This is how Wozniacki stays at #1 and why so many think she is a joke

  • Thread starter Thread starter NadalAgassi
  • Start date Start date
Think about what you are saying about the rest of the tour when you make such comments. It means all of them(Serena, Clijsters, Li, Schiavone, Sharapova, the whole lot) are that much worse by comparison.

That would imply all those players are worse than here. When in fact none of them, except possibly current version of Sharapova, are. Serena, Clijsters, Li, and Schaivone have all won slams in the last 13 months. Wozniacki hasnt even reached a slam final in the last 20 months. Thus all those players > Wozniacki. The end.

The WTA rankings are merely a sideshow.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So, is this where Mother Marjorie is supposed to agree and say, "yes, a Serena Williams fan at Talk Tennis Warehouse is definitely a good judge of tennis fitness, so Caroline Hingis-Vicario is in great shape based on that standard...sure, uh huh...."

Oh, no she wouldn't, you betcha!

Caroline Hingis-Vicario moves like a penguin on a tennis court. And do you know why?

Cakes and pies.
Cakes and pies.
Just look at the thighs,
forget the lies.
Cakes and pies.

Childish nonsense. Of course a guy who worships the likely PED-abusing "Queen Justine" is not the most sound judge of natural fitness.

Wozniacki's game is the issue, not fitness. She does not have an Olympian's form, but she's not vintage Davenport, either.

Moreover, if weight was a sigificant leg-iron to progress, players like the still-chubby Bartoli would not be playing as well as she has over the past few months.
 
Last edited:
It's rather obvious that the only person with "issues" is you.

Let's think about this.

She's alot better looking than you.
She's got alot more personality than you.
She's more successful than you.
She alot wealthier than you
She's alot more popular than you'll never be.
She plays a hell of alot better tennis than you'll ever play.

You constantly trying to put her down, post after post, thread after thread, just makes you look like a complete loser, full of bitterness, envy and jealousy. Maybe you should start eating some of the 'Krispy Kremes' that you like talking about so much - it might cheer up your bitter, miserable, toxic disposition.

Fascinating!
 
I'd like to apologise to all Wozniacki fans I incorrectly stated she is playing Eastbourne when she is not.

She is playing the Woznizcki Open then having THE WEEK OFF BEFORE A SLAM, before playing Wimby.

Maybe she is learning, I think its the 1st time since 2008 she had the pre slam week off.
 
you guys are too tough. wozniacki is 20 and she's already number 1. that's so good (imo) already. sure, she's not as good a serena, venus, or cljisters but they are legends. you can't expect that from a seasoned player (such as schiavone or li na) to play like the legends of the game let alone a young upstart like wozniacki.
 
I'd like to apologise to all Wozniacki fans I incorrectly stated she is playing Eastbourne when she is not.

She is playing the Woznizcki Open then having THE WEEK OFF BEFORE A SLAM, before playing Wimby.

Maybe she is learning, I think its the 1st time since 2008 she had the pre slam week off.

She should start adapting to the grass already. One week before Wimbledon and it might not bode so well. She playing a Hard Court tournaments to prep for Wimbledon.

Yes at least like you said she aint playing a tournament before a major like she did with Brussels. A postive but she would still lack matchplay on grass!
 
I think using the phrase 'worthy number 1' in the context of the current standard of WTA is an oxymoron. It seems a futile argument.

Even those in the top 20 who are more talented than Woz in certain areas fall down poorly in others (hence them not being anywhere near no1 themselves) or are too inconsistent or simply don't put enough effort into playing enough tennis throughout the season.

With the game that Wozniacki has, what else is she going to do?

It's like I said on page 1, all the wrath towards Woz is misplaced I think. It's the "more talented" players who are the ones failing big time in the WTA by not consistently performing all season round to - according to TT experts - achieve the ranking positions above Woz their abilities apparently should signify.

Woz seems to be doing all she can with the game she has. Can that be said about the other players in the WTA top 20?
 
Woz basically has two choices.

She can listen to all the armchair experts on this board and pack it up. Do a Safina and disappear.

Or, she can keep working hard, playing alot (unlike the Williams sisters, Clijsters and any other arguably superior part time players that many of you want her to emulate) and trying to improve her weaknesses. Given that she is still so young, if she sticks with it and doesn't get seriously injured, she is very likely to ultimately win her major.

