TT 100P Appreciation Thread

For those still using the TT 100P - like many, I found lead in the hoop did not work well. Conversely adding a leather grip gave me more mass and a solid feel, without compromising the fast-swinging nature of the racquet. I was stringing at 52# with full poly, but have had arm issues (I think due to another racquet I tried out and not the 100P). Now I am using a round poly in the mains at 47# and synthetic gut at 49# crosses. I think the 18x20 pattern provides the control, so lower tension adds comfort, enhanced sweet spot, and a bit more pop.
 
joefrancenz said:
For those still using the TT 100P - like many, I found lead in the hoop did not work well. Conversely adding a leather grip gave me more mass and a solid feel, without compromising the fast-swinging nature of the racquet. I was stringing at 52# with full poly, but have had arm issues (I think due to another racquet I tried out and not the 100P). Now I am using a round poly in the mains at 47# and synthetic gut at 49# crosses. I think the 18x20 pattern provides the control, so lower tension adds comfort, enhanced sweet spot, and a bit more pop.
Click to expand...

I have some lead on one around the hoop and and blutack inside the grip. Then another one, that has no lead around the hoop and some blutack. Very unscientific, but the one with no lead is actually same balance and a few grams (like 6g maybe) heavier, both have 2 overgrips and the heavier on is a 4 and the lighter one is a 3. Maybe the extra grip tape weighs more.... Anyway, I can play with either one equally.
 
weelie said:
I have some lead on one around the hoop and and blutack inside the grip. Then another one, that has no lead around the hoop and some blutack. Very unscientific, but the one with no lead is actually same balance and a few grams (like 6g maybe) heavier, both have 2 overgrips and the heavier on is a 4 and the lighter one is a 3. Maybe the extra grip tape weighs more.... Anyway, I can play with either one equally.
Click to expand...
this actually makes sense. I started to feel like the racquet wasn't stable enough on volleys - sweet spot seemed to be smaller. Added 1gm of lead at 3 and 9 (1gm each) and felt an improvement - and not enough to make the racquet swing too much slower. Have no idea how close my frame is to standard specs. Pretty happy with it now - wouldn't mind more spin though...
 
joefrancenz said:
this actually makes sense. I started to feel like the racquet wasn't stable enough on volleys - sweet spot seemed to be smaller. Added 1gm of lead at 3 and 9 (1gm each) and felt an improvement - and not enough to make the racquet swing too much slower. Have no idea how close my frame is to standard specs. Pretty happy with it now - wouldn't mind more spin though...
Click to expand...
Did you take the 100 (310) out for a spin? I tried it once, felt more powerful and a bit more spinny. Of course a little stiffer too.
 
Getting my 3 strung up with Max Power Rough at 51 and brand new babolat skin feel grips. Hoping that we may get the green light to start playing again soon.

edit: have found no issues with full bed of poly at low tensions. Whilst it’s an 18x20 the spacing is wider than a 16x19 and softens it up. Spin is generated pretty easily with that open pattern and a lowish SW.
 
3loudboys said:
Getting my 3 strung up with Max Power Rough at 51 and brand new babolat skin feel grips. Hoping that we may get the green light to start playing again soon.
Click to expand...

I really hope so. Can't believe we're still not even able to play outdoor singles at least
 
t_pac said:
I really hope so. Can't believe we're still not even able to play outdoor singles at least
Click to expand...
In the Netherlands tennis is one of the few sports that can still be played (outdoor singles), have to make reservations lately as all other sporters start playing tennis
 
Between the 2015 and 2019 model is the increased stiffness that much noticeable? As in power, feel and stability? I'm eyeing a pair of 2015s on the bay as I enjoyed the soft pocketing feel. I didn't buy it as it was ever slightly unforgiving on defensive stretch and lunges. In hindsight the pros outweighed the cons and I am wondering now if the 2019 version will balance things out better or if the stiffer layup will take away from the control.
 
