The Official Angell Users Club

Happi

Hall of Fame
thanks for that. loads to take in.
i had a quick look around their website and i have better understanding.
i now do my own stringing, but on a drop weight. you and them mentioned to use their tension sheet on an electronic machine/head.... so will that be an issue?
i guess it will be "more troublesome" to have to manually adjust the weight to get to the desired tension from the sheet...
(most of my strings i use i have in stock are Cat 5, and the rest are Cat 4..)
it is very tempting, but i need a few more sessions on the racquets to make my first move to the "dark side"... :laughing:

I guess drop weight could work, but you can ask Serge at Sergetti, just shoot him an email with any questions (I did that and he answered all my questions very fast).

I would suggest finding your favorite tension and string on your racquet, and then get a tension sheet to compare.

Cheers :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: esm

Paul Y

Rookie
Has anyone tried the TC101? My daughter is really interested but want to see if anyone tried it yet. I did watch tennisnerd's review.
 

OlgaOM

Rookie
Also can anyone please explain why to compare TC101 with TC97 rather than with TC100?Cause It is an oversized racquet and I would expect it to be somehow closer to TC100...
 
Last edited:

topspn

Legend
Also can anyone explain why to compare TC101 with TC97 rather than with TC100?Cause It is an oversized racquet and I would expect it to be somehow closer to TC100...
Because it is designed box beam style like the TC97 and apparently share a layup. The TC95/100 are designed with a different D beam that has very uniform flex. So it will not play like TC100 but will play like a larger TC97
 

OlgaOM

Rookie
Because it is designed box beam style like the TC97 and apparently share a layup. The TC95/100 are designed with a different D beam that has very uniform flex. So it will not play like TC100 but will play like a larger TC97
Thank you @topspn! What about swing weight/clumsiness - if I pick the same specs as my TC97, would it have generally higher SW because of the head size?
 

Happi

Hall of Fame
Thank you @topspn! What about swing weight/clumsiness - if I pick the same specs as my TC97, would it have generally higher SW because of the head size?

I think you can ask Paul to customize the TC101 to match the SW of your TC97, just give him the number of your racquet or order number when ordering.
 

landcookie

Semi-Pro
Hello to everyone, I am a current user of an slightly extended TC100 (27.25 inches, 320g) who is happy to have joined this thread about Angell racquets. In the past, I have extensively used the TC97 (27.25, 310g) and Yonex frames (ezone DR 98 +, DR 98, and AI 98). Yesterday, I ordered a pair of new TC101 (27.25 inches, 330g). I hope to be able to share with you my first impressions of these new racquets after trying them in a couple of weeks.
In the meantime, it would be great to hear if any of you had also experienced with extended length angell frames.
Best regards from Chile!

Enviado desde mi MI 9 mediante Tapatalk
Hello! I can relate as I've also moved from the DR98 + to a TC 100 27.5. I have both the 63 and 70 RA.

@SteveXtreme1978 I suspect going 27.25 instead of 27.5 has to do with swing weight. Paul noted that the 27.5 has a default SW of +/- 340.

Even though I had played my DR+ with some lead at 12 I thought I'd ask for a similar 335 SW on my TC100. Paul was a bit surprised that the DR98+ only had 335 swing weight.

I suspect it may be due to the frame construction of the DR98+, where it is stiffer and seems to have less material on the hoop, compared to the TC100 which has a uniform flex.

Much prefer the Angell myself and haven't looked at any other frames since switching almost a year ago. If you'd like to know more about my experience, be it strings set up etc just ask - happy to share.
 