I predict she will choose door #2. So, sorry, you will probably have to find someone else to hate.
 
With the game that Wozniacki has, what else is she going to do?

The very thing i've said all along: fire daddy, and get a serious coach who will change her game. She needs to be an offensive player in order to avoid being such an easy mark for her opponents. As it stands, she comes tailor-made for too many on tour, and that's due to her being a pointless, strategy-challenged pusher.

Woz seems to be doing all she can with the game she has. Can that be said about the other players in the WTA top 20?

Yes. Bartoli has a ton of physical limitations and is a poor-woman's Seles, but she's beaten her assests into shape to become an asset--to be a stronger player, as we witnessed over the past few months, leading to the French Open.

There was a time Vera was known for nothing--except being a tear machine, but her results over the past two years means she's realizing, then bulding on her assets. Yeah, she still cries from time to time, and the majors have not come her way...but then again, she's not the #1 player in the world, who was defensive over being a slamless #1 during her post-defeat press conference at this year's French Open. That distinction belongs to Wozniacki.
 
Or, she can keep working hard, playing alot (unlike the Williams sisters, Clijsters and any other arguably superior part time players that many of you want her to emulate) and trying to improve her weaknesses.

...and this is happening when? Currently, she's an "as is" player thinking her game is fine as it is, when her shameful losses at the majors proves she is not making any progress as of this year's FO.

She needs new training. Now.

arguably superior

There's no question the players you referred to are superior, as the results (winning majors) place them in a far different catagory than a slamless #1 who shows no promise at this time.

I predict she will choose door #2. So, sorry, you will probably have to find someone else to hate.

My, my...you are far too sensitive about Ms. Wozniacki.
 
She's there to win some money and promote tennis in her home country, probably getting local sponsorships and whatnot. She sort of has to appear. The tournament was probably created around the idea of Wozniacki.
 
Don’t you know thundervolley hates many WTA players? Caro is just one of them.

Many TW members have already exposed you for the racist you are in nearly every hate-filled post you make regarding the Williams family, so you are in no position to comment on anyone.

Try removing that hood, kid.
 
She's there to win some money and promote tennis in her home country, probably getting local sponsorships and whatnot. She sort of has to appear. The tournament was probably created around the idea of Wozniacki.

True, just like the Serbian Open was for Djokovic.
Also, she will DEFINITELY get a HUGE Appearance Fee and she's basically guaranteed the Title as most players with a few brain cells will be playing in Birmingham this week or Eastbourne next week.
What I don't get is how does Wozniacki have so many titles? I mean, her game is really poor, why does she not get beaten? She won 6 titles last year and she's already won a few this year . .
I don't think she will win Wimbledon, she will get smashed off the court by someone at some point, be it R2 in an unlucky draw or QF vs someone like Li Na, Clijsters, Venus or Serena etc. etc.

Anyway, I'm not a fan of her, but I do find it easy to see why she is #1. It's the WTA who needs to offer WAY MORE points for winning a Grand Slam, I'd say something like 3,000 or 4,000 points.
 
The very thing i've said all along: fire daddy, and get a serious coach who will change her game. She needs to be an offensive player in order to avoid being such an easy mark for her opponents. As it stands, she comes tailor-made for too many on tour, and that's due to her being a pointless, strategy-challenged pusher.
You see, that's the thing. I don't think she'll ever be a player who can smash balls into the corners and blow opponents off the court, plus the game she has fits perfectly in the modern WTA - especially when you look at the motley crew around her in the top 20 who can rarely string two decent tournaments together.

It's not a simple black&white case of switching to a different game. I think Woz's game is pretty much what it's always going to be, barring some slight improvements here and there maybe. Essentially she'll always be that style of player.

She is what she is and it's down to other players to concentrate on their own game and becoming more consistent themselves.
 
i saw this video about her on youtube. she said early on she spent a lot of time hitting against the wall because she had no partner (they show the wall that she used to practice). i guess that's why she plays the way she does. peters is right. she is what she is but among the wta players that don't have great weaponry (such as jankovic, radwanska, etc...), Wozniacki is pretty good.
 
i saw this video about her on youtube. she said early on she spent a lot of time hitting against the wall because she had no partner (they show the wall that she used to practice). i guess that's why she plays the way she does. peters is right. she is what she is but among the wta players that don't have great weaponry (such as jankovic, radwanska, etc...), Wozniacki is pretty good.

