The Official Angell Users Club

JorisE

New User
Received a React MPP today, beautiful racket! SW is a bit on the light side for my taste but will try it stock first.

Any customization tips for the standard spec MPP? (want to start with 2 grams @12, are there better places to start?).

I always use an OG so 6 grams at the handle is already added.
 

Soundbyte

Hall of Fame
Add 2-4g at 12 to get to your SW preferences. I recently purchased a TC90/95 and React MPP and the React MPP is my current favorite of the bunch. But I lead up to get strung SW in the 335-345 range
 

JorisE

New User
Add 2-4g at 12 to get to your SW preferences. I recently purchased a TC90/95 and React MPP and the React MPP is my current favorite of the bunch. But I lead up to get strung SW in the 335-345 range
Sounds good! Do you also add weight to the handle / grip to keep te original balance? And what is the static strung weight with OG and dampener?

PS TC95 16x19 is still on my wishlist
 

Soundbyte

Hall of Fame
Sounds good! Do you also add weight to the handle / grip to keep te original balance? And what is the static strung weight with OG and dampener?

PS TC95 16x19 is still on my wishlist
I bought 27.25" 320g customs at the most headlight option available, as I knew I'd be adding lead to beef up the swingweight. So for that reason I don't counter weight in the handle.
 

landcookie

Semi-Pro
In my case plow was missing. In the backhand I didn’t feel it as much as I have elite preparation and timing (not bragging, but it’s the only way I found to make 1hbh work over the years) but in the forehand I am a bit more all over the place and can make a lot of small variations work (mostly hitting higher balls instead of taking a step back or hitting farther from the body instead of taking that small step closer) which means I’m overall a bit lazier. When I switched to the blade (v4 and v7) I immediately noticed fantastic plow-through and I felt I was hitting a bigger ball and could generate more pace on my fh side. Lead (both at 12 and 9-3) on the TC95 helped a lot but eventually I went ahead with the switch. Backhand is typically my best shot by far but with the switch it got a bit more even.
After some time with the TC 95 I've come to the conclusion that it's SW (being 27.25 inches) is a little too high for me right now - particularly coming back from a shoulder injury. In my mind I have 2 options:
- try and play with the TC 95 with a slightly choked up grip to address the SW issue
- go back to my TC 100 and buy a second matched pair (having to spend $$ is the less appealing option to me)

Has anyone tried playing with a choked up grip? I do it for volleys and slice but never tried it for groundies.
 

guando

New User
Has anyone played both the TC100 V4 63RA and the TC100 V5 64RA? I assume these are essentially the same? I'm thinking of getting a second TC100, I currently have a V4 63RA, i'm trying to decide whether to get a second V4 or a V5.
 

Soundbyte

Hall of Fame
After some time with the TC 95 I've come to the conclusion that it's SW (being 27.25 inches) is a little too high for me right now - particularly coming back from a shoulder injury. In my mind I have 2 options:
- try and play with the TC 95 with a slightly choked up grip to address the SW issue
- go back to my TC 100 and buy a second matched pair (having to spend $$ is the less appealing option to me)

Has anyone tried playing with a choked up grip? I do it for volleys and slice but never tried it for groundies.
You could just saw off the extra 0.25" and reapply the buttcap
I haven't personally done it but I think someone on this thread mentions they buy the 28" versions and gradually cut down to their preferred length, giving them a chance to try various lengths without buying multiple versions of the same frame
 

landcookie

Semi-Pro
You could just saw off the extra 0.25" and reapply the buttcap
I haven't personally done it but I think someone on this thread mentions they buy the 28" versions and gradually cut down to their preferred length, giving them a chance to try various lengths without buying multiple versions of the same frame
So I went in to a proshop to get this done today.

My TC95 SW measured at 339 strung which is a lot higher than I anticipated (was expecting 335 tops).

Would anyone know, as a general rule of thumb, how much reduction in SW happens when .25 inches is sawn off?

What's even more surprising, my TC 100, standard length, 310g unstrung, came in at a whopping 341! Is this even possible?
 

KC!

Hall of Fame
So I went in to a proshop to get this done today.

My TC95 SW measured at 339 strung which is a lot higher than I anticipated (was expecting 335 tops).

Would anyone know, as a general rule of thumb, how much reduction in SW happens when .25 inches is sawn off?

What's even more surprising, my TC 100, standard length, 310g unstrung, came in at a whopping 341! Is this even possible?
-.25 would reduce 10 sw points
 

Lphansen

Rookie
So I went in to a proshop to get this done today.

My TC95 SW measured at 339 strung which is a lot higher than I anticipated (was expecting 335 tops).