Hi @tata - I am a 2015 100P user and have hesitated buying the 2019 models (100P or the 310). The added weight of the 310 isn't the direction I'm trying to go (coming from a 12+ ounce PK Redondo MP). I noticed in the TWU Vibration tool that the 2019 models have higher vibration ratings than the 2015 100P. That isn't the same as actually using the racquets to compare - but it did make me happier to stick where I am at with the 2015 100P
 
I just got to hit with the TT100P and TT100(310) demos yesterday. I really like the 100P! Great (first) server (I haven't developed a reliable 2nd/top spin serve yet so no comment) and easy swinging without being so whippy that I shank everything hitting it too early. I prefer the volleys off my 18x20 PStrike but that's about it. I can tell the big 17" sweetspot is smaller than my PStrike's 17.5" sweetspot on my 2HBH because it sucks, but the forehand is so incredibly solid. Also, no pain, no tenderness, no shock. Woot! So easy to play defense with the 100P whereas if I didn't get a good look off the PS I might as well not have bothered. For such little weight difference the 310 was less maneuverable; not a large difference, just big enough to be noticeable. But, the 310 had enough power to get the ball in either way, but I preferred the 100P, as did my way more experienced spouse. With the 100P, she was slamming winners down my throat on the same side of the court I was standing on. Looks like moving my feet will see the biggest improvement in my game, haha. She normally plays with a Blade 104 V7 which is real soft at 60 RA. It would seem the 2015 TT100P was softer but plays similarly to the 2019 TT100P, so I'm tempted to look out for one (or two) of those. The 310 was also behind the 100P in serves, but not very far at all. If I was looking for 16x18/19, the 310 would be a heavy contender, beating in my opinion the PStrike, Blade, Aero, and possibly even SpeedMP and PDrive in that string pattern for various reasons. But, I've spent most of my time recently on 18x20s so those memories aren't too fresh. Anyways, think I'll be using that coupon code that comes with demos on a new TT100P!
 
Although I know my 2015 TT 100P (2015) will never leave the first spot in my racquet bag, I somehow find myself trying other dense pattern racquets. But, again, Iike numerous times in the past, I come back to TT 100P. The racquets I tried recently are 1) Dunlop CX 200 Tour 18x20 (in comparison to TT100P, too powerful, less plush feel, too head heavy), Tecnifibre TFight 315 Limited XTC 18x20 (more rectangular grip shape, slower to swing), and Donnay Pro One 97 Tricore 18x20 (felt lighter, thinner beam, more solid feel due to the foam filled in the racquet). I may use the Donnay from time to time especially when I feel I have too much power on a day.
 
I’m buying a couple of leather grips and trying it with a full bed of Solinco Confidential. Think the leather will provide a more tip light and stable feel. Been interested in confidential for a while now.
 
The confidential worked well in the 100P although not much different than Kirschbaums Max Power rough - which is half the price - and had a slighter deader feel which I prefer. Good string nevertheless - excellent tension maintenance and feel. Spin above average but nothing to get too excited about, not an Ultra Cable or Hyper G.
 
Lex said:
I haven't been able to find a frame I love more than the TT100P (2015 ver). I've tried the Head Speed Pro and MP. I've tried the Tecnifibre TF40, Yonex Ezone 98 Tour too. None feel as plush as the TT100P.
Click to expand...

How would you compare 100p with tf40(305 or 315)?
Thanks.
 
Byon said:
Although I know my 2015 TT 100P (2015) will never leave the first spot in my racquet bag, I somehow find myself trying other dense pattern racquets. But, again, Iike numerous times in the past, I come back to TT 100P. The racquets I tried recently are 1) Dunlop CX 200 Tour 18x20 (in comparison to TT100P, too powerful, less plush feel, too head heavy), Tecnifibre TFight 315 Limited XTC 18x20 (more rectangular grip shape, slower to swing), and Donnay Pro One 97 Tricore 18x20 (felt lighter, thinner beam, more solid feel due to the foam filled in the racquet). I may use the Donnay from time to time especially when I feel I have too much power on a day.
Click to expand...
Your racquet interests seem similar to mine.
How would you compare 100p 18x20 to others?

