Toni Nadal reflects on "painful" ATP Finals loss

octobrina10

Talk Tennis Guru
he is just p!ssed at missing the english cash, nothing to do with losing the exhibition level title........
Hmm. Toni has never got any money from Rafa.
"Rafa: My Story", 2010:
¤¤ Toni has never received any money from me or from anyone in the family for the lifelong attention he's dedicated to me, but he's been able to do it because he owns half of my father's business, and takes half the profits, without doing any of the work. It's been a fair exchange because I would never have had anything like the same hours of coaching from Toni if my father had not worked with such purpose all his life. ¤¤
 

octobrina10

Talk Tennis Guru
Such an odd thing to say.
They really believe that ATP Finals is masters of masters when not even all masters winners from the years qualify?
Toni surely doesn't need to give these quotes to the media. Can't these guys just rest?
These expressions have been used in the Spanish media since the ATP Finals was called the Masters Cup (between 1999 - 2009)
 

aldeayeah

G.O.A.T.
Clearly, Toni does not try to dismiss the WTF as a "meaningless exho" thus showing how a mature Nadal fan treats Rafa's chronic failure to win this most important of ATP tennis tournaments.
Toni is definitely a YEC fan, from way back.
From a blog post by Toni I linked to before (quick and dirty translation):

From Nastase to my last match with Rafael
The YEC is still the same tournament that made me fall in love with tennis as a child, and also the last one I attended as my nephew's coach

My earliest memory of this magnificent year-end tournament, which has the unbeatable selling point of gathering the eight best men's singles players, is from December 2, 1972. That day, me and my father saw on TV the finals of what was then called The Masters Grand Prix, which pitted Ilie Nastase against Stan Smith in Barcelona's Palau Blaugrana.

I was only 12 years old, but that one match struck me so powerfully that not only did it make me an inmense fan of the Romanian champion (who won that one time), but also ignited in me a passion for tennis that has remained ever since. Thus, it could be said that this tournament was the start of my tennis journey, something I definitely couldn't foresee at the time. It was but a few months later that I started playing in the new Club de Tenis of my town, Manacor - the same place where years later I would first teach tennis to my 3-old nephew.

[...]

This week, yet again, I'll be enjoying the ATP finals from home, and I'm confident we'll see top level, high intensity matches between the world's best. And yet again, even though Rafael has never managed to rise this Masters Cup in victory before, I keep the faith that this year will be the one it finally happens, and so bookend my romance with this very special tournament.
 

blablavla

G.O.A.T.
Hmm. Toni has never got any money from Rafa.
"Rafa: My Story", 2010:
¤¤ Toni has never received any money from me or from anyone in the family for the lifelong attention he's dedicated to me, but he's been able to do it because he owns half of my father's business, and takes half the profits, without doing any of the work. It's been a fair exchange because I would never have had anything like the same hours of coaching from Toni if my father had not worked with such purpose all his life. ¤¤

Nadal devotee, I see a contradiction here:
"takes half the profits, without doing any of the work. It's been a fair exchange"

this means that Toni receives money form a business where he doesn't work in order to take care for Rafa.
and as far as I know, father is part of the family, so this part of the statement sounds to me like a lie "Toni has never received any money from me or from anyone in the family for the lifelong attention he's dedicated to me"
 

Mainad

Bionic Poster
Nadal devotee, I see a contradiction here:
"takes half the profits, without doing any of the work. It's been a fair exchange"

this means that Toni receives money form a business where he doesn't work in order to take care for Rafa.
and as far as I know, father is part of the family, so this part of the statement sounds to me like a lie "Toni has never received any money from me or from anyone in the family for the lifelong attention he's dedicated to me"

Either Toni invested in his brother's business or they both inherited an equal share which is why he is part owner and therefore entitled to share the profits. It was no doubt agreed that his brother would manage the business whilst Toni coached Rafa. That's what Rafa means when he said it was a fair exchange.
 