I feel like I have my pinky right on the edge
me too... the flare gives me more leverage with said pinky that way. Im a classically trained violinist si my bow work has made my pinky a lot stronger than most peoples. I feel it really comes into play on my extreme grip backhands and on american twist second serves. The leverage just helps.
 

ed70

Professional
I imagine the differences between the tc100and tc101 are very similar to the differences between the tc95 and tc97.

unfortunately off the court at the moment, or I’d of bought a TC101. Ive been playing the TC97 for over 3 years now. Watched tennis nerds review & it appears that the 101 has a similar lower launch angle to the TC97 that I like. The area that interests me is the power, I’m thinking that because the beam width is the same as the 97, the power could be lower on the 101?
If you look at tc95 vs tc100 the 100 has a thicker beam.
last time I played a very thin beam 100 was the POG (prince original graphite) loved this frames weight & feel but it was just too underpowered.
 

Classic-TXP-IG MID

Hall of Fame
unfortunately off the court at the moment, or I’d of bought a TC101. Ive been playing the TC97 for over 3 years now. Watched tennis nerds review & it appears that the 101 has a similar lower launch angle to the TC97 that I like. The area that interests me is the power, I’m thinking that because the beam width is the same as the 97, the power could be lower on the 101?
If you look at tc95 vs tc100 the 100 has a thicker beam.
last time I played a very thin beam 100 was the POG (prince original graphite) loved this frames weight & feel but it was just too underpowered.

Since the TC101 has the same beam design and thickness as the TC97, but a larger head size, I think it will be slightly more powerful than the TC97 but not as powerful as the TC100.
 
Also can anyone explain why to compare TC101 with TC97 rather than with TC100?Cause It is an oversized racquet and I would expect it to be somehow closer to TC100...
I think it is to do with the Beam sh
Hello! I can relate as I've also moved from the DR98 + to a TC 100 27.5. I have both the 63 and 70 RA.

@SteveXtreme1978 I suspect going 27.25 instead of 27.5 has to do with swing weight. Paul noted that the 27.5 has a default SW of +/- 340.

Even though I had played my DR+ with some lead at 12 I thought I'd ask for a similar 335 SW on my TC100. Paul was a bit surprised that the DR98+ only had 335 swing weight.

I suspect it may be due to the frame construction of the DR98+, where it is stiffer and seems to have less material on the hoop, compared to the TC100 which has a uniform flex.

Much prefer the Angell myself and haven't looked at any other frames since switching almost a year ago. If you'd like to know more about my experience, be it strings set up etc just ask - happy to share.
@landcookie thank you for your response. I am very interested to hear more about your experiences from switching to Angell TC100 from your DR98+.
I hit quite flat and play one handed slice backhands most and mostly doubles so will volley a lot. What would you say were the main differences between the 2 frames. Is the TC100 better for your arm as I have tennis elbow occasionally and does it give you more power. Does the extra SW feel heavier after some long matches? What kind of strings do you have on your TC100 and how do you play.

Also would you consider the new TC101?
 

esm

Legend
In addition to the above - i can share some of TC95 & TC100 (both 27", L3 w/ OG and B shape, 63RA and 16x19). by all means i am not an expert, just my personal experience.

For quite a long time until recently, i only play doubles (social, friendly and local leagues), and i have tried both the TC95 and TC100 (they were my main racquets) - i have noticed i tend to grab the TC95 much more often than the TC100. i volley loads too and the TC95 felt much better at the front and it is as capable at the back, as well as big serves and very good ROS 9on good days of course).

I am old school, more of a flatter hitter, so i dont do as much top spin as the current generation of players. Both has very similar strung setup (same string, ~340g/~31.5cm & ~335SW), even though the starting spec were different.

I do not use dampener anymore and the thumping sound from the TC95 is addictive :-D 8-B
 

ed70

Professional
Since the TC101 has the same beam design and thickness as the TC97, but a larger head size, I think it will be slightly more powerful than the TC97 but not as powerful as the TC100.

So the trampoline effect of a longer string in the 101 will make the difference over the fact the 101 could well be less manoeuvrable. Interesting.
 

ed70

Professional
Thank you @topspn! What about swing weight/clumsiness - if I pick the same specs as my TC97, would it have generally higher SW because of the head size?