And surprised cx200 is more powerful ?
Thanks.
 
ewiewp said:
How would you compare 100p with tf40(305 or 315)?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
I own both the TF40 315 and the 100P (2018 model).

Over all the 100P is more something on the boarder of tweener land (the Speed Pro being similar in that respect). I feel like it might be better for someone coming from a Pure Drive or similar rackets and wanting to step in the direction of control. The 18x20 pattern on the 100P could be a little missleading, as it is very open and more so than some 16x19 rackets. However, the extra strings does increase the predictability of the stringbed and control compared to other 16x19, 100 inch rackets. In total it might have the playability you would expect from a 16x20.
The weight and balance is also very polarized. It has that 305 unstrung weight but with a 7pts HL strung balance. Other 305 rackets usually has that 3/4 pts HL strung balance. This makes it swing whippy but still has some weight coming through at contact. However, the whippy nature of the racket (and missing some weight at the middle of the racket i feel) combined with the very open 18x20 didn’t give me the ball flight i was looking for in a 18x20 racket. Felt like i got too much spin and not enough of that «straight line» i usually have with 18x20.

the TF40 is on the other end as far as 18x20 goes. It’s the densest out there, along with the TC97 18x20. Very low ball flight. Feel at contact is slightly modern. Maybe something in between Pure Strike and Ultra Tour/Pro. Power level from the layup is also one step above Ultra Tour/Pro (but nothing for free). Directional control is excelent and with a thin shaped poly ( i use Tourna BH black 7 18 gauge)i get enough bite on the ball to whip up enough spin.
The TF40 315 kind of feels like a more forgiving/modernized 6.1.

just remember that these are my personal feelings about the rackets, and the next person might disagree completely :-)
 
RoarTT said:
I own both the TF40 315 and the 100P (2018 model).

Over all the 100P is more something on the boarder of tweener land (the Speed Pro being similar in that respect). I feel like it might be better for someone coming from a Pure Drive or similar rackets and wanting to step in the direction of control. The 18x20 pattern on the 100P could be a little missleading, as it is very open and more so than some 16x19 rackets. However, the extra strings does increase the predictability of the stringbed and control compared to other 16x19, 100 inch rackets. In total it might have the playability you would expect from a 16x20.
The weight and balance is also very polarized. It has that 305 unstrung weight but with a 7pts HL strung balance. Other 305 rackets usually has that 3/4 pts HL strung balance. This makes it swing whippy but still has some weight coming through at contact. However, the whippy nature of the racket (and missing some weight at the middle of the racket i feel) combined with the very open 18x20 didn’t give me the ball flight i was looking for in a 18x20 racket. Felt like i got too much spin and not enough of that «straight line» i usually have with 18x20.

the TF40 is on the other end as far as 18x20 goes. It’s the densest out there, along with the TC97 18x20. Very low ball flight. Feel at contact is slightly modern. Maybe something in between Pure Strike and Ultra Tour/Pro. Power level from the layup is also one step above Ultra Tour/Pro (but nothing for free). Directional control is excelent and with a thin shaped poly ( i use Tourna BH black 7 18 gauge)i get enough bite on the ball to whip up enough spin.
The TF40 315 kind of feels like a more forgiving/modernized 6.1.

just remember that these are my personal feelings about the rackets, and the next person might disagree completely :)
Click to expand...

Thanks for your review.
According to TW specs, 100p 305's strung weight is same as tour 100 310. So 305 is just product name and its average weight is 310?
 
ewiewp said:
Thanks for your review.
According to TW specs, 100p 305's strung weight is same as tour 100 310. So 305 is just product name and its average weight is 310?
Click to expand...
305 and 310 is their unstrung avarage weights. According to TW their avarage strung weight is both 326g/11.5oz. Prince probably made the 16x18 version 5 grams heavier to compensate for the fewer mains and crosses so that the 100 310 and the 100P 305 would have roughly the same weight when strung :-)
 
ewiewp said:
Your racquet interests seem similar to mine.
How would you compare 100p 18x20 to others?