blablavla

G.O.A.T.
Either Toni invested in his brother's business or they both inherited an equal share which is why he is part owner and therefore entitled to share the profits. It was no doubt agreed that his brother would manage the business whilst Toni coached Rafa. That's what Rafa means when he said it was a fair exchange.

could be, but this phrase suggests that Rafa's father is doing some work, while Toni doesn't.
"takes half the profits, without doing any of the work. "

otherwise, if they simply own each a 50% share of the company as shareholders, without the need to do any work, why would someone mention "without doing any of the work."?
you could simply say, Toni lives from dividends which he receives as shareholder of a business.
the way how it is framed, sounds like "a fair exchange", Rafa's father takes care of the business, Toni takes care of Rafa, or in other words Toni gets paid by the family to take care of Rafa.
 

aldeayeah

G.O.A.T.
the way how it is framed, sounds like "a fair exchange", Rafa's father takes care of the business, Toni takes care of Rafa, or in other words Toni gets paid by the family to take care of Rafa.
The implication is that Toni would be entitled to his half, whether he took care of Rafa or not, but would be expected to have a more active role in the managing of the family business (not just sit back and let the money roll in)

In the end, rather than money, it's Toni and Miguel trading each other's time and dedication, for each of them to do what's he best at.
 

octobrina10

Talk Tennis Guru
Nadal devotee, I see a contradiction here:
"takes half the profits, without doing any of the work. It's been a fair exchange"

this means that Toni receives money form a business where he doesn't work in order to take care for Rafa.
and as far as I know, father is part of the family, so this part of the statement sounds to me like a lie "Toni has never received any money from me or from anyone in the family for the lifelong attention he's dedicated to me"

I replied to the words "he is just p!ssed at missing the english cash" that "Toni has never got any money from Rafa."
 

blablavla

G.O.A.T.
The implication is that Toni would be entitled to his half, whether he took care of Rafa or not, but would be expected to have a more active role in the managing of the family business (not just sit back and let the money roll in)

In the end, rather than money, it's Toni and Miguel trading each other's time and dedication, for each of them to do what's he best at.

you can try and "package" it this way, but if Toni and Miguel are getting same money from the company, while Miguel works there and Toni takes care of Rafa, it means that he is being paid for taken care of Rafa.
 
you can try and "package" it this way, but if Toni and Miguel are getting same money from the company, while Miguel works there and Toni takes care of Rafa, it means that he is being paid for taken care of Rafa.

Of course that he is being paid. What a silly suggestion to be any other way.

:cool:
 
you can try and "package" it this way, but if Toni and Miguel are getting same money from the company, while Miguel works there and Toni takes care of Rafa, it means that he is being paid for taken care of Rafa.

It sure looks like tio Toni has a no-show job...
 

aldeayeah

G.O.A.T.
you can try and "package" it this way, but if Toni and Miguel are getting same money from the company, while Miguel works there and Toni takes care of Rafa, it means that he is being paid for taken care of Rafa.
If he didn't take care of Rafa, would he still get the money? I think that's the crucial question.

If the answer is 'yes', then I wouldn't say he's being paid.

It's the difference between a gentleman's agreement and an employment contract. The end result may be the same, but the involved people don't see it that way.
 

blablavla

G.O.A.T.
If he didn't take care of Rafa, would he still get the money? I think that's the crucial question.

If the answer is 'yes', then I wouldn't say he's being paid.

It's the difference between a gentleman's agreement and an employment contract.

no, question is: if he wouldn't take care of Rafa and wouldn't show up at the company, would he still get the same amount of money from being co-owner?
and the way that text is structured, my take is NO.

but we don't know the details.
 

octobrina10

Talk Tennis Guru
The implication is that Toni would be entitled to his half, whether he took care of Rafa or not, but would be expected to have a more active role in the managing of the family business (not just sit back and let the money roll in)

In the end, rather than money, it's Toni and Miguel trading each other's time and dedication, for each of them to do what's he best at.

Rafa's father's name is Sebastian. Miguel Angel Nadal is Sebastian's brother.

