I use TAUT to threaten with. When my 7 year old isn't doing it right I say o.k I guess we can put you in a TAUT tournament and he quickly refocuses on playing the right way. There is no way I would let my kid play that mess!!
Has anyone heard if there is a possibility of having 12 and under mandate (Green Balls) throughout country or will be only by Sections? Thanks
I think it's a possibility, that's why they are "testing" it in a couple of sections.
Dont worry about the mess the USTA does. Just train hard! We skipped the 10s because of that TAUT crap. Best thing we could have done. If they do this mess with the 12s we will play the 14s.It really doesnt matter anymore to me because when my little girl is 13 she will play 18s. Dont get caught up in the NOW like i once did train for the big picture.
I think it's a possibility, that's why they are "testing" it in a couple of sections.
Unless she turns 13 and goes boy crazy and says damn tennis.
from planning a pathway 5 years beyond her physical age.
Sections choose their pathway. Just because NorCal and Texas junior section committees strongly support a ROG pathway to development from 12u does not mean the USTA is designating these sections as test sections.
Attitudes on these junior threads make me vary weary of exposing my daughter to the junior circuit. I will be happy to just have her play other girls at my club. The sense of entitlement is just unbelievable.
Attitudes on these junior threads make me vary weary of exposing my daughter to the junior circuit. I will be happy to just have her play other girls at my club. The sense of entitlement is just unbelievable.
I'd suggest trying it and seeing how your section is for yourself. I think there are a lot of over zealous parents on here (we are on a tennis forum after all) who are determined that their kid is going pro and think every other parent is an idiot whose kid has no chance. Don't worry about them.
Personally, I've met mostly great people with good perspective on junior tennis. My son is playing in the 12s and is having a good time. And I don't run across a lot of cheating or bad sportsmanship. In fact when I compare it to little league or pop warner or basketball, it's very tame.
Sure, there are some crazy parents out there and some entitled kids who are just, well... a-holes. Don't let a few bad apples scare you off.
New policy in MW section for 10 and under players....
http://www.*******.usta.com/Juniors/10_and_under_advancement
Spell out MW to get to internet page.
So the old days of getting an old light racquet, a parent collecting some old flat balls from around some local courts to teach their kid, and learning tennis for pretty much free on a local court are gone.
Now the same parents will have to buy different racquet lengths, and enough of the different types of balls along the way, and somehow mark that local court with the right dimensions....before they can advance through each stage.
So why will today's over scheduled parents and kids even bother and not just let the kid play soccer instead?
TCF what days did u say you will be in Norcross?
New policy in MW section for 10 and under players....
http://www.*******.usta.com/Juniors/10_and_under_advancement
Spell out MW to get to internet page.
Yep. Just wait, every section will be covered soon...
Looks like they have exceptions if a kid has played already in U12s yellow. That sounds like the key if you have a talented 8-10 year old. Get them into a few U12s before it hits. This one says if a kid has 20 points they are exempt I think. Thats not hard to do.
Looks like they have exceptions if a kid has played already in U12s yellow. That sounds like the key if you have a talented 8-10 year old. Get them into a few U12s before it hits. This one says if a kid has 20 points they are exempt I think. Thats not hard to do.
Looks like they have exceptions if a kid has played already in U12s yellow. That sounds like the key if you have a talented 8-10 year old. Get them into a few U12s before it hits. This one says if a kid has 20 points they are exempt I think. Thats not hard to do.
The oddest thing about the whole NorCal "pathway" is that they arguably have the best 14 year old (CiCi Bellis) in the world.
And I know for a fact that she never hit colored balls.
Yes. For the NorCal section, starting June 1st, all 12 and under will be Green Dot.
I'm guessing that this will go nationwide.
I have seen it happen many times. The kid is playing 10 and under tennis and switch to regulation balls and look lost. Its not so much technique its reaction time and court coverage. The colored balls let kids get away with bad footwork.I think colored balls might be fun for some kids and give them early success but to mandate it is ridiculous!!!
I find this to be not credible. The rest of the world can do this, produced proportionally more players. The world plays the game better and there are no global pitchforks over modified teaching formats. To TCF, the ITF has expanded it to adults.
So, my plan, as of right now, is to play the U12 Novice tourneys in NorCal (green dot). She can't hang with the U12 Open, this might give her a shot.
I freaking hate, hate the Orange ball.
It looks like I am not alone, judging from the other Novice players in our next tourney, lots of these kids were playing in the Orange U10.
Please explain that the "world plays the game better" has anything to do with using ROG balls? I have watched the Spanish coaches training kids, the Russians, the French, Rick Macci, Nick Saviano. At no time did I ever see any kid exhibiting tennis talent using orange balls at age 9 and green balls at age 11.
We are not saying those low compression balls do not serve a purpose for beginners. The mandate is what is wrong.
The world playing better tennis has many causes....the better athletes with less choices than in the US, more discipline, more hunger to be great, role models of current top pros, and on and on. ROG ball mandates are not what produced any of the great players in tennis history, nor any of the current top ITF juniors.
If the goal is to make tennis simple for the masses, then yeah, allow all ages to play with orange balls. But that resembles ping pong as much as it does regular tennis.
We are not saying those low compression balls do not serve a purpose for beginners. The mandate is what is wrong.
