The Quest for THE GRAND SLAM: The Final Leg

Call me when Novak is a Billionaire
Call me when Novak is not booed
Call me when Novak has 8 Wimbledons
Call me when Novak has 5 US opens
Call me when Novak has the most matches won in this century
Call me when Novak has the most titles won in this century
Call me when Novak has 6 WTFs
Call me when Novak has an impressive semi finals streak of at least 20+ in slams
Call me when Novak has a peak where he made 19 slams and made the finals in 18 of them
Call me when Novak is considered the GOAT in the media by the majority

Actually don't bother, you never will ......
Lol actually 90 percent of your post is rubbish based on personal preference hahahaah



Bye call me when weak era champ wins 2 RG and 9 AO but dont wrry i will call you when the actual Goat reaches 8 wimblies and 5 Uso :)))))

Forgot to add that i will call you soon about WTF haahahahahah
 
I don't speak or understand any of the languages of the Indian subcontinent, I'm afraid. But I must say, for someone who doesn't understand English you're doing a remarkable job conversing with me.
Lol what!!
I never said I don't understand English. But not being native in it makes it so much difficult to catch up with lyrics.
 
240856133_2638231669656647_1992314835940967677_n.jpg
Weak era chump! :p
 
Lol what?
How am I supposed to listen to something when I can't understand 90% of the lyrics?
I was listening to bands like Abba, Bee Gees, Modern Talking, Def Leppard etc when I was a kid and I had no idea about English :D
 
Last edited:
Like anybody else does listening to music in other languages than their own. Or like they listen to instrumental music. It's music, not reading a book.
I was listening to bands Abba, Bee Gees, Modern Talking, Def Leppard etc when I was a kid and I had no idea about English :D

Vengaboys is my all time favourite album in non-south asian music. Has a kind of thrill to it & I use it for exercise times in past and even today at times. Though I still don't get lyrics lol.

But other than that and opera , I'm really not quite fan of non-south asian music.
 
Breaking the slam record and doing the CYGS at the same time is just awe-inspiring to think about. If not the Murray dream (that will be over today, most likely) then I'm wishing him the best of luck to do it.
 
Lol actually 90 percent of your post is rubbish based on personal preference hahahaah



Bye call me when weak era champ wins 2 RG and 9 AO but dont wrry i will call you when the actual Goat reaches 8 wimblies and 5 Uso :)))))

Forgot to add that i will call you soon about WTF haahahahahah

2 RGs won vs old nadal have as much value as Fed's fluke RG.
9 AOs are impressive but don't matter a lot because Fed has more USOs and wimbledons, so Fed is ahead in the 2 most important slams.
 
2 RGs won vs old nadal have as much value as Fed's fluke RG.
9 AOs are impressive but don't matter a lot because Fed has more USOs and wimbledons, so Fed is ahead in the 2 most important slams.
It is not Djokovic's fault if federer lets him off the hook from winning positions everytime in the 3 of the 4 latest grandslam finals they played.
Its also not Djokovic's fault if young players can't finish him off.
 
It is not Djokovic's fault if federer lets him off the hook from winning positions everytime in the 3 of the 4 latest grandslam finals they played.
Its also not Djokovic's fault if young players can't finish him off.

Is it @Strale 's fault that Hapthor is not the only guy who can lift in the range of 500 ?
Found this video, even this guy did it apart from Hapthor and Eddie hall ..

 
Not a prophet or a stone aged man, just a mortal with potential of a superman.

From God-complex-bottle-fed son of a ski instructor fitted with a distinct Napoleon complex to motherly-appointed Kingslayer to Nietzschean ubermensch who - acting as transcendental carnifex - eventually ends God himself; that's one hell of an epic character arc.
 
Doesn't matter, everyone knows who is the weakest champ of them all, surrendered to pigeons at his peak, has a losing h2h to Safin and Roddick, got booted out of USO like some second grade chump .... thats novak, the true weak era chump
Yet Federer has over 25 plus people who lead him in the H2H and Novak has only 11. Federer losing to chumps like tsonga, delpo and berdych in his prime at Wimbledon and us open. You of course ignore this? Federer losing to safin in Australia 2005 as well.
 
From God-complex-bottle-fed son of a ski instructor fitted with a distinct Napoleon complex to motherly-appointed Kingslayer to Nietzschean ubermensch who - acting as transcendental carnifex - eventually ends God himself; that's one hell of an epic character arc.
Easy for you to say.
 
Yet Federer has over 25 plus people who lead him in the H2H and Novak has only 11. Federer losing to chumps like tsonga, delpo and berdych in his prime at Wimbledon and us open. You of course ignore this? Federer losing to safin in Australia 2005 as well.

