Top 4 Draws: Australian Open 2024

TripleATeam

G.O.A.T.
Djokovic
R1: WC
R2: Popyrin
R3: Etcheverry/Murray
R4: Shelton/Wawrinka/RBA
QF: Fritz/Tsitsipas
SF: Sinner
F: Alcaraz/Medvedev

Sinner

R1: Van De Zandschulp
R2: Cachin
R3: Baez
R4: Tiafoe/Khachanov
QF: ADM/Korda/Rublev
SF: Djokovic
F: Alcaraz/Medvedev

Medvedev

R1: WC
R2: Ruusuvuori
R3: Auger-Aliassime
R4: Dimitrov/ADF
QF: Hurkacz/Rune
SF: Alcaraz
F: Djokovic

Alcaraz

R1: Gasquet
R2: Evans
R3: Bublik
R4: Paul
QF: Ruud/Zverev
SF: Medvedev
F: Djokovic

Analysis to follow.
 
Last edited:

TripleATeam

G.O.A.T.
Djokovic - 4/10:
SFs probably slightly easier than Medvedev, but higher ceiling than Medvedev I'd say. QF easiest of the bunch with a fine backup. Trickiest R4 though, but with a break in the action of the QF it's probably better to get a tricky R4 and easy QF than the flip. Murray R3 could be interesting for name value, but unlikely to be challenged in the first 3 rounds.

Sinner - 4/10:
Harder SF in theory, but who knows how it turns out? Fairly good top 4 for a hardcourt slam, so SF/Fs are pretty much a wash. QFs aren't the hardest of the bunch but several consistent players that can show up there. If it's not a very good Sinner, could be a challenge. R1-R3 a wash though, and R4 fairly mediocre.

Medvedev - 8/10:
QF is Rune and Hurkacz which can be quite dangerous players. On top of that a resurgent FAA could deal damage and while Dimitrov isn't the biggest name in the draw he can put up a good fight.

Alcaraz - 5/10:
SFs are roughly the same, probably the most dangerous QF but not a very strong backup QF. Path to the QF is mediocre though. Not great but not terrible. Pretty easy R4 by comparison to others.
 

Rudiiii

Semi-Pro
So rigging Alcaraz Medvedev, Djokovic Sinner match-up is a new thing in ATP town... Everything to make that Djokovic Carlito final
 

James P

G.O.A.T.
Hurkacz never makes QFs, not a threat to Medly until he can prove he can get to that point of a tournament. FAA, Dimitrov, and Rune, though. That is a tricky draw to pick through.
 

Rovesciarete

Hall of Fame
Hurkacz never makes QFs, not a threat to Medly until he can prove he can get to that point of a tournament. FAA, Dimitrov, and Rune, though. That is a tricky draw to pick through.

Hubi could be quite dangerous, but Daniil knows who to handle those players and does it almost always.
 

aldeayeah

G.O.A.T.
Alcaraz - 5/10:
SFs are roughly the same, probably the most dangerous QF but not a very strong backup QF. Path to the QF is mediocre though. Not great but not terrible. Pretty easy R4 by comparison to others.
Evans/Sonego is a strong R2. Bublik in R3 is much more of a banana peel than any of the other 3. Paul R4 is a bad matchup, possibly the worst for him (other than a zoning Shelton or mythical peak Grigolo or something)

I think Alcaraz has the toughest paper draw by a fair margin. Only thing that went right for him is, he likely prefers Med in his half over Sinner.
 

nolefam_2024

Bionic Poster
I say let Murray face Nole. It would be not a competitive match but Murray is probably in his last year too. For him, it would be great to play Nole again, hasn't played nole or nadal since 2017 Doha.
 

Neptune

Hall of Fame
Djokovic
R1: WC
R2: Popyrin
R3: Etcheverry/Murray
R4: Shelton/Wawrinka/RBA
QF: Fritz/Tsitsipas
SF: Sinner
F: Alcaraz/Medvedev

QF: Tsitsipas is actually the best among seeds 5-8 at the AO, having reached the final last year and the SF in both 2021 and 2022. The AO seems to be Tsitsipas's best slam, and Melbourne hosts the largest Greek population in Australia.

