while providing adequate pop--noticeably more than the UT, imo. And they have the same 97" head size as your UTs (same mold), which seems negligible in difference over a 95", but it makes a difference. My UP 16x19s seem leagues more forgiving than the TC95/PP/etc. I think you'd love it. Either it or one of the new PK Ki Q+ Tours (300/315) or the new Black Ace Pro.
I still miss my TC95s and sometimes wonder if I made the right decision, but after a year, I'm pretty close to UP 16x19 commitment.