I would love to explain. With dominance comes influence. Our dominance in the game is near over and so is our influence over how the game progresses, from where tourneys are played, to the rules and to the teaching methodologies. Your anecdotal experiences do not mean that many kids are not becoming highly proficient with the ROG methodology. You claim that you have observed other professionals excel without ROG. The two circumstances are not mutually exclusive. ROG as methodology for teaching children is relatively new, if not the equipment. One should not expect champions at this stage. The question is whether you are willing to bank that the game will not continue to grow globally because of ROG, as well as, will the standard of global play diminish as the ITF rule takes hold over years and decades. I will throw my anecdotal statement out also. I too have seen Evolve9, Belguim Tennis, Tennis Canada, Wayne Elderton, Butch Staples create proficient well rounded young players with ROG, who should have little to no trouble continuing to matriculate their skills into higher levels of play, including the yellow ball.
I will grant your reason for US play compared to the world as it still feeds my contention that those who dominate set the rules going forward. In simplicity one can discover elegance.
By June 1st you must notify NorCal whether your child is opting out of the Pathway. Post June 1st it is Pathway, then matriculation by achievement or age to yellow ball 12 to 18 play. You can be 3 to 12 and opt into old format, must do by June 1st.
By June 1st you must notify NorCal whether your child is opting out of the Pathway. Post June 1st it is Pathway, then matriculation by achievement or age to yellow ball 12 to 18 play. You can be 3 to 12 and opt into old format, must do by June 1st.
If the level is hate it may be time to reassess the whole thing for yourself and fam or play up.
There is no "old format" though. If you want to play yellow, you have to play 14's.
You can't sign up for yellow and play the 12's or 10's. If you are 7 and want to play yellow, you're stuck.
I've not gone through this whole thread but this has been the case in the UK for years now albeit our age ranges are different.
Red - 8u
Orange - 8-9
Green - 9-10
After this its adult ball.
Personally I really like the set up but I can see why lots of parents don't.
It will be interesting to see how the guys and girls who went through this system match up with the kids who didn't go through this system when they meet up in yellow ball.
There is no "old format" though. If you want to play yellow, you have to play 14's.
You can't sign up for yellow and play the 12's or 10's. If you are 7 and want to play yellow, you're stuck.
My son is turned 11 in March. He has been playing the 12s since March of last year. It is all yellow ball in the Challengers and Opens.
My family is in Richmond. My son is turned 11 in March. He has been playing the 12s since March of last year. It is all yellow ball in the Challengers and Opens. As I recall you are in NorCal also. We'll be at Little Mo in Stockton. Let's grab a coffee and have a sitdown. You obviously are passionate, which is your number one asset as a parent. I'm Marty, the dad with the dreadlocks and garish Nike warmup jacket.
Sounds good Marty.
From my understanding talking with Summer and Amy, there will no longer be yellow ball tournaments for U12, only green dot. All yellow will be 14's.
Also, I believe that every kid that is U12 is in the "pathway." The ones that are grandfathered in are just allowed to choose where to start from.
It looks like they did push back the deadline:
To determine your child's level in the 12 and Under Junior Development Pathway she or he will first need to be a USTA Member. Once a player becomes a USTA Member they can choose their level to compete in until August 31, 2013. As of September 1, 2013 all players will compete in the level they chose, or will enter the Pathway based on their age. If you would like to determine your level, click on one of the bubbles listed below.
See you in a couple of weeks.
Sounds good Marty.
From my understanding talking with Summer and Amy, there will no longer be yellow ball tournaments for U12, only green dot. All yellow will be 14's.
Also, I believe that every kid that is U12 is in the "pathway." The ones that are grandfathered in are just allowed to choose where to start from.
It looks like they did push back the deadline:
To determine your child's level in the 12 and Under Junior Development Pathway she or he will first need to be a USTA Member. Once a player becomes a USTA Member they can choose their level to compete in until August 31, 2013. As of September 1, 2013 all players will compete in the level they chose, or will enter the Pathway based on their age. If you would like to determine your level, click on one of the bubbles listed below.
See you in a couple of weeks.
This is a reasonable "play up" situation. If you we're in my section, he'd have to play 14s to use yellow balls. No yellow at all in the 12s. Not even at the sectional closed level.
The mandate has resulted in less choices, and the implementation of it across sections is being done poorly and inconsistently.
I look forward to meeting. I think our sections Little Mo is going to be a blast, well attended and highly competitive. A large contingent from the Bareis/Ferreira academy will compete. As for the pathway, I do not think all 12U will be green ball. Please see excerpt below:
You will move from level 1 to playing with a Yellow ball (Challenger level) once you have played 1 season of junior team tennis, won 2 tournaments, and have placed 1st to 4th in a Sectional Championships.
If you haven’t played in the events in level 3, 2, or 1 and turn 13 you will automatically move into 14 and under Yellow ball competitions.
This indicates (to me at least) that Challenger Level will have 12 U yellow ball competition. I acknowledge that skipping the NorCal pathway and not being grandfathered in by history of yellow ball competition means you must wait til 13 to compete in yellow ball in NorCal.
...I love the green ball. It would not have been a big deal. I would be a weekend voice at tournaments supporting the green ball. Perhaps I would support other coaches and parents that wanted to moderate rule to up to 11 years old.
I also like the green ball a lot...I just think the Orange is pure horse****. I don't think Orange is even good with instructing.
I think U10 should be green and just get rid of the Orange. Red makes sense for U* (beginners), Orange almost is a stop gap between Red and Green.