Jannick
Rookie
What kind of mental handicap do you have?We all established that it is the best technique inside the court.
None of us agreed with you on this and are fiercly against your false claims.
What kind of mental handicap do you have?We all established that it is the best technique inside the court.
Who dont agree ? It was all explained before. You cant disagree with obvious facts.What kind of mental handicap do you have?
None of us agreed with you on this and are fiercly against your false claims.
Who dont agree ? It was all explained before. You cant disagree with obvious facts.
We all know no one cares about facts. We all just care about winning and GD is a winner!‘Fact’ - a thing that is known or proved to be true.
‘Known’ - within the scope of knowledge.
‘Proof’ - evidence establishing a fact or the truth of a statement.
None of these criteria have been met with regard to any statement about the two handed forehand. It is entirely conjecture - with the odd off the wall claim.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I cant understand why you all fight with facts. Almost all women who used two handed forehand won grand slams in singles or doubles. I win almost all tournaments. What other proof do you need ?‘Fact’ - a thing that is known or proved to be true.
‘Known’ - within the scope of knowledge.
‘Proof’ - evidence establishing a fact or the truth of a statement.
None of these criteria have been met with regard to any statement about the two handed forehand. It is entirely conjecture - with the odd off the wall claim.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We all know no one cares about facts. We all just care about winning and GD is a winner!
I cant understand why you all fight with facts. Almost all women who used two handed forehand won grand slams in singles or doubles. I win almost all tournaments. What other proof do you need ?
So why don’t any of the top ATP pros use the 2hfh?You can see in all my videos how effective two handed forehand is. You can play with precision you will never be able to achieve using one handed forehand. You see that there is no real problem with the shortened reach because your opponents are forced to run and they dont have time to exploit it. To the last moment they dont know where the ball will go. You dont even have to hit fast balls because hiding your intentions you take time from your opponents. Even when you are late you can hit the ball where you want because of short swing. There are almost no unforced errors so your opponents are forced to go for winners to win the point. They risk a lot and they lose.
Young players are forbidden to use two handed forehand in tennis clubs. Only weak girls are allowed because nobody expects them to achieve a success. And these weak girls (Seles, Bartoli, Hsieh,Peng) won grand slams.So why don’t any of the top ATP pros use the 2hfh?
So why don’t any of the top ATP pros use the 2hfh?Young players are forbidden to use two handed forehand in tennis clubs. Only weak girls are allowed because nobody expects them to achieve a success. And these weak girls (Seles, Bartoli, Hsieh) won grand slams.
I have just replied . Nobody wants to risk. There is no theory, no trainers.So why don’t any of the top ATP pros use the 2hfh?
Every winner of a men’s grand slam event for the past 20 years has played the 1hfh. We all know the 1hfh is the fh of the future. You must not want to win a grand slam.I have just replied . Nobody wants to risk. There is no theory, no trainers.
They won only because they played against weak players using one handed forehand.Every winner of a men’s grand slam event for the past 20 years has played the 1hfh. We all know the 1hfh is the fh of the future. You must not want to win a grand slam.
We've said this 1000 times.
It is actually a fact that the one handed forehand has more power due to leverage.
You’re a very poor scientist.I cant understand why you all fight with facts. Almost all women who used two handed forehand won grand slams in singles or doubles. I win almost all tournaments. What other proof do you need ?
In the European test that tested the ability to analyze and synthesize , I had 60 out of 60. You are really funny.You’re a very poor scientist.
Your analysis is unsound. 0/60.In the European test that tested the ability to analyze and synthesize , I had 60 out of 60. You are really funny.
My analysis allowed me to win 40 matches in tournaments since the beginning of May. I lost only 3. It is excellent result.Your analysis is unsound. 0/60.
Superior to what? As proper forehand fully utilizes "rotational momentum".the two handed shot was theoretically superior because of the rotational momentum
Your analysis overestimates your results. If I can beat a one-legged man in a foot race running backwards, that does not mean running backward is superior to forward.My analysis allowed me to win 40 matches in tournaments since the beginning of May. I lost only 3. It is excellent result.