Rafa didn't imply in his autobiography that Toni would be expected to have a more active role in the managing of the family business. He just described how his family's life has been organized. He says his father is the strategic brain of his team and created the conditions for Toni to dedicate himself to Rafa.
Read more in Post#32:
 
Last edited:
Toni is definitely a YEC fan, from way back.
From a blog post by Toni I linked to before (quick and dirty translation):

From Nastase to my last match with Rafael
The YEC is still the same tournament that made me fall in love with tennis as a child, and also the last one I attended as my nephew's coach

My earliest memory of this magnificent year-end tournament, which has the unbeatable selling point of gathering the eight best men's singles players, is from December 2, 1972. That day, me and my father saw on TV the finals of what was then called The Masters Grand Prix, which pitted Ilie Nastase against Stan Smith in Barcelona's Palau Blaugrana.

I was only 12 years old, but that one match struck me so powerfully that not only did it make me an inmense fan of the Romanian champion (who won that one time), but also ignited in me a passion for tennis that has remained ever since. Thus, it could be said that this tournament was the start of my tennis journey, something I definitely couldn't foresee at the time. It was but a few months later that I started playing in the new Club de Tenis of my town, Manacor - the same place where years later I would first teach tennis to my 3-old nephew.

[...]

This week, yet again, I'll be enjoying the ATP finals from home, and I'm confident we'll see top level, high intensity matches between the world's best. And yet again, even though Rafael has never managed to rise this Masters Cup in victory before, I keep the faith that this year will be the one it finally happens, and so bookend my romance with this very special tournament.
Do you have a link for this? Great post btw.
 

clout

Hall of Fame
Definitely a tough one for Rafa. He had the match on his racket and it would've taken a mammoth performance from Thiem to have to beat Rafa twice in the same week and to pull off beating Djokodal back-to-back. Had he held his serve at 5-4, he'd have as good of chance as ever to finally win this title.
 

BeatlesFan

Bionic Poster
Neither the Med or the Thiem matches were particularly bad chokes.
So serving for the match and being broken at love by a mediocre returner who has never defeated you isn't choking?
31a28c7da59e0506ba257a87a172816d32cb4e3b.gif


f8cfaf15cbb7acbee4423b060261bd6cd019af34.gifv
 

Nadalgaenger

G.O.A.T.
Rafa and his whole entourage in denial about his choking.

Having his YES men tapping him on the back when he can't hold his nerves isn't going to do Rafa much good.

He will win RG for the next few years, but unless someone like Tsitsipas takes out for him Novak and the rest of nextgen, he's definitely finished winning slams on hard as his nerves won't allow him.
Not sure if you’re serious or trolling. Nadal is still a top 5 threat at any HC slam he plays.
He had a solid WTF. Just lost to a red-hot player.
 

blablavla

G.O.A.T.
Yes, Xisca.
And why would I tell her?...

because she can tell you how for a woman the biological clock makes tick tack.

a man can make a kid at pretty much any age, and there is little to no difference whether that is first kid or not.
in case of women it's a bit different.
and there is a difference between being pregnant with first kid or not the first kid after 40 for example.

age plays a role in the probability of having healthy kid, or a kid with some serious health issue.
now, if a women is pregnant for the first time, and makes a test which says that there is a serious health issue, abortion after certain age is almost not an option, even if the parents would decide otherwise.

there are many nuances to the topic.
which can be resumed to two words: tick tack.

P.S.
with age, getting pregnant is not so easy.
so, if they for example decide today that they want a kid, it might easily take 12 months till she gets pregnant.
and this time interval doesn't decrease with age, especially in combination with certain "birth control" mechanisms

tick tack ;)
 

oldmanfan

Legend
1A. Nadal - 20
2. Federer - 20
3. Djokovic - 17
Incorrect.

