Ultimate racquet of choice - tournament players and/or coaches

After 3-4 hours with the Tecnifibre TF40 315 16*19 and have served fewer than 1000 serves in my life, I'm stating right here, right now, that in a month I'll be flat-serving like Daniel Medvedev!
Man, this stick is great on serves! I hit super loose and my motion is so fluid, I don't pause my motion at any stage and today, man, I got back into playing sets and I'm hitting 3 straight aces! What is going on? I couldn't hit the serve at all with the Nova and the Elevate.
 

ClaudTT

Semi-Pro
After 3-4 hours with the Tecnifibre TF40 315 16*19 and have served fewer than 1000 serves in my life, I'm stating right here, right now, that in a month I'll be flat-serving like Daniel Medvedev!
Man, this stick is great on serves! I hit super loose and my motion is so fluid, I don't pause my motion at any stage and today, man, I got back into playing sets and I'm hitting 3 straight aces! What is going on? I couldn't hit the serve at all with the Nova and the Elevate.
..imaging IF you were using the ISO 305 !!! mammamia ....;):p
 
..imaging IF you were using the ISO 305 !!! mammamia ....;):p
I'm actually currently talking about trading my Head Boom Pro with a TF-X1. It would be nice to pair it with the TF40 and starting my sessions with the X1 and then swicthing to the TF40.
I'm only a bit concerned about the open string pattern, but even if I don't like it, I will be able to re-trade it later.
 

ClaudTT

Semi-Pro
I'm actually currently talking about trading my Head Boom Pro with a TF-X1. It would be nice to pair it with the TF40 and starting my sessions with the X1 and then swicthing to the TF40.
I'm only a bit concerned about the open string pattern, but even if I don't like it, I will be able to re-trade it later.
Get 2 identical rackets and work on your footwork for the next 12 months. Watch HOW you should move from pros videos and COPY.
 
Get 2 identical rackets and work on your footwork for the next 12 months. Watch HOW you should move from pros videos and COPY.
That would be the wisest thing to do, BUT at this stage I prefer trying different strings and different rackets.
This year I'll be playing more and more competitive sessions.

* I'd pick the TF40 315 16*19 for a tournament match.
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
DIADEM ELEVATE V3 REVIEW:

diadems.jpg


Wohoo! It's so rare to play with something that good. Especially within "control oriented range" of rackets. You guys already know I really liked V2 Elevate and this frame made me sell Head Prestige MP 360+. Now V3 Elevate is pushing out my TF40 315 :X3: Main reason - I can serve better with the Elevate.

Elevate is still an elevate -
performance:

Performance is closer to Prestige line with some hints of Blade. "easier Prestige in performance" and "easier Blade in maneuverability" (copied from my v2 review)
this means it gives more spin than prestige and it's easier to move around than blade. Maybe it's a bit similar to Yonex Vcore 97 idea-wise but croseed with Vcore 95 precision and spin?

So it's always hard to create and sell well-performing control oriented frames with all those "gimmicks" around on the market (AND endorsements). I feel like the market for those type of frames is really getting smaller and smaller each year. If you don't add some kind of a modern flare it will probably die among competition.

MODERN FLARES IN V3 Elevate:

1. First, the string pattern:
16x20 for many is their perfect sweet spot. Wawrinka is probably my favourite player endorsing this string pattern. Although so far It was not my favourite pattern I might reconsider my approach. So from 16 mains you are getting the spin potential of usual 16x19 frames but from 20 crosses you get slightly less power, less movement of the mains (so less spin potential), more touch and control but decreased forgiveness. You should experience lower launch angle and less "springiness" compared to 16x19.
THE BIGGEST "WHY" for 16x20 over 16x19 is the slice. Slices are important part of my game and switching from 16x19 to 16x20 really made a difference. Slices are less floaty and more penetrating.

Now with A BIT more power from V3 Elevate I feel like this combination clicked and Diadem made something already good even better.

2. FOAM injected!
Most of my favourite frames have foam inside. I feel like it's the best way to increase feel, confidence and performance at the same time. You feel the racket as one and the flex style is really addicting and specific.

3. Added kraibon material:
Ok, im not really a tech-guy so I will copy text from Diadem Europe:
"The headliner innovation, Kraibon, manages to increase both the flexibility and stability of the frame without sacrificing power."
I can only confirm that indeed the feel improved, it is more solid and a bit more comfortable (for some it's called "muted") without making any sacrifices. Actually the power potential improved slightly and that alone IMO is also an improvement.
I made some digging around here and found out Kraibon was used by Head in their Graphene Touch line? - from famous Head users I think Sinner is using their "touch" version of Speed racquet.


ACTUAL CHANGES FROM V2 ELEVATE:
I feel like the weight distribution is a bit changed. In my hands and during a swing it feels a bit different. Also the dwell time increased which for me made the impact sensation even sweeter and probably unlocked more spin !
So V3:
- more spin
- more comfort
- more solidness
- same/better control (due to better spin)
- a bit more power (easier to get out from difficult situations)
- better feel (it's really something special)


The only thing I am not sure about is the stability. Is it better/worse/same? In theory it should be better but the regular v3 was twisting in my hands sometimes on the returns. Not the case with V3 Tour.


Tour and the Regular Elevate - which one is better?
So I am playing with the Elevates as my main for almost a month now. Tweaking and testing it in match situations, altering with TF40 and ISO Tfight 305. Why it took me so long to write a review?

It's because I was not sure which one I like more and how I want to customize them (elevate tour or regular).
While regular 305 Elevate is a slight but noticeable improvement I feel like Tour version really climbed high up to my expectations.

