Thanks for the comments. We are always looking for feedback so if anyone would like to see anything changed or different in reviews, please let us know!
We try to give the best feedback possible so we can to help customers choose the right racquet. There have definitely been racquets/shoes that have tested well and some that have tested poorly but for the most part there are a lot of really good racquets out on the market. Racquet like the Pure Strike ProjectOne7 or TF40 305 that tested extremely high, we actually had multiple playtesters switch to those racquets as their racquet of choice. We have had racquets test poorly as well (Gamma RZRs are the first that pop in my mind but there have been others). Additionally, we try to match playtesters with racquet specs in their wheelhouses to set the racquets up for success. We wouldn't put Troy or Michelle on an 11 ounce racquet as they prefer heavier racquets.
I also wanted to clear a couple things up. We do not own Prince. As another user mentioned, we are the US licensee/distributor of the brand. It is owned by Authentic Brands Group.
Also, regarding not publishing some reviews, you can check out my full answer here (the TW playtesters did not test the V1 MP so there was not any review to be published):
https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/prince-vs-volkl.660738/#post-14003508
As always we love hearing from you guys and always happy to help if you have any additional questions!
Thanks,
Brittany, TW
Wow thanks for taking your time to read over this and reply, it's amazing that you guys do this! To be clear I love your reviews and am addicted to watching them.
But let me try to use the TF40 as an example to what I think doesn't work...
I wonder if most people watching realize how much more advanced Julie's game (and to a lesser degree Erik's) are, when compared to Jason's or Tiffani's. They shouldn't all be liking the same racquet. I can understand (and clearly see from the video) how the first two can reap the benefits of a classic players frame with that much SW, handle a more head heavy balance, hit consistently with a small head size (true 95) and get spin and depth from a tight 18x20. With all due respect to them, I
cannot understand how Jason or Tiffani would be able to consistently play well with that racquet... both relative to Julie or Erik, or relative to another kind of racquet that favors shorter swings and spin. After watching the review and hearing them all speak, it seems like this is a great racquet for everyone. It's really easy to see straight from the specs that it's not. I miss having a more down to earth, honest review that matches the level of play. It's ok for Tiffani to appreciate that racquet, but I don't think it's ok for her not to say that for someone whose game is closer to hers, this is more than likely not the best option out there (don't mean to pick on her, I see this case repeated elsewhere).
We need to remember that most viewers probably:
a) Don't have the fitness level to get to every shot well ahead of time over the course of an hour of play
b) Don't have a full swing and super extended follow-through
c) Don't hit the sweetspot that consistently
While this description seems like a nightmare, it is what it is, and that's the reason a lot of people rely on modern tweeners.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that the reviews are generally really good for someone who is a super advanced player, but do a suboptimal job of exposing the shortcomings of each racquet if technique/fitness are not fully there. That's how I found my way to a ProjectOne7 only to have to sell it later due to a lot of shoulder pain and tennis elbow. It's a great stick, but probably not one you should be missing around with if you're under a 5.0 level and/or prone to injuries...! It's totally my fault but I wish I knew that going into it, since other racquets worked out fine up to then.