Thiem Taking It to the Top I Tell Ya

Cilic loses:
giphy.gif


Great, great news on the Thiem ranking front at IW:
1. Thiem has a great draw and could easily make the final which would save his ranking for the clay season.:p
2. Cilic and Tsonga lost their first matches.:D
3. Federer in Quarter of death

Not so great news:
4. Dimitrov looking very good from reports at the tournament
5. Monfils despite being sick fought back brilliantly in his first match and may find great form
6. With Murray out of the way, the main Thiem nemesis is a potential Goffin SF. If Goffin beats Thiem he moves ahead of him in the rankings.:confused:

Overall this is better than expected for Thiem. He plays a tough Mischa Zverev in the fast heat at IW today.:oops: After this winner of Isner v Monfils. Thiem has recently beat Monfils and Gael has a poor record at IW, so Thiem has a strong chance of coming through. Goffin.:mad:
 
Can we say that Thiem has become quite consistent for his level? Its a good sign.
he is almost more consistent on his level than the top 4(or the hell who is top 4 nowadays :oops:)
 
Thiem facebook:
"6/1 6/4 against Mischa Zverev. I am so happy about my performance today, I served and returned really well. My game was on point, there was not a single second where I lacked of concentration. Good evening from Indian Wells!
#bamos #fourthround #blueisthecolour"

"6/3 6/2 against Gael Monfils. I performed really well today. I played aggressive, returned and served well. Overall a solid performance. Tomorrow I am facing Stan the man, looking forward to it! Good night from the desert!
#bamos #quarters #stantheman"

Thiem has a golden opportunity to cement top 8 seeding for the clay season against Wawrinka tonight. Thiem has slid ahead of Cilic in the rankings and has a nice gap over Tsonga. Another 180 points with the win tonight should cement Thiem in the top 8 for clay. Federer has passed Thiem in the rankings, but faces the mighty Kyrgios Friday night so Thiem could get to 7. A win at IW would get Thiem to 6.

Wawrinka struggled with the top spin from Nishioka and his tremendous court coverage, barely squeeking out a win last night. A long awaited rematch between these two. Thiem is in strong form and ready for the challenge. Wawrinka.:confused:
 
Thiem facebook:
"6/1 6/4 against Mischa Zverev. I am so happy about my performance today, I served and returned really well. My game was on point, there was not a single second where I lacked of concentration. Good evening from Indian Wells!
#bamos #fourthround #blueisthecolour"

"6/3 6/2 against Gael Monfils. I performed really well today. I played aggressive, returned and served well. Overall a solid performance. Tomorrow I am facing Stan the man, looking forward to it! Good night from the desert!
#bamos #quarters #stantheman"

Thiem has a golden opportunity to cement top 8 seeding for the clay season against Wawrinka tonight. Thiem has slid ahead of Cilic in the rankings and has a nice gap over Tsonga. Another 180 points with the win tonight should cement Thiem in the top 8 for clay. Federer has passed Thiem in the rankings, but faces the mighty Kyrgios Friday night so Thiem could get to 7. A win at IW would get Thiem to 6.

Wawrinka struggled with the top spin from Nishioka and his tremendous court coverage, barely squeeking out a win last night. A long awaited rematch between these two. Thiem is in strong form and ready for the challenge. Wawrinka.:confused:

Thiem playing as he has over the last year or two would still be currently Slamless in the beginning of the Federer era (2003-2004). I'm going by the idea that he'd be the same age as Federer.. and he hasn't hit prime early enough to have taken advantage of the landscape in 2003 like Roddick did at the US Open.
 
Thiem playing as he has over the last year or two would still be currently Slamless in the beginning of the Federer era (2003-2004). I'm going by the idea that he'd be the same age as Federer.. and he hasn't hit prime early enough to have taken advantage of the landscape in 2003 like Roddick did at the US Open.
Thiem had fine clay stats in 2016. Similar time of year birthday for Thiem so Fed's 2004 is comparable to Thiem 2016. Fed had the advantage of adapting well (likely prospering) with the new technology of the time Poly strings. He wasn't against a host of Poly baseliners and big servers that dominate the tour now either. Its not as easy to break in now. The better comparison for Thiem is Djokovic who broke out in his 24th year 2011, which is comparable to Thiem 2017. We'll see what happens the rest of the year.

Roddick really was a phenom with his huge serve. Truely amazing stuff as I don't think we've had a young player since whose been close to that kind of serving. Such an advantage for him breaking in early on hard courts and going deep in slams. Sadly Roddick had to change his forehand in 2005 to adapt to things and he just wasn't good enough past his speed prime too as not the most fleet of foot returners. I believe the worst first serve return game of any major player.

Clay wasn't too too strong some of those years and Thiem's clay game is not fully appreciated with 2017 so young. Thiem 2016 would have more than a shot at 2002 RG. He won 60% of his points at Nice heading into the French and was in solid form until the weather fiasco left him drained with less than 24 hours to recover from greulling Goffin QF and play Peakovic. Thiem 2017 has not been written, but he's on track to put up some prime JCF like numbers right now. Won 56.6% of points in Rio which is a helluva start. His return games won was a staggering 43% which matches Nadal's career average and is 3% above the #2 career player Coria at 40%. Its way early, but that return number is an incredible sign for Thiem who won 28% of return games last year on clay. If he splits the diffrence for the year he may be unstoppable on clay.:eek::D
 
Thiem had fine clay stats in 2016. Similar time of year birthday for Thiem so Fed's 2004 is comparable to Thiem 2016. Fed had the advantage of adapting well (likely prospering) with the new technology of the time Poly strings. He wasn't against a host of Poly baseliners and big servers that dominate the tour now either. Its not as easy to break in now. The better comparison for Thiem is Djokovic who broke out in his 24th year 2011, which is comparable to Thiem 2017. We'll see what happens the rest of the year.

