The_Racketeer
Professional
I missed your post too! I'll add ya to the list. Welcome aboard! What setup did you go with?why no congrat to me? my is on the way too!
I missed your post too! I'll add ya to the list. Welcome aboard! What setup did you go with?why no congrat to me? my is on the way too!
Hi Jack,
great score on the Angell. Do you have an estimate on the swingweight for the strung racket prior to your mods? I've been looking for similar specs but the 27.25" length.
Thanks
I bought second hand TC97 currently at 330g so therefore I desperately need tutorial how to remove some weight outI missed your post too! I'll add ya to the list. Welcome aboard! What setup did you go with?
I bought second hand TC97 currently at 330g so therefore I desperately need tutorial how to remove some weight out
I have googled just one sad video about Head pallet removal, am I useless searcher or is it really only source?You have to remove the grip and then the pallet to get to the weights. Do a search here for pallet removal. Its pretty easy but take your time so you don't ruin the pallets.
I have googled just one sad video about Head pallet removal, am I useless searcher or is it really only source?
hmm not much there either.. some pics from shaving the Babolat..
I have googled just one sad video about Head pallet removal, am I useless searcher or is it really only source?
Look forward to not only your review by your comparison with the Prince T100P you're playing with now.Got a TC100 on the way, thanks to a fellow poster! Looking forward to trying it and seeing what this "Angell feel" is all about
Should have it by Tues and will report back impressions shortly thereafter.
Got to play with the big hitting lefty again. Really awesome for breaking in a new frame because the spin is a lot heavier than most guys and its lefty spin which tails into you on FHs. Good for footwork.
Anyway, I have to say ramping up the tension made a real difference for me ( I went from around 46# to 53#s). The frame is now moving up to more of a Wow experience. Whomever said this racquet was string sensitive was right. I'd venture to say it is tension sensitive. It simply shines with the tension higher than what you may usually use. I think this is due simply to the open pattern. I should have thought of that before - open pattern = higher tension, at least for me.
808, how do the TC95 63 and 70 differ? Power, control, feel, etc
I'm interested in this too. I have the same specs as 808's 70RA and plan to buy another TC95 later this year but I'm not sure I want another 70 or the 63.
I've had a chance to play the 70RA by now, and as Backhanded Compliment already hinted, the only difference between my 63RA and 70RA TC95's is the feel – one has noticeable flex, the other one much less so (I wouldn't quite call it "no perceivable flex", as even at 70RA ungripped/unstrung it's not a super stiff frame in real use).Ive heard it is mostly just feel... the 63ra is like 57-58 strung the flex is noticable but not noodley. RA70 probaly no percievable flex as its about 64 strung... more prostafff 85 like.
Thanks for the comparison. Just to confirm, though, the 63RA should be a little higher in SW than the 70RA per previous discussions about the layup of the Angell racquets. Did you find that noticeable, all other variables being equal?You're welcome and sorry for being late, haven't had a chance to play for nearly two weeks now.
In the end the decision between the 63RA and 70RA is purely personal. If you usually prefer stiffer frames, go for the 70 obviously, and vice versa. I think neither one is necessarily better than the other.
Yes, the 63RA feels slightly more substantial, the 70RA swings a bit faster. I did not notice a significant difference in power, though – I guess I'm not as sensitive to swing weight variances as long as it's in my preferred range (or unconsciously compensate with higher racket head speed).Thanks for the comparison. Just to confirm, though, the 63RA should be a little higher in SW than the 70RA per previous discussions about the layup of the Angell racquets. Did you find that noticeable, all other variables being equal?
what hybrid setup do you mean - if you are not satisfied with tension maintanance of natural gut, nothing will help you there. Anything else will die even earlier.. if it is about saving the buck then yes, natgut hybrid with some durable poly might be way how to get costs down..I have been slowly experimenting with string tensions, going down each time by 1# using VS Touch 16. Starting from 57#, I reached for 53# for one of the racquets (TC97). First time playing with it balls were flying all over and I had to significantly adjust my racquet head angle and swing. After couple of hours, I got used to it, but it just did not feel quite right. So, I measured the tension and it turned out to be at 46.8#. It was playable but not enjoyable for my technique.
