The leather is nice, but it is a very "dry" leather. For me, it is so dry that I have to wrap my overgrips with more overlap at the base so they do not slide off.
To be fair, I end up doing this with most of my leather grips (Head, etc)
The Official Angell Users Club
- Thread starter The_Racketeer
- Start date
To be fair, I end up doing this with most of my leather grips (Head, etc)
landcookie
Professional
So I had my TC100 re-lengthened to standard. Specs are more or less similar to my TC 95.
Got to say I much prefer the TC 100 in all aspects, even control - which I never thought would be the case.
Got to say I much prefer the TC 100 in all aspects, even control - which I never thought would be the case.
10sGearHead
New User
My custom rc mp at 310g /310mm with leather grip arrived yesterday. I know it's been said a million times, but still struck by the quality and design. So were the guys at my local shop. Mine came in at 312g (on an admittedly cheap home scale) and 299 SW unstrung on the Briffidi. 325 SW strung with a multi.
Can't wait to hit with it tomorrow!
Can't wait to hit with it tomorrow!
bluebonsai
New User
Question for you Angell experts:
If my dream racquet is a 98in 18x19 Gravity Pro, which Angell frame should I be looking at?
If my dream racquet is a 98in 18x19 Gravity Pro, which Angell frame should I be looking at?
Happi
Hall of Fame
React Custom, 99 18x19
bluebonsai
New User
Any idea what the swing and twist weights usually run on the React?
I usually like a SW around 325 and TW 14. If I needed to add lead to get there then I’d probably order a lighter stick w non leather grip then add the leather to counterbalance the lead in the head. If it’s at those specs out the box then I’d just go straight for the 315g 310mm w leather grip.
Edit 310mm
I had a Custom React 27.25" 18x19, Weight / Balance: 11.1oz / 12Pts HL.
With my Briffidi and TW adapter, unstrung specs: 313.7g, 30.6cm, 298SW ,12.9TW
tennisreflectslife
Rookie
Hi Soundbyte! Any particular reason or specific shortcoming that made you switch form the react mpp. I am looking to get one in the exact same spec that you have listed here, so would love any feedback you have.
Additionally, any comments on comparing this react mpp with a tc97 for power and launch angle. Thank you
Carreau
Semi-Pro
Standard length MPP was reported ~290 unstrung SW. Angell website says 288 SW. So, the SW should be spot on for you. Of course you can ask Angell directly what can be expected (I believe there can be variations from batch to batch). Regarding the TW - I think it will be lowed than 14, I would expect 13.
Nope. It was by far my favorite Angell frame. I'm just a racket addict who can't stay committed to one frame long enough. I've played with all the k7 XLs, TC90/95/97. Lime XL is my 2nd favorite.Hi Soundbyte! Any particular reason or specific shortcoming that made you switch form the react mpp. I am looking to get one in the exact same spec that you have listed here, so would love any feedback you have.
Additionally, any comments on comparing this react mpp with a tc97 for power and launch angle. Thank you
I only switched when the PC2.0 came out and nothing compares to that rackets nostalgic solid feel.
It has been a few years since I used the original TC97s.
React felt flexier, whippier, and all around a better frame. Easier to play with too. I did add some lead to get the swingweight higher (as is my preference).
My Angell RC MP 16x19 arrived today, I ordered 305g/10 pts HL with a leather grip, weighs in at 300g; it’s going to be one of the lightest racquets I’ve played with.
Quality of the finish is good, one minor blemish on the throat toward the handle, but no worse than what I’ve had on other racquet brands.
Looks and feels great in the hand, aesthetics alone might be the thing that stops me from switching racquets again. Going to string it up with Yonex Poly Tour Air, mostly because I think it will look awesome.
Quality of the finish is good, one minor blemish on the throat toward the handle, but no worse than what I’ve had on other racquet brands.
Looks and feels great in the hand, aesthetics alone might be the thing that stops me from switching racquets again. Going to string it up with Yonex Poly Tour Air, mostly because I think it will look awesome.
So I strung up the RCMP16 with the Poly Tour Air, looks great with blue strings. I will say that I found it challenging to thread the last couple of crosses, the outer strings on both the mains and the crosses run pretty close to the frame compared to other racquets and you end up having to thread past the tied off mains. I compared the frame to a Dunlop Biomimetic 300 I have, very similar head shape and has the thinner bridge like the Dunlop Biomimetic 100 I have.