My V2 310g TC97’s end up around 325sw once strung and weigh around 330g. The V3’s seem to come with lower SW. tennis nerds 101 weighed over 342g and was just under 325sw. So worth trying to get a close match
 

landcookie

Semi-Pro
I think it is to do with the Beam sh

@landcookie thank you for your response. I am very interested to hear more about your experiences from switching to Angell TC100 from your DR98+.
I hit quite flat and play one handed slice backhands most and mostly doubles so will volley a lot. What would you say were the main differences between the 2 frames. Is the TC100 better for your arm as I have tennis elbow occasionally and does it give you more power. Does the extra SW feel heavier after some long matches? What kind of strings do you have on your TC100 and how do you play.

Also would you consider the new TC101?
Hmm. From memory and personal experience, here are the main differences:
- DR98+ flexes more at the hoop while TC100 is more uniform. I prefer the TC100 in this regard especially for volleys, especially the 70RA. DR98+ felt too 'noodley' at the net.
- TC100 has more power and spin. Bigger groundies, bigger and more action on the serve. IMO DR98+ plays quite flat as it had 8(?) mains in the throat Vs 6 for the TC100. I play with a lot of spin, more than some pros (even though I'm nowhere their level) , so this suits me.
- I can control spin better with the TC100. Depending on how you slice (flat, punchy slice or more side spin), you may prefer one or the other.
- TC100 feels more stable. I asked for twist weight but Paul said they dont have it in their data base.
- DR98+ swings faster, presumably due to the more aerodynamic hoop shape
- TC100 feels more solid in its construction. Even though my Tc100 and DR98+ have identical specs (static and swingweight) the TC100 just feels heavier in my hand.
- My TC100 comes with 335 SW so no different to DR98+. I can go for hours even with 340+ SW racquets as I'm relatively strong and explosive.

I used to play primarily tour bite 1.25 in my Yonex but now play with ng/poly hybrid in TC100 (more power!!) or full bed poly strung mid/low 40s. I can control powerful frames because I play with topspin.

I never had elbow issues with the DR but can sometimes feel a twinge in my elbow on the 70RA with a full bed poly so would advise to stay away and go with 63RA if you have elbow issues. The 70RA is still really plush but best err on the safe side.

No, wouldn't consider 101 as apparently it's construction is similar to the 97 which apparently flexes more at the hoop, like the DR. Plus I love my 100s.

Anything I miss?
 

Dansan

Semi-Pro
Finally got my new 320g 10pt HL V3 TC95 63RA 16x19 out for some playing. Strung it with a hybrid- klip 16 nat gut mains vs kirsch max power @ 58/55 lbs. OG and dampener, lead at 3/9. Probably somewhere around 345-355g strung? I can usually tell how I feel about a racquet when playing mini tennis, and this started very well. Ton's of feel and control. I have heard people complaining about the launch angle being a bit high - but I felt it was really easy to flatten out and actually lower than my RF97A. My fears about the launch angle were pretty much immediately gone once I started.

The guy I played is a bit of a really athletic mixed junkballer. So, not the best playtest because of my opponent. I'll get a chance to play with my 4.5 level partner tomorrow for a better judge of things.

The overall take away with the TC95 is power and spin, and an overall dynamic versatility that was really "fun" to play with. I could not believe how much power this thing had for its size, and I found my forehand sailing long many times. My two handed backhand is going to take a little time to find center. OHBH was awesome when I set up for it. Slice backhand is amazing and precise. Volleys were stable and I could place them well. Took me a little bit to find my serve, but once I did - a lot of them were simply unreturnable. High bouncing kick serves and wide corners were easier than most other racquets. It can be a serious weapon in the right hands, and I look forward to getting adjusted to the power of this thing. Maybe once I finish with this hybrid, I'll try a full bed of poly in the low 50s or high 40s. I experienced zero arm pain.