So, I wanted to go higher on my other racquet, and asked for 55# (a different stringer). I measured the tension before playing and it came out at 60.2#. Saying I was disappointed is an understatement, so much so that I started looking to get my own stringing machine. The first hour of hitting was like carrying a wooden pallet, no power, no feel, just horrible. I had to play a ladder match, so I picked up the 60# racquet and forced myself to play with it. My precision was just superb, I just had to really put the power into it though. With this setup my unforced errors went down significantly and I won two matches back to back that I was not expected to win. One good news is that even as stiff as 60# feels, I had no issues in my arm or elbow
So, it appears I need the control as long as I can manage to put the power in. However here is the big downside: I used to get about 12-14 hours of play from a string, it initially went down to about 9-10 after starting play more singles than doubles. With the 47# and 60# setups, I got less than 5 hours of play with each. Suddenly my string economics equation is turned upside down. Although I really don't want to change my strings if I don't have to, I really enjoy the full nat. gut, I may have to go with a hybrid setup.
I haven't experienced this with other racquets, which is the reason I am posting here. Any thoughts or advice for me?
Thank you.
I am sorry I could not articulate better. I have no complaints about tension maintenance of nat. gut, it is one of the best things and why I use it besides being good to my elbow and touch play. However, in two separate instances and with two different stringers the strings were not done properly and I had the chance to test a wide range of tension as an unintended consequence.what hybrid setup do you mean - if you are not satisfied with tension maintenance of natural gut, nothing will help you there. Anything else will die even earlier.. if it is about saving the buck then yes, natgut hybrid with some durable poly might be way how to get costs down..
High tension is best with gut for sure. Gut poly is one of the best setups you can have in tennis, but the thing is that you will go through mains pretty fast since that is what breaks first.
I would suggest gut poly though because you will cut the cost of gut in half and you don't have to splurge on expensive poly crosses. I used Cofocus, but anything round and slick will do.
What I've been led to believe - after reading through a lot of threads - that if the poly is slick and thin you can even re-string the crosses while gut mains are still playable. Sounds pretty awesome...in theory.
I ve done it (for myself) when testing different crosses and it died earlier. It is bit of neurochirurgy/John McClane experience when trying to cut knot on crosses without damaging mains.. but in real life yes - it is only for people who string for themselvesYeah, but I would not recommend it. I have done it too. Not worth the risk. Also he has a guy who strings his frames, and I doubt any real stringer will do that.
1. find good stringer - reliable one who can keep DT on his string jobs in some reasonable tolerance (like me )I am sorry I could not articulate better. I have no complaints about tension maintenance of nat. gut, it is one of the best things and why I use it besides being good to my elbow and touch play. However, in two separate instances and with two different stringers the strings were not done properly and I had the chance to test a wide range of tension as an unintended consequence.
I liked the higher tension setup best; however, now I am only getting 1/2 of play time with the same strings as I did before, so my string costs doubled (~$130-150/mo.). So, part of my inexperienced thinking is that going to a nat. gut on the mains and poly on the crosses would restore the $$$ equation probably; lower purchase costs and longer gut play time, I assume.
It is bit of neurochirurgy
it is only for people who string for themselves
yeah Id suggest what everyone else is saying Gut/Poly hybrid... it will stiffen up your stringbed but you can have a lower tension like 53-55lbs and still get string longevity. I personally switched to lower tension poly 4 years ago and it has been great but everyone is different.I am sorry I could not articulate better. I have no complaints about tension maintenance of nat. gut, it is one of the best things and why I use it besides being good to my elbow and touch play. However, in two separate instances and with two different stringers the strings were not done properly and I had the chance to test a wide range of tension as an unintended consequence.
I liked the higher tension setup best; however, now I am only getting 1/2 of play time with the same strings as I did before, so my string costs doubled (~$130-150/mo.). So, part of my inexperienced thinking is that going to a nat. gut on the mains and poly on the crosses would restore the $$$ equation probably; lower purchase costs and longer gut play time, I assume.
Just ordered another TC100 so my collection will now be 2 TC95s and 2TC100s all at exact specs. I played last week with the TC100 and upped the tension a bit to 52lbs and it was a freaking beast of heavy hitting. I still don’t get the level of precision i get with my 95s but I’m certainly not shy about hitting all out with it. I just aim with better margin and it is giving my opponents fits. The serve is huge and i can generate some really nice movement. Ugh, such a dilemma having these two great racquets
Can I be Captain Obvious here and suggest a TC97?
Can I be Captain Obvious here and suggest a TC97?
Why do you think he needs one? His current setup his giving him hard time choosing what racquet to play with, as they are both(all) pretty awesome...at least that's how I understand it.