It's softer than V2 and overall really really similar in feel compared to the regular version. At the same time the specs of the Tour are closer to my usual setups and as it's more stable in stock form than the regular Elevate I was considering picking the Tour as a preferred version. Also I was serving really good with the Tour and I needed that boost in confidence here coming from TF40. I already mentioned before - the racquet that will bring back my serves will push out TF40 from my bag. With clean hits I probably would not be able to distinguish one from the other by the feel of the stringbed. Maybe hitting outside the sweetspot is a bit different - Tour kinda stiffens up to take over the imperfection of your swing but overall the differences in feel are really small but have bigger impact on performance.

Although Tour is closer to my specs I also felt like the SW is quite similar between them. That lower than my usual SW made me feel a bit disconnected during my swing. It was clear I need to customize both of them to my liking.

My match situations showed that I am playing a bit better with the regular Elevate.
(a bit) longer dwell time of the regular elevate gives me more feel and spin potential as I have more time to finish my stroke. So I am actually a bit more aggresive with the frame that is made to be more control oriented resulting in a heavier ball.

Customizations:

diadem-leather.jpg


First, I added Diadem's leather grip which to my surprise had same or very similar weight to stock grip. I can call it a happy accident as during my customization journey I found out Elevate doesn't need weight at the handle. It makes it less stable. I found out Elevate shines best when you keep the static weight as low as possible with all the mass added to the head at the specific locations depending on your needs. Leather grip improved my feel and connection without decreasing comfort from already a top frame. It also looks great ! Classsyyy

I added VT advantec strips at 3 & 9 which increased the comfort even more. it's 3.2 grams total so not much. For Tour it was all it needed to push the plow through to my liking. For the regular Elevate it was not enough. I also tried the legendary 10 and 2 positions instead but it was not exactly what I wanted (but really effective).

regular version:
as I still wanted a bit more power I added around 2 grams at 12. Boom! It was really something !!! Still very fast, spin friendly with enough power to push back and enough control to keep the ball forever in play. It was the first moment I thought ok, I think I have it, regular elevate is my choice. But match situations showed me that I still need more stability...
I added 2 more grams at 12 and like 6 grams at the bottom of the handle. Power increased but the stability didnt change much. I took out 4 grams from the handle and it was better but still too powerful. So I removed some mass from 12" and moved it to 10 and 2.

My current setup (+2g at 12, +3g at 10 & 2 , +3g at 3&9 +2g handle +Diadem's Leather grip)
current-diadem.jpg


I played with it yesterday and it was amazing. It is a bit heavy and I still need to check out serves if it's ok. But the control/power/spin on groundstrokes is almost perfect. It's so close to my golden setup that I am scared to change anything. I still feel like my backhand could be better but I am pretty sure it's close enough for me to adapt.

I could try:
1. removing some mass from 10 and 2 and from the handle (2 grams)
2. removing some mass from 3 and 9 (not really sure about that) and from the handle (2 grams)
3. removing some mass from 12 and from the handle (2 grams)

basicly I am not sure about having any added mass (2 added grams atm) at the bottom of the handle. I want to keep the current stability.

If my serves remain good I will probably keep it for tournaments and see how I can handle the weight for longer matches.
current weight with everything:
340g , around 33 cm strung. Very serious setup as my usual balance with such static weight is around 32 cm. But I already tried to lower the balance and it didnt work. I customize by feel and performance , not the numbers.

I will be adding some videos and content on my IG so if you enjoyed this review please follow for more :) Thank you !
say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis

side-note - Diadem is probably the fastest growing tennis brand right now and I am happy to see Diadem Europe division after so many years looking only at the US market xd If you are a coach or pro-player you should contact them before they are full :) I've heard they will be releasing another line - something between Nova and Elevate. This can be huge and I am really excited!

rating: 7.5 / 10 (regular) - could be slightly more stable in stock form but feel, spin and control - amazing
rating: 7.5 / 10 (tour version) - it's more stable in stock form and definitely an improvement coming from previous version. I had big headache choosing which one I prefer so this is a good thing. I found it more ready to play in stock form and was actually serving a bit better with it but decided to pick regular as I was having better match results with it overall.

full racquet list (click)
say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
 
Last edited:
DIADEM ELEVATE V3 REVIEW:

diadems.jpg


Wohoo! It's so rare to play with something that good. Especially within "control oriented range" of rackets. You guys already know I really liked V2 Elevate and this frame made me sell my Head Prestige MP 360+ . Eventually I had to switch to TF40 becasue Elevate was not giving me enough "thump" to push back my opponents - even though i could play fast, the ball was somehow too easy to handle and my opponents played better than usual.
But I actually experienced very similar thing with TF40 (not enough thump on serves in this case) so from there I moved to Tecnifbre ISO 305 and was very excited about new V3 Elevates.

Elevate is still an elevate "performance":
Performance is closer to Prestige line with some hints of Blade. "easier Prestige in performance" and "easier Blade in maneuverability" (copied from v2 review)
this means it gives more spin than prestige and it's easier to move around than blade. Maybe it's a bit similar to Yonex Vcore 97 idea-wise but croseed with Vcore 95 precision and spin?

So it's always hard to create and sell well-performing control oriented frames with all those "gimmicks" around on the market (AND endorsements). I feel like the market for those type of frames is really getting smaller and smaller each year. If you don't add some kind of a modern flare to those types of frames it will probably die among competition.

