The only 3 men to Complete a Surface

R

Ron5

New User
I wanted to map out the Surface Clean Sweep: winning every "Big Title" (Slam, Masters 1000, and Year-End Finals) PLUS the Olympic Gold on the exact same surface.

Since the ATP has no Masters 1000s on grass, the requirement for that surface is Wimbledon + Olympic Gold + one of the premier ATP 500 lead-up which run concurrently (Queen's or Halle).

Here are the only three men in the Open Era to achieve 100% completion:

1. Hard Court: Andre Agassi
Hard courts offer the most "Big Titles," making them very difficult to sweep. Agassi is the only man to check every box:

Grand Slams: Australian Open & US Open

Olympic Gold: Atlanta 1996 (Hard)

Year-End Finals: ATP Finals (1990)

Masters 1000s: Swept all the major hard-court Masters of his era (Indian Wells, Miami, Canada, Cincinnati, Paris, Madrid).

Note: Novak Djokovic has more hard-court titles but lacks only the Olympic Gold on this surface.

2. Clay Court: Novak Djokovic

With his Paris 2024 Gold Medal at Roland Garros, Djokovic officially "conquered" clay.

Grand Slam: Roland Garros (French Open)

Olympic Gold: Paris 2024 (Clay)

Masters 1000s: Won all three clay masters titles (Monte Carlo, Madrid, Rome).

Note: Nadal is the most prolific winner in clay-court history, but his Olympic Gold (2008) was on hard court, leaving his Clay Titles Set technically incomplete.

3. Grass Court: Andy Murray
Because Queen's and Halle run concurrently, winning either one counts as the "Elite" grass lead-up.

Grand Slam: Wimbledon (2013, 2016)

Olympic Gold: London 2012 (Held on the grass of Centre Court)

The "Grass Master" Requirement: Murray holds the all-time record at Queen's Club with 5 singles titles.

Note: Roger Federer has 10 Halle titles and 8 Wimbledons (Both all time records), but the loss to Murray in the 2012 Olympic Final is the only thing keeping him off this list.


Why your favorite player is missing:

Rafael Nadal (Clay): He has the Slams and the Masters, but his Olympic Gold was in Beijing (Hard).

Roger Federer (Grass/Hard): Missing the Olympic Singles Gold entirely (won Silver in 2012 and Doubles Gold in 2008).

Pete Sampras (Grass): The Olympics weren't held on grass during his time so he never had the opportunity to complete the set
 
Gazelle said:
The Olympics being only every 4 years, combined with the surface choice being so random, makes me wonder what we are supposed to conclude from this. Certainly not that Djokovic is a better claycourter than Nadal.
Click to expand...
Razer said:
Sir Murrey is a better grass courter than Peter and Roger since he completed green grass ?
Click to expand...
OP never said that, I think it's just a cool stat.
 
OG is so overrated. It is a medal, it is patriotic title but nothing beyond that and should not be even counted as "big titles".
No $$, no points, once every 4 years...
 
dr325i said:
OG is so overrated. It is a medal, it is patriotic title but nothing beyond that and should not be even counted as "big titles".
No $$, no points, once every 4 years...
Click to expand...
Why are Slam titles so important then? Reaching a couple of Slam finals and winning a couple of Masters are worth way more money and points than a Slam title.

3888x2916!

images
 
Olympics is such an anomaly in tennis that I don't understand why anyone considers it a "big title". It happens so infrequently, is always on a random surface, and doesn't give any points.
 
duaneeo said:
This was the opinion of Nole fans until he won it.
Click to expand...
My opinion was that Nadal's YEC and Federer's Rome/MC holes were way bigger than Nole's Olympics hole because Nadal and Federer had a chance every year while Nole only every four year.

Anyway this is all in the past because despite it being only every 4 years Nole still managed to win it.
 