First impressions…
I don’t usually play with a vibration dampener, mostly because there was a time when I was shanking so badly I was losing them weekly so I just stopped using them. Within the first 2 minutes of hitting the sound was annoying beyond distraction and the feel put me right off the racquet; I’ve never experienced that before. I popped a vibration dampener in and it was a much better experience, the racquet feels solid and has good levels of feedback for the ball on the string bed. The launch angle was lower than I anticipated, particularly compared to the ’23 VCore 95 I’ve been hitting with for a couple of weeks. The RCMP is quick through the air, not as quick as the ’23 Vcore 95, but not that far off, which surprised me.
Despite its low static weight (323g with overgrip and dampener) it felt quite stable and came around very easily on my SHBH; I’ll see if I can get the swing weight measured at the pro shop at some point. The sweet spot was forgiving, and the level of control wasn’t an issue for me despite being a 16x19, but I mostly play with 16x19s.
My mate was play testing the Head Speed MP and Yonex Percept 100, the RCMP was still the pick of the bunch for me, the Speed MP felt like a club in comparison and the Percept 100 had just a little less feel, possibly from the vibration dampening tech in the shaft.
First impressions…
I don’t usually play with a vibration dampener, mostly because there was a time when I was shanking so badly I was losing them weekly so I just stopped using them. Within the first 2 minutes of hitting the sound was annoying beyond distraction and the feel put me right off the racquet; I’ve never experienced that before. I popped a vibration dampener in and it was a much better experience, the racquet feels solid and has good levels of feedback for the ball on the string bed. The launch angle was lower than I anticipated, particularly compared to the ’23 VCore 95 I’ve been hitting with for a couple of weeks. The RCMP is quick through the air, not as quick as the ’23 Vcore 95, but not that far off, which surprised me.
Despite its low static weight (323g with overgrip and dampener) it felt quite stable and came around very easily on my SHBH; I’ll see if I can get the swing weight measured at the pro shop at some point. The sweet spot was forgiving, and the level of control wasn’t an issue for me despite being a 16x19, but I mostly play with 16x19s.
My mate was play testing the Head Speed MP and Yonex Percept 100, the RCMP was still the pick of the bunch for me, the Speed MP felt like a club in comparison and the Percept 100 had just a little less feel, possibly from the vibration dampening tech in the shaft.
zeneto1234
New User
I had the same experience with my React Pro 96, i never play with a dampener and had same vibrations sensation with the racket even when hitting in the sweetspot, but after a dampener it was like night and day, 0 vibrations and the feedback of the racket was top tier. It became even better after adding some weight in the head.
Last edited:
That's strange. I have a React custom 96 Mid and there is a trap door.
The Angell logo is on a thin metal plate which can be peeled off though - I think you might just accidentally peeled off the metal. The trap door should still be there. Give it another try?
mn_chilly
New User
Oh wow - I am currently considering getting some TC (V5) racquets. Out of curiousity, do you recall the weight/balance specs you ordered for each?
You were correct, thanks for the response, saved me from butchering my butt cap.
Last edited:
I have them specced out in a spreadsheet at home. I can get them to you after work. DM me if I forget!
React:
Length: 27.25"
Weight / Balance: 11.1oz / 12Pts HL
Handle Size: L2
Handle Shape: B
Grip: Tan Leather (+ €5.00)
Grip Band: Black
TC95
String Pattern: 18 x 20
Stiffness: 64 RA
Length: 27.25"
Weight / Balance: 11.2oz / 12Pts HL
Handle Size: L2
Handle Shape: B
Grip: Tan Leather (+ €5.00)
TC90:
String Pattern: 16 x 18
Stiffness: 71 RA
Length: 27.25"
Weight / Balance: 11.2oz / 12Pts HL
Handle Size: L2
Handle Shape: B
Grip: Tan Leather (+ €5.00)
mn_chilly
New User
Thanks!
Junioradae
New User
How did you achieve your desired balance? Did you have to do several iterations of rearranging the remaining weights / rechecking balance till you got your desired?
