I don't understand. How can a top 10 player be a worse returner than 90 of the top 100 players in the world ?
I mean, we're not talking about volleys, which can be avoided like the plague if one wants to, or drop shots, or backhand smashes. We're talking about a very, very important part of a tennis match.
Tsonga has a 42% break point conversion rate: 136/324
Bautista Agut also has a 42% break point conversion rate: 143/344
That places them 13th and 17th respectively for 2013, though because Bautista Agut is 73rd in the world, it's safe to assume he's playing weaker players, how come he's not in the OP list as one of the worst while Tsonga is ? None of those two probably belong on the list.
Davydenko was 1st at 48%.
I'm looking at that list and it doesn't make sense. Is your top 10 in order or not ? Because Nadal was 2nd at 47%, and because he's the #1 in the world, and because he's won 310/662 breakpoints, he'd probably be the best returner in the world, considering he has the best percentage of return games won in 2013, 3rd in actual number of games.
When it comes to return games won, the rankings change a bit but Tsonga is still 26th, Davydenko 7th, Almagro 18th, Raonic 45th, Anderson 41st, Lopez 43rd, Querrey 44th, Isner 47th.
Berdych has won 25% of his return games in 2013, and converted 41% of his breakpoints. Not top 10 material in terms of returners but still not too shabby.
As much as it pains me to say, Federer is probably on the outside looking in too. He's most likely in the top 20, but not in the top 10, looking at the stats.
Nishikori belongs in the top 10. If we look at the stats, he's in the top 10 in both categories.
And to reiterate, the stats don't even tell the whole story. We have to look at the quality of serves too.
What were your criterias ?
I don't buy that list at all.
That looks like a list of players you know, not a list of the top 100 players in the world, and even so, it doesn't make complete sense.