SF: Sinner is currently in top form on hard courts, securing 10 wins against top 5 players last year, including two victories against each of the top 3.

At this moment, the top 4 feels reminiscent of the early Big 4 era:
Nole(Fed), Alcaraz(Rafa), Sinner(Nole), Meddy(Murray)

Sinner would greatly prefer to be on Alcaraz's side, but there is a significant age gap of 14 years between him and Nole.
 

nolefam_2024

Bionic Poster
QF: Tsitsipas is actually the best among seeds 5-8 at the AO, having reached the final last year and the SF in both 2021 and 2022. The AO seems to be Tsitsipas's best slam, and Melbourne hosts the largest Greek population in Australia.

SF: Sinner is currently in top form on hard courts, securing 10 wins against top 5 players last year, including two victories against each of the top 3.

At this moment, the top 4 feels reminiscent of the early Big 4 era:
Nole(Fed), Alcaraz(Rafa), Sinner(Nole), Meddy(Murray)

Sinner would greatly prefer to be on Alcaraz's side, but there is a significant age gap of 14 years between him and Nole.
Yes and whoever is in R16, be it Shelton or someone else, I don't know how easy it would be either.
It can be Mannarino or Wawrinka or RBA but all three are old players and unlike Djokovic 2 are near career end. I don't think they can cause any upset but Shelton has won Beijing and made AO QF and USO SF. Just because Nole handled him in USO doesn't mean he is any worse than Paul or Struff. In fact Shelton and Paul are very similar level wise.
Paul beat Shelton in 4 sets in AO. Shelton beat him in 4 sets in USO. But then Shelton beat him again in Beijing last year.

This was another attempt to throw shade at Novak.
 

Neptune

Hall of Fame
Yes and whoever is in R16, be it Shelton or someone else, I don't know how easy it would be either.
It can be Mannarino or Wawrinka or RBA but all three are old players and unlike Djokovic 2 are near career end. I don't think they can cause any upset but Shelton has won Beijing and made AO QF and USO SF. Just because Nole handled him in USO doesn't mean he is any worse than Paul or Struff. In fact Shelton and Paul are very similar level wise.
Paul beat Shelton in 4 sets in AO. Shelton beat him in 4 sets in USO. But then Shelton beat him again in Beijing last year.

This was another attempt to throw shade at Novak.

Yeah, not thrilled to see Shelton in Nole's draw, but in Paris (failed to happen) and now AO again.
 

NatF

Bionic Poster
QF: Tsitsipas is actually the best among seeds 5-8 at the AO, having reached the final last year and the SF in both 2021 and 2022. The AO seems to be Tsitsipas's best slam, and Melbourne hosts the largest Greek population in Australia.

SF: Sinner is currently in top form on hard courts, securing 10 wins against top 5 players last year, including two victories against each of the top 3.

At this moment, the top 4 feels reminiscent of the early Big 4 era:
Nole(Fed), Alcaraz(Rafa), Sinner(Nole), Meddy(Murray)


Sinner would greatly prefer to be on Alcaraz's side, but there is a significant age gap of 14 years between him and Nole.
:laughing:
 

TripleATeam

G.O.A.T.
Evans/Sonego is a strong R2. Bublik in R3 is much more of a banana peel than any of the other 3. Paul R4 is a bad matchup, possibly the worst for him (other than a zoning Shelton or mythical peak Grigolo or something)

I think Alcaraz has the toughest paper draw by a fair margin. Only thing that went right for him is, he likely prefers Med in his half over Sinner.
Can't say I agree. Evans has played Alcaraz 4 times and he's only ever won a single set to Alcaraz's 9, not to mention that since Canada Evans has either gone out R1 or lost to Alcaraz in every tournament except Adelaide (Cincy, USO, Chengdu, Beijing, Shanghai, Sweden, Vienna). And in Adelaide, Evans still just made the 2nd round. Evans' greatest win was in 2021 Monte Carlo over Djokovic. Apart from that, he doesn't do particularly well against players inside the top 8. Bublik, despite having some tricky shots, also doesn't seem like he'll be beating Alcaraz.