Roddick really was a phenom with his huge serve. Truely amazing stuff as I don't think we've had a young player since whose been close to that kind of serving. Such an advantage for him breaking in early on hard courts and going deep in slams. Sadly Roddick had to change his forehand in 2005 to adapt to things and he just wasn't good enough past his speed prime too as not the most fleet of foot returners. I believe the worst first serve return game of any major player.

Clay wasn't too too strong some of those years and Thiem's clay game is not fully appreciated with 2017 so young. Thiem 2016 would have more than a shot at 2002 RG. He won 60% of his points at Nice heading into the French and was in solid form until the weather fiasco left him drained with less than 24 hours to recover from greulling Goffin QF and play Peakovic. Thiem 2017 has not been written, but he's on track to put up some prime JCF like numbers right now. Won 56.6% of points in Rio which is a helluva start. His return games won was a staggering 43% which matches Nadal's career average and is 3% above the #2 career player Coria at 40%. Its way early, but that return number is an incredible sign for Thiem who won 28% of return games last year on clay. If he splits the diffrence for the year he may be unstoppable on clay.:eek::D

He'll need those numbers so that he actually has the gas for a Slam given his inefficient game on a point by point basis.
 
He'll need those numbers so that he actually has the gas for a Slam given his inefficient game on a point by point basis.
Well he won Rio in straight sets so that'll work.;) See Nadal for the book on clay court brutality. Thiem is going to make Muster look like a pansy in the upcoming years. Definitely getting strong like bull.

Thieminator fans take a look at the brute close up here practicing at IW. A regular pro tennis shirt masks the power of the Thiem physique. You can see the Austrian in cotton is ready to make Arnie proud in the brute department:
 
Well he won Rio in straight sets so that'll work.;) See Nadal for the book on clay court brutality. Thiem is going to make Muster look like a pansy in the upcoming years. Definitely getting strong like bull.

Thieminator fans take a look at the brute close up here practicing at IW. A regular pro tennis shirt masks the power of the Thiem physique. You can see the Austrian in cotton is ready to make Arnie proud in the brute department:

Thiem is going Nadalian but will he have the pure athleticism to back it up? Proficiency = excellent. Efficiency = poor. Sustainable? That's the big Q. If he's proficient enough then he can overcome point-by-point inefficiency (effort per point).

Nice vid.
 
Thiem is going Nadalian but will he have the pure athleticism to back it up? Proficiency = excellent. Efficiency = poor. Sustainable? That's the big Q. If he's proficient enough then he can overcome point-by-point inefficiency (effort per point).

Nice vid.
Hehe. Yeah that was a nice one. There is a video on Youtube where Thiem and Nadal play a practice set at IW. Someone near the camera man was quite impressed with the Thieminator's strength and form on the practice courts this week. This little stretch from Rio into IW is just what he's needed to start hitting on all cylinders. Last year Thiem was actually slipping a bit (serve and forehand particularly) coming into the clay season and really only got his game going at Nice right before the French. This year is looking very, very promising. I suspect for RG he'll have the stamina if he obliterates most of his opponents in straight sets. He can certainly handle some big 4 set matches in the latter stages, but not too sure about rebounding from a five setter deep in the event. Praying his health holds together. A weeks rest after Miami and then he may be back at the wheel of pain all the way to RG; that's why top 8 seeding and byes so, so important at the clay masters.:confused: A major roll is possible, but I have to remind myself that Thiem was clearly flagging the whole time at Acapulco after winning Rio. They're going to have to drop some events if he wins something big. Going to Barcelona after weekend play at Monte Carlo would be near suicide in particular.:eek:
 
With Djokoray experiencing elbow issues and Nishikori under performing its time to look anew at Thiem's clay prospects. If Thiem makes QF at Miami and SFs at all three masters he'll add 830 points to his current ranking of 3465 for a total of nearly 4300 points. Federer is actually defending a QF at Monte Carlo, so Thiem has an outside shot of nudging Federer out for the 4th seed at the French Open. This assumes that Raonic and Nishikori drop a bit which is not out of the question. Nadal may not make much of a move as his M1000 clay results were quite good (W, SF, QF) and he won Barcelona last year. Thiem really has a shot for a 4 seed.:D
ThiemRanking.png
 
Good news:
1. Cilic lost first match at Miami to Chardy and looked pretty shakey:D; all Thiem needs to do is beat Coric today and he nudges ahead of Cilic to 8
2. Dimitrov lost first match and looked very bad:(:D; Dimitrov is defending no points on clay and so was a threat to make a move. Dimitrov looked inexplicably bad today.
3. Thiem lost in doubles, but had a blast with the crowd and his buddy Sascha; they really crack each other up:p
4. Nadal looked pretty iffy in his first match:cool:

Bad news on the ranking front:
1. Nishikori looks to be rounding into form:eek:
2. The draw has evaporated at Miami for Nadal and Nishikori with a possible Sock vs Raonic winner heading Nadal's way for QF. Nishikori faces no seeds except Verdasco. These two players are a major threat for the coveted 4th seed at RG.:oops:
 
Thiem taking it to the Top racquet smashing, somehow Meles forgot to tell Ya. Was probably busy with working on his stats and ELO ratings.
Btw , excellent technique:cool:
 
Maybe he is not that great on HC:confused:One just can't play clay court tennis on all surfaces and be consistently good at it. (There is one and only Rafa).

i guess Miami weather doesn't fit with the Austrian.
he was strangely struggling for some reason.