MODERN FLARES IN V3 Elevate (and elevate in general):

1. First, the string pattern:
16x20 for many is their perfect sweet spot. Wawrinka is probably my favourite player endorsing this string pattern. Although so far It was not my favourite pattern I might reconsider my approach. So from 16 mains you are getting the spin potential of usual 16x19 frames but from 20 crosses you get slightly less power, less movement of the mains (so less spin potential), more touch and control but decreased forgiveness BUT also lower launch and "springiness" compared to 16x19. In such control oriented beam design I felt like I would prefer 16x19 solution in V2 elevate as I wanted a bit more lift and power to push back opponents. THE BIGGEST "WHY" for 16x20 over 16x19 for me is the slice. My slices were always good and switching from 16x19 to 16x20 really made a difference. I get more bite and the lower launch for slices is pretty much what you want.
Now with A BIT more power from V3 Elevate I feel like this combination clicked and Diadem made something already good even better.

2. FOAM injected!
This will always get my attention. I feel like the foam is the best way to increase feel, confidence and performance at the same time. You feel the racket as one and the flex style is really addicting and specific. Maybe that was even the "hidden secret" why among my favourite frames you can see Tecnifibre TF40, ISO Tfight and Angell TC95 ?

3. Added kraibon material:
Ok, im not really a tech-guy so I will copy text from Diadem Europe:
"The headliner innovation, Kraibon, manages to increase both the flexibility and stability of the frame without sacrificing power."
I can only confirm that indeed the feel improved, it is more solid and a bit more comfortable (for some it's called "muted") without making any sacrifices. Actually the power potential actually improved slightly and that alone IMO is also an improvement.
I made some digging around here and found out Kraibon was used by Head in their Graphene Touch line? - from famous Head users I think Sinner is using their "touch" version of Speed racquet.


ACTUAL CHANGES FROM V2 ELEVATE:
I feel like the weight distribution is a bit changed. In my hands and during a swing it feels a bit different. Also the dwell time increased which for me made the impact sensation even sweeter and probably unlocked more spin really !
So V3:
- more spin
- more comfort
- more solidness
- same/better control (due to better spin)
- a bit more power (easier to get out from difficult situations)
- more addicting feel (it's really something special)

The only thing I am not sure about is the stability. Is it better/worse/same? In theory it should be better but the regular v3 was twisting in my hands sometimes on returns. Not the case with V3 Tour.


Tour and the Regular Elevate - which one is better?
So I am playing with Elevates as my main for almost a month now. Tweaking and testing it in match situations, altering with TF40 and ISO Tfight 305. Why it took me so long to write a review?

It's because I was not sure which one I like more and how I want to customize them.
While regular 305 Elevate is a slight but noticeable improvement I feel like Tour version really climbed high up to my expectations. It's softer than V2 and overall really really similar in feel compared to the regular version. At the same time the specs of the Tour are closer to my usual setups and as it's more stable in stock form than the regular Elevate I was considering picking the Tour as a preferred version. Also I was serving really good with the Tour and I needed that boost in confidence here coming from TF40. I already mentioned before - the racquet that will bring back my serves will push out TF40 from my bag.

Although Tour is closer to my specs I also felt like the SW is quite similar between them. That lower than my usual SW made me feel a bit disconnected during my swing. It was clear I need to customize both of them to my liking.

Long story short - as I came close to my "swing - feel" on both frames my match situations showed that I am playing a bit better with the regular Elevate.

(a bit) longer dwell time of the regular elevate gives me more feel and spin potential as I have more time to finish my stroke. At least that's how I explain it to myself why I can get better RPMs with the regular one. So I am actually a bit more aggresive with the frame that is made to be more control oriented resulting in a heavier ball.

Customizations:

diadem-leather.jpg


First, I added Diadem's leather grip which to my surprise had same or very similar weight to stock grip. I can call it a happy accident as during my customization journey I found out Elevate doesn't need weight at the handle. It makes it less stable. I found out Elevate shines best when you keep the static weight as low as possible with all the mass added to the head at the specific locations depending on your needs. Leather grip improved my feel and connection without decreasing comfort from already a top frame. It also looks great and tennis is also about looking good right? haha

I added VT advantec strips at 3 & 9 which increased the comfort even more. it's 3.2 grams total so not much. For Tour it was all it needed to push the plow through to my liking. For the regular Elevate it was not enough. I also tried the legendary 10 and 2 positions instead but it was not exactly what I wanted.

regular version:
as I still wanted a bit more power I added around 2 grams at 12. Boom! It was really something !!! Still very fast, spin friendly with enough power to push back and enough control to keep the ball forever in play. It was the first moment I thought ok, I think I have it, regular elevate is my choice. But match situations showed me that I still need more stability...
I added 2 more grams at 12 and like 6 grams at the bottom of the handle. Power increased but the stability didnt changed much. I took out 4 grams from the handle and it was better but still too powerful. So I removed some mass from 12" and moved it to 10 and 2 (with some more lead there as well I think?)

My current setup:
current-diadem.jpg


I played with it yesterday and it was amazing. It is a bit heavy and I still need to check out serves if it's ok. But the control/power/spin on groundstrokes is almost perfect. It's so close to my golden setup that I am scared to change anything. I still feel like my backhand could be better but I am pretty sure it's close enough for me to adapt.

I could try:
1. removing some mass from 10 and 2 and from the handle (2 grams)
2. removing some mass from 3 and 9 (not really sure about that) and from the handle (2 grams)
3. removing mass from 12 and from the handle (2 grams)

basicly I am not sure about having any added mass (2 added grams atm) at the bottom of the handle. I might like the lower static weight/head heavier setup more. Maybe with decreased mass and shifted balance I could also remove some from the head while keeping the sensation of the plow through and gaining more RHS with max possible stability.. See how complicated it is? xd That's why I might call it a day.

If my serves remain good I will probably keep it for tournaments and see how I can handle the weight for longer matches.
current weight with everything:
342g , around 33 cm strung. Very serious setup as my usual balance with such static weight is around 32 cm. But I already tried to lower the balance and it didnt work. I customize by feel and performance , not the numbers.