"She is what she is" is the problem, and in order to overcome problems, she has to change. Some keep harping about how young she is, so if that is the case, she's also young enough to make changes. Players with no ability or apparent desire to change (see: Jankovic) end up with same results: no majors.
 
Many TW members have already exposed you for the racist you are in nearly every hate-filled post you make regarding the Williams family, so you are in no position to comment on anyone.

Try removing that hood, kid.

I don't like Serena's antics or threatening a line judge is not a racist. (dry)

You have a history of attacking countless of players. You even went further wishing they(eg Henin) retire, and despise about the style they play. I can understand someone is not a fan of certain player, but your hatred will always be a mystery.
 
It's rather obvious that the only person with "issues" is you.
Let's think about this.
She.. She.. She.. She.. She.. She..
You constantly trying to put her down, post after post, thread after thread, just makes you look like a complete loser, full of bitterness, envy and jealousy. Maybe you should start eating some of the 'Krispy Kremes' that you like talking about so much - it might cheer up your bitter, miserable, toxic disposition.

You seem a sincere person.
But i disagree with your method of expressing yourself.

Gee, this is "Talk Tennis" forum.
That we aren't as good a tennis player or as talented as gifted pros on tour doesn't mean we don't have the right to talk about them.

Personally attacking the poster is the tell-tale sign of sure defeat.
I was really hoping that you counter MotherMarjorie's posts with some of your own witted posts,,,



I find MotherMarjorie's posts entirely good natured with no aftertaste.
She seems just too positively minded to be truly mean and sinister.

And she is big on wits, humor and truth!

One of handful posters that i come to this board for.
 
MotherMarjorie is a great poster. She brings laughter to this forum.

Few bad apples in here bring up offensive topic. e.g. racism. Which is against the forum's rule.
 
MotherMarjorie is a great poster. She brings laughter to this forum.
Indeed, she brings laughter to us.
But, to me, it is the "truth" part she laces into laughter that i really cherish.


Few bad apples in here bring up offensive topic. e.g. racism. Which is against the forum's rule.

Yes, few bad apples bring up offensive method to express themselves.

Remember, there is only one "true" rule in any forum :
One expresses oneself via merits (wits, humor, truth, logic, respect, etc)
Whoever agrees/disagrees expresses oneself the same way.


Ah, so easy to tell who doesn't abide by "true" rule of forum.

. . .
 
Last edited:
I don't like Serena's antics or threatening a line judge is not a racist.

Complete bullsh*t. You have a long history of attacking the entire Williams family for any fantasy you choose to create. Over the years, you have mocked and questioned the sisters' feelings over their murdered sister, you tried to dismiss SW's proven, recent medical issues, and as innumerable members have repeatedly said about you, you will not only enter threads where a Williams is mentioned just to attack them, but will bring them up in threads having nothing to do with either--all to continue your campaign of hatred, which you do not apply to any other player.

It is no wonder many call you a racist.

You have a history of attacking countless of players

Between this forum and the Fomer player forum, you have a very long, sad record of fighting, flaming--or jumping on the bandwagon of those who attack members you despise--and generally destroying any fair-minded discussiion with flames, lies and your disturbing, pathological hatred of the Williams family. It would be too easy to post years of evidence, but this thread is not about you--though you cannot help but drive it in that direction--another negative trait you possess.

The lesson here: if you do not wish to be exposed by so many members, then exercise a little self-control. No one believes you will, but the warning is on the table.
 
TMF's sole existence is based around:


1. Endless over the top worshipping of Federer, Wozniacki, and Sharapova. To the point that anyone who suggest Federer while one of the greatest ever might not quite be THE GOAT, that Wozniacki is a weak #1, and that Sharapova's best days are well past her, all perfectly logical conclusions held by many, TMF is on that person like a rottweiler on red meat. Complete with profanity, insults, twisted facts, whining, lies and false accusations, the whole works.

2. Endless parade of hating to the Williams sisters, and to a lesser degree Nadal and Sampras (solely due to their being the biggest recent threats to his beloved Federer's position in history). To the point of bringing up said players, especialy Venus and Serena, even in threads that have nothing to do with them. Even often times wishing physical harm on them when they start to (inevitably) beat up on his favorites.
 