I would say lower ball bounce bothers him more than Miami weather
 
No worry. The time has come for Thiem to go into Muster mode and vulture a myriad of clay tournaments.
Thiem is not on the schedule for Munich and that means he's unlikely to play Nice. With early exit at Miami wildcard Marrekech incoming?

Big mistake for Thiem to let Coric best him; Cilic stays ahead of Thiem in rankings via tiebreaker. With Nishikori not playing Monte Carlo it shouldn't matter, but if Thiem has another weakish Masters 1000 clay season, Cilic may plague him in the rankings as he is defending 0.0 points in these events.:confused:
 
Thiem is not on the schedule for Munich and that means he's unlikely to play Nice. With early exit at Miami wildcard Marrekech incoming?

Big mistake for Thiem to let Coric best him; Cilic stays ahead of Thiem in rankings via tiebreaker. With Nishikori not playing Monte Carlo it shouldn't matter, but if Thiem has another weakish Masters 1000 clay season, Cilic may plague him in the rankings as he is defending 0.0 points in these events.:confused:
Nice is being replaced by Lyon in the schedule. Thiem will probably it. I believe he's adding Barcelona to his schedule too. Marrekech would be the ultimate vulture move:rolleyes:. Ramos Vanilla would be the #2 seed:eek:! Muster won it in 1990o_O
 
Nice is being replaced by Lyon in the schedule. Thiem will probably it. I believe he's adding Barcelona to his schedule too. Marrekech would be the ultimate vulture move:rolleyes:. Ramos Vanilla would be the #2 seed:eek:! Muster won it in 1990o_O
Barcelona on his schedule.

Thiem facebook:
"1/6 5/7 against Borna Coric. Poor performance yesterday. I was a little bit tired and distracted by the rain delays. Too many unforced errors, which was punished immediately. I can only congratulate Borna for the win and wish him all the best for his upcoming match. I am heading back home to Austria where hard training and the clay season are awaiting me. Although I had an early loss here in Miami I am still happy about my past weeks. Now I am really pumped for the clay court season to start!
#bamos #lost #braceyourselfclayseasoniscoming"
 
Good news:
1. Cilic lost first match at Miami to Chardy and looked pretty shakey:D; all Thiem needs to do is beat Coric today and he nudges ahead of Cilic to 8
2. Dimitrov lost first match and looked very bad:(:D; Dimitrov is defending no points on clay and so was a threat to make a move. Dimitrov looked inexplicably bad today.
3. Thiem lost in doubles, but had a blast with the crowd and his buddy Sascha; they really crack each other up:p
4. Nadal looked pretty iffy in his first match:cool:

Bad news on the ranking front:
1. Nishikori looks to be rounding into form:eek:
2. The draw has evaporated at Miami for Nadal and Nishikori with a possible Sock vs Raonic winner heading Nadal's way for QF. Nishikori faces no seeds except Verdasco. These two players are a major threat for the coveted 4th seed at RG.:oops:
Great news. Nishikori is out at Miami with likely wrist issues and knee tweaked in previous match.

Sock is taking on Nadal in minutes and has an outside shot of beating Nadal who still looks sub par. Federer keeps going at the event and is close to getting too far ahead of Thiem to be caught for 4th seed at RG.
 
Fantastic news for Thiem; Federer is out until the French which should assure Thiem of byes at all the clay masters.:D

Brad Gilbert approved:rolleyes:
http://www.**************.org/news/...c-thiem-is-the-most-explosive-tennis-player-/
 
Well Federer won't be around to do any of Thiem's dirty work on clay until RG. In some kind of TTW payback moment the draw Gods have given Thiem a do-over of sorts on RG. At Monte Carlo R16 is Goffin followed by the mighty defending French Open champion Djokovic in the QF:eek: should Thiem be lucky enough to get by Goffin again.:oops:

First Thiem plays the winner of Delbonis/Haase. Delbonis is in fine form and could easily catch Thiem sleeping despite the head to head:
31/2015 R16 Gstaad Clay Dominic Thiem Federico Delbonis 6-3 6-4 1.67 - 2.15

Haase on clay shouldn't be a problem:
44/2015 R32 Basel I Hard Dominic Thiem Robin Haase 0-6 7-6(5) 7-5 1.57 - 2.35
42/2014 R32 Vienna Hard Robin Haase Dominic Thiem 6-3 3-6 6-3 2.50 - 1.60

Its amazing Thiem has been favored over him since late 2014. Haase is a very smart player.

Thiem needs to outperform Cilic this week as they are tied on ranking points with the TB rules putting Marin ahead. Cilic is not great on clay, but is in easier section of the draw. After Borna Coric wrecked Miami for Thiem he'd better take Cilic out in his first match.:mad: Coric just won Marrakech so he'll have a head of steam and just needs to get by Chardy in first match on Tuesday (beaten him before on clay pretty easily at Estoril in 2015.)

