Doesn't look like BZ but maybe contact Tourna and ask them to replace. They have the best customer service.
Hi, just strung my racket with string that came out of the black zone package. But it really doesn't look like round. Can anyone tell from the pictures if this looks like something else?
For me it looks like shaped five sided.
https://imgur.com/LmeVmK5
https://imgur.com/o3G4uWp
https://imgur.com/vUdNWpu
Problem (almost) solved, I contacted TWE and they confirmed it was the wrong string. Unfortunately all the strings in stock were also wrong so I can't get a new set anytime soon. Was really looking forward to test this string.
Oh great, I just ordered 2 packs that are on their way. So they won’t be BZ eitherProblem (almost) solved, I contacted TWE and they confirmed it was the wrong string. Unfortunately all the strings in stock were also wrong so I can't get a new set anytime soon. Was really looking forward to test this string.
Oh great, I just ordered 2 packs that are on their way. So they won’t be BZ either
Oh, I shot out an email to TW Now they’re gonna think I’ve been drinkingThis was TW Europe, but still better check those string carefully.
Oh, I shot out an email to TW Now they’re gonna think I’ve been drinking
I tried this several years ago and have been meaning to start a thread on hybrid poly experiences and post about it. I'll probably never get around to it, and since you brought it up.... It was memorable. This was in a Fischer MPro One 105. Also, it was low tension — 38 lb constant pull, I think — as it always is for me with polys.BHB7/BZ might make a nice hybrid. If Tourna lets you keep the extra pack of string, maybe you'll want to try it out.
Hit with the BHBZ 17 yesterday in my Pure Aero. Have been looking for an alternative to Hyper G 18 lately as I've been chewing through those strings in the open pattern and needed to restring every ~1.5 weeks. Was looking at strings with good tension maintenance (testing Kirschbaum Pro Line II 17 in the Pure Aero next).
I strung it up at 52 lbs on my Klippermate DW stringer and took a reading on RacquetTune which showed that the tension dropped to 44.8lb out of the stringer. I need to do some research on a better way to string as this was a huge drop off (perhaps I'm giving too much slack on my mains in the center while stringing with a starting pin).
After 1 set I took another measurement (albeit it was a bit loud out on the courts). 41.8lb. My HyperG may have been dropping tension like this as well, so again it may be a problem with my stringing technique.
After another 2 sets, I took another measurement in the parking lot and it read 41.0lb. So perhaps this string takes a bit to settle down and maintain its tension from then on. I may need to string this a bit tighter so when it does settle down it's a bit more in the high 40's range.
I'll be hitting again tomorrow and will take another reading at the end of the night.
I did notice a fair bit of notching after 1 hour of hitting, but pulling the string to the side with my fingers and snapping it back had it fall back to its original position so it may not affect spin production (didn't feel that different in the spin department after 3 sets).
Overall, staying optimistic on this string as a reel of HyperG will set me back $170 but this is only $80 in a reel.
Fellow Sunnyvale resident here. Typically use a modified APD13 with Tour Bite 1.25 at 58 lb. Used BZ 1.25 in same tension (also 60 lb). Felt like I got more spin with TB than BZ as more shots dropped in with TB. BZ is definitely softer, but my personal preference is for a slightly stiffer string bed. Tension maintenance felt even for me if I left the strings in the frame. Notching was normal and launch angle seemed about the same in both strings. A while back, also compared HG to TB (same gauge and tension for both strings, but in a APD+13) and HG felt softer, ball flew out a bit more than TB due to launch angle (higher than TB for me). In hindsight, if I had to choose b/w BZ and HG, I'd go with BZ because it's slightly closer to what I'm used to (TB).
Had not heard of this string before checking out this thread. Seeing that it’s softer with good tension maintenance and at $80 a reel has made me order a few sets. I love Hyper G in my Pure Aeros but I only get about 2 weeks (3 days/week hitting) before the tension drops off a cliff and I need to restring. Hoping even though this is a smooth poly that I can get at least 3 weeks out of each string job.
The sets arrive tomorrow and can’t wait to give it a whirl at 52 lbs.
But why BZ's tw score of playability duration is only 78, while there are others like Pro Line II-86 , Poly Tour Spin G-91 etc...
Would also appreciate if someone could elaborate on the comparison BZ vs BHB7, especially with regards to comfort and holding tension/playability.
BZ is supposed to be less stiff according to TW database, not sure if that means more elasticity.