The reason why not everyone can see Novak's greatness.

Captain Grant

Semi-Pro
Djockovic posses an excellence that just doesn't seem special. as crazy as that sounds, its how i feel.
The reason why Novak is getting a little bit underrated is because his game isn’t too powerful, but since it's so great in terms of accurate placement he does exactly the right damage just on the edge of needed power/precision to make his opponents struggle. I'm not surprised that it could be too tough for average Joe to get this greatness and see the line between goat tennis and non-goat tennis unless the line is too flashy like during USO-11 final when Novak was smacking every ball(hello to the guys like tennis_pro claiming Novak was impressive only in 2011), but he doesn’t really need to always play this style because by it certainly wouldn't be a smart choice regarding physical/mental economy of resources, so in reality Djokovic dominates the sport spending less energy than any other opponent which is confirmed by professionals.

Informative part of Obradovic's interview on the topic:


Talking of his time with Djokovic, who is now coached by Marian Vajda and, of course, Boris Becker, Obradovic says the World No. 1 had fitness issues early in his career.

"The good thing was that he was naturally elastic. So we developed an exercise regimen and made sure we didn't destroy that aspect of his body. Look, most tennis players are strong and powerful. But they are not agile. They don't possess elastic energy. This is not American football or rugby. In tennis, you need to have elastic energy," he explains.

"By using your elastic energy, you tend to spend less energy during matches. This helps you recover faster. No one knows your tank capacity; how much gasoline you have. I can tell you Novak spends less energy than any other player on the Tour. That's why is so fit. That's why he is No. 1.''

Gencic's and Djokovic's view on the topic:

And another part of In an interview in Belgrade in 2010, Gencic said she took great care not to overburden Djokovic.

“You know Novak was not too strong a boy,” Gencic said. “You know how he is now elastic and flexible. Do you know why? It’s because I didn’t want to work too hard with him.”

Gencic held up her racket. “This,” she said, “is the heaviest thing he had to handle. We only worked on his legs, his quickness, only fitness on the court, not in the weight room. We stretched and did special movements for tennis, to be flexible, to be agile and to be fast and with the legs. And now he’s excellent, excellent, excellent.”

Djokovic said Gencic’s approach was always long-term.

“Jelena was one of the people that had a huge impact and huge influence on that part of let’s say my profession, being flexible and taking care of my elasticity of the muscles,” he said Saturday. “Because she taught me and convinced me that if I stayed flexible, not only will I be able to move well around the court and be able to recover well after the matches, but also I’ll be able to have a long career.”
 
That makes a lot of sense and may explain how he's likely to have even greater longevity than Federer.
 
Simply, Djokovic is a counterpuncher (like Hewitt/Murray), and I or many others don't like watching that style of play. He is an awesome counterpuncher, sure, but for me watching that style of play is dull.

And all tennis players have that "elastic energy". Any explosive muscle power is based on that, just google "stretch shortening cycle" for more.
 
Simply, Djokovic is a counterpuncher (like Hewitt/Murray), and I or many others don't like watching that style of play. He is an awesome counterpuncher, sure, but for me watching that style of play is dull.

And all tennis players have that "elastic energy". Any explosive muscle power is based on that, just google "stretch shortening cycle" for more.
I'm just gonna ignore your first paragraph, which is obviously weak era trolling and would like to address the second one. Even if everyone has that elastic energy, Djokovic has more. That's the point of the post.
 
That makes a lot of sense and may explain how he's likely to have even greater longevity than Federer.
=Look, most tennis players are strong and powerful. But they are not agile. They don't possess elastic energy. This is not American football or rugby. In tennis, you need to have elastic energy=

For some reason after reading this I immediately thought about Bull's declince. Do you see the connection? Even though Nadal is extremely agile, but still.
rafa-muscles-rafael-nadal-15699359-1537-1024.jpg
 
No one appreciated lendl either. He is still to this day the least appreciated great player. And for similar reasons. He uprooted the status quo supplanted players like mac and conners was from a strange eastern european country and played a brutal but effective if not super entertaining style. And was incredibly consistent.Joker does have a better personality however.
 
Last edited:
You play to your strengths and I'm glad Novak's team didn't try to push him to be something that he maybe naturally wasn't suited (in this case, power) for so they looked at his flexibility and decided to exploit it and eventually become the player that he is. It makes him unique in this regard because some of the things Novak does on the court just seems impossible like the way he stretches and slides around the court to get balls back in play. I've seen hundreds of his matches and the amount of would-be winners he gets back is crazy.

Once he built this type of foundation then everything else clicked in.

It won him 10 slams and 60 titles, he and us fans don't have any regrets. There's no question he's an ATG, this shouldn't even be up for discussion at this point.
 