Delbonis vs Haase play Tuesday so Thiem likely to play Wednesday and with luck every day after that through to the trophy.:D
 
Well Federer won't be around to do any of Thiem's dirty work on clay until RG. In some kind of TTW payback moment the draw Gods have given Thiem a do-over of sorts on RG. At Monte Carlo R16 is Goffin followed by the mighty defending French Open champion Djokovic in the QF:eek: should Thiem be lucky enough to get by Goffin again.:oops:

First Thiem plays the winner of Delbonis/Haase. Delbonis is in fine form and could easily catch Thiem sleeping despite the head to head:
31/2015 R16 Gstaad Clay Dominic Thiem Federico Delbonis 6-3 6-4 1.67 - 2.15

Haase on clay shouldn't be a problem:
44/2015 R32 Basel I Hard Dominic Thiem Robin Haase 0-6 7-6(5) 7-5 1.57 - 2.35
42/2014 R32 Vienna Hard Robin Haase Dominic Thiem 6-3 3-6 6-3 2.50 - 1.60

Its amazing Thiem has been favored over him since late 2014. Haase is a very smart player.

Thiem needs to outperform Cilic this week as they are tied on ranking points with the TB rules putting Marin ahead. Cilic is not great on clay, but is in easier section of the draw. After Borna Coric wrecked Miami for Thiem he'd better take Cilic out in his first match.:mad: Coric just won Marrakech so he'll have a head of steam and just needs to get by Chardy in first match on Tuesday (beaten him before on clay pretty easily at Estoril in 2015.)

Delbonis vs Haase play Tuesday so Thiem likely to play Wednesday and with luck every day after that through to the trophy.:D
Well Thiem flunked the RG do over in Monte Carlo, but Goffin made amends by beating Djokovic.:D Unfortunately, then the infamous Mourier call happened in SF for Goffin with Nadal who was in any other world other than Mourier's up 4-2 versus Nadal in the first set and looking formidable.:rolleyes:
4a5ec75c714644bfbc722e75ccd5ebc1.gif


With Thiem exiting early thankfully Cilic:mad: was taken out by ARV luckily in the QFs.:p Still with the Munich final dropping the week of Barcelona this year, Thiem started the week of Barcelona 180 points ahead of Thiem.:eek: Thiem was 9 in the live rankings starting the week of Barcelona and in danger of not getting a bye at Madrid if Fed and the rest show up.:confused:
 
Barcelona has been good to Thiem, he's been a bit up and down but absolutely mauled Sugita (who beat Gasquet and PCB with a big forehand game plus speed earlier in the event.) Sugita only held serve once in the match which shows Thiem's return game is improving as much as dared hope when his first return stats boosted so much on hard courts last year in the Spring.

Of course the Murray match confirmed the expectations set by Thiem's superlative stats so far this year. Thiem amazingly prevailed while serving under 50% to boot.

Nadal is next in the final and even with the 150 points Cilic:mad: is ahead of Thiem still by 35 points with Madrid coming up. With a win tomorrow Thiem will shoot ahead of Cilic by 165 points and lock up Madrid top 8 and #8 in the world. Cilic:mad: has wildcarded into Istanbul for some vulturing as 2 seed, but he must win event to catch Thiem for Rome.o_O
 
If he's guarding his right elbow then he really should not be playing, right? More likely he is spooked about reinjuring it.

These players can really screw up their technique while recovering. I blame Nadal's problems in AO 2014 for throwing him off for a LONG time. We will never know the full story of what happened, but I suspect also some problems in the shoulder area. Or maybe both the shoulder and back.

I've been on the Thiem train this year for clay. I've told everyone two of the main players to look out for in RG are Thiem and Nadal. So far I see nothing to make me think I was wrong. As different as their games are, there are also big similarities. Both like to drop back, both have to work their way in. The key to long-range success for Thiem will be:

1. Better placement on serve.
2. Learning to get in closer to the baseline sooner to dictate points and take away time.

The biggest thing that is overlooked in Nadal's game, in my opinion, is the effectiveness of his slice serve. Yes, that normally works better for lefties against righties, but it doesn't get used enough on clay. That wide serve to the deuce court does not get used enough by righties, who keep attacking the backhand. It's one of Fed's great strengths, spot serves to the forehand, make guys run to the left first and then trap them in the backhand court.

Thiem likes to mostly keep pounding away to the backhand, and that negates the speed of his serve, which is enough to dominate on all surfaces.

If Thiem improves his tactics, he can beat anyone on clay and maybe on other surfaces in the future.
Gary quoted you in this thread for Thiem stat discussion as didn't want to clog up the Murray massacered thread:
https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/murray-massacred.559653/page-3#post-11169665

The Thiem serve is a bit odd. He loves to work his super kicker serve on the add side most of the time, but he also loves to keep people honest with aces up the T. Often Thiem will take cross court returns of the kicker down the line with his backhands for winners on the first shot. His game is made for clay and these spinnier serves really are effective (see the prime Nadal playbook). Thiem is never going to have placement like Federer.

Thiem's serve stats are on the rise this year despite having physical issues that have caused him to change his serve motion. This is a guy who was rolling in Acapulco last year culminating in 78% first serves in the final against Tomic along with 22 aces and 1 DF. If healthy Thiem can be awesome. Sadly his serve game faded last year with the Stutgart tourney win plauged with over 25 DFs for the week.:confused:

Thiem varies his return position greatly and his up position is why his first return stats are booming. He's now varying position and fine tuning it all. Thiem's slice backhand is getting to be quite effective on clay while even his squash forehand (a shot I hate in general) was effective versus Murray. I believe there are limits to how much he can play up due to his stroke mechanics. It would be foolish to alter those much because his whole game is optimized for clay. I'm frankly getting sick of all the positioning comments on TTW about Thiem's game from people who watch matches here or there and care little about clay court tennis.