I will be adding some videos and content on my IG so if you enjoyed this review please follow for more :) Thank you !
say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
Looking forward to some clips and your 8 favorite strings. I would actually be more interested in the Tour version, since I seem to prefer higher static weight overall and the V3 Elevate will for sure be as whippy as the V2 version. I am only concered about the open spacing of the mains. That's it, nothing more to concern about. The V2 was easier to play defensively than the Boom Pro.
 

Gee

Hall of Fame
DIADEM ELEVATE V3 REVIEW:

diadems.jpg


Wohoo! It's so rare to play with something that good. Especially within "control oriented range" of rackets. You guys already know I really liked V2 Elevate and this frame made me sell my Head Prestige MP 360+ . Eventually I had to switch to TF40 becasue Elevate was not giving me enough "thump" to push back my opponents - even though i could play fast, the ball was somehow too easy to handle and my opponents played better than usual.
But I actually experienced very similar thing with TF40 (not enough thump on serves in this case) so from there I moved to Tecnifbre ISO 305 and was very excited about new V3 Elevates.


@Gee this is something for you :p

Thanks for your very extensive review. Nice to read!
I really like the new paintjob with the beautiful blue colours. Better than the previous one in my opinion.
However I'm sorry to say that I have been so addicted to my Prince Phantom 100x 18x20 that I actually switched and a second one is coming soon,...
That doesn't mean the Elevates are bad, they are still great of course as we both know :)

I just love the precision of the 18x20 string pattern with a very generous sweetspot. The PP100x also has a lot of feel. Very suitable for a crafty game.
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
Thanks for your very extensive review. Nice to read!
I really like the new paintjob with the beautiful blue colours. Better than the previous one in my opinion.
However I'm sorry to say that I have been so addicted to my Prince Phantom 100x 18x20 that I actually switched and a second one is coming soon,...
That doesn't mean the Elevates are bad, they are still great of course as we both know :)

I just love the precision of the 18x20 string pattern with a very generous sweetspot. The PP100x also has a lot of feel. Very suitable for a crafty game.
never tried prince ! Their lines are interesting I can admit that ! :) A bit confusing IMO, they should work on their names and models. I have no idea what is what and when released.
 

zzturtle

New User
never tried prince ! Their lines are interesting I can admit that ! :) A bit confusing IMO, they should work on their names and models. I have no idea what is what and when released.
The Phantom suffix indicates the beam/construction. P is box beam, G is the one with the crossbar, the one with O3 has the uniq O ports(I haven't tried this) and X is the modern oval shape beam. I only used 93P for a small a little bit of a time. That racquet is too advanced for me. I think Phantom is one of the representative line of Prince. They all have very low RA and thin beam. The other one is Tour. Iga was using the previous generation of Tour to win French Open. The other lines are more on the adventure side.
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
The Phantom suffix indicates the beam/construction. P is box beam, G is the one with the crossbar, the one with O3 has the uniq O ports(I haven't tried this) and X is the modern oval shape beam. I only used 93P for a small a little bit of a time. That racquet is too advanced for me. I think Phantom is one of the representative line of Prince. They all have very low RA and thin beam. The other one is Tour. Iga was using the previous generation of Tour to win French Open. The other lines are more on the adventure side.
But dont they have like few versions for each „name” ? I feel like there is many versions of the phantom 100x - 18x20 , 16x18 , 305g, 310g, 320 g… so many options for the same name right? And they were messing around with those for a while. I found 100x that is 305g and 320g.
 

zzturtle

New User
But dont they have like few versions for each „name” ? I feel like there is many versions of the phantom 100x - 18x20 , 16x18 , 305g, 310g, 320 g… so many options for the same name right? And they were messing around with those for a while. I found 100x that is 305g and 320g.
For 100x, from tw website, there're two string pattern: 16 * 18 and 18 * 20. There're two weight: 290 and 305 for 16 * 18. I think they are the same racquet. They have the same beam and swing weight. The only difference between them is the balance point. 305 probably has more weight on the handle.

There's only one 18 * 20 100X which is 320g.

P series is more straightforward. They all have 16 * 18 for 97 p(320g, 320 sw) and 100p(310g, 328 sw). 93p has two string pattern options: 14 * 18(325g, 329 sw) and 18 * 20(330g, 329 sw).
 

kailash

Hall of Fame
DIADEM ELEVATE FS 98, 305g, 32cm balance, 64 ra, 16x20 pattern, 21.5 mm flat beam

Now this will stay in my bag!

elevate.jpg


how does it perform?
first - the racquet in stock form is enough stable for my game. Maybe because of the foam inside? Maybe because of the 21.5m beam ? I don't know but compared to Yonex Vcore Pro 97 (previous editions) and Yonex Vcore 95 it's night and day. It is also slightly more stable than Head Gravity Tour (review to come).

The biggest comparable, competitive racquet in that weight range would be Wilson Blade which is more stable but definitely harder to accelerate. I would estimate the SW to be at around 315-324 - similar to Yonex frames or Prestige line. Gravity Tour is slightly faster. Could be QC of course...

It's a perfect cross between Prestige MP 360+ (heavy but easy to accelerate) and Wilson Blade V7 (light but harder to accelerate). The weight distribution is almost perfect. It just clicked with me and my technique. I don't remember when was the last time I felt so much connected to the specs. Very smooth and easy!