I was losing the first set badly1-4 when I came back 2-4, then 3-5, evened it up at 5-5, and won 7-5. Second set, I found my serve and forehand a bit better and won 6-1. I just could not put it down and change racquets because of how much fun and versality I found. So a successful match against a guy that gives me a lot of trouble at times.

The strengths: power, spin, and good control for a frame that has this much power and spin. The feel was plush and comfortable - I would characterize it as a "solid" feel. It's not the softest feeling frame, but it's not stiff either...just felt right in the middle. Slice backhands, OHBH, volleys, and big serves with english'. More power than the K7, more control than the RF....power is on par with the RF. When I wanted to "turn it on", I could dial it up and back with effectiveness.

Negatives: Going to take me a little while to reign in some of the power on my forehand and serve to keep them inside the baseline, and access all of that spin potential to bring my balls down. My two handed backhand will take time to find center. It's less forgiving than my K7 Lime and V7 blade, and a lot of other 98 sq in frames out there. Less control than my K7 lime and old ti radical head mp 18x20. I was however able to hit more unreturnable winners than most other racquets I've used.

Bottom line: my interest is piqued and I will put in the time to keep adjusting and getting better with it, really really fun play test.
 
Finally got my new 320g 10pt HL V3 TC95 63RA 16x19 out for some playing. Strung it with a hybrid- klip 16 nat gut mains vs kirsch max power @ 58/55 lbs. OG and dampener, lead at 3/9. Probably somewhere around 345-355g strung? I can usually tell how I feel about a racquet when playing mini tennis, and this started very well. Ton's of feel and control. I have heard people complaining about the launch angle being a bit high - but I felt it was really easy to flatten out and actually lower than my RF97A. My fears about the launch angle were pretty much immediately gone once I started.

The guy I played is a bit of a really athletic mixed junkballer. So, not the best playtest because of my opponent. I'll get a chance to play with my 4.5 level partner tomorrow for a better judge of things.

The overall take away with the TC95 is power and spin, and an overall dynamic versatility that was really "fun" to play with. I could not believe how much power this thing had for its size, and I found my forehand sailing long many times. My two handed backhand is going to take a little time to find center. OHBH was awesome when I set up for it. Slice backhand is amazing and precise. Volleys were stable and I could place them well. Took me a little bit to find my serve, but once I did - a lot of them were simply unreturnable. High bouncing kick serves and wide corners were easier than most other racquets. It can be a serious weapon in the right hands, and I look forward to getting adjusted to the power of this thing. Maybe once I finish with this hybrid, I'll try a full bed of poly in the low 50s or high 40s. I experienced zero arm pain.

I was losing the first set badly1-4 when I came back 2-4, then 3-5, evened it up at 5-5, and won 7-5. Second set, I found my serve and forehand a bit better and won 6-1. I just could not put it down and change racquets because of how much fun and versality I found. So a successful match against a guy that gives me a lot of trouble at times.

The strengths: power, spin, and good control for a frame that has this much power and spin. The feel was plush and comfortable - I would characterize it as a "solid" feel. It's not the softest feeling frame, but it's not stiff either...just felt right in the middle. Slice backhands, OHBH, volleys, and big serves with english'. More power than the K7, more control than the RF....power is on par with the RF. When I wanted to "turn it on", I could dial it up and back with effectiveness.

Negatives: Going to take me a little while to reign in some of the power on my forehand and serve to keep them inside the baseline, and access all of that spin potential to bring my balls down. My two handed backhand will take time to find center. It's less forgiving than my K7 Lime and V7 blade, and a lot of other 98 sq in frames out there. Less control than my K7 lime and old ti radical head mp 18x20. I was however able to hit more unreturnable winners than most other racquets I've used.

Bottom line: my interest is piqued and I will put in the time to keep adjusting and getting better with it, really really fun play test.
I dont know that many who have liked it with a 2 hander so curious how you find it? For me it took dialing in the right strings because the power is surprising. But yeah... the fun factor. My main hitting partner will sometime hit something my zone to my backhand just so I can obliterate it (he's using a TC95 too now after a few years with the TC100). It took me a bit to dial in at the net with its power but doing the classic shrug bled off pace.
 