Thiem had some tactics issues earlier this year on hard courts because he literally was trying to blow people off the court with those big serves you champion and everything else. It was pure power and the Goffin match at Auz Open showed it to be a failure as Thiem was gassed by midway through the 2nd set with this approach. Hitting 220 kph serves one after the other is not a good thing for him physically. His serve is not the easy power of Fed's. Its based on brutal core strength that Thiem must also conserve.

On clay courts, Thiem is learning how to play the best quickly and I saw little that I would change against Murray except going flat and going for broke at the end of the 2nd set. Ultimately he beat Murray coming back in the 3rd set with a measured increase in power on his shots. At first his UE count was rising quickly, but then he found the right balance in the 3rd set.

I'm not sure of the solution on serve for Thiem. I feel that much of this is on the technical side and he's in the right hands with Breznik as long as he doesn't hurt himself any more. Bresnik not so much to blame as Thiem was wilfully deceiving his team last summer and calling the shots on play. Thiem has not been his own best doctor, but actually more the reverse. LOL that Fed advised him at Stutgart on the situation and Thiem rebuffed him somewhat.:confused:

I feel Thiem is alike Nadal in many ways. The biggest is he likes a lot of matches and is a very similar momentum type of player. South American clay last year lead to Acapulco triumph. Consecutive weeks of play starting at Munich last year had Thiem's ground game much improved by the time of RG and early grass season.

I'll track down some stats posted on Thiem elsewhere, but conking out for the night. Before the Murray match Thiem has won 55.5% of his clay court points. As you know numbers sustained near that level inidicate slam potential.;)
 
Gary quoted you in this thread for Thiem stat discussion as didn't want to clog up the Murray massacered thread:
https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/murray-massacred.559653/page-3#post-11169665

The Thiem serve is a bit odd. He loves to work his super kicker serve on the add side most of the time, but he also loves to keep people honest with aces up the T. Often Thiem will take cross court returns of the kicker down the line with his backhands for winners on the first shot. His game is made for clay and these spinnier serves really are effective (see the prime Nadal playbook). Thiem is never going to have placement like Federer.

Thiem's serve stats are on the rise this year despite having physical issues that have caused him to change his serve motion. This is a guy who was rolling in Acapulco last year culminating in 78% first serves in the final against Tomic along with 22 aces and 1 DF. If healthy Thiem can be awesome. Sadly his serve game faded last year with the Stutgart tourney win plauged with over 25 DFs for the week.:confused:

Thiem varies his return position greatly and his up position is why his first return stats are booming. He's now varying position and fine tuning it all. Thiem's slice backhand is getting to be quite effective on clay while even his squash forehand (a shot I hate in general) was effective versus Murray. I believe there are limits to how much he can play up due to his stroke mechanics. It would be foolish to alter those much because his whole game is optimized for clay. I'm frankly getting sick of all the positioning comments on TTW about Thiem's game from people who watch matches here or there and care little about clay court tennis.

Thiem had some tactics issues earlier this year on hard courts because he literally was trying to blow people off the court with those big serves you champion and everything else. It was pure power and the Goffin match at Auz Open showed it to be a failure as Thiem was gassed by midway through the 2nd set with this approach. Hitting 220 kph serves one after the other is not a good thing for him physically. His serve is not the easy power of Fed's. Its based on brutal core strength that Thiem must also conserve.

On clay courts, Thiem is learning how to play the best quickly and I saw little that I would change against Murray except going flat and going for broke at the end of the 2nd set. Ultimately he beat Murray coming back in the 3rd set with a measured increase in power on his shots. At first his UE count was rising quickly, but then he found the right balance in the 3rd set.

I'm not sure of the solution on serve for Thiem. I feel that much of this is on the technical side and he's in the right hands with Breznik as long as he doesn't hurt himself any more. Bresnik not so much to blame as Thiem was wilfully deceiving his team last summer and calling the shots on play. Thiem has not been his own best doctor, but actually more the reverse. LOL that Fed advised him at Stutgart on the situation and Thiem rebuffed him somewhat.:confused:

I feel Thiem is alike Nadal in many ways. The biggest is he likes a lot of matches and is a very similar momentum type of player. South American clay last year lead to Acapulco triumph. Consecutive weeks of play starting at Munich last year had Thiem's ground game much improved by the time of RG and early grass season.

I'll track down some stats posted on Thiem elsewhere, but conking out for the night. Before the Murray match Thiem has won 55.5% of his clay court points. As you know numbers sustained near that level inidicate slam potential.;)

So, are you backing your boy for the title later today? ;)
 
Some stats analysis of Nadal and Thiem for upcoming match (from that thread):
Its clay stat time:D:
Coming into today's SF play Nadal leads the tour with 58.7% of points won on clay. Do we believe this number? No. Nadal's two best seasons were in 2007 where he won 57.6% of his clay court points and 2012 at 58.3%.
NadalClay.png