Performance is closer to Prestige line with some hints of Blade. "easier Prestige in performance" and "easier Blade in maneuverability"

FEEL:


Slightly improved compared to Elevate Tour. They are still very similar and maybe on some certain shots like volleys I felt the biggest difference. Compared to Prestige 360+ MP or Gravity Tour or Tecnifibre RS305 or Blade v7 16x19 or Angell TC95 16x19 it's still slightly stiffer. SLIGHTLY. Maybe because most of them are also heavier so they have bigger mass (or SW) to take the vibrations and Gravity Tour is 100". Interesting fact that my student couldn't feel too much difference between regular and Tour Elevate. Not only feel but also how heavy they are. Sounds a bit silly but they are really close even in maneuverability department (you can feel the difference more on serves only)

PACKED with performance:

Do you remember when I said Gravity Pro has very bad performance per weight ratio (to be precise-how heavy the racquet feels and how much it gives in return) ? Head Speed Pro 360+ is a king here but Elevate is a smaller brother with better maneuverability, thinner beam and that special "connection" Every gram is doing it's job.

That could be an interesting fight Elevate customized to Speed Pro specs (including RA and SW). I actually think Elevate would blew Speed Pro out of the water ! Unfortunately stock specs make it impossible to customize it that way. WE WANT EVELATE TOUR with Speed Pro specs (310g/315mm balance 62ra, beam design of elevate, foam filled, 326-330 SW). thank you- racquet of destruction is ready, real
tesseract !!!
1*zgcdC9IZL-mG3igTCjPY4Q.jpeg


What was wrong?

I noticed that despite my special connection and ability to hit fast shots they were lacking some "mass".
I mean - I noticed that my students and sparing partners are more comfortable with the incoming ball. There is a difference between "fast" and "heavy".

it became clear that I should try to find a solution.

BUT the racquet is stable enough for my game, I love how the racquet moves so adding mass to head makes little sense to me...

So decided to just add more mass to the handle (+/- 320g/310mm balance) - at the very bottom. So I have heavier frame overall with slightly higher SW but actually very maneuverable balance setup.

Did it work? Hmm...yes and no. I noticed few things:
-it maybe feels even faster than before, I indeed solved the problem with ball heaviness without sacrificing maneuverability. Forehand groundstrokes and serves improved.
-but my backhand is not so smooth as before - lost the feeling of "throwing" my arms into the ball's direction (Blade is the king here). - sounds like too small SW or I moved the balance too low.

at this point I will keep playing with it and try to adapt. Another serious session tonight so we will see!
possible further customizations:
1. move the weight from the bottom to the top of the handle ?
2. distribute the weight along the handle ?
3. concentrate even more mass at the bottom BUT remove some grams and add what's left at 3&9 ?
4. concentrate even more mass at the bottom, less grams AND what's left add to the bridge/6 o'clock ?
5. Ignore lead. It's poisonous. Just lower the tension or use more powerful strings?
1*qG1qexW2PrbR-Jj7w9m_TQ.jpeg


Overall I rate it at 7.5 / 10 . Paintjob looks great and the control oriented performance with that "special connection" is what I am usually looking for in the racquet !
Waiting for the updated Elevate Tour :)
I think regular Evelate is as good as it is and doesn't have to be improved. Perfect platform racquet that can be used in stock or customized version.

rest of the racquets (click)
say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
What is the difference between the V3 version and FS V2?

Never mind...just saw the post on V3; reading...
 
Last edited:

galapagos

Hall of Fame
Looking at the specs, I feel like that the tour would work for me. Need to demo!

If those are as good as TF40 or better, I am tempted!!
More power and juice from diadem tour. TF40 is closer to diadem regular version in terms of feel and performance but Elevate is easier to customize while tf40 I was expecting a bit more from 315g frame. The SW should be higher. I think tf40 305 would be a better fight. I would lead it up similar to Elevate :)
 

ClaudTT

Semi-Pro
More power and juice from diadem tour. TF40 is closer to diadem regular version in terms of feel and performance but Elevate is easier to customize while tf40 I was expecting a bit more from 315g frame. The SW should be higher. I think tf40 305 would be a better fight. I would lead it up similar to Elevate :)
I did that to bring TF40 power to Elevate V2 or closer... and didn't loose ANY of the qualities. Got SW to 326 in my set up.
 

Fintft

G.O.A.T.
More power and juice from diadem tour. TF40 is closer to diadem regular version in terms of feel and performance but Elevate is easier to customize while tf40 I was expecting a bit more from 315g frame. The SW should be higher. I think tf40 305 would be a better fight. I would lead it up similar to Elevate :)
Not really though. I take Artengo and the PKs in my sig over TF40 305( the only one that I've sold completely), but even more so Blade Pro v8 is the way to go.
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
Sorry for the offtop again, I released new music video today with my band :) It's an uplifting party starter about self-care and searching for happiness which opens discussion about mental health. Sonically and in mindset “Jolly” can be referred as a mix between dance-pop (Disclosure) and indie (Phoenix) influences. Self-produced by us and mastered by John Davis (The Killers, Gorillaz, The Kooks, Foals).

Would appreciate some love and your feedback. Still trying to figure out the place for us in music industry.



thanks,
Dan
 
Sorry for the offtop again, I released new music video today with my band :) It's an uplifting party starter about self-care and searching for happiness which opens discussion about mental health. Sonically and in mindset “Jolly” can be referred as a mix between dance-pop (Disclosure) and indie (Phoenix) influences. Self-produced by us and mastered by John Davis (The Killers, Gorillaz, The Kooks, Foals).

Would appreciate some love and your feedback. Still trying to figure out the place for us in music industry.



thanks,
Dan
Try to get in touch with this YouTube channel called "Selected". It matches your band's style perfectly.
https://www.youtube.com/@SelectedBase/videos
 

RWilke86

New User
DIADEM ELEVATE V3 REVIEW:

diadems.jpg


Wohoo! It's so rare to play with something that good. Especially within "control oriented range" of rackets. You guys already know I really liked V2 Elevate and this frame made me sell Head Prestige MP 360+. Now V3 Elevate is pushing out my TF40 315 :X3: Main reason - I can serve better with the Elevate.