Dansan

Semi-Pro
I dont know that many who have liked it with a 2 hander so curious how you find it? For me it took dialing in the right strings because the power is surprising. But yeah... the fun factor. My main hitting partner will sometime hit something my zone to my backhand just so I can obliterate it (he's using a TC95 too now after a few years with the TC100). It took me a bit to dial in at the net with its power but doing the classic shrug bled off pace.

It definitely took me a while to find the sweet spot of the racquet with my two hander. Mishits did however go in, just with less power and were sometimes floaters. The two hander is my go to, but I can sporadically hit nice OHBH when I actually set up for it. I just need to practice that to get more consistent. I relied on a backhand slice which it does in spades when I was not feeling confident with the two hander.

I did however hit the most amazing two handed backhand with it...a powerful crosscourt passing shot that was well placed. That's the thing with this racquet - I found myself hitting just amazing shots....but it's not like I didn't also make errors. My errors were either mishits, or balls sailing long. I believe I can improve those things with more practice using it and perhaps some string adjustments. But I don't know if I necessarily hit more errors than usual. I may take some video today with it if I can get out , the weather is really nice in Orlando right now
 
Hmm. From memory and personal experience, here are the main differences:
- DR98+ flexes more at the hoop while TC100 is more uniform. I prefer the TC100 in this regard especially for volleys, especially the 70RA. DR98+ felt too 'noodley' at the net.
- TC100 has more power and spin. Bigger groundies, bigger and more action on the serve. IMO DR98+ plays quite flat as it had 8(?) mains in the throat Vs 6 for the TC100. I play with a lot of spin, more than some pros (even though I'm nowhere their level) , so this suits me.
- I can control spin better with the TC100. Depending on how you slice (flat, punchy slice or more side spin), you may prefer one or the other.
- TC100 feels more stable. I asked for twist weight but Paul said they dont have it in their data base.
- DR98+ swings faster, presumably due to the more aerodynamic hoop shape
- TC100 feels more solid in its construction. Even though my Tc100 and DR98+ have identical specs (static and swingweight) the TC100 just feels heavier in my hand.
- My TC100 comes with 335 SW so no different to DR98+. I can go for hours even with 340+ SW racquets as I'm relatively strong and explosive.

I used to play primarily tour bite 1.25 in my Yonex but now play with ng/poly hybrid in TC100 (more power!!) or full bed poly strung mid/low 40s. I can control powerful frames because I play with topspin.

I never had elbow issues with the DR but can sometimes feel a twinge in my elbow on the 70RA with a full bed poly so would advise to stay away and go with 63RA if you have elbow issues. The 70RA is still really plush but best err on the safe side.

No, wouldn't consider 101 as apparently it's construction is similar to the 97 which apparently flexes more at the hoop, like the DR. Plus I love my 100s.

Anything I miss?

Thanks @landcookie. Great feedback. Think I will take the plunge soon. Maybe a 63RA but I want the power so 70RA is appealing to me too. I use a hybrid setup on strings with Syn Gut in crosses so maybe 70RA is ok. Think I may go for a very slightly lighter TC100.
 

Dansan

Semi-Pro
I was skeptical at first. Didn't buy the hype. But now I'm drinking the TC95 Kool-Aid. Great racquet...has a butt-ton of firepower compared to the K7 Lime at the expense of a little bit of control. Very forgiving for a 95 sq inch frame, it took two sessions to gel with this thing but I haven't even looked at my RF, K7, blade, or PT 280.
 

landcookie

Semi-Pro
Thanks @landcookie. Great feedback. Think I will take the plunge soon. Maybe a 63RA but I want the power so 70RA is appealing to me too. I use a hybrid setup on strings with Syn Gut in crosses so maybe 70RA is ok. Think I may go for a very slightly lighter TC100.
The power difference between 63 and 70 RA is rather negligible. I find myself only using the 63RA these days and keeping the 70 as a spare. If, even on the DR, you get some elbow issues, I would personally stay away from the 70ra. I had zero issues with DR98+ and felt a little bit in the elbow with the 70RA.