Yet Federer is one who is regarded by many as the GOAT while your inferior boy is booed and considered second grade.
We play matches for the crowd and the crowd form opinions, stats are like residue, nobody cares for stats once opinions are formed.
The ones in minority like you should know that the majority feel Fed is the GOAT for a reason and that is the endgame !
 
This is clearly a thread for Novak aficionados. Decent Federer fans would just snub it. Otherwise, they look sour - or right out dumb.
 
I didn't bring up Federer, just pointing out that it's quite silly to compare him to McDonalds.
[/QUOTE]
I can see you dont understand the difference between being the best and being the most popular. What is silly is that someone needs to explain you this over and over again, but you still dont comprehend.
 
I didn't bring up Federer, just pointing out that it's quite silly to compare him to McDonalds.
I can see you dont understand the difference between being the best and being the most popular. What is silly is that someone needs to explain you this over and over again, but you still dont comprehend.
[/QUOTE]

When did I say Federer was the best? Sad how easily some people become confused.
 
FIRST ROUND

1933 JACK CRAWFORD (Australia)
Crawford didn't want to play the US Championship. He was exhausted after five months on the road and 13 straight tournament wins in a row, but his home association was paid a $1500 guarantee by the USLTA, so he had to play.

He had the easiest of starts: a bye in the first round. The sixteen seeds all made it safely through.

New York Times columnist John Kiernan wrote: 'If Crawford wins, it would be something like scoring a grand slam on the courts"

The Grand Slam was born.
 
Last edited:
I can see you dont understand the difference between being the best and being the most popular. What is silly is that someone needs to explain you this over and over again, but you still dont comprehend.

When did I say Federer was the best? Sad how easily some people become confused.
[/QUOTE]
Then its fine. I say Djokovic is the best player of all time and Federer the most popular. Then we are in agreement. Federer is by far the most popular tennis player ever. Also Danielle Steel is one of the best seeling and popular authors in history, but I dont read her books, I preffer Dostoyevsky.
 
Last edited:
FIRST ROUND

1938 DONALD BUDGE (USA)
Budge had been suffering from flu -at one point he lost his voice - but he got off to the easiest of starts at Forest Hills, a bye in the First Round.

4th international seed Destremau of France was the only seed to lose in this round.
 
Last edited:
Djokovic has that final leg in the bag, as in winner winner chicken dinner…err… lentil dinner.

Put a fork in the GS record, this will be a done deal after he starts tomorrow. Watch history in the making, it will be a routine 2 weeks, book it!
 
FIRST ROUND

1956 LEW HOAD (Australia)

The Diamond Jubilee year of the US Championships at Forest Hills saw Hoad comfortably beat Walraven(USA) 6-0, 6-2, 6-0 in the opening round.

All of the seeds made it safely through to the second round.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NAS
FIRST ROUND

1962 ROD LAVER (Australia)
Don Budge invited Laver to spend a day in the Catskills before the tournament -even playing a couple of sets with him. It got the rocket in tune; he won his first round match comfortably, 6-2, 6-3, 6-2 against Davidman of Israel.

There were no shocks in the first round. All the seeds were safely through.
 
Last edited:
FIRST ROUND

1969 ROD LAVER (Australia)
The Rocket prepared for his tilt at a unique Double Grand Slam by knocking up and listening to albums (Aretha Franklin, Dave Brubeck, Jose Feliciano) with New Zealand Davis Cup player, John McDonald.

Laver won easily 6-2, 6-4, 6-2 against Garcia of Mexico in his first match.

Meanwhile, Ken Rosewall survived a 5 set thriller but 8th seed, Drysdale, and 5th seed, Okker, were shock losers in the first round.
 
Of course. Rafi and Kumar were like the Beatles and the Stones in their media invented rivalry in the 70s. I'm no expert, but I preferred Kumar.

Have heard that style of singing on the radio. It seems like they are not using the standard Western musical scale. They are singing a lot of quarter tones. Correct?
 
Have heard that style of singing on the radio. It seems like they are not using the standard Western musical scale. They are singing a lot of quarter tones. Correct?
Indian music doesn't use the Western 12 tone equal temperament scales, so it sounds very strange to our ears. It uses a variety of different scales I believe. I remember an Indian musician showing me a scale with 22 notes.
 
Indian music doesn't use the Western 12 tone equal temperament scales, so it sounds very strange to our ears. It uses a variety of different scales I believe. I remember an Indian musician showing me a scale with 22 notes.

Indian music uses both the Western scale (most of the silly Bollywood films?) and non-Western scales. Some singers sound like they are singing a lot of quarter tones. Their voices still sound pleasing. But don't think Mick and Paul could sing like that. They are used to singing 12 tones.
 