Would anyone know, as a general rule of thumb, how much reduction in SW happens when .25 inches is sawn off?

What's even more surprising, my TC 100, standard length, 310g unstrung, came in at a whopping 341! Is this even possible?
You can also cut the sidebumpers. Reduces weight of the hoop by 5-6 gram.
I have done it many times, does not effect playability..
use a sharp and pointy knife..
 

Carreau

Semi-Pro
So I went in to a proshop to get this done today.

My TC95 SW measured at 339 strung which is a lot higher than I anticipated (was expecting 335 tops).

Would anyone know, as a general rule of thumb, how much reduction in SW happens when .25 inches is sawn off?

What's even more surprising, my TC 100, standard length, 310g unstrung, came in at a whopping 341! Is this even possible?
Maybe they have tried to match different sticks in the same order? 341 (I believe it is strung?) is quite high. Is it V5 TC100?
 

landcookie

Semi-Pro
Maybe they have tried to match different sticks in the same order? 341 (I believe it is strung?) is quite high. Is it V5 TC100?

341 is extremely high! The racquet definitely does not play like 341. It's a V3 TC100.
I've sent Paul an email asking what the unstrung specs are to get some clarity.


-.25 would reduce 10 sw points
Tracked my old messages with Paul - you are correct! .25 reduces 10 unstrung SW points. So strung it would likely be slightly more than 10 If I had to guess.


You can also cut the sidebumpers. Reduces weight of the hoop by 5-6 gram.
I have done it many times, does not effect playability..
use a sharp and pointy knife..
Good idea - alas (for better or worse) I'm a pretty conservative tinkerer. Adding lead is as far as I go - I leave the DIY to the people who do it day in, day out
 

topspn

G.O.A.T.
Hmm a regular length TC100 strung SW 341 sounds fishy to me. I don’t recall anyone who has ever reported that high
 

zeneto1234

New User
Can anyone give me a feedback of the React 96 Pro? I'm really curious about this stick. I play with a modded Blade v8 18x20 (around 334g/32,8cm/SW 337 strung w/ overgrip) Anyone that played with both can compare them?
 

landcookie

Semi-Pro
Hmm a regular length TC100 strung SW 341 sounds fishy to me. I don’t recall anyone who has ever reported that high
Absolutely. We measured it multiple times even - this is at a very reputable pro shop so I am very surprised. They did the get swingweight for my other racquets bang on which is even more perplexing!

The mystery continues...
 

landcookie

Semi-Pro
Hmm a regular length TC100 strung SW 341 sounds fishy to me. I don’t recall anyone who has ever reported that high
Yes it is very well possible.

Got confirmation from Paul that specs unstrung for the TC 100 is 301 SW; ~326/331 SW strung.

Even though I've added a tiny bit of lead at 3/9 I don't think it'll take the SW to 341. Ah well.

I'm struggling with my TC100 lately; I have lost all confidence to hit out on them (afraid they'll sail) but if I slow down then that's even worse...
 

Carreau

Semi-Pro
Got confirmation from Paul that specs unstrung for the TC 100 is 301 SW; ~326/331 SW strung.

Even though I've added a tiny bit of lead at 3/9 I don't think it'll take the SW to 341. Ah well.

I'm struggling with my TC100 lately; I have lost all confidence to hit out on them (afraid they'll sail) but if I slow down then that's even worse...
It is a healthy SW without any lead. So, first thing is to remove all the lead and check under the grommets as well. Second thing to consider - strings. 1.30 control oriented poly should add confidence for your full strokes. What string and tension you use currently and how often you restring your TC100? Be aware that it kills strings easily (healthy SW + open pattern).
 

landcookie

Semi-Pro
It is a healthy SW without any lead. So, first thing is to remove all the lead and check under the grommets as well. Second thing to consider - strings. 1.30 control oriented poly should add confidence for your full strokes. What string and tension you use currently and how often you restring your TC100? Be aware that it kills strings easily (healthy SW + open pattern).
I string with Technifibre Red Code 1.3 at 53 lbs (same with mains and crosses). I restring every 10 hours - sometimes less. I'd like to go higher in tension but I start feeling it a little in my arm at 55 lbs.

Today, with fresh strings, I removed lead at 3/9 and just could not keep the ball in. I naturally hit with a lot of top, as well, so this is strange.

Tried other strings like Black Code, Razor Code, PTP etc and settled on Red Code as it offered the best middle ground between control and comfort.

I used to play with Hyper G 4 years ago- maybe I should give it a try again. I am swinging a lot faster now than before, though.
 

topspn

G.O.A.T.
Got confirmation from Paul that specs unstrung for the TC 100 is 301 SW; ~326/331 SW strung.