I got the static weight close and then I put the handle back together and dialed it the rest of the way with weight in the trap door
Hi guys, I’m considering trying an Angell for the first time. I’m looking for something with a predictable stringbed that is a bit biased to hitting flatter and through the court with access to spin if need.
Current rackets in my bag:
All the frames have been heavily customised through trial and error with most the weight at 12 and then some at 3 and 9 + counterbalancing in the handle.
pro kennex q+5 pro 100sqinch ( doppio) 16x20 pattern with 8 mains in throat 350g around 32cm balance 347 swing weight
blx pro staff 95 16x19 pattern: https://www.tennisthis.com/tennis-racquet-reviews/wilson-blx-prostaff-six-one-95-review/ ( not to be confused with the the six one ) 360 g 32cm balance 18mm beam 347 swing weight
rf97 356 grams 16x19 pattern 347 swing weight just under 32 cm balance I believe
pro kennex Q+5 is my main stick but been trying to find a new stick with more control.
I typically play around the baseline, but also like to come into the net . I have a big forehand where I like to take to the ball on the rise and first serve which my aggressive game style is based around on .
The pro kennex allows me to hit through the court more with access to some spin when needed. Slightly low launch angle. Having to string high at 67lb with kurshbaum max power to get the directional control I need to paint the lines however still looking for a bit more control .
However as soon as tension drops, the balls start sailing when hitting from the baseline.
Tried a smaller head size in the pro staff 95 16x19 weighted up , and found it much more manoeuvrable despite the higher static weight . I assume due to the smaller headsize and thinner beam. My obh improved significantly (both slice and topspin) overall however the racket was more biased to hitting more aggressive spin with a higher launch angle. While this was fun while rallying ...during match play however, I didn’t have the confidence or precision to be aggressive with more flatter forehands . Felt great on second serves but not as good on flat first serves. I felt the string pattern was a bit too open for me .
Tried the rf97, but it felt a bit too clunky compared to the other two frames.
I have no issues generating my own power. The ideal frame in my head would be a control racket with the bias for more flatter hitting + some access to spin when needed like the pro kennex in combination with the manoeuvrability and thinner beam of the pro staff 95. Also, responds well to adding lead.
Going over the angell lineup, the tc97s and 95s 18x20s seem to be potential candidates . Possibly also the k7 lime and the new 18x19 react. Im aware unfortunately you can't demo these frames. Does anyone have any possible suggestions/recommendations ?
Current rackets in my bag:
All the frames have been heavily customised through trial and error with most the weight at 12 and then some at 3 and 9 + counterbalancing in the handle.
pro kennex q+5 pro 100sqinch ( doppio) 16x20 pattern with 8 mains in throat 350g around 32cm balance 347 swing weight
blx pro staff 95 16x19 pattern: https://www.tennisthis.com/tennis-racquet-reviews/wilson-blx-prostaff-six-one-95-review/ ( not to be confused with the the six one ) 360 g 32cm balance 18mm beam 347 swing weight
rf97 356 grams 16x19 pattern 347 swing weight just under 32 cm balance I believe
pro kennex Q+5 is my main stick but been trying to find a new stick with more control.
I typically play around the baseline, but also like to come into the net . I have a big forehand where I like to take to the ball on the rise and first serve which my aggressive game style is based around on .
The pro kennex allows me to hit through the court more with access to some spin when needed. Slightly low launch angle. Having to string high at 67lb with kurshbaum max power to get the directional control I need to paint the lines however still looking for a bit more control .
However as soon as tension drops, the balls start sailing when hitting from the baseline.
Tried a smaller head size in the pro staff 95 16x19 weighted up , and found it much more manoeuvrable despite the higher static weight . I assume due to the smaller headsize and thinner beam. My obh improved significantly (both slice and topspin) overall however the racket was more biased to hitting more aggressive spin with a higher launch angle. While this was fun while rallying ...during match play however, I didn’t have the confidence or precision to be aggressive with more flatter forehands . Felt great on second serves but not as good on flat first serves. I felt the string pattern was a bit too open for me .
Tried the rf97, but it felt a bit too clunky compared to the other two frames.
I have no issues generating my own power. The ideal frame in my head would be a control racket with the bias for more flatter hitting + some access to spin when needed like the pro kennex in combination with the manoeuvrability and thinner beam of the pro staff 95. Also, responds well to adding lead.