And surprised cx200 is more powerful ?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
That is how I felt. Maybe I did a more full swing with Dunlop CX 200 Tour than with TT 100p because the launch angle was lower with the 200 Tour?
 
Before writing on this thread, I wanted to make sure I left the honeymoon phase, but I still can't really fault my TT 100p (2019) frames, so who knows. I bought them about 8 months ago, and I think it does everything well, without being exceptional anywhere (or maybe just on serve...).
It is true that it's a fairly wide 18*20 stringbed, so I was really surprised with the spin generation I got, although I didn't really notice it myself, but my hitting partners who told me my shots felt heavier. I think what surprised me is that you can still really drive the ball whilst adding the spin or the arch that you want. I've had racquets that felt better on the forehand, like the blade 18*20 V8, but I feel the TT 100p has better (or maybe just easier ?) directional control. You're really connected to the stringbed and I think it's a terrific point and shoot racquet, and that's not something I've read on this frame, but it really is. It feels just as good on the attack, than it is grinding away on the baseline, on dropshots or placing volleys.
The feel, when hit in the sweetspot, is a nice blend of crisp and plushness. It has good pop for defense and putting away volleys. Again, I cannot really fault it I love it that much. I tested and switched racquets for about 2 years, going from Blade 18*20 V6, to PD 2020, to Head Extreme Tour, to Head 360+ Speed MP/Pro, to Völkl V8 Pro, to Blade 18*20 V8 to this ! Hazah ! I feel like my search is done.
I am curious on the new 100p, but I really enjoy the crispness of the 2019 so I don't feel the need to demo it.
I tried different string setups : VS Gut/Head Hawk @ 22/21kg (really nice !), Prince Tour XP, Tier One Black Knight, Solinco Hyper G, and Solinco Outlast, all @ 22kg and all felt good. I'm sticking to both Solinco strings for now and might go down a kg or 2.
 
I still have my three 2015 tt100p’s. Been playing Phantom pp100 instead now. Love hitting forehands with it. The phantom is a lot more demanding, need to hit well for the ball to move. All my friends say I play a lot better with it. Once a while I dig out the tt100p, as it has great feel (does not flutter, ”crack” and bend when hitting!) and the extra power… but it also makes me lazy. Going back and forth is not that easy as the launch angle on the Phantom is way higher.

23.5kg Wilson Revolve 1.30mm on the tt100p. Maybe should be tighter a bit.
20kg Black widow (prestreched, 1.25ish thickness) on the Phantom.
 
I’m in my 50s and returned to the game about a year+ ago. Played HS and competitively into my late 20s (probably a 4.0+ at my best) but focused more on soccer. Injuries, age, and a pandemic has brought me back to the game.

My racquet history is short. Dunlop Black Max in HS (80s) and PS85 SV from college into my late 20s (late 80s /90s). Transitioned to the Wilson K-Factor 6.1 Tour (poor choice - too heavy and difficult for me to yield) and finally to the Head Microgel Prestige Pro. Good racquet for my previous all-court game but lacked the power for my current, more labored baseline counter punching game. So I’ve been seeking a racquet that provides in order of priority:
  • Power: I need a little more free power, especially on off center swings when I’m late.
  • Comfort: Early signs of TE, but I’m also old and out of shape
  • Feel: I prefer a more plush feel, I enjoy that plow through, pocketing feel.
  • I am concerned about weight and SW.
  • Control/Spin: Not necessarily a high priority. I hit a fairly flat ball.
I’ve demo’d the following racquets this summer:
  • Head Speed MP and Boom MP
  • Babolat PS 16x19 Gen3
  • Wilson Clash 100 and Blade 16x19
  • Price TT100P and Phantom 100G
  • Wilson Pro Staff 6.1 100v13
  • Yonex EZone 100
  • TF TFight 300RS
The Prince TT 100P was easily the best choice. I really enjoyed the comfort and forgiveness, the pocketing felt wonderful too. Sufficient power. Forehand, serves, and net play are all great. Needed to adjust my THBH due to the lower launch angle but that came with time.

