'They are going to kill us' - Alcaraz criticises schedule

Devilito

Legend
Yeah no. It's not the schedule buddy, it's the game. We went from a sport that was primarily skill based to one where skill takes a back seat to fitness, endurance and athletic ability. Everyone plays the same game and has the same style. Stand 40 feet from the baseline to return a serve, have a 40 ball rally where eventually your opponent makes a mistake, tear off your shirt and flex like you're Conan.

Sorry, i can't believe anybody would find this entertaining over skill and shotmaking that leads to winners and errors mattering more than how fit you are. If I wanted to watch a fitness competition i'd watch a marathon or crossfit.

Carlos is correct, but for the wrong reasons.

 

insideguy

G.O.A.T.
Is it more congested than it was 10 years ago? Honestly im a little confused. I mean as a fan I just tune out after the US Open. Not really clear on what these guys have to play after the open. I guess technically the last two masters and if you are good enough the Finals? That doesn't seem crazy to me. But what do I know.
 

Devilito

Legend
He criticizes the calendar but then chooses to play Fed's exho? LOL
It's more like a practice match than a job. That's why many play it. Seems to me the psychological aspect of a modern pro is getting to them even more so than the schedule. The pressure is far great than it was before. Your sponsors, your media exposure, your social media posts, etc.

Some of the best tennis i've seen has been in the Laver Cup merely because it seems such a stress free event that pros can enjoy playing without expectations. They can focus on shot making and spectacle rather than just results
 

FlyingSaucer

Professional
A large part of why Charles is at the Laver Cup this year is that he wanted to hang out with Fed properly, I expect. He may not play it that much going forward (and who knows how long it will last, anyway).
 
Drama queen. LOL. Djoker was still winning at 37 with 500,000 miles on his body. You won’t die gill man. Nadal was winning up to 36 and he started 20 years ago. He would still be winning if he didn’t break down physically. Fed almost won Wimbledon at 38. Why are these kids such wussies?

No one is going to die. Barbie dolls I swear Their parents should be ashamed
 

Lleytonstation

Talk Tennis Guru
yeah-fired-up.gif

That's right.

He wants to play 10 tourneys a year and be up there with the big3 lol.

Grow a few cm's my man.

He is also playing 2 exhos and complaining.

Tennis is better without long rallies, skill, not out lasting your opponent in a rally.
 

big ted

Legend
Some of the best tennis i've seen has been in the Laver Cup merely because it seems such a stress free event that pros can enjoy playing without expectations. They can focus on shot making and spectacle rather than just results
Playing a fun exhibition event in a nice place is completely different from being forced to be in China for 2 weeks for a M1000 only in name.

true but it does count in their official h2h’s o_O
 

jm1980

Talk Tennis Guru
Playing a fun exhibition event in a nice place is completely different from being forced to be in China for 2 weeks for a M1000 only in name.

Your comment just tells me you're pretty clueless on what's like to be a top player.
Even as a clueless foreigner who doesn't speak Chinese, Shanghai is a far better place to be than some of the places Alcaraz willingly dragged himself to

He also said "Sometimes, you don't want to go to a tournament," he said. "I'm not going to lie - I have felt this way a few times already."

Seeing how he's only been to China once, I doubt that comment of his was aimed at the Asian swing
 

T&M Returns

Rookie
Yeah no. It's not the schedule buddy, it's the game. We went from a sport that was primarily skill based to one where skill takes a back seat to fitness, endurance and athletic ability. Everyone plays the same game and has the same style. Stand 40 feet from the baseline to return a serve, have a 40 ball rally where eventually your opponent makes a mistake, tear off your shirt and flex like you're Conan.

Sorry, i can't believe anybody would find this entertaining over skill and shotmaking that leads to winners and errors mattering more than how fit you are. If I wanted to watch a fitness competition i'd watch a marathon or crossfit.

Carlos is correct, but for the wrong reasons.

No, the guys playing now have plenty of skill and shot making ability.

The tennis year is simply nonstop, it's 12 months out of the year. No other major sport does anything near that.
 

SonnyT

Legend
Yeah, I got you! The two best players, Alcaraz & Sinner, are like identical twins!

So were the two best players previously, Djokovic & Nadal! Without a program, there would be no way to tell them apart!
 

mtommer

Hall of Fame
We went from a sport that was primarily skill based to one where skill takes a back seat to fitness, endurance and athletic ability. Everyone plays the same game and has the same style.
True but I think it's in large part due to the fact that fitness, endurance and athletic ability negates skill. In other words, you can be the most skillful player in the world and you'll just flat out lose to players today. There's a reason why everyone plays the same way. It works and careers and money is on the line.
 

MrFlip

Professional
The game is fine, but his playstyle is not. He runs around still thinking he's as good as Nadal day in, day out.
 

insideguy

G.O.A.T.
So I am looking at this and thinking the guy lost early at US Open. So then he didnt play for two weeks. Played a couple Davis cup matches. Then didnt play for another 2 weeks and is playing Laver cup. And doesn't really have to play till Sept 30. The guy could have literally taken a month off. Davis cup and Laver cup are not mandatory. No one is forcing him to play this stuff.
 

Sudacafan

Bionic Poster
Exhibitions doesn't matter.
Nobody plays hard on them.
I have never seen a pro seriously injuring him or herself during an exhibition.
 

vokazu

Legend
Exhibitions doesn't matter.
Nobody plays hard on them.
I have never seen a pro seriously injuring him or herself during an exhibition.
Federer got hit on the butt by Nole at Laver Cup. Fed also got hit on the body by Tiafoe at Laver Cup.