The reason why Novak is getting a little bit underrated is because his game isn’t too powerful, but since it's so great in terms of accurate placement he does exactly the right damage just on the edge of needed power/precision to make his opponents struggle. I'm not surprised that it could be too tough for average Joe to get this greatness and see the line between goat tennis and non-goat tennis unless the line is too flashy like during USO-11 final when Novak was smacking every ball(hello to the guys like tennis_pro claiming Novak was impressive only in 2011), but he doesn’t really need to always play this style because by it certainly wouldn't be a smart choice regarding physical/mental economy of resources, so in reality Djokovic dominates the sport spending less energy than any other opponent which is confirmed by professionals.

Informative part of Obradovic's interview on the topic:


Talking of his time with Djokovic, who is now coached by Marian Vajda and, of course, Boris Becker, Obradovic says the World No. 1 had fitness issues early in his career.

"The good thing was that he was naturally elastic. So we developed an exercise regimen and made sure we didn't destroy that aspect of his body. Look, most tennis players are strong and powerful. But they are not agile. They don't possess elastic energy. This is not American football or rugby. In tennis, you need to have elastic energy," he explains.

"By using your elastic energy, you tend to spend less energy during matches. This helps you recover faster. No one knows your tank capacity; how much gasoline you have. I can tell you Novak spends less energy than any other player on the Tour. That's why is so fit. That's why he is No. 1.''

Gencic's and Djokovic's view on the topic:

And another part of In an interview in Belgrade in 2010, Gencic said she took great care not to overburden Djokovic.

“You know Novak was not too strong a boy,” Gencic said. “You know how he is now elastic and flexible. Do you know why? It’s because I didn’t want to work too hard with him.”

Gencic held up her racket. “This,” she said, “is the heaviest thing he had to handle. We only worked on his legs, his quickness, only fitness on the court, not in the weight room. We stretched and did special movements for tennis, to be flexible, to be agile and to be fast and with the legs. And now he’s excellent, excellent, excellent.”

Djokovic said Gencic’s approach was always long-term.

“Jelena was one of the people that had a huge impact and huge influence on that part of let’s say my profession, being flexible and taking care of my elasticity of the muscles,” he said Saturday. “Because she taught me and convinced me that if I stayed flexible, not only will I be able to move well around the court and be able to recover well after the matches, but also I’ll be able to have a long career.”
UH, yea, yea, blah, blah, blah...

basically, your guy just isn't that exciting! Excellent, but not exciting.

that's pretty much it, thanks...

the Floyd Mayweather of tennis, with a more wholesome personal life (hopefully)!
 
Always thought Novak was made of elastic. This article confirms all my suspicions!

He's the original Rubber Band Boy!

;)
 
You play to your strengths and I'm glad Novak's team didn't try to push him to be something that he maybe naturally wasn't suited (in this case, power) for so they looked at his flexibility and decided to exploit it and eventually become the player that he is. It makes him unique in this regard because some of the things Novak does on the court just seems impossible like the way he stretches and slides around the court to get balls back in play. I've seen hundreds of his matches and the amount of would-be winners he gets back is crazy.

Once he built this type of foundation then everything else clicked in.

It won him 10 slams and 60 titles, he and us fans don't have any regrets. There's no question he's an ATG, this shouldn't even be up for discussion at this point.
Novak isn't ATG anymore. He's GTA. The boss of the tour. Tony Montana of Vice City.
UH, yea, yea, blah, blah, blah...

basically, your guy just isn't that exciting! Excellent, but not exciting.

that's pretty much it, thanks...

the Floyd Mayweather of tennis, with a more wholesome personal life (hopefully)!
You're confusing "greatness" with "excitement". Nobody is denying his greatness, it's just super dull to watch.
You don't enjoy the excitement of Djokovic play because he's playing with his opponents like a cat with a mouse, so you never know what to expect from him which confuses and frustrates you more than watching Fed or Nadal who are way more predictable. Observing Djokovic's tennis is a mystical experience that leads to the enlightenment. Not everyone is ready to push the limits of his mind, that's why more conservative human beings like you aren't mentally mature enough for Djokovic's new age tennis.
 
You don't enjoy the excitement of Djokovic play because he's playing with his opponents like a cat with a mouse, so you never know what to expect from him which confuses and frustrates you more than watching Fed or Nadal who are way more predictable. Observing Djokovic's tennis is a mystical experience that leads to the enlightenment. Not everyone is ready to push the limits of his mind, that's why more conservative human beings like you aren't mentally mature enough for Djokovic's new age tennis.

I've read it all now.
 
He is a freak of nature. tall, inhumanly flexible, incredibly quick. that's unbeatable in any sport.

this can be shown when he loses balance or slips: his body folded like laptop, somehow incredibly spring back quickly, then stretch like snake and hit incredable winner paiting line (federer match).

he is doing something humanly impossible.
 
Back
Top