1. Nadal - 20
1. Federer - 20
3. Djokovic - 17
1a. Federer - 20
1b. Nadal - 20
3. Djokovic - 17

ftfy.
Nadl doesn't get to be listed first for getting there 2nd.
Setting the record is greater than matching it. ;)


Overall ranking or just based on Slams? To me, overall Federer is still #1 of the 3 right now. The 100 weeks gap at #1 is too large, then Federer having more titles at 3/4 Slams compared to Nadal, etc.
Valid points.
Also, see a few lines above. And... the saying goes "In order to be the best, you have to beat the best." 6>>0 YECs, no?
 
because she can tell you how for a woman the biological clock makes tick tack.

a man can make a kid at pretty much any age, and there is little to no difference whether that is first kid or not.
in case of women it's a bit different.
and there is a difference between being pregnant with first kid or not the first kid after 40 for example.

age plays a role in the probability of having healthy kid, or a kid with some serious health issue.
now, if a women is pregnant for the first time, and makes a test which says that there is a serious health issue, abortion after certain age is almost not an option, even if the parents would decide otherwise.

there are many nuances to the topic.
which can be resumed to two words: tick tack.

P.S.
with age, getting pregnant is not so easy.
so, if they for example decide today that they want a kid, it might easily take 12 months till she gets pregnant.
and this time interval doesn't decrease with age, especially in combination with certain "birth control" mechanisms

tick tack ;)
Man, everything you just said is common sense.
But she's 32...there's plenty of time for her to have kids.

Two words for you: derp derp
 

aldeayeah

G.O.A.T.
So serving for the match and being broken at love by a mediocre returner who has never defeated you isn't choking?
31a28c7da59e0506ba257a87a172816d32cb4e3b.gif


f8cfaf15cbb7acbee4423b060261bd6cd019af34.gifv
They played 3 matches before and 2 of them were close as hell.

plus every year that passes rafa is further away from his prime

plus he didn't play particularly bad in that game, it was mostly med raising the level
 

octobrina10

Talk Tennis Guru
It's kind of a stock phrase in Spanish tennis journalism since the tournament was called Masters Cup.

Masters Cup, and by extension WTF, is usually rendered as "Copa de Maestros"

And the Masters Cup Champion is sometimes referred to as "Maestro de Maestros", which is what Toni said in the original interview:


There are a bunch of Toni blog posts stretching back to 2017 (in Spanish) in El Pais, although you'll hit a paywall pretty fast if you intend to read them all:

Toni is a great writer.
 

vive le beau jeu !

Talk Tennis Guru
Nadal devotee, I see a contradiction here:
"takes half the profits, without doing any of the work. It's been a fair exchange"

this means that Toni receives money form a business where he doesn't work in order to take care for Rafa.
and as far as I know, father is part of the family, so this part of the statement sounds to me like a lie "Toni has never received any money from me or from anyone in the family for the lifelong attention he's dedicated to me"
wTWacbh.jpg
 
its time for everyone to realize that nadal will never win this event....meaning he can never be the GOAT. this is not just some exhibition or a random atp event in a long calender season....no it is essentially the playoffs exclusive to the best 8 players on tour that earned it. The Finals.

all of the ATGs have won this event except him and that's embarrassing.

nadal is disqualified from GOAT discussion without this trophy.
 

JasonZ

Hall of Fame
its time for everyone to realize that nadal will never win this event....meaning he can never be the GOAT. this is not just some exhibition or a random atp event in a long calender season....no it is essentially the playoffs exclusive to the best 8 players on tour that earned it. The Finals.

all of the ATGs have won this event except him and that's embarrassing.

nadal is disqualified from GOAT discussion without this trophy.

exactly!! but nadal fanboys will never admit it. they know it, but will never admit it.
 

terribleIVAN

Hall of Fame
Not sure if you’re serious or trolling. Nadal is still a top 5 threat at any HC slam he plays.
He had a solid WTF. Just lost to a red-hot player.

Can't hold his nerves when it really matters anymore.

It's alright if you guys are in denial.

Doesn't mean he can't win AO or USO anymore: he just needs Rublev or Tsitsipas to take out Thien, Medvedev, Zverev.

Don"t take my word; you'll see for yourself.
 
Top