Elevate is still an elevate -
performance:

Performance is closer to Prestige line with some hints of Blade. "easier Prestige in performance" and "easier Blade in maneuverability" (copied from my v2 review)
this means it gives more spin than prestige and it's easier to move around than blade. Maybe it's a bit similar to Yonex Vcore 97 idea-wise but croseed with Vcore 95 precision and spin?

So it's always hard to create and sell well-performing control oriented frames with all those "gimmicks" around on the market (AND endorsements). I feel like the market for those type of frames is really getting smaller and smaller each year. If you don't add some kind of a modern flare it will probably die among competition.

MODERN FLARES IN V3 Elevate:

1. First, the string pattern:
16x20 for many is their perfect sweet spot. Wawrinka is probably my favourite player endorsing this string pattern. Although so far It was not my favourite pattern I might reconsider my approach. So from 16 mains you are getting the spin potential of usual 16x19 frames but from 20 crosses you get slightly less power, less movement of the mains (so less spin potential), more touch and control but decreased forgiveness. You should experience lower launch angle and less "springiness" compared to 16x19.
THE BIGGEST "WHY" for 16x20 over 16x19 is the slice. Slices are important part of my game and switching from 16x19 to 16x20 really made a difference. Slices are less floaty and more penetrating.

Now with A BIT more power from V3 Elevate I feel like this combination clicked and Diadem made something already good even better.

2. FOAM injected!
Most of my favourite frames have foam inside. I feel like it's the best way to increase feel, confidence and performance at the same time. You feel the racket as one and the flex style is really addicting and specific.

3. Added kraibon material:
Ok, im not really a tech-guy so I will copy text from Diadem Europe:
"The headliner innovation, Kraibon, manages to increase both the flexibility and stability of the frame without sacrificing power."
I can only confirm that indeed the feel improved, it is more solid and a bit more comfortable (for some it's called "muted") without making any sacrifices. Actually the power potential improved slightly and that alone IMO is also an improvement.
I made some digging around here and found out Kraibon was used by Head in their Graphene Touch line? - from famous Head users I think Sinner is using their "touch" version of Speed racquet.


ACTUAL CHANGES FROM V2 ELEVATE:
I feel like the weight distribution is a bit changed. In my hands and during a swing it feels a bit different. Also the dwell time increased which for me made the impact sensation even sweeter and probably unlocked more spin !
So V3:
- more spin
- more comfort
- more solidness
- same/better control (due to better spin)
- a bit more power (easier to get out from difficult situations)
- better feel (it's really something special)


The only thing I am not sure about is the stability. Is it better/worse/same? In theory it should be better but the regular v3 was twisting in my hands sometimes on the returns. Not the case with V3 Tour.


Tour and the Regular Elevate - which one is better?
So I am playing with the Elevates as my main for almost a month now. Tweaking and testing it in match situations, altering with TF40 and ISO Tfight 305. Why it took me so long to write a review?

It's because I was not sure which one I like more and how I want to customize them (elevate tour or regular).
While regular 305 Elevate is a slight but noticeable improvement I feel like Tour version really climbed high up to my expectations.

It's softer than V2 and overall really really similar in feel compared to the regular version. At the same time the specs of the Tour are closer to my usual setups and as it's more stable in stock form than the regular Elevate I was considering picking the Tour as a preferred version. Also I was serving really good with the Tour and I needed that boost in confidence here coming from TF40. I already mentioned before - the racquet that will bring back my serves will push out TF40 from my bag. With clean hits I probably would not be able to distinguish one from the other by the feel of the stringbed. Maybe hitting outside the sweetspot is a bit different - Tour kinda stiffens up to take over the imperfection of your swing but overall the differences in feel are really small but have bigger impact on performance.

Although Tour is closer to my specs I also felt like the SW is quite similar between them. That lower than my usual SW made me feel a bit disconnected during my swing. It was clear I need to customize both of them to my liking.

My match situations showed that I am playing a bit better with the regular Elevate.
(a bit) longer dwell time of the regular elevate gives me more feel and spin potential as I have more time to finish my stroke. So I am actually a bit more aggresive with the frame that is made to be more control oriented resulting in a heavier ball.

Customizations:

diadem-leather.jpg


First, I added Diadem's leather grip which to my surprise had same or very similar weight to stock grip. I can call it a happy accident as during my customization journey I found out Elevate doesn't need weight at the handle. It makes it less stable. I found out Elevate shines best when you keep the static weight as low as possible with all the mass added to the head at the specific locations depending on your needs. Leather grip improved my feel and connection without decreasing comfort from already a top frame. It also looks great ! Classsyyy

I added VT advantec strips at 3 & 9 which increased the comfort even more. it's 3.2 grams total so not much. For Tour it was all it needed to push the plow through to my liking. For the regular Elevate it was not enough. I also tried the legendary 10 and 2 positions instead but it was not exactly what I wanted (but really effective).

regular version:
as I still wanted a bit more power I added around 2 grams at 12. Boom! It was really something !!! Still very fast, spin friendly with enough power to push back and enough control to keep the ball forever in play. It was the first moment I thought ok, I think I have it, regular elevate is my choice. But match situations showed me that I still need more stability...
I added 2 more grams at 12 and like 6 grams at the bottom of the handle. Power increased but the stability didnt change much. I took out 4 grams from the handle and it was better but still too powerful. So I removed some mass from 12" and moved it to 10 and 2.