When in fact none of them, except possibly current version of Sharapova, are. Serena, Clijsters, Li, and Schaivone have all won slams in the last 13 months. Wozniacki hasnt even reached a slam final in the last 20 months. Thus all those players > Wozniacki. The end.

The WTA rankings are merely a sideshow.

If the WTA rankings are a sideshow, then why are you making such a big deal about it? You're the one who said the WTA is a mess because there is a 'no-talent mug as #1'. So which is it? If they are just a sideshow, they have nothing to do with the WTA being a mess.

Why can't we appreciate both sides? Why can't we simply say that Wozniacki is more consistent and at least in some cases more dedicated, and has been and continues to be a very successful player, while the others have been more successful at winning Slams?
 
TMF's sole existence is based around:


1. Endless over the top worshipping of Federer, Wozniacki, and Sharapova. To the point that anyone who suggest Federer while one of the greatest ever might not quite be THE GOAT, that Wozniacki is a weak #1, and that Sharapova's best days are well past her, all perfectly logical conclusions held by many, TMF is on that person like a rottweiler on red meat. Complete with profanity, insults, twisted facts, whining, lies and false accusations, the whole works.

2. Endless parade of hating to the Williams sisters, and to a lesser degree Nadal and Sampras (solely due to their being the biggest recent threats to his beloved Federer's position in history). To the point of bringing up said players, especialy Venus and Serena, even in threads that have nothing to do with them. Even often times wishing physical harm on them when they start to (inevitably) beat up on his favorites.

This is true, and TMF is a very biased poster (and this is coming from a Federer fan). But THUNDERVOLLEY is equally biased. In fact, you can almost reverse TMF's position on Federer, Wozniacki, Sharapova, WS, and Sampras and you would have THUNDERVOLLEY's opinion. As bitter as TMF seems against the WS, THUNDERVOLLEY is just as bad about Wozniacki and Sharapova (and Federer, to a lesser extent). You have to look at it both ways, even if you may agree with some of THUNDERVOLLEY's opinions.
 
Would a seeding system just for slams solely based on players slam performances over the past 12 months work better than seeding based on WTA rank?
 
This is true, and TMF is a very biased poster (and this is coming from a Federer fan). But THUNDERVOLLEY is equally biased. In fact, you can almost reverse TMF's position on Federer, Wozniacki, Sharapova, WS, and Sampras and you would have THUNDERVOLLEY's opinion. As bitter as TMF seems against the WS, THUNDERVOLLEY is just as bad about Wozniacki and Sharapova (and Federer, to a lesser extent). You have to look at it both ways, even if you may agree with some of THUNDERVOLLEY's opinions.

No it's not !

I do not wishes harm to any players, wishing them to retire. Or bringing sensitive materials that is prohibited in this forum(eg Racism).

All of these accusations are not true but in actuality, NadalAgassi & Thundervolley are guilty for all of these actions toward other players. Even a retire Henin they don't leave her alone.

You don't know me at all.
 
TMF's sole existence is based around:


1. Endless over the top worshipping of Federer, Wozniacki, and Sharapova. To the point that anyone who suggest Federer while one of the greatest ever might not quite be THE GOAT, that Wozniacki is a weak #1, and that Sharapova's best days are well past her, all perfectly logical conclusions held by many, TMF is on that person like a rottweiler on red meat. Complete with profanity, insults, twisted facts, whining, lies and false accusations, the whole works.

2. Endless parade of hating to the Williams sisters, and to a lesser degree Nadal and Sampras (solely due to their being the biggest recent threats to his beloved Federer's position in history). To the point of bringing up said players, especialy Venus and Serena, even in threads that have nothing to do with them. Even often times wishing physical harm on them when they start to (inevitably) beat up on his favorites.

This is the most accurate assessment one will ever need to read about TMF.
 
This is true, and TMF is a very biased poster (and this is coming from a Federer fan). But THUNDERVOLLEY is equally biased. In fact, you can almost reverse TMF's position on Federer, Wozniacki

Not quite. In this and another recent thread, i've not only made positive comments about CW's fitness improvements (when someone else always refers to her weight), but talked about what she needs to do to increase her chances of becoming a winner of majors. If I was wholly dismissive of her, I would not waste the time to post anything about her training.

I've already said Fed was one of the greats (actually, i've said that for years)...he's just not the GOAT, and as NadalAgassi states, if anyone does not see Fed as the GOAT, people like TMF respond in one way, and one way only...

