TMZ gets Sampras: Federer better than Agassi

The Bawss

Banned
I find it appalling that a guy with 14 majors doesn't know that tennis matches can only go to a maximum of 5 sets and not 7!
 
Last edited:

6-1 6-3 6-0

Banned
It's an interesting point by Pete Sampras actually, a 7-set match for grand slam finals may be better to watch. I think the Nadal-Djokovic match at AO 2012 deserved to go to more than 5 sets.
 

tacou

G.O.A.T.
It's an interesting point by Pete Sampras actually, a 7-set match for grand slam finals may be better to watch. I think the Nadal-Djokovic match at AO 2012 deserved to go to more than 5 sets.
so that instead of Zagreb we could watch 2 funerals/?
 

Big_Dangerous

Talk Tennis Guru
It's an interesting point by Pete Sampras actually, a 7-set match for grand slam finals may be better to watch. I think the Nadal-Djokovic match at AO 2012 deserved to go to more than 5 sets.
Of course if your Spanish lover Nadal had won you wouldn't be saying that.
 

Radicalized

Semi-Pro
I couldn't get it to load. What was it about?
Just a paparazzi video following "Pistol Pete," as he calls him, walking down a street in CA. Asks at peak, Andre vs. Fed, "who has the advantage?" Pete, while going into a building says, "I'd take Roger." Pete continues to respond with humor in dealing with a pap. "Does it go 5 sets at least?" Pete says, "Maybe 7." The actual video is complemented by poor humor (meth /Pete's eyebrows) and stats about their H2H.
 
Last edited:
Top