Tiebreaks vs. ad games

[Raphael]

To all the people in this forum who have posted about keeping the system of ad games in the final sets of grand slam matches (except the USOpen), I wanted to ask:

Would you prefer to do away with tiebreaks entirely and have every set go to ad games?

 

[LameTennisPlayer]

^^^
no that is just stupid, thats how it use to be, until they changed it, we should be moving forwards not backwards....

 

[Hood_Man]

No. Although I hate the idea of a deciding set tiebreak, tiebreaks at the end of regular sets are fantastic. Especially at the end of 3rd or 4th sets where a guy who's 2 sets to love down can have a chance to keep the match going.

Deciding set tiebreaks in Majors end great matches prematurely I think, whereas in the 1st to 4th sets they can prolong them.

 

[muzza123]

Enough of these threads already!!

 

[LameTennisPlayer]

i think you have your answer, now close thread!

 

[Kenny022593]

Well, IMO, the Dent vs Navarro tiebreak at the USO last year was better than the 70-68 Isner vs Mahut. Not by much though.