Gazelle said:
The Olympics being only every 4 years, combined with the surface choice being so random, makes me wonder what we are supposed to conclude from this. Certainly not that Djokovic is a better claycourter than Nadal.
Click to expand...
This list isn't meant to rank players on a specific surface. Instead, it’s about historical completion.
The surface aligns with the host country's most popular or prestigious courts.
The FIFA world cup is also held once every four years.
It is what it is
 
Ron5 said:
This list isn't meant to rank players on a specific surface. Instead, it’s about historical completion.
The surface aligns with the host country's most popular or prestigious courts.
The FIFA world cup is also held once every four years.
It is what it is
Click to expand...

It's one thing to include the Olympics in a list of overall tennis achievements, but including it within a list of surface-specific achievements means going to much less frequency than once every four years. Since tennis became an Olympic sport again in 1984 (exhibition junior event)/1988 (full medal event), the games have been held on grass once (in 2012), on clay twice (in 1992 and 2024), and on hard courts seven times (in 1988, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2016, and 2021). Thus, most players have not had the opportunity to "complete grass-court tennis" or even to "compete clay-court tennis" and even on hard courts, that's seven attempts in 38 years, which is more like once every five and a half years than once every four years.

Moreover, the Olympics have never been held indoors, so it's impossible for any tennis player to have "completed indoor tennis".
 
helterskelter said:
It's one thing to include the Olympics in a list of overall tennis achievements, but including it within a list of surface-specific achievements means going to much less frequency than once every four years. Since tennis became an Olympic sport again in 1984 (exhibition junior event)/1988 (full medal event), the games have been held on grass once (in 2012), on clay twice (in 1992 and 2024), and on hard courts seven times (in 1988, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2016, and 2021). Thus, most players have not had the opportunity to "complete grass-court tennis" or even to "compete clay-court tennis" and even on hard courts, that's seven attempts in 38 years, which is more like once every five and a half years than once every four years.

Moreover, the Olympics have never been held indoors, so it's impossible for any tennis player to have "completed indoor tennis".
Click to expand...
fed is the only one who completed blue clay!
 
dr325i said:
OG is so overrated. It is a medal, it is patriotic title but nothing beyond that and should not be even counted as "big titles".
No $$, no points, once every 4 years...
Click to expand...

Tennis in the Olympic Games does not award ATP or WTA ranking points. Same with all exhibition events
 
Ron5 said:
1. Hard Court: Andre Agassi
Year-End Finals: ATP Finals (1990)

Masters 1000s: Swept all the major hard-court Masters of his era (Indian Wells, Miami, Canada, Cincinnati, Paris, Madrid).
Click to expand...
The tour finals and Paris-Bercy were both carpet when Agassi won them.

Paris was on carpet from 86-06, so pretty much exactly Andre's entire career, and therefore we can't hold it against him for not winning it on hard courts. But technically we can hold it against him for the YEC. That switched to hard courts in 1997, meaning he had 10 years to win it on HC but never did (0-3 in the finals he made).
 
dr325i said:
Actually, I recall RF and Rafa fans saying -- he cannot be the GOAT until he wins the singles OG (although RF does not have it and never will have it...).
Click to expand...

Exactly, so why would his fans say another player needs it to be the GOAT? Your recall is off.
 
thrust said:
I assume you are kidding-LOL! Grass: Pete, Roger, Novak. Clay: Nadal, Novak, Borg Hard: Pete, Roger, Novak
Click to expand...

Of course I was kidding, I was being Sarcastic.

Murray is in the tier of Roddick and Hewitt on Grass, overall body of work combined yes, they are all in the same tier.

Federer and Sampras can wake up in the middle of the night, beat Murray on grass and then go to sleep, that big a gap exists between them. Djokovic could face some problems vs Murray even on a good day but Novak is better than Murray, no doubt.
 
duaneeo said:
Exactly, so why would his fans say another player needs it to be the GOAT? Your recall is off.
Click to expand...


berceuse everything changed the moment nole got the records!

for some years ago who ever had slam and weeks at no1 records was undisputed GOAT. now it is money, fallowers, pretty stile and other BS!

what made GOAT before does not do it now.

and nole fans said that nole completed tennis and pointed on rafas WTF, paris and miami and feds rome and MC. so they needed to point something nole did not have.

nole fans was mocking fed for 40-15 and fed fans for nole crying after OG.

and many of fed fans pointed that fed had gold in doubles.