My current setup (+2g at 12, +3g at 10 & 2 , +3g at 3&9 +2g handle +Diadem's Leather grip)
current-diadem.jpg


I played with it yesterday and it was amazing. It is a bit heavy and I still need to check out serves if it's ok. But the control/power/spin on groundstrokes is almost perfect. It's so close to my golden setup that I am scared to change anything. I still feel like my backhand could be better but I am pretty sure it's close enough for me to adapt.

I could try:
1. removing some mass from 10 and 2 and from the handle (2 grams)
2. removing some mass from 3 and 9 (not really sure about that) and from the handle (2 grams)
3. removing some mass from 12 and from the handle (2 grams)

basicly I am not sure about having any added mass (2 added grams atm) at the bottom of the handle. I want to keep the current stability.

If my serves remain good I will probably keep it for tournaments and see how I can handle the weight for longer matches.
current weight with everything:
340g , around 33 cm strung. Very serious setup as my usual balance with such static weight is around 32 cm. But I already tried to lower the balance and it didnt work. I customize by feel and performance , not the numbers.

I will be adding some videos and content on my IG so if you enjoyed this review please follow for more :) Thank you !
say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis

side-note - Diadem is probably the fastest growing tennis brand right now and I am happy to see Diadem Europe division after so many years looking only at the US market xd If you are a coach or pro-player you should contact them before they are full :) I've heard they will be releasing another line - something between Nova and Elevate. This can be huge and I am really excited!
a comparison to the Iso305 and the stringing used would be very interesting for me :)

Thanks for the great content
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
a comparison to the Iso305 and the stringing used would be very interesting for me :)

Thanks for the great content
I used same tension as with ISO305 - tecnifibre razor code at 22kg just to be more objective with my review.
ISO is more forgiving and stable in stock form, also more power. Elevate is easier to use with more defined sweet spot and overall more "traditional" feel.
ISO is very modern. When I think about other "similar" frames I think about Ezone and Speed lines while Blade being the middle point for both frames (ISO and Elevate) and then for Elevate you have other side of the coin with frames like Prestige MP, Vcore 95, Extreme Tour.

They all land in very similar "players" category but under slightly different playstyle and feel of the response.
 
@galapagos

Looks like the Tecnifibre TF40 315 16*19 is going to be my main stick for getting better in tennis in general, playing friendly matches and participating in local tournaments. It's the racket I feel most comfortable playing with. I will most probably experiment with just a few grams in the handle. It weights 307 grams unstrung, well underspeced, but in the following weeks I will be experimenting with a few grams in the handle and 9 and 3.

I'll read about your experience with it. I don't wanna mess with its whippiness. From the few hours I've played, I just felt it was lacking a little power. Could be the string of course. Good thing is I'll be taking some pre-weighted sticking magnetic strips (cut from thin magnetic sheet for kids crafting activities) to put them in different places on the racket to see what happens.

tf40-315-16-19-unstrung-specs.jpg
tf40-315-weight.jpg
 

ClaudTT

Semi-Pro
I just got a Tecni ISO 305 to test all this theories going around...

We will see once I get the set up right... NEVER played an 18x19 pattern seriously, so I expect every single of the qualities that are talked...
To make matters even will have it identical to my other guns... Weight, SW and strings.
So, no stability issues from physics will be different comparatively, i.e. isolate the frame behaviour.

Then will have my son (29) give it a try... he hits big with his TFIGHT 315 RS...
Stay tuned.
 
Last edited:

galapagos

Hall of Fame
I just got a Tecni ISO 305 to test all this theories going around...

We will see once I get the set up right... NEVER played an 18x19 pattern seriously, so I expect every single of the qualities that are talked...
To make matters even will have it identical to my other guns... Weight, SW and strings.
So, no stability issues from physics will be different comparatively, i.e. isolate the frame behaviour.

Then will have my son (29) give it a try... he hits big with his TFIGHT 315 RS...
Stay tuned.
I absolutely love ISO 305. I added some weight to the handle to make the balance point slightly below 32 cm strung. This frame is rock-solid and a total upgrade from RS line.
 
Another 1+ hours in the books. Played my most intense hitting session with a coach. Making big adjustments on my forehand. Worked on mini tennis warm-ups to fix my technique, then groundstrokes from the middle of the baseline and he would mix it up with cross-court forehands on the run. Many of them would find the net, after several tries, I'm getting hitting with more top-spin and depth and clearing the net safely, then forehands cross-court, 2-handed backhands cross-courts, volleys, overheads...

My TF40 315 feels that needs a few grams on the hoop for more plough-through and better twisting stability, till I get to the level that I can hit the sweet-spot clean in different situations.

I have added 6 grams total at 9 and 3 o'clock for next time. Balance after the added 6 grams is still very much towards the handle.

L-Tec Premium Celeste 1.2
5 played slightly firm at first half-hour, but that was because I switched from my Pro Kennex Ki5 295 to the TF40.

This time, I felt super dialed-in. Feel of being in control is always there and I get very predictable results when I hit it right.
 
2 clips of low intensity today. Making progress with my forehand, footwork etc. My hittining partner today was a beginner. I also played with an advanced one who was stood-up for half-an-hour, only with the TF40. He was impressed and we will certainly play again. Laying out my progress.

I've added 6 grams at 9 and 3 on the TF40. Great stick. My current go-to-racket right now.

You should expect higher intensity clips in the following days and weeks.