Then TW lowered the price a few weeks back and I bought 2 w/ full bed natural gut @50. Love love love the racquet and zero elbow concerns so far. I did also trade my K-Factor for a Pure Strike 16x19 Gen3 which I gives me that extra power, but it’s a little stiff so I’ve been playing with the TT100P almost exclusively. Highly recommended for someone with a similar profile. Hope that helps someone.
 
Ombudsman said:
The Prince TT 100P was easily the best choice. I really enjoyed the comfort and forgiveness, the pocketing felt wonderful too. Sufficient power. Forehand, serves, and net play are all great. Needed to adjust my THBH due to the lower launch angle but that came with time.
Click to expand...

Yes, it is a very good stick! I have also found the comfort and forgiveness very good. I had a Gravity Tour for a while as a back-up to the (2015) TT100P and even that felt a bit jarring on off-center hits, in comparison. Also had a Clash 100 Tour/Pro... terrible at flattening out, could not hit a forehand with that at all.

My current Phantom Pro 100 has a higher launch angle, so getting back to the TT100P is difficult now, would take some time / would need to commit to it. Instead, I was thinking about a ATS Tour 98, but actually ordered a 100x 305 for now. Not selling the TT100Ps for sure, it is still a great stick, I feel it a great basic stick, suits everything. When I played it (a couple of years), it was usually strung 24kg/23kg Kirschbaum PL2.
 
Last edited:
I've been using a lot of 18X20's lately. Mainly using Confidential or Lynx Tour 120 or 125 on top of RPM rough 125 in the mid to high 40's in them.
The Prince Textreme Tour 100P just has it all. Comfort, control, spin, power. It has much more spin than you would think an 18X20 should have.
I have owned a TF40 18X20, loads of different Blades 18X20 and 16X19, 99 sq in Prestiges in 18X19, 98 18X20 Prestiges, 6.1 95's, 2019 Speed Pro, Dunlop F3.0/BioM 300 18X20, and Dunlop 200G.
Of all those, the Dunlops felt the best, even better maybe than the 100P, but they required the most from you, and I am not a kid any longer. I need a bit of help nowadays.
I got into Blades because they just have everything in a fairly light and stable package due to being so even balanced for most of them. But I have been wanting a bit more easy power lately to get me out of jams, make volleys a bit easier, and retain my serving ability. I even tried a load of open string patterns. When I did, I found the Textreme Tour 100's to have a very unique feel that I liked a lot.
The standard 16X18 were a bit more power than I needed on ground strokes. It took a lot of rhs to keep the balls in for me. So I went hunting for a 100P. It took a while because I didn't want the 66RA version.
I ended up with an LTD and I freaking love it. I like how the power is like a light switch. If you are back in the court, or want a big first serve, or need to put that over head away, it just comes alive for it.
Then when you go back to the rest of the game, it goes and gets the job done and puts the ball where you want it. No fuss. It just does it all with competence and loads of forgiveness.
The spin is sort of like that as well. When you pound ground strokes back and forth, the 100P is very happy to skirt the net as much as you dare, whether forehands or slicing. Then when you want to hit a lob or flick an angle or when you are doing kickers, it just comes alive and says 'here's all the spin'.
I read a lot of folks used to more weight in the head complaining about the whippiness of the 100P. But as a former blade user, I will say the 100P is as stable as any stock blade unless you are stringing it rather tightly. But lead will solve that issue. Since I am in the mid to high 40's, I find it rock solid.
 