..

why fedal fans mocking nole for not having CYGS`? he held all 4 at the same time and it is much more than fedal did! do not search for logic on coping fans.
 
Last edited:
GoatNo1 said:
berceuse everything changed the moment nole got the records!

for some years ago who ever had slam and weeks at no1 records was undisputed GOAT. now it is money, fallowers, pretty stile and other BS!

what made GOAT before does not do it now.

and nole fans said that nole completed tennis and pointed on rafas WTF, paris and miami and feds rome and MC. so they needed to point something nole did not have.

nole fans was mocking fed for 40-15 and fed fans for nole crying after OG.

and many of fed fans pointed that fed had gold in doubles.

..

why fedal fans mocking nole for not having CYGS`? he held all 4 at the same time and it is much more than fedal did! do not search for logic on coping fans.
Click to expand...
ALL TRUE!
 
GoatNo1 said:
berceuse everything changed the moment nole got the records!

for some years ago who ever had slam and weeks at no1 records was undisputed GOAT. now it is money, fallowers, pretty stile and other BS!

what made GOAT before does not do it now.

and nole fans said that nole completed tennis and pointed on rafas WTF, paris and miami and feds rome and MC. so they needed to point something nole did not have.

nole fans was mocking fed for 40-15 and fed fans for nole crying after OG.

and many of fed fans pointed that fed had gold in doubles.

..

why fedal fans mocking nole for not having CYGS`? he held all 4 at the same time and it is much more than fedal did! do not search for logic on coping fans.
Click to expand...

Tha was a whole lot of nothing.
 
dr325i said:
Actually, I recall RF and Rafa fans saying -- he cannot be the GOAT until he wins the singles OG (although RF does not have it and never will have it...).
Once he achieved that in impressive fashion taking out (old and crippled) Rafa and peak Carlos, they found something else to whine about...
Click to expand...
The Olympics has selective importance from all fan bases. Graf and Agassi and even Capriati fans laud it to ridiculous heights. Sampras fans pooh pooh it's importance.
 
Unfortunately for Nadal, the Olympic Games in Paris came in the year of his retirement, when he was almost a former player.
:(
 
Olympics is surface agnostic , another useless thread. TTW need IP verification for every account tbh this is sus activity.
 
dr325i said:
OG is so overrated. It is a medal, it is patriotic title but nothing beyond that and should not be even counted as "big titles".
No $$, no points, once every 4 years...
Click to expand...


That's because it's supposed to represent the Olympic amateur spirit, not because of its importance. Challengers give more money and points, and they are certainly not more important.

Davis Cup was huge, and it also didn't give money and points. It certainly wasn't "overrated".

It's a "big title" just like the YEC is a big title. If not, only slams are big, and the term "big title" is just redundant if it only applies to one category.
 
BauerAlmeida said:
That's because it's supposed to represent the Olympic amateur spirit, not because of its importance. Challengers give more money and points, and they are certainly not more important.

Davis Cup was huge, and it also didn't give money and points. It certainly wasn't "overrated".

It's a "big title" just like the YEC is a big title. If not, only slams are big, and the term "big title" is just redundant if it only applies to one category.
Click to expand...
It cannot be compared to YEC/WTF. Not even close!
 
Olympic Gold does not count unfortunately. Being once every 4 years means it's luck based on which surface you end up with. Nevertheless excellent on Andre, Andy, and Novak's end.
 
BauerAlmeida said:
It certainly can. Both less important than Slams and more important than M1000s.
Click to expand...
OG is in no way more important than the M1000, or anywhere in line with the WTF.
It was not even an Olympic sport before 1988 and for doubles not even 15 years ago!

To qualify for the OG, one of the things is another unimportant event: Players must have represented their nation in at least two Davis Cup or Billie Jean King Cup ties during the four-year Olympic cycle.