Indian music uses both the Western scale (most of the silly Bollywood films?) and non-Western scales. Some singers sound like they are singing a lot of quarter tones. Their voices still sound pleasing. But don't think Mick and Paul could sing like that. They are used to singing 12 tones.
George could have coped...
 
George could have coped...

Backing instruments like sitar naturally produce quarter tones. It is true. But it is not clear that George is singing quarter tones. The vocal is still using the 12 tones found in Western. Not quarter tones.

The melody conforms to the pitches of Mixolydian mode, or its Indian equivalent, the Kham. Musicologist Dominic Pedler writes that the tune features unusual tritone intervals, which, together with the musical arrangement, ensure that the song is far removed from standard "pop tunes". In a further departure from Harrison's previous forays into Indian music, both of which made extensive use of single-chord drone, the melody allows for formal chord changes: over the verses, the dominant E♭ major alternates with F minor, before a move to A♭ over the line "The farther one travels the less one knows".​
In the opening words ("Without going out"), the melody uses what Pedler terms a "hauntingly modal" G-B♭-D♭ tritone progression as, within the song's tonic key (of E♭), the 3rd note heads towards the flat 7th.[39] Musicologist Walter Everett likens this ascending arpeggiation of the diminished triad to a melodic feature in "Within You Without You" (over that song's recurring phrase "We were talking").[41]
"The Inner Light" is an example of Harrison creating ambiguity about the tonic key, a technique that Pedler recognises as a characteristic of Harrison's spiritually oriented songwriting​
 
MOST POPULAR RESTAURANT IN THE WORLD

2003 McDonald's
2004 McDonald's
2005 McDonald's
2006 McDonald's
2007 McDonald's
2008 McDonald's
2009 McDonald's
2010 McDonald's
2011 McDonald's
2012 McDonald's
2013 McDonald's
2014 McDonald's
2015 McDonald's
2016 McDonald's
2017 McDonald's
2018 McDonald's
2019 McDonald's
2020 McDonald's

Yep--garbage is often most popular, it has nothing to do with quality or importance--similar to tennis players.
 
Again, this thread is about players who were good enough to be in a position to win the Grand Slam, not players who failed to get past the second leg. Please stop posting off-topic.

Some people are so rattled and insecure about players such as Federer (who was forced into this thread) who failed to win the Grand Slam, that they have to post meaningless stats as a last ditch effort to give him "credits".
 
FIRST ROUND

2021 NOVAK DJOKOVIC (Serbia)
Top seed, Djokovic, played no warm up tournaments before his attempt at the Grand Slam at Flushing Meadows.

His first round opponent was 18 year old Dane, Holger Rune (former French Junior champion), ranked 145 in the world. Djokovic struggled in the second set but came through 6-1, 6-7, 6-2, 6-1

Former US champions Murray and Cilic lost in the first round, alongside seeds Carreño Busta, de Minaur, Isner, Sonego, Humbert, Khachanov, Norris, Goffin, Fognini, Fokina and Krajinovic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NAS
We play matches for the crowd and the crowd form opinions, stats are like residue, nobody cares for stats once opinions are formed.

Opinions are formed and based on stats first.


GOAT = A subjective Opinion shared by people

Whoever has the majority of people forms the narrative of being the GOAT.

So unless Novak has most fans he cannot become the GOAT, his influence on Tennis is very less.

A Federer with 10 GS and 4 billion fans would never become the GOAT. And if social media existed in the 90s then Agassi would have probably crushed any player when it comes to fanbase and followers but Sampras was the one dominating the tour, not Andre.
 
Opinions are formed and based on stats first.




A Federer with 10 GS and 4 billion fans would never become the GOAT. And if social media existed in the 90s then Agassi would have probably crushed any player when it comes to fanbase and followers but Sampras was the one dominating the tour, not Andre.


Agassi is a more complete player than Sampras.

Had he focussed more in his early years then he would have had 10-12 slams and had the courts been like the modern day then Agassi would have been on 15 slams and Pete would be on 10 slams.

Agassi rocks !!!
 
Agassi is a more complete player than Sampras.

If this were football we could say things like this about certain players but tennis is an individual sport and the fact is that Sampras is way above Agassi in terms of overall success and h2h stats.

Had he focussed more in his early years then he would have had 10-12 slams and had the courts been like the modern day then Agassi would have been on 15 slams and Pete would be on 10 slams.

You mean had Agassi been a woman he would have played against Steffi.

The fact that the courts were much more diverse and the players played different styles then means it was a lot tougher to play Roland Garros first and 3 weeks later Wimbledon.
 
Back
Top