WYK said:
I ended up with an LTD and I freaking love it. I like how the power is like a light switch. If you are back in the court, or want a big first serve, or need to put that over head away, it just comes alive for it.
Then when you go back to the rest of the game, it goes and gets the job done and puts the ball where you want it. No fuss. It just does it all with competence and loads of forgiveness.
The spin is sort of like that as well. When you pound ground strokes back and forth, the 100P is very happy to skirt the net as much as you dare, whether forehands or slicing. Then when you want to hit a lob or flick an angle or when you are doing kickers, it just comes alive and says 'here's all the spin'.
I read a lot of folks used to more weight in the head complaining about the whippiness of the 100P. But as a former blade user, I will say the 100P is as stable as any stock blade unless you are stringing it rather tightly. But lead will solve that issue. Since I am in the mid to high 40's, I find it rock solid.
Click to expand...
You exactly put into words how I feel about this frame. It does whatever you ask of it, it's pretty amazing how well rounded this racquet really is.
 
You can still get an LTD from Amazon and it’s been on my mind quite a bit :)

One small OCD complaint though is that apparently they’re susceptible to paint chips at the 5/7 o’clock grommet holes. Just happened to my second.

Anyone else experienced that or is it my stringer?
 
Just bumping this thread in honor of this criminally-underrated frame (to which Lucas Pouille has recently switched back to from Babolat, no less).

I've been playing the 2019 100P's, in the search for a bit more free power and control than my Prestige MP-L's, and they deliver on both fronts, at least against slightly lower-level opponents. I've found against harder hitters, however, that the 2019's higher RA (a 66RA that plays more like a 67-68) and fairly minimal dwell time don't leave me much in the way of mid-shot timing adjustability, and I find myself and my flatter style over-hitting more often with the 100P than with flexier flatter-hitter frames like the MP-L (a 65RA that plays more like a 63).

This makes me curious to try the 2022 100P, which, at least on paper, looks as though it may offer more dwell time. Anyone who has played the 2019 and 2022 100P care to comment?
 
Trip said:
Just bumping this thread in honor of this criminally-underrated frame (to which Lucas Pouille has recently switched back to from Babolat, no less).

I've been playing the 2019 100P's, in the search for a bit more free power and control than my Prestige MP-L's, and they deliver on both fronts, at least against slightly lower-level opponents. I've found against harder hitters, however, that the 2019's higher RA (a 66RA that plays more like a 67-68) and fairly minimal dwell time don't leave me much in the way of mid-shot timing adjustability, and I find myself and my flatter style over-hitting more often with the 100P than with flexier flatter-hitter frames like the MP-L (a 65RA that plays more like a 63).

This makes me curious to try the 2022 100P, which, at least on paper, looks as though it may offer more dwell time. Anyone who has played the 2019 and 2022 100P care to comment?
Click to expand...
Nice bump - cant help with that question - still on the 2015 Wimbledon White Outs - but share your curiosity on the new batch.
 
Trip said:
Just bumping this thread in honor of this criminally-underrated frame (to which Lucas Pouille has recently switched back to from Babolat, no less).

I've been playing the 2019 100P's, in the search for a bit more free power and control than my Prestige MP-L's, and they deliver on both fronts, at least against slightly lower-level opponents. I've found against harder hitters, however, that the 2019's higher RA (a 66RA that plays more like a 67-68) and fairly minimal dwell time don't leave me much in the way of mid-shot timing adjustability, and I find myself and my flatter style over-hitting more often with the 100P than with flexier flatter-hitter frames like the MP-L (a 65RA that plays more like a 63).

This makes me curious to try the 2022 100P, which, at least on paper, looks as though it may offer more dwell time. Anyone who has played the 2019 and 2022 100P care to comment?
Click to expand...
Minimal difference really (IMO). I would argue that would come more down to string choice.
 
mpournaras said:
Minimal difference really (IMO). I would argue that would come more down to string choice.
Click to expand...
I figured as much, but was still wondering. As for strings, I'd bet stiffer/crisper strings would be a better fit in the 2022; softer/more rubbery strings a better match for the 2019.
 
I doubt there is much difference between the 2019 and 2022, some change in stiffness yes, but the French guy loved the 2015, the 2019, the 2022.

