Impressive stuff from both don't you think Lew?
Your own favourite was offended to be called a weak opponent. So you're basically offending him every day.
Impressive stuff from both don't you think Lew?
I liked both hard to say. Liked the contrast in different styles in 2015 and the baseline fearlessness in 2011.In the second one, Djokovic's mental solidness just amazed me.
The guy somehow found two more gears to go on B.Ps
But quality wise this one is not even close to 2011. Crazy ballstriking from both in first two sets.
Umm i think you play tennis right? The big 3 all have a better game tactics and variety than they had when they were younger. Also this whole notion that they have lost massive amounts of speed and their reaction times are that of a geriatric imbecile are way exxaggrrated and blown way out of proportion. Fed lost a noticable step around 36. Lots of this nonsense is agenda driven. Many want 2007 to be the last year of tennis. So i aint buying alot of this ocean front property in a hurricane.Hard to imagine calling Federer a weak opponent. The more politically correct term would be that he isn't as good a player as he was before.
Federer then proceeded to win 3 slams LOL.
Imagine Djokovic or Nadal being called babies after they had won 3 slams.
Your own favourite was offended to be called a weak opponent. So you're basically offending him every day.
They have those because they are not the players they used to be.Umm i think you play tennis right? The big 3 all have a better game tactics and variety than they had when they were younger. Also this whole notion that they have lost massive amounts of speed and their reaction times are that of a geriatric imbecile are way exxaggrrated and blown way out of proportion. Fed lost a noticable step around 36. Lots of this nonsense is agenda driven. Many want 2007 to be the last year of tennis. So i aint buying alot of this ocean front property in a hurricane.
No more along the lines that these guys push themselves. They get solved and change. Nadal aint winning nothing off clay with 2008 game. Goes for all players. Nothing is static with these pros. You can get away with it for only so long.They have those because they are not the players they used to be.
Fed got offended because he was and would be Djokovic opponent in the future.Reporter wasn't asking about Federer, he was talking about lost gen and next gen...
"...no great opponents in the future..."
No more along the lines that these guys push themselves. They get solved and change. Nadal aint winning nothing off clay with 2008 game. Goes for all players. Nothing is static with these pros. You can get away with it for only so long.
Fed got offended because he was and would be Djokovic opponent in the future.
Of course he was thinking about himself when he answered that question.
Not a question for me. Not good at hypotheticals.Thiem beats 2011 Djokovic at the AO no?
Thiem beats 2011 Djokovic at the AO no?
He didn't say young opponents. He said opponents in the future which included Federer.Reporter wasn't asking about Federer, he was talking about lost gen and next gen...
"...no great opponents in the future..."
He didn't say young opponents. He said opponents in the future which included Federer.
Not a question for me. Not good at hypotheticals.
No more along the lines that these guys push themselves. They get solved and change. Nadal aint winning nothing off clay with 2008 game. Goes for all players. Nothing is static with these pros. You can get away with it for only so long.
Wtf was he winning off clay in 2008? This is more fed fan semantics.Saying 2008 Nadal wins nothing off clay is a hypothetical though right? Either way it should be plainly obvious that 2008 Nadal is leagues ahead of any similarly aged player today...
Lol these guys already have stated over and over again how they have pushed each other and we are wimpering about the evolution of the game. If fed was a few years younger he prob would find a way to solve djokovic and beat him in a major again. Time has run out for fed at this stage. But you never know.
All these pros and ex pros and coaches talk about it all the time. Yet TTW is like WUT?!Good point which goes missed a lot. You have to change it up to stay competitive. A lot of people think you can play the way you did 10 years ago and win big because you were a better athlete but forget that 10 years ago, people had already figured out your patterns of play.
Wtf was he winning off clay in 2008? This is more fed fan semantics.
Random mugs? Try and get into the top 100.Every other major sport has been able to produce great players in the last 11 years. You would have a point if the young guys were only stopped by big 3 rather than losing to random mugs
All these pros and ex pros and coaches talk about it all the time. Yet TTW is like WUT?!
Good point which goes missed a lot. You have to change it up to stay competitive. A lot of people think you can play the way you did 10 years ago and win big because you were a better athlete but forget that 10 years ago, people had already figured out your patterns of play.
I liked both hard to say. Liked the contrast in different styles in 2015 and the baseline fearlessness in 2011.
Wimbledon, Olympics, TorontoWtf was he winning off clay in 2008? This is more fed fan semantics.
Or better yet, Federer reigned in the weak era of the likes Roddicks, Bagdhatis and Gonzaleses etcHard to imagine calling Federer a weak opponent. The more politically correct term would be that he isn't as good a player as he was before.
Wtf was he winning off clay in 2008? This is more fed fan semantics.
It wouldn’t even be close. The game always evolves. 2019 De Minaur >>> 2011 Djokovic.
2010 Nadal. Everything about his game was better for hard courts. Sigh.Wimbledon? Olympics? AO 1 month after 08 ended? What are you smoking right now
Why lump Roddick in with Baghdatis? The two are miles apart. But then again, I guess most weak era proponents are also prone to lumping Murray in with Federer and Nadal in terms of competition.Or better yet, Federer reigned in the weak era of the likes Roddicks, Bagdhatis and Gonzaleses etc
Random mugs? Try and get into the top 100.
Disagree. Nadal's 2008 game would rip apart the Next Gen and not be owned by Fedovic.No more along the lines that these guys push themselves. They get solved and change. Nadal aint winning nothing off clay with 2008 game. Goes for all players. Nothing is static with these pros. You can get away with it for only so long.