So far I have played more with the TC95 especially singles were I simply gravitate towards the precision. The TC100 is still a lot of fun and I’m finding a little extra tension is giving some additional sharpness and I’m not holding back. The feel for both racquets is really close and I seem to be able to switch between them with ease. It just comes down to a bit more precision vs. a bit more brunt
What I've been led to believe - after reading through a lot of threads - that if the poly is slick and thin you can even re-string the crosses while gut mains are still playable. Sounds pretty awesome...in theory.
havent noticed that at all and i used to play with a 13oz IGMP prestige and have compared them directly. In fact i have a have a hard time not finding the sweetspot in the tc95. Now my x feel pro 95 needed more twist weight but ive added only a little at 3 and 9 to the tc95... because i am a big returner and always need as much stability as possible.Anyone feel like the TC95 lacks twistweight or is unusually jarring/dead outside the sweetspot? My specs are 16x19, 320g, 310mm balance 63ra. Compared to my trusty Pro Staff 90s, I'm not getting the plough and stability I like on off-center hits. I mean, the Prostaff is notorious for its dead upper hoop, but I feel like the TC95 is worse across a larger area outside the sweetspot. My buddy, who plays with a stock Youtek IG Prestige MP, hit with it and this was the first thing he noticed. Might try some lead at 3 & 9 to remedy this.
Why do you think he needs one? His current setup his giving him hard time choosing what racquet to play with, as they are both(all) pretty awesome...at least that's how I understand it.
Anyone feel like the TC95 lacks twistweight or is unusually jarring/dead outside the sweetspot? My specs are 16x19, 320g, 310mm balance 63ra. Compared to my trusty Pro Staff 90s, I'm not getting the plough and stability I like on off-center hits. I mean, the Prostaff is notorious for its dead upper hoop, but I feel like the TC95 is worse across a larger area outside the sweetspot. My buddy, who plays with a stock Youtek IG Prestige MP, hit with it and this was the first thing he noticed. Might try some lead at 3 & 9 to remedy this.
thank you for info.Anyone feel like the TC95 lacks twistweight or is unusually jarring/dead outside the sweetspot? My specs are 16x19, 320g, 310mm balance 63ra. Compared to my trusty Pro Staff 90s, I'm not getting the plough and stability I like on off-center hits. I mean, the Prostaff is notorious for its dead upper hoop, but I feel like the TC95 is worse across a larger area outside the sweetspot. My buddy, who plays with a stock Youtek IG Prestige MP, hit with it and this was the first thing he noticed. Might try some lead at 3 & 9 to remedy this.
Because he said he doesn't get the precision of the 95 with the 100, so obviously the 97 would be something between the two and might work best
Just ordered another TC100 so my collection will now be 2 TC95s and 2TC100s all at exact specs. I played last week with the TC100 and upped the tension a bit to 52lbs and it was a freaking beast of heavy hitting. I still don’t get the level of precision i get with my 95s but I’m certainly not shy about hitting all out with it. I just aim with better margin and it is giving my opponents fits. The serve is huge and i can generate some really nice movement. Ugh, such a dilemma having these two great racquets
Can I be Captain Obvious here and suggest a TC97?
Anyone feel like the TC95 lacks twistweight or is unusually jarring/dead outside the sweetspot? My specs are 16x19, 320g, 310mm balance 63ra. Compared to my trusty Pro Staff 90s, I'm not getting the plough and stability I like on off-center hits. I mean, the Prostaff is notorious for its dead upper hoop, but I feel like the TC95 is worse across a larger area outside the sweetspot. My buddy, who plays with a stock Youtek IG Prestige MP, hit with it and this was the first thing he noticed. Might try some lead at 3 & 9 to remedy this.
Received my TC100 (70RA) last night and hope to try it out some this afternoon. It comes in at 325 grams all strung with overgrip, so I added another 5 grams to the butt to bring it up to 330.
It appears to be close to even balance, so I hope the swingweight is not too high. I'll check it on the RDC machine today too. I got a grip size 2, but when you put the PU grip on it plus overgrip, it measures the same as all my other 3/8 racquets. I guess the Angell PU grip is thicker than most.
I haven't experienced this at all. Is the SW high enough for you? It may just need some lead at 12.The first Angell frame is probably going to be tweaked a little, at least IME.
What strings, what tension?
What were the unstrung specs you ordered? Good luck!
Keep in mind that due to a herniated disc I'm not actually able to play proper tennis with it right now. Just feeding balls, volleying, and slapping some balls against the wall.