thinking about now , 06 rome final was the fed 's biggest lose ever

skypadq

Rookie
definaly fed 's best match in clay was the 06 rome final
i mean .. fed had two match point in that final
if fed was lucky , if net code shot happen , fed had won that point , i belive least fed win 06 RG final
like coria didn 't convert at 04 RG FINAL HAPPEND
this loss is really ruind fed 's legacy a lot
 

NatF

Bionic Poster
This loss is barely a footnote on Federer's legacy. No loss in a masters can compare to a slam final loss and often times even a SF loss.
 

skypadq

Rookie
This loss is barely a footnote on Federer's legacy. No loss in a masters can compare to a slam final loss and often times even a SF loss.
uhmm ... i don 't know man if fed win this match , i confident about he wins 06 RG
 

ChrisRF

Hall of Fame
uhmm ... i don 't know man if fed win this match , i confident about he wins 06 RG
I agree that RG 2006 would have been the biggest win of his career because it would have given him the CYGS. He was so superior at the the other Slams that even the additional pressure wouldn’t have stopped him.

But would he win RG just by winning Rome? I doubt it, because even a crushing 6-1 in the 1st set couldn’t give him enough confidence, and he missed even more chances in that RG match itself.

Also Hamburg 2007 didn’t result in beating Rafa at RG.
 
Top