Serena injured her knee and retired at Hopman Cup.


Sock injured his hip at Hopman Cup.



Petkovic retired with knee injury at Hopman Cup.



Tsonga retired with groin injury at Hopman Cup.



Ivanovic tore her abdominal muscle at Hopman Cup



Ebden injured his calf muscle at Hopman Cup


Marc Rosset injured his hand at Hopman Cup after punching an advertising board in anger.



Clijsters injured her left ankle at Hopman Cup


Hanescu retired with groin injury at Hopman Cup

 
Last edited:

Gizo

Legend
In terms of scheduling, I’ve always thought that there should be a clear tournament hierarchy, but with no mandatory events on either the ATP or WTA tours.

The WTA set-up before their IMO terrible roadmap changes from 2009, with a Tier 1, 2, 3 and 4 tournament system (easy to follow and understand for diehard and more casual fans), and no mandatory events other than Miami (and ideally even Miami shouldn’t have been mandatory), was great. It meant that players had a lot more flexibility with their scheduling, and that ultimately a noticeably larger number of tournaments throughout the year had big name players in them, so effectively spreading the wealth more.
 
Last edited:

Lleytonstation

Talk Tennis Guru
In terms of scheduling, I’ve always thought that there should be a clear tournament hierarchy, but with no mandatory events on the either the ATP or WTA tours.

The WTA set-up before their IMO terrible roadmap changes from 2009, with a Tier tournament system (easy to follow and understand), and no mandatory events other than Miami (and ideally even Miami shouldn’t have been mandatory), was great. It meant that players had a lot more flexibility with their scheduling, and that ultimately a noticeably larger number of tournaments throughout the year had big name players in them, so effectively spreading the wealth more.
They do need an entire shakeup.

Add grass masters, shorten the season, and it should be clear.

4 slams. 2 Elite Masters (1250 points), 8 masters (1000 points), and let the rest fall wherever. But the season should end after the USO, and have ATP finals in October. Give them 3 months off.
 

TripleATeam

G.O.A.T.
If players think they can't keep up with the demands of the tour, they're free to show up and not play their best. Or they can switch to a more efficient game plan than running from side to side until the opponent gets tired.

That gameplan worked for 2 guys, it doesn't mean everyone can do it.
 
So players would play like 5-6 tourneys if you are a top player.
5 or 6? No, because even top players don't know how they'll do at Slams until the US Open is over, which is most of the year.
Alcaraz for example, lost in the 2nd Round, so he can't bank on the Slams alone to help his ranking when Sinner is so far ahead and even Zverev may finish ahead.
Players wanting to finish #1 or #2 will still need to play a lot more than 5 tournaments, to either overtake the other top 10 players, or to prepare for each slam.
 
Last edited:

Aabye5

G.O.A.T.
5 or 6? No, because even top players don't know how they'll do at Slams until the US Open is over, which is most of the year.
Alcaraz for example, lost in the 2nd Round!
Plus they need to play tennis in the lead-up to Roland Garros in particular, to find form.

But if you double the points from that 2nd Round, he's not doing too badly.

Slams are not the season. I know that's all TTW cares about, but that's not all there is to tennis.

Now, the season does need to be shortened, but we're talking about a player playing 3 exhibition tournaments. I don't care how good the money is, if you're that tired, skip two of those.
 
But if you double the points from that 2nd Round, he's not doing too badly.

Slams are not the season. I know that's all TTW cares about, but that's not all there is to tennis.

Now, the season does need to be shortened, but we're talking about a player playing 3 exhibition tournaments. I don't care how good the money is, if you're that tired, skip two of those.
If you double a 2nd Round Slam performance, it still won't help Alcaraz contend for #1 when Sinner and Zverev are also receiving doubled points...
Well I don't think you'll find anyone who thinks the Slams are currently given enough points!
Alcaraz is hardly playing at the Laver Cup, so it doesn't compare to if he was playing an event in Asia instead...
Plus he's always been a huge Federer fan, so this is his chance to be around Federer.
 

Aabye5

G.O.A.T.
If you double a 2nd Round Slam performance, it still won't help Alcaraz contend for #1 when Sinner and Zverev are also receiving doubled points...
Well I don't think you'll find anyone who thinks the Slams are currently given enough points!

I think it would be better to have 8 M1000s. Then the points make more sense.

A Slam is worth double the number of points as an M1000. In terms of difficulty, you have days off at Slams, but you play seven matches. Fewer matches at the M1000 level, but you don't get days off between most matches.
 

Steve500

New User
Yeah no. It's not the schedule buddy, it's the game. We went from a sport that was primarily skill based to one where skill takes a back seat to fitness, endurance and athletic ability. Everyone plays the same game and has the same style. Stand 40 feet from the baseline to return a serve, have a 40 ball rally where eventually your opponent makes a mistake, tear off your shirt and flex like you're Conan.

Sorry, i can't believe anybody would find this entertaining over skill and shotmaking that leads to winners and errors mattering more than how fit you are. If I wanted to watch a fitness competition i'd watch a marathon or crossfit.

Carlos is correct, but for the wrong reasons.

You say all this but you openly support the advancements in racquet technology and sanitised tennis surfaces being similar now everywhere . Racquet technology has killed the skilled players more eg John McEnroe and Bjorg and Edberg would get destroyed in this era. Boris Becker would do well in current eta .
 
Top