Even though I've added a tiny bit of lead at 3/9 I don't think it'll take the SW to 341. Ah well.

I'm struggling with my TC100 lately; I have lost all confidence to hit out on them (afraid they'll sail) but if I slow down then that's even worse...

Yes, this makes more sense. Try Tru Pro Durraflux, a really good control string that is firm but comfortable. Really does a great job with control
 

ed70

Professional
Has anyone played both the TC100 V4 63RA and the TC100 V5 64RA? I assume these are essentially the same? I'm thinking of getting a second TC100, I currently have a V4 63RA, i'm trying to decide whether to get a second V4 or a V5.
I really doubt anyone would tell any difference in play between 63 & 64RA if all else on Racquets were the same! maybe just in their mind.
 

emhtennis

Hall of Fame
I string with Technifibre Red Code 1.3 at 53 lbs (same with mains and crosses). I restring every 10 hours - sometimes less. I'd like to go higher in tension but I start feeling it a little in my arm at 55 lbs.

Today, with fresh strings, I removed lead at 3/9 and just could not keep the ball in. I naturally hit with a lot of top, as well, so this is strange.

Tried other strings like Black Code, Razor Code, PTP etc and settled on Red Code as it offered the best middle ground between control and comfort.

I used to play with Hyper G 4 years ago- maybe I should give it a try again. I am swinging a lot faster now than before, though.
Agree strings worth trying that are some of the most controlled I've hit are:

Signum Pro Firestorm
Isospeed Greyfire
Kirschbaum Orange

Buy the thickest gauge you can find. They are all round polys. I'd be very surprised if these didn't help keep your ball more tame.
 

landcookie

Semi-Pro
Agree strings worth trying that are some of the most controlled I've hit are:

Signum Pro Firestorm
Isospeed Greyfire
Kirschbaum Orange

Buy the thickest gauge you can find. They are all round polys. I'd be very surprised if these didn't help keep your ball more tame.
Thanks.

Will give em a go.

I also have a groundbreaking thought that maybe I just need to be better at tennis.
 
Hi all. I'm new here, new to this thread. Finally made the plunge and joined team Angell. 5.0 former college player.
Ordered a TC101 (v5) , 330g unstrung, 10pts HL unstrung, 27.25 length. Have only hit once with it, and broke strings in about an hour of hitting lol. The feel was great, but it had some serious pop. I think i strung it too low(53 with 18g poly).
Going with a thicker guage poly a bit higher tension next to dial in some control. Its a bit open for 18g I think!
 

emhtennis

Hall of Fame
Hi all. I'm new here, new to this thread. Finally made the plunge and joined team Angell. 5.0 former college player.
Ordered a TC101 (v5) , 330g unstrung, 10pts HL unstrung, 27.25 length. Have only hit once with it, and broke strings in about an hour of hitting lol. The feel was great, but it had some serious pop. I think i strung it too low(53 with 18g poly).
Going with a thicker guage poly a bit higher tension next to dial in some control. Its a bit open for 18g I think!
Don't give up on the string journey!

Recommend trying some lower power 1.25 or 1.30 strings like Signum Pro Firestorm, Luxilon BBO, Isospeed greyfire, Kirschbaum Orange, etc.

53lbs is probably a good reference tension to keep, and then go from there. Keep us updated!
 

guando

New User
If anyone's interested I measured my 63RA TC100 V4 Custom on my newly acquired Briffidi swing weight machine. I've not measured it unstrung yet but Paul informed me that is was 292 unstrung. I currently have it strung with a hybrid of Halo Bite mains and 1.28mm Alu Power RG edition crosses and swingweight measures at 331 (twist weight 13), quite hefty... that explains the sledge hammer levels of power but also why I run hot and cold with it.
 

Carreau

Semi-Pro
If anyone's interested I measured my 63RA TC100 V4 Custom on my newly acquired Briffidi swing weight machine. I've not measured it unstrung yet but Paul informed me that is was 292 unstrung. I currently have it strung with a hybrid of Halo Bite mains and 1.28mm Alu Power RG edition crosses and swingweight measures at 331 (twist weight 13), quite hefty... that explains the sledge hammer levels of power but also why I run hot and cold with it.
I have V4 with similar unstrung SW. It is 325 SW with Tour Sniper 1,25 string. Measured on SW1 as well. TW - 12,97. Maybe your strings are heavier.
 