To the point that anyone who suggest Federer while one of the greatest ever might not quite be THE GOAT, that Wozniacki is a weak #1, and that Sharapova's best days are well past her, all perfectly logical conclusions held by many, TMF is on that person like a rottweiler on red meat. Complete with profanity, insults, twisted facts, whining, lies and false accusations, the whole works

He tries to pretend to be objective (which is a laugh, because he's the polar opposite of objectivity), but as seen in the S.I./Nadal thread, he constantly attacks anyone (with vile flames) who does not worship at the altar of Roger Federer.
 
Woz reminds me of Hingis: A quarter maybe semi final player at a GS due to having no weapons and capable of taking titles through the year and mainting no. 1 by not getting injured and constantly showing up. I hope I'm wrong, I'd like to see her take her game up a gear, maybe she will have her Hingis 1997 :-| She does get a lot of crap for her ranking but she didn't make the rules.

It does annoy me that there are players who don't give two hoots about the tour and only show up for GS events and make a big show of it, at least Woz shows up.

Can't win on this forum though, if she had a big forehand she would then be a 'baseline basher'.

She's there to win some money and promote tennis in her home country, probably getting local sponsorships and whatnot. She sort of has to appear. The tournament was probably created around the idea of Wozniacki.

Yeah, I think this tourney has only been going two years? She probably needed to support it if not for the money politically. Less than ideal prep for wimbley though, I can't see her doing too well.
 
You are wrong in most of your statement.

1-It is her home tournament and She is promoting and supporting the tournament and I think She should have done the same.

2- Don't people normally come back to defend their points?? What's wrong with that??

3- She already has enough money, but what's wrong with more??
You should also know that she gets bonuses from her sponsors from tournaments she wins and for staying at number 1.

4- Whether or not you think she deserves the number 1 it doesn't matter she likes it and she wants to be, and she is very young and can improve a lot still.

5- I agree with you, currently she has no game to win a major, pretty much because of a few factors and once she gets to the semis, there is no way around, she'll have to play a player that will be able to overpower her, or is more aggressive... In my opinion most of the matches she plays against some top players is out of her hands, it is up to her opponents to decide the result.
 
Venus On the current No.1 player in the world, Caroline Wozniacki...

"Caroline is a great player doing positive things - she's really on the right road. She doesn't need much advice. Off the court she's a very nice person and super helpful; on the court she's an unbelievable competitor. She has played more consistently than anyone and is leaps and bounds ahead in the points."

http://www.wtatennis.com/page/OffCourtNews/Read/0,,12781~2374996,00.html

I wonder what Serena thinks...:)

TBH - Woz being #1 is due to Serena/Venus/Clijsters being injured, and the other top players are either inconsistent or ineffective.

Look at Li - yes she won RG and made AO final, but between that she was awful at times - lost 5 of 6 matches she played after the AO final (Wickmayer, Zakopalova, Peng, Larrson, Lisicki). Made Madrid SF and Rome SF before winning RG. But Woz has her beat on consistency. That's the way the rankings have always been on both tours - consistency >>> peak results.
 
Li Na still is only a few hundred points behind Wozniacki in the Race points (not the ranking points). So if she can start performing more consistently in the regular tour events she could take over #1 at the end of the year. She should do better than Wozniacki at Wimbledon, and has just as good a chance of doing well at the U.S Open.
 
I wonder what Serena thinks...:)

TBH - Woz being #1 is due to Serena/Venus/Clijsters being injured, and the other top players are either inconsistent or ineffective.

Look at Li - yes she won RG and made AO final, but between that she was awful at times - lost 5 of 6 matches she played after the AO final (Wickmayer, Zakopalova, Peng, Larrson, Lisicki). Made Madrid SF and Rome SF before winning RG. But Woz has her beat on consistency. That's the way the rankings have always been on both tours - consistency >>> peak results.

Serena will probably take back the #1 spot next year. She wins just about everything she enters.

As for Wozniacki. All it takes is for one person to jump into the #1 spot. After that, it will be a mental blow and Wozniacki will probably fall just as hard as Jankovic and Safina did. Probably won't happen this year but the way Serena looks; really fit, she will probably take her 2 best slams(wimbly+uso), the finals and be on top by next year post-AO.
 
