The Player that brought YOU the most joy in your lifetime

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 763024
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    goat

See title


  • Total voters
    143
Edberg... I patterned my game after his (with MUCH less successful results....heehee). Before Fed, he was the epitome of style, grace, and professionalism on court. I believe, like Fed, he also won a bunch of those Best Sportsman awards.
He used to get a large number of foot-faults (probably a few every match). Reporters would ask him: "Why do you get so many foot-faults?" and he said that his game needed those extra 2 inches (or something like that, I'm paraphrasing). His serve and volley game was like a beautiful, well-oiled machine and he got EVERY inch out of his abundant talents.
 
Don't know about 'joy' but couldn't take my eyes off McEnroe.

You mean his game or him?

He looks better now than when younger. He was a weird combo of curls, chubby/baby face, tight shorts and a volatile temper.
 
Djokovic. Period.

However, Becker and his teenage exploits at Wimbledon was what got me hooked to tennis at a very young age(as in following the sport)
 
mw38v0.gif


:p

Murray massively underrated as a joygiver to tennis fans.

There is something so funky about his game and he really has given us some great moments:

- Trolling Tommy Robredo while beating him in consecutive matches saving 5 match points in each match

- His dismantling of Milos Raonic in the W2016F, probably the definitive exhibition of R. O. S. at its absolute best on grass.

- His early mastering of Roger Federer at m1000 level.

- CLAYRAY, his rare alter ego capable of beating Nadal and Djokovic in spectacular fashion on red brick
 
Federer. I started following tennis in the Sampras Agassi era, liked them both while favoring Andre more. When Federer came to power somehow his level felt like a level above all those previous greats. His ability of taking control of a neutral rally within 2 or 3 shots was really eye opening. In 2005 or 2006 there was a NYT tennis column deeming watching Fed play was a “religious” experience, which was an exaggeration but the fact that term was used says a lot of the prime Fed.

How many slams would Fed hold now if there weren’t Nadal and Djokovic? We are looking at ridiculous numbers like 30 or even 40. We should thank Nadal and Djokovic for saving tennis from a one man show. But they never reached the greatness scale like Fed did (and they are already old). I can understand why the younger tennis fans who didn’t experience Fed’s prime think Rafa and Novak are the best, but I know the reason was they didn’t watch Fed like when he was ruling the field.


I strted watching tennis after 2002 Sampras win.. And i have watched most grand slams finals of Federer, as my elder bro is big Federer fan..
But I like djokovic, my Dad likes Nadal.
It's not that If someone likes djokovic or Nadal then they have not watched peak Federer..
I think it's all about personal preference..
 
It's not that If someone likes djokovic or Nadal then they have not watched peak Federer..
I think it's all about personal preference..

Absolutely! I have played and watched tennis since the days of Rosewall, Laver etc., But no-one has given me that absolute joy in watching tennis as Nadal has and still does. Every match is an emotional roller coaster, but it's well worth the ride.
 
I strted watching tennis after 2002 Sampras win.. And i have watched most grand slams finals of Federer, as my elder bro is big Federer fan..
But I like djokovic, my Dad likes Nadal.
It's not that If someone likes djokovic or Nadal then they have not watched peak Federer..
I think it's all about personal preference..
True of course, especially for those tennis fans who truly appreciate the sports. It is like each generation has their favorite bands. However you can find Beatles fans in all the new generations.
 
Absolutely! I have played and watched tennis since the days of Rosewall, Laver etc., But no-one has given me that absolute joy in watching tennis as Nadal has and still does. Every match is an emotional roller coaster, but it's well worth the ride.

Very true..
As a kid I always cheered for Federer, as my elder brother used to fanatically cheer for Federer..
But once I saw Djokovic play during 2007-08 he became my favourite..
Maybe its just a natural selection..
People like the Sportsman as per their personality or mentality ..
 
True of course, especially for those tennis fans who truly appreciate the sports. It is like each generation has their favorite bands. However you can find Beatles fans in all the new generations.
I like the longevity...and lineage of bands, athletes, and seeing the common threads.
Like kramer to laver to mac to pete to roger to stefanos and shapo.
Like mid century American blues to the Beatles, to just about every band including Black Sabbath and Led Zeppelin....to bowie, the clash, u2, the cult, the smiths, happy mondays, stone roses, REM, the pixies....to the pumpkins, nirvana, blur and oasis (a cracking good beatles tribute act, right?)
 
Edberg... His serve and volley game was like a beautiful, well-oiled machine and he got EVERY inch out of his abundant talents.

I don't know if you ever got a chance to see him in person from just a few feet away.
But if you did you would have seen the most graceful, light-footed, ballerina-like mover of all tennis
players!
 
Murray massively underrated as a joygiver to tennis fans.

There is something so funky about his game and he really has given us some great moments:

- Trolling Tommy Robredo while beating him in consecutive matches saving 5 match points in each match

- His dismantling of Milos Raonic in the W2016F, probably the definitive exhibition of R. O. S. at its absolute best on grass.

- His early mastering of Roger Federer at m1000 level.

- CLAYRAY, his rare alter ego capable of beating Nadal and Djokovic in spectacular fashion on red brick

Not a Murray fan but I do love the way he makes a mockery of servebots :)
 
Not a Murray fan but I do love the way he makes a mockery of servebots :)
Well put. Muzzer is miserable, but also smart and realleh funneh.
His game looks uninteresting, but returns and passes like a genius.
His gameplan is often defensive, but he has touch on the level of McEnRíos.
Cannot believe I'm writing this but.... yeh.... Murray. Joy.
 
It has to be the Muzziah. Andre Agassi was childhood sweetheart.
Uuuhhhm. Ya, it's graet...it's uuhhm, an honorr to be mentioned...as sometheng...positev reound here. Usualleh, I'm realleh just a sleep aid for moast people. But you lot, herre at the Tennus wareheouce forrums, you're realleh makin me mum happeh sayin im a source of joy. It's realleh realleh graet. Thenk yeww. Thank yew oll.
 
Back
Top