I somewhat agree, but I feel participation and preparation is 1/2 the battle, some kids are not even participating because of fear of losing. My kid goes into battle knowing that he is going to get his butt kicked 0 and 0 and for that he should be awarded. It is not about winning, it is about how you get yourself to comeback to fight another day. I do not like the system where there is only one winner. My son tried so hard that at match point 40-40 no add at 6-5 his opponent called a foot in serve long and won the game, my son lost in the tie breaker and almost quit the game and said what is the point?!?!?! My son was clearly the better player and better ball striker. The largest and only one trophy was awarded to the winner. I think that is harsh especially with the rampant cheating in JR tennis. There should be a system like in Europe where there is an award to first second and third like in car racing where they stand on a podium, I think that is fun, they do have a big fat check for first on the tour and a smaller check for second etc... why not USTA, I think an award for second and third is warranted. Little mos there are trophies given left and right,
I agree with awards for placing - second or third, but not with the same award as the winner. Outside of third, give them a T-shirt or something, but not an award. Consolation trinkets will work just fine in keeping kids coming back. My son has gone home without an award many times, but loves to wear his tennis T-shirts, wrist bands, etc that they give out.
This is a sport, and it's competition. There is a winner. If that's removed, it's not competition, it's practice. Practice, we're talkin' 'bout practice (that was for TCF
). So, have a round robin with no winner if you want practice. Why remove the risk and reward from competition? If everyone gets the same reward, why keep score, why have a bracket, etc?
Not only is competition preparing them for higher levels of sport, but life as well. An entry level employee doesn't get paid the same as management, and management doesn't get paid the same as the CEO, right? Does that mean they don't work hard? No.
Also, everyone at some point thinks their kid is better than the kid who beat them, cheating or not. Most people think they can do a better job than their boss as well. Another life parallel.
Look, I don't mean to sound harsh and I'm not a hard-*ss parent by any means, but IMO rewarding everyone equally in "competition" waters it down and devalues the process. The lesson should be hard work leads to success. Not simply paying an entry fee and showing up.