I used to play with the 2015 myself, which I assume is basically identical to the 2022. Since then moved to Phantom PP100 and the 100x 305. The TT100P just feels overly powerful (and less spinny) after having played with the PP100... so took the lead out, pumped up the string tension (to 24kg Wilson Revolve 1.3mm) , but still not there. Still in the bag for the off days, but just don't like playing with it anymore. (Actually, tore my ACL, had an operation, so won't be on court until the summer, might start with the TT100P, who knows, having lost muscles, the form).
 
@BillKid - Thank you for those added thoughts. However, if you look closely in that video, I believe he's referencing the similarly-soft 2015 TT 100P (it has the green paint around the outside grommet channel), and not the 2019 (which is all-black around the outside). Nevertheless, I appreciate the added info.

@weelie - Thank you for your thoughts as well. I've tried the 100X 305 -- error tolerance was nice and it had good spin, but I found it had a lot of tip flutter, frame twist and a constant low-grade "buzz" at impact. Lead on the hoop helped, but didn't address those completely. I haven't tried the PP100, but I do have a Phantom 100P which I found more stable and comfortable than the 100X. With all of the above, though, I wasn't able to find as much free power or guidance on my shots as I can get with wider-beamed alternatives. I realize that may have some from simply stringing at too high a tension and/or using string that wasn't high-powered enough, and/or I simply might not have the strength or skill set, but at the end of the day, I find the Tours to overall be a better fit. But we're all different, and we're lucky to have the Phantoms still around, as they are so unique.
 
Last edited:
Trip said:
@BillKid - Thank you for those added thoughts. However, if you look closely in that video, I believe he's referencing the similarly-soft 2015 TT 100P (it has the green paint around the outside grommet channel), and not the 2019 (which is all-black around the outside). Nevertheless, I appreciate the added info.
Click to expand...

Could be, yes! I never realized a difference in grommets side color. I always looked at the tip, the 2015 has "Midplus" and 2019 has "305" written.
 
Trip said:
I figured as much, but was still wondering. As for strings, I'd bet stiffer/crisper strings would be a better fit in the 2022; softer/more rubbery strings a better match for the 2019.
Click to expand...

If you're after dwell and lower powered response then Prince premier control is a great string. At least try a hybrid if you must have a poly main to get some of that back.
 
Trip said:
Just bumping this thread in honor of this criminally-underrated frame (to which Lucas Pouille has recently switched back to from Babolat, no less).

I've been playing the 2019 100P's, in the search for a bit more free power and control than my Prestige MP-L's, and they deliver on both fronts, at least against slightly lower-level opponents. I've found against harder hitters, however, that the 2019's higher RA (a 66RA that plays more like a 67-68) and fairly minimal dwell time don't leave me much in the way of mid-shot timing adjustability, and I find myself and my flatter style over-hitting more often with the 100P than with flexier flatter-hitter frames like the MP-L (a 65RA that plays more like a 63).

This makes me curious to try the 2022 100P, which, at least on paper, looks as though it may offer more dwell time. Anyone who has played the 2019 and 2022 100P care to comment?
Click to expand...
I had same issues... I changed strings n tensions to get the dwell right...I changed to 1.19mm black night at 45pounds and hyperg soft 1.20mm at 45lbs worked
 
Another update. Played a decent 4.0-ish partner this morning. Started with the MP-L (340g/31.5cm/327sw), won the first set and played decently well. For the second set, switched to the 2019 TT100P, spec'd noticeably lighter (330g/31.5cm/322sw) and played equally well, if not slightly better. I really enjoyed the frame's higher stock stability and error tolerance, and the drill pattern is nothing short of genius -- very consistent across a large percentage of the face, yet precise around the sweet spot, and a good balance of spin and control. Definitely one of the most well-balanced frame designs ever, at least in my estimation.
 