Also, only 4 can participate from a single nation, allowing lower ranked players to be automatically qualified (US for example has 10 top 56 players, so 6 spots will be vacant).

YEC/WTF is the tournament that only includes top 8+ backups of the season. Cannot compare the strength and importance of the contest, 1500 points on the line.

Take emotions out, Olympics is irrelevant for tennis. However, once every 4 years event, fighting for your country is a big deal and super emotional win.

It was completely irrelevant until ND took everything else and was missing OG - an excuse to devalue his greatness on these boards.

Only time OG was relevant was when mentioned in the Golden Slam context for Steffi (1988)…
 
dr325i said:
OG is in no way more important than the M1000,
Click to expand...


Ask 10 players if the would prefer to win a M1000 or the OG and 11 will tell you the latter. No contest.


dr325i said:
It was not even an Olympic sport before 1988
Click to expand...

Not very relevant. Football has been an Olympic sport for ages and it's not very relevant in the sport.


dr325i said:
To qualify for the OG, one of the things is another unimportant event: Players must have represented their nation in at least two Davis Cup or Billie Jean King Cup ties during the four-year Olympic cycle.
Click to expand...

Again, this doesn't make it more or less important. There are several similar requirements in the sports in where Olympics are huge. You represent your nation, so you will have that play a major role.


dr325i said:
Also, only 4 can participate from a single nation, allowing lower ranked players to be automatically qualified (US for example has 10 top 56 players, so 6 spots will be vacant).
Click to expand...

dr325i said:
YEC/WTF is the tournament that only includes top 8+ backups of the season. Cannot compare the strength and importance of the contest, 1500 points on the line.
Click to expand...

Again. The Olympics are poor because only 4 from a single nation can participate? By that logic, YEC is poor too. How many per nation participate? Did we ever have more than 4 per nation in a single edition?


dr325i said:
Take emotions out, Olympics is irrelevant for tennis.
Click to expand...

You cannot take emotions out. By that logic, we can say take prize money and points out. The fact that it doesn't give points or money tells you that IT IS important. How many tournaments could get away with that? Do you imagine other tournaments would have players showing up if they didn't give money or points? They wouldn't. If the Olympics do, it is because they are important.



dr325i said:
However, once every 4 years event, fighting for your country is a big deal and super emotional win.
Click to expand...

Exactly, hence why they are important.


dr325i said:
It was completely irrelevant until ND took everything else and was missing OG -
Click to expand...

Not really. They were already important for Nadal when he won. And they were important for Djokovic back in 2008 way before he won everything else and he only won one slam. Federer also targeted the Olympics as a potential retirement date.


dr325i said:
an excuse to devalue his greatness on these boards.
Click to expand...

Yes, that too. But they also devalue the NCYGS, the M1000 record, etc. And it happens with everyone who is missing something. Nadal fans try to act as if YEC is an exho which is ridiculous too.

dr325i said:
Only time OG was relevant was when mentioned in the Golden Slam context for Steffi (1988)…
Click to expand...

If it's mentioned along the slams, then it was important. In fact, the "Golden Slam" is a very popular term and there isn't a similar term for winning the YEC and the 4 slams in the same year.


The importance of an event is given by the players. 5 of the best 6 players of this century mentioned it as very important. Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, Murray, and Alcaraz. Only Sinner didn't, and that may change.

I've never seen a player compare a M1000 with a slam or put it above the Olympics.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

dandelion_smiley
Nadal better on grass or hard courts?
2
Replies
50
Views
6K
dlk
dlk
clout
Djokovic is the only men's player to win every major title in tennis
2
Replies
67
Views
3K
langley
langley
3fees
A Select few Career Titles/Finals 2011-13
Replies
2
Views
801
Def
Def
J
What will be left for other members of Big3 if Djokovic wins one more ATP Finals?
Replies
16
Views
1K
Hitman
Hitman
UnforcedTerror
Prediction: Alexander Zverev will be the second player in tennis history to complete the Golden Masters
2
Replies
70
Views
5K
Enceladus
Enceladus
Back
Top