As I pointed out recently in another thread, this is simply not true. Wozniacki's playing schedule is roughly average compared to other top players. She's not wearing herself out for slams anymore than others are. It's nowhere near 30 events a year, she's on about 22 right now.

Try again.

OK, I will.

Wozniacki's playing schedule ISN'T average compared to other top players. She's played more events than any other top 10 player, save Bartoli (who can't enter enough events.....so she can default/retire from a fair amount of them anyway) and Kvitova, who only recent;y entered the top 10. If Serena had played just a few events in the last 12 months, she'd be top 10, making it more apparent how Wozniacki overplays.

And bears repeating: how INSANELY STUPID, and HOLLOW the current WTA ranking system is.

Bryan, when will you ever learn?
 
If the WTA rankings are a sideshow, then why are you making such a big deal about it? You're the one who said the WTA is a mess because there is a 'no-talent mug as #1'. So which is it? If they are just a sideshow, they have nothing to do with the WTA being a mess.

Why can't we appreciate both sides? Why can't we simply say that Wozniacki is more consistent and at least in some cases more dedicated, and has been and continues to be a very successful player, while the others have been more successful at winning Slams?

I'll say it: the WTA is a MESS!.

Their ranking system is the ULTIMATE SIDESHOW in the history of the sport. It's laughable. No credibility whatsoever!

Now, can we just have the WTA be a sideshow.....especially at Wimbledon!! ALL WTA matches are on outside courts only! Everyone will be happy!
 
Wozniacki's playing schedule ISN'T average compared to other top players. She's played more events than any other top 10 player, save Bartoli (who can't enter enough events.....so she can default/retire from a fair amount of them anyway) and Kvitova, who only recent;y entered the top 10.

Yes it is. Your 'excuses' for Bartoli and Kvitova hold no water. It doesn't matter how recently they entered the top 10 or how often they retire or withdraw, the issue is about how many events they play, period.

Furthermore, Schiavone has played as many events as Wozniacki as well. That's three out of the other nine Top 10 players, putting Woz at the 40th percentile. When you consider Clijster's injury issues and the fact that two other players(Azarenka and Stosur) have played only one event fewer, and two more(Li and Zvonareva, you know, the two active players closest to her in the rankings) have played two fewer, you see there is not this huge gap being alleged betweed Wozniacki's playing schedule and her rivals.

Another way of looking at it is to note that Wozniacki has played 22 events: 20 or more have played by everyone in the Top 10 except for Sharapova and Clijsters(both at least partly because of injury), and in the 11-30 rankings you can find only three more players who have played less than 20, one being Serena.

I'll say it: the WTA is a MESS!.

Their ranking system is the ULTIMATE SIDESHOW in the history of the sport. It's laughable. No credibility whatsoever!

Repeating an inchorent statement doesn't add to it's validity. If the ranking system is a sideshow, than by definition it doesn't show the WTA to be a mess. It can only be a major problem if it is not a sideshow: they very accusation of it being a sideshow means that it is not a significant problem.
 
Wozniacki's schedule for this year

1. Syndey
2. AO
3. Dubai
4. Doha
5. Indian Wells
6. Miami
7. Charlston
8. Stuttgart
9. Madrid
10. Rome
11. Brussels
12. Wozniacki Open (Copenhagen)
13. Eastbourne
14. Wimbledon.

She will be on her 14th tournament of the year come Wimbledon, no weeks off between clay and grass, stuipd, stupid girl.


If you really think Wozniacki will be exhausted from the Copenhagen tournament you don't know anything about professional tennis, stupid ...
 
Serena will probably take back the #1 spot next year. She wins just about everything she enters. ...


Fanboy BS!
Serena has lost in the overwhelming majority of all the tournaments she entered. Even in slams she lost more than 70 percent.
 
Matches in this year:
Wozniacki 48
Bartoli 46
Azarenka 40
Kvitova 39
Zvonareva 38
Schiavone 36
Stosur 34
Li Na 34

To be specific YTD : Win - Loss

Wozniacki : 40 - 8
Clijsters : 22 - 5
Zvonareva : 28 - 10
Li Na : 26 - 8
Azarenka : 31 - 9
Sharapova : 26 - 7
Schiavone : 23 - 13
Kvitova : 32 - 7
Bartoli : 31 - 15
Stosur : 21 - 13

When Woz plays something like Copenhagen, what on earth is she doing fraggin people like Falconi, Brianti and Kerbe??
 
