Amen786
Semi-Pro
Ah. So did you understand their urdu lyrics?Of course. Rafi and Kumar were like the Beatles and the Stones in their media invented rivalry in the 70s. I'm no expert, but I preferred Kumar.
Ah. So did you understand their urdu lyrics?Of course. Rafi and Kumar were like the Beatles and the Stones in their media invented rivalry in the 70s. I'm no expert, but I preferred Kumar.
I don't speak or understand any of the languages of the Indian subcontinent, I'm afraid. But I must say, for someone who doesn't understand English you're doing a remarkable job conversing with me.Ah. So did you understand their urdu lyrics?
Lol actually 90 percent of your post is rubbish based on personal preference hahahaahCall me when Novak is a Billionaire
Call me when Novak is not booed
Call me when Novak has 8 Wimbledons
Call me when Novak has 5 US opens
Call me when Novak has the most matches won in this century
Call me when Novak has the most titles won in this century
Call me when Novak has 6 WTFs
Call me when Novak has an impressive semi finals streak of at least 20+ in slams
Call me when Novak has a peak where he made 19 slams and made the finals in 18 of them
Call me when Novak is considered the GOAT in the media by the majority
Actually don't bother, you never will ......
Lol what!!I don't speak or understand any of the languages of the Indian subcontinent, I'm afraid. But I must say, for someone who doesn't understand English you're doing a remarkable job conversing with me.
Weak era chump!
Lol what?
How am I supposed to listen to something when I can't understand 90% of the lyrics?
I was listening to bands like Abba, Bee Gees, Modern Talking, Def Leppard etc when I was a kid and I had no idea about EnglishLol what?
How am I supposed to listen to something when I can't understand 90% of the lyrics?
Like anybody else does listening to music in other languages than their own. Or like they listen to instrumental music. It's music, not reading a book.
I was listening to bands Abba, Bee Gees, Modern Talking, Def Leppard etc when I was a kid and I had no idea about English![]()
Weak era chump!![]()
Lol actually 90 percent of your post is rubbish based on personal preference hahahaah
Bye call me when weak era champ wins 2 RG and 9 AO but dont wrry i will call you when the actual Goat reaches 8 wimblies and 5 Uso))))
Forgot to add that i will call you soon about WTF haahahahahah
It is not Djokovic's fault if federer lets him off the hook from winning positions everytime in the 3 of the 4 latest grandslam finals they played.2 RGs won vs old nadal have as much value as Fed's fluke RG.
9 AOs are impressive but don't matter a lot because Fed has more USOs and wimbledons, so Fed is ahead in the 2 most important slams.
It is not Djokovic's fault if federer lets him off the hook from winning positions everytime in the 3 of the 4 latest grandslam finals they played.
Its also not Djokovic's fault if young players can't finish him off.
I was talking about your 40-15 manYup, he face berretini, medvedev, tsitsi, old fed, old nadal types ......indeed novak is the weak era chump
I was talking about *******![]()
Federer's biggest negative point is his inability to close out biggest moments in biggest matches with his biggest weapons (forehand & serve). Its usually these two shots which faulter for no reason, despite delivering deadly blows all match.I was talking about your 40-15 man![]()
Not a prophet or a stone aged man, just a mortal with potential of a superman.
Yet Federer has over 25 plus people who lead him in the H2H and Novak has only 11. Federer losing to chumps like tsonga, delpo and berdych in his prime at Wimbledon and us open. You of course ignore this? Federer losing to safin in Australia 2005 as well.Doesn't matter, everyone knows who is the weakest champ of them all, surrendered to pigeons at his peak, has a losing h2h to Safin and Roddick, got booted out of USO like some second grade chump .... thats novak, the true weak era chump
Easy for you to say.From God-complex-bottle-fed son of a ski instructor fitted with a distinct Napoleon complex to motherly-appointed Kingslayer to Nietzschean ubermensch who - acting as transcendental carnifex - eventually ends God himself; that's one hell of an epic character arc.
Yet Federer has over 25 plus people who lead him in the H2H and Novak has only 11. Federer losing to chumps like tsonga, delpo and berdych in his prime at Wimbledon and us open. You of course ignore this? Federer losing to safin in Australia 2005 as well.
Or both.This is clearly a thread for Novak aficionados. Decent Federer fans would just snub it. Otherwise, they look sour - or right out dumb.
I can see you dont understand the difference between being the best and being the most popular. What is silly is that someone needs to explain you this over and over again, but you still dont comprehend.I didn't bring up Federer, just pointing out that it's quite silly to compare him to McDonalds.
I can see you dont understand the difference between being the best and being the most popular. What is silly is that someone needs to explain you this over and over again, but you still dont comprehend.
Well, you were the one who handed the say to me on a tasty plate, hence I just couldn't keep away from it.Easy for you to say.
Nevermind. I promise I will concentrate my hate only in this one.A Djokovic thread was started and 30 minutes in it has been flooded by haters.
Rent free. Obsessed. Closeted fans.
Of course. Rafi and Kumar were like the Beatles and the Stones in their media invented rivalry in the 70s. I'm no expert, but I preferred Kumar.
Indian music doesn't use the Western 12 tone equal temperament scales, so it sounds very strange to our ears. It uses a variety of different scales I believe. I remember an Indian musician showing me a scale with 22 notes.Have heard that style of singing on the radio. It seems like they are not using the standard Western musical scale. They are singing a lot of quarter tones. Correct?
Indian music doesn't use the Western 12 tone equal temperament scales, so it sounds very strange to our ears. It uses a variety of different scales I believe. I remember an Indian musician showing me a scale with 22 notes.
George could have coped...Indian music uses both the Western scale (most of the silly Bollywood films?) and non-Western scales. Some singers sound like they are singing a lot of quarter tones. Their voices still sound pleasing. But don't think Mick and Paul could sing like that. They are used to singing 12 tones.
George could have coped...
MOST POPULAR RESTAURANT IN THE WORLD
2003 McDonald's
2004 McDonald's
2005 McDonald's
2006 McDonald's
2007 McDonald's
2008 McDonald's
2009 McDonald's
2010 McDonald's
2011 McDonald's
2012 McDonald's
2013 McDonald's
2014 McDonald's
2015 McDonald's
2016 McDonald's
2017 McDonald's
2018 McDonald's
2019 McDonald's
2020 McDonald's
Again, this thread is about players who were good enough to be in a position to win the Grand Slam, not players who failed to get past the second leg. Please stop posting off-topic.
We play matches for the crowd and the crowd form opinions, stats are like residue, nobody cares for stats once opinions are formed.
GOAT = A subjective Opinion shared by people
Whoever has the majority of people forms the narrative of being the GOAT.
So unless Novak has most fans he cannot become the GOAT, his influence on Tennis is very less.
Opinions are formed and based on stats first.
A Federer with 10 GS and 4 billion fans would never become the GOAT. And if social media existed in the 90s then Agassi would have probably crushed any player when it comes to fanbase and followers but Sampras was the one dominating the tour, not Andre.
Agassi is a more complete player than Sampras.
Had he focussed more in his early years then he would have had 10-12 slams and had the courts been like the modern day then Agassi would have been on 15 slams and Pete would be on 10 slams.