Nadal 2017 clay likely points level:
Ace% is 4.2% and that is in the realm of possibility given Nadal's serve game the best its been perhaps ever.:eek:
First serve % is 67.2% and shows Rafa being more aggressive on first serve which is exactly what he's needed to do.:p
First serve points won is 73.0% and this is also quite believable as Rafa with aggressive serving in 2012 won 75.1%:eek:
Second serve points won is a highly suspect 62.1% in 2017 which is off the charts versus previous years. 2012 was nice so lets say 58.0% is his real level and this number has been inflated by poor opponents (ranking, plus Goffin and ARV way off at MC boosting Rafa's numbers).
Serve points won is 69.4% this year and that's crazy. Rafa won 68.7% in 2010, so he might end up that level in 2017.
Return points won is 50.4% in 2017 which is another fantasy number boosted by scenario described above. This is not 2008 Rafa.:rolleyes: Analyzing his matches he's failed to play any strong servers except for a suspect Kevin Anderson. He's around 58% 2nd serve return points won in 2017 and he may be that good again as generally he's played reasonably mobile players save Zverev and Anderson. The area clearly off kilter is first return where Nadal in 2017 he's over 45% with a career average of 39.5%. He might be as good as 46.0% return points won when 2017 is done.
IN SHORT, RAFA MIGHT BE ON TRACK FOR A MIGHTY 57.0% POINTS WON IN 2017.

Thiem visually is improved this year and so we have this for 2017:
TOTALS Match Tiebreak Ace% 1stIn 1st% 2nd% SPW RPW TPW DR
Clay 9-1 (90%) 1-1 (50%) 6.5% 62.3% 72.4% 55.7% 66.1% 44.2% 55.5% 1.30

Thiem's 2017 numbers on serve all look fairly legit and cover more matches than Rafa. They show some solid improvement over 2016 in 2nd serve points won at 55.7%. Thiem's return game bears further scrutiny with 2017 showing a whopping improvement of over 4% on return points won to 44.2%. Thiem is likely going to end up around 53.7% 2nd return points won (2015 was his best at 53.7%), so this is not the source of Thiem's boosted return points won; its his first return. Thiem in 2015 won 30.5% of his first return points on clay. In 2016 he was greatly improved to 32.9% on first return. Nadal career average leads at 39.5% and Djokoray have checked in around 36.0% in the last two years. 40% first return is devestatingly good. Thiem has outdone Nadal on first return this year in two of his matches with Sugita match at over 67% first return points won and Schwartzman around 57% (Nadal got 50% against the Schwartz). For reference against Murray Thiem won 46% of first return points. (Nadal in 2016 at Monte Carlo against Murray got 32% for reference in his win against Murray.) It seems likely that this great first return number for Thiem is a reality, but his stats are boosted like Rafa's from not playing any big servers. Thiem likely to end up around 36% on first return this year. At RG in 2016 he was at 42% return points won for the event and his highest first return match was just 36.2% against Cervantes.:confused: With 7 of his 11 matches in 2017 over the Cervantes number Thiem it appears is making a gigantic leap in first return on clay finally (much like what he did on hard courts last year.):eek: The Thiem return number may be very close to what he'll do in 2017 and that puts him at Djokoray class return game of the last few years on clay.:p
IN SHORT, THIEM MIGHT BE ON TRACK FOR AN IMPRESSIVE 55.0% POINTS WON IN 2017.

The stats show Rafa as the favorite for this match, but their is trouble in paradise. Here is where Thiem may be Rafa's undoing:
1. Thiem has a big first serve. Rafa's first return numbers should droop as Thiem specializes in punishing average returns; Rafa just getting a lot of first balls in play may not garner his normal success. Rafa's first return numbers are likely to be weak for him in this match.
2. Thiem has highish first serve points won and if he gets hot on serve on clay he's capable of getting over 70% of first serves in play which would give him a better overall serve game than prime Rafa.:confused:
3. Thiem has an excellent first return and damaged Murray greatly with it. Rafa's serve attack hinges on a high first serve percentage and points won on those serves. Thiem could easily put him in Juan Monaco serve territory.o_O

Nadal should hurt Thiem on 2nd serve and return points badly. It may not help Rafa greatly on his own serve, but on return if Thiem has a lowish first serve percentage (and it was very low with Murray at 49%:confused:) Rafa could break him frequently. Thiem at a minimum needs to find 62% first serving to keep afloat against Nadal (season average).

Very interesting match as this a bit of old school stats versus new school stats on clay. The new school is dominating around first serve and Thiem is a prime example. Old school is winning off a better ground game and solid numbers on 2nd return and serve (Rafa.)

This match probably hinges on Thiem's first serve percentage more than anything. Before Murray, Thiem was averaging close to 70% in his 4 previous matches. With that and Rafa's average play against Zeballos (game not unlike Thiem's, but much weaker), Thiem should win this match in 3 sets if he serves well.;) It could easily be 2 sets.:eek:
 
So, are you backing your boy for the title later today? ;)
I'm not in a league this week so hard to be impartial. I like Thiem's chances and some of the reasons for hope are in the post above.:rolleyes: This is probably going to be a Kyrgios beats Djokovic and then Fed happens kind of moment.:rolleyes: Visually I thought Thiem looked much better than Rafa in the SFs. Thiem has beaten Rafa on clay before so I'm not seeing much of an intimidation factor. Its an important match. If Thiem wins this immediately puts Murray in contention at RG. If Thiem plays well, but still gets beat decisively then Rafa becomes even more of a favorite on clay.:confused:
 
Barcelona has been good to Thiem, he's been a bit up and down but absolutely mauled Sugita (who beat Gasquet and PCB with a big forehand game plus speed earlier in the event.) Sugita only held serve once in the match which shows Thiem's return game is improving as much as dared hope when his first return stats boosted so much on hard courts last year in the Spring.