Trip said:
Another update. Played a decent 4.0-ish partner this morning. Started with the MP-L (340g/31.5cm/327sw), won the first set and played decently well. For the second set, switched to the 2019 TT100P, spec'd noticeably lighter (330g/31.5cm/322sw) and played equally well, if not slightly better. I really enjoyed the frame's higher stock stability and error tolerance, and the drill pattern is nothing short of genius -- very consistent across a large percentage of the face, yet precise around the sweet spot, and a good balance of spin and control. Definitely one of the most well-balanced frame designs ever, at least in my estimation.
Click to expand...
I'm so torn between tt 100p and my DR and my new ezone98....I need to settle on one to up my game
 
berkyboy said:
I'm so torn between tt 100p and my DR and my new ezone98....I need to settle on one to up my game
Click to expand...
Ooooo... that's a tough one. They're all solid sticks in their own right. For me, I prefer the 100P's more head-light stock balance (for my OHBH) and cleaner string bed feel over the bit kludgier and slightly more muted/vague feel of the EZ98. That said, I can understand why people like the EZ -- it probably hits the heaviest ball of any 305g 98 on the market, especially for having such a controlled, tight pattern. As for the DR, I haven't hit with one, but I would imagine it's like the current EZ98, just with a bit more direct/clean feel and maybe a tad less power?

Ultimately, it comes down to which stick is the most natural fit for your biomechanics and game. I would probably lean towards the 100P or '22 EZ98, just for the sake of being able to get grommets for longer.
 
DR has a feel that's hard to describe... maybe like regna, whish someone has both that can compare.... 100p has more consistent and bigger sweet spot
 
Gotcha. Yes, the 100P has one of the best feeling and behaving "large" sweet spots that I know of. The ball stays located and feel is precise. This is in contrast to other frames that are more teardrop in shape (several Yonex sticks) and/or have longer mains (Gravity, even the MP-L occasionally), where I've felt the ball can get a bit lost and/or feel can be slightly vague. Not so with the 100" Tour mold and 18x20 pattern -- you always know what's going on in the string bed. That's a tough quality to give up once you've felt it properly.
 
I haven’t decided how best to hit a forehand with the 100p. It seems to work better to slap the forehand instead of letting the grip lead first with wrist lag (like with a heavier racquet) - coming from a more head heavy racquet. Backhands are fine.
 
I find you can do both, even if it takes some lead to tune it towards your optimal mechanics, as it responds well to customization -- lead at 12, or 10 and 2, optionally 6 (so you don't over-polarize) -- whatever gives you the balance and mass bias that floats your boat.

FWIW, I tend to hit a slightly more swipey, slightly less slappy Federer type forehand with it, and that's just with 1g at 10 and 1g at 2, and I find that to work pretty darn reliably.
 
TennisHound said:
I haven’t decided how best to hit a forehand with the 100p. It seems to work better to slap the forehand instead of letting the grip lead first with wrist lag (like with a heavier racquet) - coming from a more head heavy racquet. Backhands are fine.
Click to expand...
On short balls I show the buttcapp and face the strings down with semi western grip and blast to a corner... on baseline rallies I hold almost a continental grip and go flat.... does almost everything my ezones do but better EXCEPT the most important shot in tennis.... love my ezones for their serves and if someone can find a racquet that can serve like ezones but plays like 100p ....maybe upcoming gravity pro...regna 100 to expensive cause I need 3
 
@berkyboy - I don't know... I've hit likely my fastest and most lethal flat bombs ever with the TT100 and TT100P. The head-lightness and 66RA (which plays more like a 67-68) just allow for Pure Drive level crushing power, but with more leverage/maneuverability applied, and tighter degrees of control with the 100P. I see my opponents having all kinds of issues with the serves coming of the 100P. What more does the EZ98 give you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
TT warrior 100 vs TT tour 100P
Replies
13
Views
4K
Roms
R
J
Prince Tour 100p thread
2 3 4
Replies
167
Views
12K
Trip
T
M
comparison between - Head Speed MP (2022) vs Prince TT 100p vs Head Gravity MP (2021)
Replies
2
Views
503
Trip
T
D
TT 100p too powerful, TT95?
Replies
36
Views
3K
Deleted member 54265
D
B
prince demo list???
Replies
6
Views
740
Dartagnan64
Dartagnan64
Back
Top