To be specific YTD : Win - Loss

Wozniacki : 40 - 8
Clijsters : 22 - 5
Zvonareva : 28 - 10
Li Na : 26 - 8
Azarenka : 31 - 9
Sharapova : 26 - 7
Schiavone : 23 - 13
Kvitova : 32 - 7
Bartoli : 31 - 15
Stosur : 21 - 13

When Woz plays something like Copenhagen, what on earth is she doing fraggin people like Falconi, Brianti and Kerbe??

People need to quit harping about the Copenhagen tournament. It was created specifically for her - 2010 was the first year it was held. It's promoting tennis in her home country and she's politically and socially obligated to compete.
 
To be specific YTD : Win - Loss

Wozniacki : 40 - 8
Clijsters : 22 - 5
Zvonareva : 28 - 10
Li Na : 26 - 8
Azarenka : 31 - 9
Sharapova : 26 - 7
Schiavone : 23 - 13
Kvitova : 32 - 7
Bartoli : 31 - 15
Stosur : 21 - 13

When Woz plays something like Copenhagen, what on earth is she doing fraggin people like Falconi, Brianti and Kerbe??


Copenhagen is in Denmark.
And Wozniacki is from Denmark.
Got it now, you genius?
 
People need to quit harping about the Copenhagen tournament. It was created specifically for her - 2010 was the first year it was held. It's promoting tennis in her home country and she's politically and socially obligated to compete.

And maybe she likes it to compete in her home country?

I have even heard of US players who think the USO is greater than FO or Wimbledon, can you believe it?
 
I do want Woz to win a slam and I do believe she can win a slam at some point, but at which point? Yes, Woz is still young, there's lots of room for improvement etc. But it doesn't work that way when you're on the tour battling day in and day out, you don't have the space nor the time to radically change the player that you are and grew up into. What you can do is you can fill in some game, adjust what you do have. How much space does Woz have? She doesn't have another ten good years to stay at the top. My guess is she has about another three best years or so or within about another 200 to 250 matches in her physical prime to win her slam, still as a top favourite, before the injury phase sets in with all the accumulated wear and tear and before she knows it she's down in the rankings all beaten up and struggling hard, just like Ivanovic, Safina, Sharapova, Jankovic, Dokic..... etc. She can still come back after that but she will only once in a while will she have an outside chance of having a good two weeks, going all the way and winning a slam. You just don't have that many matches when you are at your physically freshest to spend. Woz isn't a golden oldie like a Schiavone nor a special case like Li who spent a long time bottlenecked in her national system, taking time off for study for two years because of disagreements with her national coaches and then only within these two years has she gotten "real" coaches capable of advising her at the level of contending for Slams that she is now playing at. And Li herself is also very beaten up with her three right knee operations.

Why spend up your best matches when you are at your freshest on things like e-boks SE? Why waste time beating up people like Falconi, Brianti and Kerber? You wouldn't be meeting them in the QF, SF and F of Wim, will you? And winning against that sort will not increase your confidence, it will decrease it because now you don't know how you will do when you next face Lisicki, Gorgeous, Kvitova and Serena. After your physically peak years, it gets harder and harder and you win less and less. Like this year, you lost early at RG, so play Birmingham and rest before Wim. If you got into the second week and later rounds like Maria, Li and Schiavone, rest a week then play Eastbourne. Maria withdrew only because of illness. Or Ana who played both, desperate for match play and trying hard to play herself into winning form. But an indoors HC before Wim when everybody else is playing the preparatory grass events? Really should have gone to Birmingham with Lisicki and Ana there, Lisicki whom you lost to on grass two years ago and then on to Eastbourne with such a draw there almost a mini Wimbledon which will probably be significant how the big one itself plays out. Hence all the bad jokes about Woz invitational, Woz Open, Caro's pajama party and so on.

So how many of her best opportunities does Woz have left? Within 3 years she has about 12-14 slams to spend her peak freshness on. But you have to cut about half of those since she's an HC player, not a grass or clay player where in RG and Wim she may be top seed but it will be a surprise if she actually wins one of those, not that she cannot, but many, many stars will have to be VERY favourably aligned indeed. About 8 to 10 AO and USO slams and maybe one or two RG or Wim till the end of 2014 that she can realistically have a chance of winning between one to three of those is my guesstimate.
 
Back
Top