Of course the Murray match confirmed the expectations set by Thiem's superlative stats so far this year. Thiem amazingly prevailed while serving under 50% to boot.

Nadal is next in the final and even with the 150 points Cilic:mad: is ahead of Thiem still by 35 points with Madrid coming up. With a win tomorrow Thiem will shoot ahead of Cilic by 165 points and lock up Madrid top 8 and #8 in the world. Cilic:mad: has wildcarded into Istanbul for some vulturing as 2 seed, but he must win event to catch Thiem for Rome.o_O
Big news for Thiem so far in Madrid:
1. Nishikori is now behind in the live rankings at 9:eek:
2. Cilic won Istanbul, but just got jilted from Madrid by Thiem's good buddy:
giphy.gif

3. Thiem's serve has finally caught fire again after an over 1 year hiatus. 84% first serving and 6 aces in his opening win.:eek::eek::eek::D:D:D Thiem played extremely well against Donald and looked particulary strong on forehand as well (these two aspects of his game seem to go up and down together). Its all good.:p
4. Thiem still has to likely beat Murray again and must make SF at Madrid to pass Cilic in the rankings
5. Rafa is looking vulnerable and in range.:eek: If Rafa loses to Kyrgios tomorrow he'll be at 4205 in the rankings. If Thiem wins Madrid he goes to 4435 and leaps to 5 in the rankings and will have a shot at 4 seed for French if Fed withdraws.:)

Thiem faces a somewhat resurgent Dimitrov tomorrow.:confused:
 
Dimitrov was very resurgent today, but Thiem came back from one set down, 2-4 in the 2nd, 1-3 in the 3rd, and down 3-6 in the final set breaker saving 5 match points in one of the finest examples of Thiem Gold to date.:eek: Dimitrov was in Auz Open form.;) Simply the most clutch player of all time save perhaps Pouille at times.:oops:

Thiem needs a win tomorrow over Coric to make SF and pass Cilic in the live rankings for 7. Nadal, Djokovic, Goffin, and Nishikori (now 145 points behind Thiem) are together in the bottom half, so Thiem may be able to cement himself in at #8 or above this week for RG.:p
 
Federer got in the conversation with his Auz win.;)

The particulars from the match are detailed. Do you have a more extreme example? Down in the last two sets and save 5 match points in breaker. Do you have a better example?o_O
 
What a match yesterday. Wasn't sure if I was rooting for Thiem or Dimitrov, but when Thiem was a break down and a set down, I was pretty annoyed, so I guess I like Thiem more. Also, I figured Thiem would probably go deeper if he won, so I went with him.

Extremely clutch yesterday, saving so many MPs.

Of course, he wouldn't have had to save that many MPs if his tactics weren't so bone-headed at times...then again, that is just a given when you watch Thiem...
 
Federer got in the conversation with his Auz win.;)

The particulars from the match are detailed. Do you have a more extreme example? Down in the last two sets and save 5 match points in breaker. Do you have a better example?o_O
jesus christ I know your knowledge of tennis history is non-existent but did you start watching tennis yesterday? Let's even disregard that this method of evaluating clutchness is total garbage, there have been matches on bigger stages and/or with greater comebacks.

2011 USO semi, 84 RG final, 04 RG final, 1990 Wimbledon final, 1989 FO final, 05/06 Rome finals, 11 USO semi, Nadal-Moya Chennai 08, Nadal-Djokovic Madrid 09. The list goes on and on, there's probably a ton of matches I don't know about. Connors i know came back from 6-1 6-1 4-1 once, don't even remember the match. I think Orantes or something came back from 2 sets to 1 and 5-1 down or something at the 1975 USO.

Unless you were trolling me this whole time it's tough to take you seriously anymore with this series of posts.
 
jesus christ I know your knowledge of tennis history is non-existent but did you start watching tennis yesterday? Let's even disregard that this method of evaluating clutchness is total garbage, there have been matches on bigger stages and/or with greater comebacks.

2011 USO semi, 84 RG final, 04 RG final, 1990 Wimbledon final, 1989 FO final, 05/06 Rome finals, 11 USO semi, Nadal-Moya Chennai 08, Nadal-Djokovic Madrid 09. The list goes on and on, there's probably a ton of matches I don't know about. Connors i know came back from 6-1 6-1 4-1 once, don't even remember the match. I think Orantes or something came back from 2 sets to 1 and 5-1 down or something at the 1975 USO.

Unless you were trolling me this whole time it's tough to take you seriously anymore with this series of posts.
Connors example fails.:rolleyes: I'm asking for specifics. Now if Connors was down 6-1, 6-1, 4-1, and then 3-1 again and then save five MPs in fifth set tiebreaker you'd have something.;) Looks like you don't have a better example. One with specifics will do.;)
 
jesus christ I know your knowledge of tennis history is non-existent but did you start watching tennis yesterday? Let's even disregard that this method of evaluating clutchness is total garbage, there have been matches on bigger stages and/or with greater comebacks.

2011 USO semi, 84 RG final, 04 RG final, 1990 Wimbledon final, 1989 FO final, 05/06 Rome finals, 11 USO semi, Nadal-Moya Chennai 08, Nadal-Djokovic Madrid 09. The list goes on and on, there's probably a ton of matches I don't know about. Connors i know came back from 6-1 6-1 4-1 once, don't even remember the match. I think Orantes or something came back from 2 sets to 1 and 5-1 down or something at the 1975 USO.