2 cents.
 

tennis347

Hall of Fame
Just had a hit with the ASL2 tonight. Holly **** this racquet deserves so much hype. It’s so comfortable without the gimmick flex tech. I even strung it with rpm blast at 58 lbs. The racquet swings fast and is not sluggish like the Blade 98. I’ve been hitting with the Blade 18x20 and TF40 and going to the ASL2’s Open pattern didn’t compromise control. But I got more access to spin and better on defensive shots. In fact, I find the control better than the Blade because the stringbed is more predictable. Volleys were fantastic and it slices thru the air quick making those short angle volleys deadly. I did put some lead at 3&9 as I find it was still a bit too light and the sweetspot a bit small. This racquet can hit a heavy ball whether it’s flat or spin you can do it all. Serves were fantastic as well as I was able place it anywhere on the court. I’ve mentioned it already, but the feel is special. It’s just so comfortable and I have golfers elbow. There’s really nothing like it out there. This racquet doesn’t really have a glaring weakness. It’s incredible how Paul is able to make a powerful racquet without compromising control. As much as I enjoy the TF40, it’s still too firm for my sensitive elbow. It also doesn’t hit as heavy of a ball as the ASL2. I know I’m in the honeymoon stage, but I might just switch to this permanently because it’s so good for my arm. I’ve official joined the Angell hype train.

I just ordered the ASL2 directly from Angell and looking for to the legendary feel that Angell is known for. I too had to stop playing with the TF40 as it was too firm for my elbow. I just sold most of my racquets. I had the K7 Red but someone made me an offer to sell that could not be refused. The ASL2 appears to be quite unique to anything else on the market.
 
It definitely took me a while to find the sweet spot of the racquet with my two hander. Mishits did however go in, just with less power and were sometimes floaters. The two hander is my go to, but I can sporadically hit nice OHBH when I actually set up for it. I just need to practice that to get more consistent. I relied on a backhand slice which it does in spades when I was not feeling confident with the two hander.

I did however hit the most amazing two handed backhand with it...a powerful crosscourt passing shot that was well placed. That's the thing with this racquet - I found myself hitting just amazing shots....but it's not like I didn't also make errors. My errors were either mishits, or balls sailing long. I believe I can improve those things with more practice using it and perhaps some string adjustments. But I don't know if I necessarily hit more errors than usual. I may take some video today with it if I can get out , the weather is really nice in Orlando right now
yeah its a great all round stick but it has that same thing the PS85 has... when you really connect it just destroys stuff... far more than youd expect. The adjustments I made were to hiting at 75%-80% on rally balls and still drawing "forced" unforced errors from the heaviness it produces.

I wrote this classic review years ago: https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/angell-tc95-16x19-flexy-shakedown.553138/ detailing my adjustment process
 

Dansan

Semi-Pro
yeah its a great all round stick but it has that same thing the PS85 has... when you really connect it just destroys stuff... far more than youd expect. The adjustments I made were to hiting at 75%-80% on rally balls and still drawing "forced" unforced errors from the heaviness it produces.

I wrote this classic review years ago: https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/angell-tc95-16x19-flexy-shakedown.553138/ detailing my adjustment process

Awesome review, wish I had found it sooner. Do you still use it after the years gone by and trying other frames? I am kind of honeymooning with it at this point, hope it lasts.
 
