Sinner is set to eat his lunch and dominate at Wimbledon for years to come. It will be ugly.
Dude what are you talking about?? Yeah the skidding across the grass is Carlos's issue when he has 4 grass titles including two back to back Wimbledon titles. He has the highest win percentage on grass out of the entire ATP.
Neutral here.
Of course, Medvedev, former US Open champion and two other finals there, is a random like VdZ.
Appreciate the sensible take Raul!
I haven't seen any Sinner fan being so biased to say Alcaraz is finished, quite the opposite actually, so I'm not sure where you're coming from. Some of us had predicted that Sinner would perform well even on natural surfaces and that's exactly what happened. It was obvious to any non biased viewer. To be honest, so far most Sinner fans have been more right than wrong, given he's dominating and looking ominous for the foreseeable future. As per your original question, I do see Alcaraz winning plenty of slams, on any surface. Sinner won't always be at the top of his game and Alcaraz will improve and be ready.
This is a ridiculous take mate come on. You're basing your opinion on ancient results
So who would u back if they make the final in New York and why?
Sinner 2-0 Alcaraz on grass. Both 4 sets.
As things are now, I'd say Sinner. But it depends how they get there. I think Raz is looking much more consistent than a year ago so I won't be surprised to see him in most finals from now on, even on hard
Both!
I’m simply talking about the thread we are on. I remember seeing the opposite sentiments after the RG25 final.
I’m more of a sinner fan, but sinner can still lose and then Alcaraz has it. I see him winning another Wimbledon maybe. Maybe a uso
One match was 3 years ago. And you are referring to one player? What about all the other players Alcaraz has beaten on grass including ones Sinner has lost to? What about Alcarazs superior number of titles on grass and his superior win percentage? What that matters less than a 2 match head to head between 2 players?
I think Alcaraz is better on north American hard courts. I think Sinner is better on Australasia HCs.
who has the H2H on hard courts?
Yeah. Apparently he gets him the first time in 20 months and all of a sudden sinneroid is going to dominate ?
That match against Grigor was lucky. So lucky his first Wimbledon title should have an asterisk next to it.
Sinner almost lost to grigor. i think either could win a match on any given day.
Posters like me provide facts.
Facts: sinner didn’t actually beat Grigor. Walkover down 0-2 isn’t exactly promising.
arguably, no. Sinner was much closer to losing earlier than Sinner was at the very least. And only one of them actually won the match.
Sinner didn’t get anywhere close to winning a set.
Two sets up doesn't mean a thing.
He lost to Botic in an upset sure - after coming off the late clay court transition. Sinner lost to medvedev at wimby 2024 who y’all call a mug so …
It doesn’t. But sad to see a win by walk over down 0-2 in sets with no clear level of outplaying the opposition who retired in the 3rd either.
Even if Sinner had recovered to win in five sets, it is insane to suggest a 2-0 deficit isn’t “almost losing.” The only time I’d ever question that is if the lost sets were very close and the won sets were bagels and breadsticks (kind of like Djokovic-Musetti at RG 2021).
He lost to Botic in an upset sure - after coming off the late clay court transition. Sinner lost to medvedev at wimby 2024 who y’all call a mug so …
Sinner won 2/3 slams so far this year but isn’t the conversation of who can stop sinner? H2H still favors Carlos.
Carlos still owns the H2H on hard courts.
Sinner has been the more consistent of the two recent. Coincidence those stamina issues and consistency aligned with two PED failures - I’ll let you be the judge
all the best boy