Going over the angell lineup, the tc97s and 95s 18x20s seem to be potential candidates . Possibly also the k7 lime and the new 18x19 react. Im aware unfortunately you can't demo these frames. Does anyone have any possible suggestions/recommendations ?
Last edited:
Happi
Hall of Fame
Best advice I can give you is to pick up the phone and call Paul, he is really good to talk to.
Thanks . I'm assuming the contact number is the one off the Angell website ?
Happi
Hall of Fame
Yes, he generally pick up the phone himself and is very happy to talk customers. Just tell him what you wrote here and he will come up with a suggestion. This was how I found my first Angell racquet (I wanted something close to Prince TT100P).
Lime and the React 18x19 were going to be my suggestions. I also have the doppio. Lime is more control. React is whipper and more spin than the lime. The doppio feels flexier than both Angell. But I had to add lead to my react hoop to liven it up a bit. Switch weight was too low for my liking (and I had a 27.25" custom)
Junioradae
New User
What were their separate weights and balances ? What was your exact process In matching them, move weight , put everything back together,check balance.... repeat till you got what you wanted?
But which one is more powerful and have open string pattern?
Which was close to 2019 tt 100p? 16x19 version would be great .hate stringing 18x20
An Angell 100 is way more powerful than the Prince 100P. Only chance to get close would be a 1.30mm dead poly.
I would still lean towards the Angell 97 18x20 or Lime (also 18x20) if you want something close to the Prince.
I would say that the Angell is the most powerful 100 I have hit with. I would compare it to a comfortable foam-filled pure drive.
The ezone 100 is still powerful, but the denser string pattern will make balls have lower trajectory and slightly less power on average.
Carreau
Semi-Pro
Not sure if this statement is true provided that TC100 is foam filled and usually has a higher SW. From my experience - Ezone100 and PD (for example) are more powerful with same specs (higher SW). My experience with Ezone100 - it is kind of inconsistent and too powerful for me.
At one time I had both the ezone and Angell 100. My favorite string in the ezone was Head Lynx Tour 1.25. I never found a favorite with the Angell.
For the Angell, I loved the spin, the feel on volleys, the serves, but under pressure it was just way too easy for me to hit long. I always felt I had to "hold back" because everything had so much juice. Part of me wants to buy another one just for thr challenge of trying to tame it, like a wild mustang or something. But the first thing I'll do is put a nice fat 1.30 round poly in it like Big Banger Original.
The ezone just ended up fitting my game and swingpath better. And the frame really gelled well with the Lynx Tour.
Yes. I bought the v5 95, 90, and a React MPP. The React was my favorite. i've since sold the TC95.
Not because I didn't like it, I just preferred the React over it....but I ended up selling that one too.
TC95 is more for those favoring classic strokes, React is moreso for modern loopier strokes. React needs some leadtape though in the hoop IMO
Honestly in hindsight I probably should have kept my 27.25" React MPPs.
Last edited:
Tc95 have more power then react?
IMO yes. But the TC95 also has a higher stock swingweight. Tc95 was more conducive to hitting through the ball as the React was more for spinning it due to a higher launch angle
Carreau
Semi-Pro
Are we comparing MPP to 18M TC95?
Correct. 18*20 V5 TC95 vs 18*19 React
landcookie
Professional
You will probably get more intellectual responses from others. As for me -
Yes - my arm.
I've used many an Angell frame over the years... Never felt any arm discomfort with any of them.
landcookie
Professional
I have asked Paul Angell that question once. His response was: "we do not measure twistweight of frames".
I am sure there is a way of working it out.
Has anybody with a React frame put silicon in the handle? Would like an idea of how much it changes the feel of the frame.
Historically I've played with box beams and I do prefer foam filled, but went for the React as I wanted something a little quicker through the air and more forgiving. I'm using a dampener, which I haven't done for a while and I'm stringing with power pads on a full-bed of poly (which I usually only do for gut/poly hybrids). Just trying to get the feel to be a bit more 'solid'.
Historically I've played with box beams and I do prefer foam filled, but went for the React as I wanted something a little quicker through the air and more forgiving. I'm using a dampener, which I haven't done for a while and I'm stringing with power pads on a full-bed of poly (which I usually only do for gut/poly hybrids). Just trying to get the feel to be a bit more 'solid'.