Superior to what? As proper forehand fully utilizes "rotational momentum".
The main advantage of two handed forehand is that it allows to absorb a lot of energy of approaching ball because of more firm grip..It means the rotational momentum is stronger with two hands because the frame is closer to our body, just why a baseball player hits with both hands. However the reach is not as good, nor is the lever/fulcrum/distance. I got this information/hypothesis from the old Racquet Reseach site.
My thought is the two hander rewards tight "core" muscles of the body and not the arms, since I know several women players who have good two handers that are better than their one handed. Perhaps if you have tight abs and weaker arms the two hander helps?
Actually, from theory standpoint, more range rewards rotational moment more. In practice we should consider if momentum of inertia of the arm slows down torso rotation to any singnificant degree. I don't have any proofs, but my opinion is - not that much. the actual issue is creating a strong link to deliver more-than-enough moment of force to counter increased moment of inertia from longer lever. Shoulder muscles and pecs are not strong enough to keep up with these powers with flexing, but fully-ESRed, locked shoulder deals with this just well with fully stretched muscles.It means the rotational momentum is stronger with two hands because the frame is closer to our body, just why a baseball player hits with both hands. However the reach is not as good, nor is the lever/fulcrum/distance. I got this information/hypothesis from the old Racquet Reseach site.
My thought is the two hander rewards tight "core" muscles of the body and not the arms, since I know several women players who have good two handers that are better than their one handed. Perhaps if you have tight abs and weaker arms the two hander helps?
I feel like we’re getting somewhere with GD.Guys I think your time is much better used somewhere else
We did, but then everyone changed their mind again after watching GD’s videos. Now we are all back to square one.But we all already agreed 2hfh is the future.
Sorry but we should all agree.EACH TIME YOU REPLY TO THIS THREAD, A BOTTLE OF BLANTON'S IS FLUSHED DOWN THE TOILET.
Damn, I just wasted another bottle.
This is a great crisis!EACH TIME YOU REPLY TO THIS THREAD, A BOTTLE OF BLANTON'S IS FLUSHED DOWN THE TOILET.
Damn, I just wasted another bottle.
fixed it for youThis is a great crisis !!!
Very wise comment.But we all already agreed 2hfh is the future.
I don’t think so because even if he is overweight and he can beat a two handed forehand person who think that two handed forehand is the future of tennis.You are right, he's probably a UTR 8 or less, right? You should be able to beat him what, 6-2, 6-2?
Lol. Baseline will lose your energy during rallies.I can serve much faster and go to the net but I dont have to. I dont want to waste my energy. When I play from the baseline I not only win a point but also I force my opponent to run a lot. After several rallies he is so tired that I win next points easily. This tactics works well on clay. We all know that only on clay there is real tennis.
Only first several rallies might be difficult. I play greater angles so they run much more. Usually after that my opponents are so tired that they cant keep the ball in the court. Then it is only execution.Lol. Baseline will lose your energy during rallies.
What in my last comment you disagree with ? Do you think that we should use one handed forehand when we usually play volleys or serves ?Stop saying “we all agree...”
Is it not clear to you that we don’t?
I disagree with you every time you claim “we all agree.” It is not true. You can spout whatever crackpot theories you have, but don’t try to validate them by falsely claiming other people’s support.What in my last comment you disagree with ? Do you think that we should use one handed forehand when we usually play volleys or serves ?
You didnt answer my last question about volleys, serves and one handed forehand.I disagree with you every time you claim “we all agree.” It is not true. You can spout whatever crackpot theories you have, but don’t try to validate them by falsely claiming other people’s support.
And you haven’t responded to my request. I was first to ask.You didnt answer my last question about volleys, serves and one handed forehand.
Very wise comment.
Since the beginning of May I have won 8 tournamentes on national level and in 2 lost in the final. It proves that two handed forehand is the future of tennis.