Unless you were trolling me this whole time it's tough to take you seriously anymore with this series of posts.
You might be talking about this:

CONNORS d. Mikael Pernfors [SWE]
1-6 1-6 7-5 6-4 6-2

Wimbledon 2nd round 87
 
Good win yesterday. With that win he creates a little buffer for the large load of points he has to defend until Wimbledon.

On the other hand, he could still gain quite a bunch of points in the clay season, as he's probaby the 2nd best clay courter right now, but the Rome draw is ****.

The worst thing is, if Nadal wins Madrid or Rome, he'll be going into RG as the #4 seed and may get a Thiem QF again.
 
Good win yesterday. With that win he creates a little buffer for the large load of points he has to defend until Wimbledon.

On the other hand, he could still gain quite a bunch of points in the clay season, as he's probaby the 2nd best clay courter right now, but the Rome draw is ****.

The worst thing is, if Nadal wins Madrid or Rome, he'll be going into RG as the #4 seed and may get a Thiem QF again.
Once again I have to comment on the insanity that Nadal may go into RG seeded #4. RG should be seeded according to clay results.
 
Once again I have to comment on the insanity that Nadal may go into RG seeded #4. RG should be seeded according to clay results.
Nah, if they do the same thing as Wimbledon, it benefits the playeres who play on clay outside the regular clay season disproportionally.
 
Nah, if they do the same thing as Wimbledon, it benefits the playeres who play on clay outside the regular clay season disproportionally.
That would be fairer than giving players top seeds when they are all but useless on clay.

And with three M1000s providing a clear record for the year, it makes sense to me.
 
jesus christ I know your knowledge of tennis history is non-existent but did you start watching tennis yesterday? Let's even disregard that this method of evaluating clutchness is total garbage, there have been matches on bigger stages and/or with greater comebacks.

2011 USO semi, 84 RG final, 04 RG final, 1990 Wimbledon final, 1989 FO final, 05/06 Rome finals, 11 USO semi, Nadal-Moya Chennai 08, Nadal-Djokovic Madrid 09. The list goes on and on, there's probably a ton of matches I don't know about. Connors i know came back from 6-1 6-1 4-1 once, don't even remember the match. I think Orantes or something came back from 2 sets to 1 and 5-1 down or something at the 1975 USO.

Unless you were trolling me this whole time it's tough to take you seriously anymore with this series of posts.
Thiem leads the tour on clay in 2017 for break points converted (53%) and break points saved (70%) for any player with a decent number of matches.:rolleyes: Betterer than Nadal even.;)
giphy.gif
 
Good win yesterday. With that win he creates a little buffer for the large load of points he has to defend until Wimbledon.

On the other hand, he could still gain quite a bunch of points in the clay season, as he's probaby the 2nd best clay courter right now, but the Rome draw is ****.

The worst thing is, if Nadal wins Madrid or Rome, he'll be going into RG as the #4 seed and may get a Thiem QF again.
At this point he just needs top 8 for RG. As it stands Thiem is 7th in the race and has a sizeable lead on Nishikori and Goffin at 10th in the race (315 points and 785 on Goffin). If Goffin wins Rome, Nishikori makes the final they will nudge ahead of Thiem presuming Thiem only makes QF in Rome losing to Nadal. Cilic and Goffin clash R16 in Rome so even with this scenario Thiem remains ahead of Goffin. With Federer withdraw from RG, Thiem is a lock for a seed in the 5-8 range. With Nadal winning Madrid he's uncatchable for 4th seed.

It would be great for Thiem if Goffin made the finals or won Rome and got top 8 seeding because Thiem would be much better off not facing Goffin potentially in R16 Roland Garros. The real doomsday draw at RG might be Tsonga R16 and Delpo R32.

For Wimbledon, Thiem currently stands just over 400 points behind Nishikori at 8 so he needs to make that up by the end of Halle. If Thiem gets dumped early at RG he'd probably try for a wildcard at Stuttgart. Wimby race:
http://www.openerarankings.com/home?Race=3
 
Last year after Nice Thiem stood at 1720 points. This year Thiem has 2085 points in the race plus a likely 180 points from Rome for 2265 points before RG. Thiem's points position will still be better than 2016 even if he draws Nadal for the QF again at RG. R16 at RG would hurt Thiem a bit especially with Stuttgart droping off a week early. If Thiem keeps ahead of Nishikori in the rankings he'll be the 2nd seed at Halle after Federer.:p

giphy.gif

giphy.gif
 
Hope he gets the other half draw vs Rafa.... please!!!! Hope he gets novak his side of draw, at least one easy player to beat :p Goffin- hope get other half of draw vs Thiem too.
For RG
 
The Nishikori and Goffin threats are gone at Rome with their losses today and Thiem's advancement to a QF with Nadal. Cilic has a very good chance of beating Isner in his QF tomorrow, but will stay back of Thiem at #8 in the world unless he makes it all the way to the final.

Rome is playing fast and bounces lower than Madrid this year. (Madrid was quite wet and cool this year.) Big servers seem to be doing very well at Rome too. For Thiem this may translate to an advantage with Nadal later today as Thiem has the bigger serve and his forehand won't be as overwhelmed by the high bounce of Nadal. Thiem may also be marginally more rested for this quarterfinal. This may be Thiem's best chance to beat Nadal so far in 2017.:eek:
 
Back
Top