That is interesting. Over the phone, Paul mentioned to me that all the foam-filled rackets have an average SW of 325 and that normal variances are +/- 3-5 SW points. So you would think you would be able to order one 290 or at least 292. However, he also mentioned that the weather impacts the expansion weight of the foam. So in the winter they get slightly higher numbers, and the swingweight could have a variance as high as +10 SW in that case. Maybe Paul just has a hard time getting rackets lower in SW than 295 in the wintertime.I asked for a 290 Sw for my CT 97 18x20, but Paul told me he cannot go that low since the CT racquets have foam inside. We agreed on a 295 Sw which is the lowest achievable Sw for that line.
He told me that players should not focus too much on Sw as other criterias like beam design play an important role in how heavy the frame feels. If the racquet feels too cluncky i will go compesate with a thinner gauge.
You can get a lower Sw with the CR line that has no foam though, but I dont think it will suit my play style.
My Angell racquet will be delivered next week. For those interested i will be able to make a comparison with the Tecnifibre TF40 305 16x19 that i am playing with since i got back to tennis 2 years ago after a 15 years hiatus.
I can also compare it with the i.Prestige MP that i used from age 14 to 17 and that shaped my swings. I still have two of them that i bring on the court from time to time. Brilliant racquet but 20g too heavy for me.
I hope the CT 97 can give me that i.prestige superb feel and directional control minus the heavy weight.
My specs : 300g / 325mm / 295sw / PU grip / Shape A / L2
I'd love to hear your comparison between those two rackets! Really liked that Tecnifibre frame when I demoed it.