guando

New User
I have V4 with similar unstrung SW. It is 325 SW with Tour Sniper 1,25 string. Measured on SW1 as well. TW - 12,97. Maybe your strings are heavier.
Yep, i think the 1.28mm ALU Power are on the heavier side. I recently acquired a VCore 95, not sure what it was strung with, might have been Kirshcbaum Orange but it measured 314, after restringing with 1.10mm Cyclone it dropped to 311. I'm loving the SW1, the perfect tool for a racket geek.
 

topspn

G.O.A.T.
If anyone's interested I measured my 63RA TC100 V4 Custom on my newly acquired Briffidi swing weight machine. I've not measured it unstrung yet but Paul informed me that is was 292 unstrung. I currently have it strung with a hybrid of Halo Bite mains and 1.28mm Alu Power RG edition crosses and swingweight measures at 331 (twist weight 13), quite hefty... that explains the sledge hammer levels of power but also why I run hot and cold with it.

Mine measures 299 unstrung and 332 strung with full poly 1.25
 

Soundbyte

Hall of Fame
Decided to list my V5 TC90 and 95.

React MPP is my favorite of the bunch. Just got the Lime XLs and enjoying that as well (340SW strung stock!). So going to part ways with the other two and the spare grommets I got for each. Look at the classifieds for details if your interested!
 
Decided to list my V5 TC90 and 95.

React MPP is my favorite of the bunch. Just got the Lime XLs and enjoying that as well (340SW strung stock!). So going to part ways with the other two and the spare grommets I got for each. Look at the classifieds for details if your interested!
I’ve just seen this post and it makes sense of a for sale advert that I saw earlier.

Did you realise that you have listed both frames as TC90. I couldn’t understand how someone had listed a TC90 that had a 18x20 string pattern and a 64RA.
 

Soundbyte

Hall of Fame
I’ve just seen this post and it makes sense of a for sale advert that I saw earlier.

Did you realise that you have listed both frames as TC90. I couldn’t understand how someone had listed a TC90 that had a 18x20 string pattern and a 64RA.
Oh crap good catch if I made that typo!

Edit: asked the mods to amend it. Darn typo!
 
Last edited:

landcookie

Semi-Pro
Curious to get thoughts- where does the tc95 fall within the category of racquets these days. Big brands try to define their lines as spin, power, control / comfort oriented etc.

In my mind it does everything.
 

flanker2000fr

Hall of Fame
Curious to get thoughts- where does the tc95 fall within the category of racquets these days. Big brands try to define their lines as spin, power, control / comfort oriented etc.

In my mind it does everything.
The 18x20 and 16x19 are completely different, so you'd have to qualify your question.

In my view, the 18x20 is a pure control frame, whereas the 16x19 is more of a hybrid, having most of the characteristics of a control frame, but with a very open pattern which increases power at the expense of predictability.
 

Soundbyte

Hall of Fame
The 18x20 and 16x19 are completely different, so you'd have to qualify your question.

In my view, the 18x20 is a pure control frame, whereas the 16x19 is more of a hybrid, having most of the characteristics of a control frame, but with a very open pattern which increases power at the expense of predictability.
Fair. I've always had the 18x20 so I agree - control frame
 

emhtennis

Hall of Fame
Fair. I've always had the 18x20 so I agree - control frame
I really need to try a 95 18x20. I just don't know if I can find a string that works with me and the 95 16x19.

The strings that give me the power I like make it too wild, the strings that have tamed it take away too much power.

So far the best string I've tried is Lynx Tour. Need to revisit that string and the 95 itself now that my elbow is back to 100%.
 

landcookie

Semi-Pro
The 18x20 and 16x19 are completely different, so you'd have to qualify your question.

In my view, the 18x20 is a pure control frame, whereas the 16x19 is more of a hybrid, having most of the characteristics of a control frame, but with a very open pattern which increases power at the expense of predictability.
Talking about the 16x19 here.

What intrigues me is that it is very powerful for a thin beam, low RA, 95 sq inch 'control' frame - compared to the Prestige, for instance. I recently picked up an old Yonex Vcore Tour 97 and even that feels way lower powered and 'control' oriented than the TC 95.
 

emhtennis

Hall of Fame
Anyone here sold their Angell racquet only to instantly regret it?
I did with my v3 97 18x20s. I had played exclusively with them for almost 2 years, same string setup too. Just got to where I wanted easier defense and to see what else was out in the world.

But, when someone on the boards offered a pair of Octane 97 18x20s I instantly jumped and got them back. No regrets about the re-purchase.

I've also owned and sold a TC100. Such an interesting frame, but it was so so powerful. I just couldn't trust it in match situations. But, I still wish I had it because trying to find a string to control it was half the fun of owning it!
 
Top