Times Big3 held 3+ Slams

[Madinolf]

Times Big3 held 3/4 Slams or more:

DJOKOVIC after

2011 UO
2012 AO
2012 RG
2015 UO
2016 AO
2016 RG (held all four Slams)
2016 WI
2019 AO
2019 WI
2021 WI
2021 UO (could hold all four Slams)

Total: 11

FEDERER after

2004 UO
2006 AO
2006 RG
2006 WI
2006 UO
2007 AO
2007 RG
2007 WI
2007 UO
2009 WI
2010 AO

Total: 11

NADAL after

2009 AO
2010 UO
2011 RG

Total: 3

 

[MichaelNadal]

Slam count:

Djokovic: 20
Federer:20
Nadal: 20

 

[Madinolf]

Slam count:

Djokovic: 20
Federer:20
Nadal: 20

Winning 10 slams in a row or winning 10 slams in 10 different years: what's more impressive to you?

IMO the first one, definitely.

 

[MichaelNadal]

Winning 10 slams in a row or winning 10 slams in 10 different years: what's more impressive to you?

IMO the first one, definitely.

To me it doesn't matter lol. Both are impressive, most players will never win 10 250's or 500's.

 

[Spencer Gore]

Winning 10 slams in a row or winning 10 slams in 10 different years: what's more impressive to you?

Winning ten slams in a row is an astonishing feat. Who has achieved that?

 

[Hitman]

OP, now even though that is incredible dominance shown by Djokovic and Federer over Nadal, lets also keep one other thing in mind here to be fair to Nadal

Federer and Djokovic would have a much easier time holding three slams in the sense that they are HC GOAT, now you can say that comes down to them deserving it by winning those titles, but their games are naturally geared to more HC court. Nadal is more geared to clay courts....taking that into consideration and the fact that there are indeed two HC slams, this feat was always going to be accomplished more by Fedovic.

 

[Madinolf]

OP, now even though that is incredible dominance shown by Djokovic and Federer over Nadal, lets also keep one other thing in mind here to be fair to Nadal

Federer and Djokovic would have a much easier time holding three slams in the sense that they are HC GOAT, now you can say that comes down to them deserving it by winning those titles, but their games are naturally geared to more HC court. Nadal is more geared to clay courts....taking that into consideration and the fact that there are indeed two HC slams, this feat was always going to be accomplished more by Fedovic.

This is how tennis is. With the 'ifs' we can say many things.

If there was only one serve Sampras would have zero Slams. If there was three serves Isner would have several Slams. If the court was three meters wider Monfils would have several Slams. Etc...

 

[Hitman]

This is how tennis is. With the 'ifs' we can say many things.

If there was only one serve Sampras would have zero Slams. If there was three serves Isner would have several Slams. If the court was three meters wider Monfils would have several Slams. Etc...

If there was only one serve Sampras would have zero slams? LOL You're talking about one of the, if not THE mentally toughest players out there, if he doesn't get two serves, then neither do his rivals and Sampras still has one of the most devastating forehands of all time and insane net attacking skills, he would chip and charge in on more returns in such a situation and get to the net much quicker.

 

[Deleted member 771911]

Nice undermining.