I was skeptical at first. Didn't buy the hype. But now I'm drinking the TC95 Kool-Aid. Great racquet...has a butt-ton of firepower compared to the K7 Lime at the expense of a little bit of control. Very forgiving for a 95 sq inch frame, it took two sessions to gel with this thing but I haven't even looked at my RF, K7, blade, or PT 280.
Nicely written review! :) Do you notice the 95" - vs 97" headsize of your RF97 etc. - in terms of forgiveness? I'm more comfortable with a 97" headsize, but the beam and flex characteristics of the TC95 sound like they would provide more power, particularly on serve, than the TC97.
 

emhtennis

Professional
Somewhere pretty far back in this thread someone took a photo with both laying on top of each other, and you could barely see a difference.

It almost looks like an even hoop reduction, so having the whole hoop taken in by 1/8in (total guess) doesnt impact the stringbed much.

As everyone else has said, beam difference and flex are the difference. I have a 97 18x20 and love it, but all this 95 talk makes me want one of those now too [emoji33]

And about the serve. I have never served bigger than with my TC97. Used to play with a 1st gen pure strike and on a playsight court my first serve would average 105-108mph. My Angell has me averaging 108-111mph over the course of 2hrs of match play. Everyone does say that the 95 serves the biggest, maybe I'd start putting holes thru walls?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

esm

Legend
Somewhere pretty far back in this thread someone took a photo with both laying on top of each other, and you could barely see a difference.

It almost looks like an even hoop reduction, so having the whole hoop taken in by 1/8in (total guess) doesnt impact the stringbed much.

As everyone else has said, beam difference and flex are the difference. I have a 97 18x20 and love it, but all this 95 talk makes me want one of those now too [emoji33]

And about the serve. I have never served bigger than with my TC97. Used to play with a 1st gen pure strike and on a playsight court my first serve would average 105-108mph. My Angell has me averaging 108-111mph over the course of 2hrs of match play. Everyone does say that the 95 serves the biggest, maybe I'd start putting holes thru walls?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
The grommet fits for both the TC95 and TC97.
i have also fitted one of the TC95/TC97 grommets on K7 Red. So 95/96/98 are very close....8-B
 

Dansan

Semi-Pro
Nicely written review! :) Do you notice the 95" - vs 97" headsize of your RF97 etc. - in terms of forgiveness? I'm more comfortable with a 97" headsize, but the beam and flex characteristics of the TC95 sound like they would provide more power, particularly on serve, than the TC97.

The difference between the two is minimal, I think because the RF has a thicker beam/hoop that the forgiveness is about even between the 95 vs 97 sq in. I had a couple mishits on my first session, but not enough to make me put the racquet down. I would even go so far to say that the TC95 is more forgiving than the RF. It's a touch lighter, swings through the air easier, and has a lot more feel. It doesn't feel like a brick like the RF does. It is def going to be noticeable though for those that are use to hitting 98-100sq in frames.
 
Awesome review, wish I had found it sooner. Do you still use it after the years gone by and trying other frames? I am kind of honeymooning with it at this point, hope it lasts.
The stick has really improved my game. I play a more relaxed and flowing game now and the TC95 is my thing. I have a big game and never ever win ugly because there is enough of that in life... for tennis its nice to bring the thunder and the TC95 is kinda the Thor's hammer of sticks. It forces me to be both patient and at the same time non complacent. If that makes any sense?
 

ChrisG

Professional
The stick has really improved my game. I play a more relaxed and flowing game now and the TC95 is my thing. I have a big game and never ever win ugly because there is enough of that in life... for tennis its nice to bring the thunder and the TC95 is kinda the Thor's hammer of sticks. It forces me to be both patient and at the same time non complacent. If that makes any sense?
I play for the beauty of the sport too, although I’m doing a lot of competition, I don’t mind loosing as long as I had some fun. TC95 is perfect for that, it’s unbelievable how much you can get from this stick if your tennis is generous.
Last week I trained with a friend who’s a former D2 player, and I managed (somehow...) to follow his pace and power mostly thanks to the racquet that allowed me to hit incredible shots with confidence. Power, precision, comfort, I don’t understand why people keep playing with anything else haha
 

skeeter

Professional
I just ordered the ASL2 directly from Angell and looking for to the legendary feel that Angell is known for. I too had to stop playing with the TF40 as it was too firm for my elbow. I just sold most of my racquets. I had the K7 Red but someone made me an offer to sell that could not be refused. The ASL2 appears to be quite unique to anything else on the market.
Including your v7 Blades? Thought you really liked those and they are easy on the elbow.
 

tennis347

Hall of Fame
Including your v7 Blades? Thought you really liked those and they are easy on the elbow.

