Top 3
------
Edberg was my 1st idol. Hard to get that kind of excitment especially when he competed against Becker for 3 straight finals with his nice adidas shirt, cool blond hair, no-look serve, arching back, fluid volleys and backhand. Every point I will cheer and shout when he won Becker. Especially those backhand low-volleys that he picks up at his shoe-laces and then strutter step gracefully towards the net, makes me eager to go onto the tennis court and emulate him. And when I managed to hit the same low-volley, I get that immense joy. Really my very 1st idol.
I supported Edberg when he played against Sampras at the US open final.
When Edberg retired, Sampras was my next idol. I always supported Sampras when he played Agassi. But if Agassi played against other players, I will support Agassi. However, Agassi was not my idol. Sampras was because of his dominance at Wimbledon, just wanted him to win. Maybe because I loved Edberg's serve and volley game and when Edberg was at his prime, Sampras could not win Edberg at the net. So naturally Sampras was kind of a substitute idol for me. But I grown to like Sampras for his running down the line forehands and backhands and little flicks of the wrist for his backhand and pin-point accuracy disguise serves.
I loved Sampras all-court game and always wanted him to win French Open but he can't. But Edberg will always be my no. 1 favourite for Serve & Volleys and Volleys itself. Edberg was also my no. 1 favourite for his kick serves.
So you can guess it, my third idol that has both elements of Edberg and Sampras....Federer.
Federer is the successor of both Edberg and Sampras for me.
Federer has Edberg's coolness when he walks, talks, serves, moves, runs,....
He has a very good kick serve like Edberg and Sampras. Federer is also one of the dying breed that at least know how to serve and volley respectfully.
He gives me the same level of excitement as Edberg (Edberg vs Becker) and Sampras (Sampras vs Agassi). I wont get bored viewing re-runs of Federer dominating Hewitt or Roddick. Federer vs Nadal & Federer vs Safin were the 2 best matches in a long time which kept me glued to the TV, but it can never reached the epic excitment of Edberg vs Becker...
Federer is the one most likely to overtake Sampras' Grandslam record and Wimbledon records. He has a similar game to Sampras and his dominance over opponents are like Sampras. In additional he is the new HOPE to do what Sampras cannot achieve and that is to win the French Open.
Federer is my no. 1 favourite for his gifted talents of mixing defence and offence so well, reading & anticipating the ball so well, able to play touch shots like mcenroe, blast balls like Roddick, hit on the rise returns & half volley groundstrokes like Agassi, run as fast as Hewitt with same tenacity. There is nothing he cannot do and he seemed to have all the great qualities, mastery, magic from all the great players I know from the mid 80s till the present day. In fact he does shots that I have never seen before. Eg. a full lunge, almost diving, at full stretch, totally out-of-position, in mid-air, flick of a wrist, pass someone at the net CROSSCOURT with his backhand. Sampras was able to do this shot but I only saw Sampras do it when his feet was set and was not as fully stretched like Federer.
I supported Sampras when he played Federer in 2001 when Federer was quite a new player to me with long hair and a pony-tail. If I knew he would become so good or we can turn back the clock now, I would have supported Federer over Sampras.
To rate:
Co-No. 1 favourites: Edberg & Federer
No. 2 favourite: Sampras
All 3 players were/are dominant players over their peers when they were/are in their prime.
All 3 players can serve and volley well.
All 3 players are cool in their temperment.