Paul's been a tough matchup also but I don't expect him to do much. His last flash of brilliance was against Alcaraz last year in Canada. If he takes out Alcaraz again, then it'll just be a matchup issue. But Paul's ceiling is under Shelton's and Shelton and Dimitrov seem to be in better form so far this year.

The biggest thing that matters is the later stages. Since SF-F are fairly balanced (with slight differences, maybe 0.5+/-), the biggest changes come in the QF/R4. Zverev might be the strongest QF (debatable), but there's no backups there. If Zverev gets upset, Alcaraz gets a practical bye in the QF. Since Paul's ceiling is also under Dimitrov/Shelton and probably about as good as Khachanov/Tiafoe, I can't in good conscience say his draw is tougher than Medvedev's. Especially as Medvedev can get a resurgent FAA, followed by an in-form Dimitrov, then a pretty good Rune, Alcaraz, Djokovic/Sinner. If that draw turns up, it's definitely harder than Bublik, Paul (even a bad matchup), Zverev, Medvedev, Djokovic/Sinner.

QF: Tsitsipas is actually the best among seeds 5-8 at the AO, having reached the final last year and the SF in both 2021 and 2022. The AO seems to be Tsitsipas's best slam, and Melbourne hosts the largest Greek population in Australia.

SF: Sinner is currently in top form on hard courts, securing 10 wins against top 5 players last year, including two victories against each of the top 3.

At this moment, the top 4 feels reminiscent of the early Big 4 era:
Nole(Fed), Alcaraz(Rafa), Sinner(Nole), Meddy(Murray)

Sinner would greatly prefer to be on Alcaraz's side, but there is a significant age gap of 14 years between him and Nole.
Tsitsipas does tend to do well in Australia, but in the YEC he lost both matches he played (almost everyone considered him a walking bye) and he hasn't played a match since then. Not to mention Sinner was 4/23 on BPs in his 5-setter against Tsitsipas last year. A bit better and Tsitsipas goes out R4. Contrast that with Rune whose last 3 tournaments were: made the Brisbane final (in form), barely lost to both Sinner and Djokovic at the YEC (both finalists), lost to eventual winner Djokovic at Paris. Tsitsipas did play decently before that, which is why I'm not completely discounting him - I think the 5-8 seeds are all somewhere in the same ballpark if uninjured. But if we account for injuries, Tsitsipas is likely to be affected by his.

Re-Sinner: Yes, he was in form in November. It's January. He may have gained a new gear and that's why I'm saying he's just as dangerous as 5-time slam finalist and 1-time champ Daniil Medvedev despite never making a hardcourt slam semi. I'm still not going to put him above Medvedev just yet. I'd say he's likelier to make an upset happen, but Medvedev's likelier to make it to the semifinal and more likely to put up a tiring fight if he makes it there.
 
Last edited:

Guru Apu

Rookie
Could you elaborate more on this point please? Thanks!

Well say Novak he get sore arm or wrist from playing with the balls, or something else. he may get all the happy massage rub he like for it and not work. His team will give him pills and bottles with special juice to help him play.

This will not be illegal things, because that would be illegal. I guess he take viagra as this is not illegal and it help you play longer, it work for me for sure. And then he take maybe the special pickle juice with extra vitamins? who can say
 

Third Serve

Talk Tennis Guru
Well say Novak he get sore arm or wrist from playing with the balls, or something else. he may get all the happy massage rub he like for it and not work. His team will give him pills and bottles with special juice to help him play.

