D
Deleted member 798069
Guest
Those 5-setters at the US Open tricked some into believing Alcaraz was ready to win slams. Nah, he doesn't have the body to be a regular slam winner.
He'll sneak a couple more slams in his career maybe, as he did last year with 5-set victories over the almost retired Cilic, choker Sinner, and non-factor Tiafoe.
And people thought Federer's backhand struggled with the high ball, Alcaraz is far worse, looked totally lost on that wing and was made to run around the ball too often.
That's another thing, David Ferrer said Rune is the best mover on clay since Rafael Nadal, and yesterday was an example of why Alcaraz is not - very unsteady on his feet, and messy footwork.
Thank God I'm a Rune fan, because this Alcaraz has no future in terms of winning slams regularly.... while Rune shortens the points expertly, and doesn't get injured.
He'll sneak a couple more slams in his career maybe, as he did last year with 5-set victories over the almost retired Cilic, choker Sinner, and non-factor Tiafoe.
And people thought Federer's backhand struggled with the high ball, Alcaraz is far worse, looked totally lost on that wing and was made to run around the ball too often.
That's another thing, David Ferrer said Rune is the best mover on clay since Rafael Nadal, and yesterday was an example of why Alcaraz is not - very unsteady on his feet, and messy footwork.
Thank God I'm a Rune fan, because this Alcaraz has no future in terms of winning slams regularly.... while Rune shortens the points expertly, and doesn't get injured.