Yes, I have sold all my racquets. I did like the Blade but enjoy the unique feel more of Angell. My goal is to get to a point where I am just using the same frame and not switching back and forth. There's too much to think about.
 

Classic-TXP-IG MID

Hall of Fame
Yes, I have sold all my racquets. I did like the Blade but enjoy the unique feel more of Angell. My goal is to get to a point where I am just using the same frame and not switching back and forth. There's too much to think about.

I would love to be able to do that but a part of me always wants to try other racquets or go back to the feel of those others I like.

I think that, for me, the TC95 63RA 18x20 is a racquet I could use exclusively and be happy for the rest of my life (I'm also going to be testing many strings for the 16x19 version to find one that allows me to enjoy that string pattern as much as the 18x20 - it will happen, I just haven't put in enough effort as I have so many different racquets and I want to give them all a go... :laughing: :-D :rolleyes:).

Just knowing that I will never be able to hit with my PT630 or RT630 or DR98... or experience the utter scalpel precision of the Phantom Pro 93P, leaves me feeling a longing and slight sadness which prevents me from selling any of my collection.

This has been a confession of a true racquet addict... the urge and longing that the above statement has caused is directly responsible for said addict going to hit the courts... Adios Amigos. :giggle:
 

tennis347

Hall of Fame
I would love to be able to do that but a part of me always wants to try other racquets or go back to the feel of those others I like.

I think that, for me, the TC95 63RA 18x20 is a racquet I could use exclusively and be happy for the rest of my life (I'm also going to be testing many strings for the 16x19 version to find one that allows me to enjoy that string pattern as much as the 18x20 - it will happen, I just haven't put in enough effort as I have so many different racquets and I want to give them all a go... :laughing: :-D :rolleyes:).

Just knowing that I will never be able to hit with my PT630 or RT630 or DR98... or experience the utter scalpel precision of the Phantom Pro 93P, leaves me feeling a longing and slight sadness which prevents me from selling any of my collection.

This has been a confession of a true racquet addict... the urge and longing that the above statement has caused is directly responsible for said addict going to hit the courts... Adios Amigos. :giggle:

I hear what your saying about keeping your collection of racquets. I enjoyed buying racquets and then switching back and forth. But unfortunately for me I can no longer forgo buying racquets constantly due to the financials. I only recently tried an Angell frame and realize how superior they are to most racquets made today IMO. This is why I sold everything, lol. I have to end racketholism. Continue to enjoy all your racquets!
 

Jouke

Professional
I hear what your saying about keeping your collection of racquets. I enjoyed buying racquets and then switching back and forth. But unfortunately for me I can no longer forgo buying racquets constantly due to the financials. I only recently tried an Angell frame and realize how superior they are to most racquets made today IMO. This is why I sold everything, lol. I have to end racketholism. Continue to enjoy all your racquets!
I think we all tried to go down your path. My first racket was the tc95 18x20. Tried a lot of rackets after that. The TC95 is unique. But I noticed just how much easier a lot of other rackets were to play with. I have tried so many other rackets and tried to settle, but i keep trying other things..
 

Brand77

Rookie
I really like my Angel rackets, but can't they engineer some grommets which solve the issue of double blocked holes near the throat?
 

Paul Y

Rookie
I'm in the process of selling my collection of rackets minus my PS85 St. Vincents. My daughter is waiting to see what others say about the TC101 before the commitment.
 
Top