This will not be illegal things, because that would be illegal. I guess he take viagra as this is not illegal and it help you play longer, it work for me for sure. And then he take maybe the special pickle juice with extra vitamins? who can say
Ah I see this makes sense.

Especially the viagra part. Never thought of that before.
 

Rafa4LifeEver

G.O.A.T.
Can't say I agree. Evans has played Alcaraz 4 times and he's only ever won a single set to Alcaraz's 9, not to mention that since Canada Evans has either gone out R1 or lost to Alcaraz in every tournament except Adelaide (Cincy, USO, Chengdu, Beijing, Shanghai, Sweden, Vienna). And in Adelaide, Evans still just made the 2nd round. Evans' greatest win was in 2021 Monte Carlo over Djokovic. Apart from that, he doesn't do particularly well against players inside the top 8. Bublik, despite having some tricky shots, also doesn't seem like he'll be beating Alcaraz.

Paul's been a tough matchup also but I don't expect him to do much. His last flash of brilliance was against Alcaraz last year in Canada. If he takes out Alcaraz again, then it'll just be a matchup issue. But Paul's ceiling is under Shelton's and Shelton and Dimitrov seem to be in better form so far this year.

The biggest thing that matters is the later stages. Since SF-F are fairly balanced (with slight differences, maybe 0.5+/-), the biggest changes come in the QF/R4. Zverev might be the strongest QF (debatable), but there's no backups there. If Zverev gets upset, Alcaraz gets a practical bye in the QF. Since Paul's ceiling is also under Dimitrov/Shelton and probably about as good as Khachanov/Tiafoe, I can't in good conscience say his draw is tougher than Medvedev's. Especially as Medvedev can get a resurgent FAA, followed by an in-form Dimitrov, then a pretty good Rune, Alcaraz, Djokovic/Sinner. If that draw turns up, it's definitely harder than Bublik, Paul (even a bad matchup), Zverev, Medvedev, Djokovic/Sinner.


Tsitsipas does tend to do well in Australia, but in the YEC he lost both matches he played (almost everyone considered him a walking bye) and he hasn't played a match since then. Not to mention Sinner was 4/23 on BPs in his 5-setter against Tsitsipas last year. A bit better and Tsitsipas goes out R4. Contrast that with Rune whose last 3 tournaments were: made the Brisbane final (in form), barely lost to both Sinner and Djokovic at the YEC (both finalists), lost to eventual winner Djokovic at Paris. Tsitsipas did play decently before that, which is why I'm not completely discounting him - I think the 5-8 seeds are all somewhere in the same ballpark if uninjured. But if we account for injuries, Tsitsipas is likely to be affected by his.

Re-Sinner: Yes, he was in form in November. It's January. He may have gained a new gear and that's why I'm saying he's just as dangerous as 5-time slam finalist and 1-time champ Daniil Medvedev despite never making a hardcourt slam semi. I'm still not going to put him above Medvedev just yet. I'd say he's likelier to make an upset happen, but Medvedev's likelier to make it to the semifinal and more likely to put up a tiring fight if he makes it there.
Excellent analysis, right on point. That's what I need with my early morning coffee.
You're much better at this than most of the "tennis experts" on multiple web platforms.
Ever considered writing a blog?
 

TripleATeam

G.O.A.T.
Excellent analysis, right on point. That's what I need with my early morning coffee.
You're much better at this than most of the "tennis experts" on multiple web platforms.
Ever considered writing a blog?
Thanks! Never really considered a blog, feels like that time of the internet is over. But I appreciate the kind words anyhow :)
 

Subway Tennis

G.O.A.T.
Great writeup! This draw is an absolute minefield, so appreciate the effort you’ve made with the analysis.

Only thing I dont agree on is Alcaraz. I feel he has a tougher path to the final than described, although Tommy Paul looks like he is in horrible form which probably lessens the early resistance Alcaraz will face.

If you’re following the women’s event as well it would be great to get a similar draw report if you haven’t already done one.
 
Top