 
Pro Kennex Black Ace 300 delivered today! I will be pairing it with the Ki5 295 that is definitely a "keeper". Already, not a big fan of the yellow texture, feels sticky somehow, but I'll see how it plays.

pk-ba-300-1.jpg
pk-ba-300-2.jpg
 

ClaudTT

Semi-Pro
I absolutely love ISO 305. I added some weight to the handle to make the balance point slightly below 32 cm strung. This frame is rock-solid and a total upgrade from RS line.
Just started to test the ISO 305, came at SW333 strung, added double overgrip. First impressions are power and sweet area are bigger than most others.
It felt not as precise as TF40 with 56lb hybrid Poly/multi. I am going to bring it up to 60lb to search for more precision... as I feel uncertain in the upper head.
Feel is superplush more than RS less muted than TF40, sort of like hitting soft cookies... with loads of power and spin at will.
Now, first take on ISO 18x19 is NOT near TF40 18x20 directionality... felt more like the TFIGHT RS 16x19 in that aspect and similar power or slightly more.
I will see serves with the higher tension, want to get the ball where I aim... not off 2-3 ft.
Once the rain is over... will try serving to adjust and compare. But can see that serving bombs are a strong possibility.

Stay tuned.
 

ClaudTT

Semi-Pro
Just started to test the ISO 305, came at SW333 strung, added double overgrip. First impressions are power and sweet area are bigger than most others.
It felt not as precise as TF40 with 56lb hybrid Poly/multi. I am going to bring it up to 60lb to search for more precision... as I feel uncertain in the upper head.
Feel is superplush more than RS less muted than TF40, sort of like hitting soft cookies... with loads of power and spin at will.
Now, first take on ISO 18x19 is NOT near TF40 18x20 directionality... felt more like the TFIGHT RS 16x19 in that aspect and similar power or slightly more.
I will see serves with the higher tension, want to get the ball where I aim... not off 2-3 ft.
Once the rain is over... will try serving to adjust and compare. But can see that serving bombs are a strong possibility.

Stay tuned.
I am wondering what would ISOFLEX do for a TF40 ? ....

OR even worse, if Tecnifibre can screw my life bad if they make a 97 Ltd 626cm^2 with ISOFLEX and the other TF40 goodies... And that will do bad for my finances...
:oops:
 
Last edited:

galapagos

Hall of Fame
TECNIFIBRE TFight ISO 315 16x19 REVIEW!

tfight-315.jpg


There is something in this new TFight line...everytime I look at the paintjobs and those shapes at home I have the urge to pick them up and swing just for fun xd

As a Tfight big fan I wanted to try 315 and compare it to previous RS model. I also have TF40 315 that I love but I miss some free power (it's a bit too control oriented probably). Also where does it stand next to ISO 305 but customized to be more headlight?

DNA of the racquet:
It's for the players that want some help from the frame but still have "control" oriented game-style preference. The closest competition racquets would be Yonex Ezone and Head Extreme Tour, maybe Radical Pro but I haven't tried it yet (BUT SOON!) and Wilson Pro Staff 97.

Positives:
it's foam filled! You know I love foam filled frames. They are solid, comfortable, muted but in a very good way without sacrificing feel.
By just my feel I would rate the stiffness between 64-66.
It's pretty much ready to play with in stock form - my ISO on a scale was 312g which is ok for me. It's stable in stock form and maneuverable. Plow through is ok - something between Radical Pro and Extreme Tour.

Regarding performance I really wasn't sure if I want something more from it. Frame is very fast but not "toy like" compared to Extreme Tour. I think those types of racquets should be fast through the air so I didn't want to kill it's potential. I am used to 'heavier in feel" setups so I obviously had to try out some mods :)

Just like from the Ezone or Radical - the frame itself is all-around complete frame with good access to power and spin without sacrificing control. The launch angle and response were all good for me even coming from 18x19 ISO 305.

I could also label this frame as "easier to play with Angell TC95" but with the drawback of it being less "dominating". Always a matter of finding the good balance of everything...

compared to TF40 I am getting a hotter response but less "traditional feel" both by about hmm... 15 % ? xd It's a gentle touch but noticeable. Compared to Tfight 305 I am getting more spin and it's easier to play with in stock form. 315 is more "complete" all around while 305 is a very specific weapon for a specific player but very rewarding and addictive to play with.
I feel more "special" with 305 and my name is Danny so I gravitate towards Daniil's setups haha.
Compared to previous model (RS) I feel like this one is actually more control oriented with improved feel.

Tfight 315 is "enough modern" and "enough traditional" for my game and I prefer it over the Ezone 98 that was lacking feel and was a bit erratic. Compared to Extreme Tour - Extreme needs more customizations as in stock form it is a bit anemic and unstable. Tfight 315 is so far the best Tfight 315 I tried to date :)

My modification story:
1. 2g at 12 - my serves didn't like it
2. 2g shifted down towards 10 and 2 - my serves didn't like it, not enough snap from the wrist - surprisingly my serves suffered the most with this setup
3. 3.2 g at 3&9 with VT advantec strips - this was a cool setup making the frame a bit heavier without making much changes in everything else - I was still missing something to be honest.
4. 3.2g at 3&9 with Tecnifibre leather grip - a bit too headlight and heavy but I noticed even more spin potential and overall solidness which I liked.
5. 3.2g at 3&9 with 4g at the bottom of the handle - this was very good from the baseline - almost exactly what I wanted but again something didn't work with my serves. Still too headlight probably and surprisingly heavier than rest of the setups I tried - kinda heavy and whippy at the same time.
6. removed 2 grams from the handle - again - a bit too "easy to move"
7. now with 4 grams at 12 and removed mass from the handle - it is so far my favourite setup and probably the best - thinking of adding 1 or 2 grams more haha


Strings used: Razor Code 1.25 at 22 kg - it's my reference string lately and It played very well in ISO 315. Very control oriented and spin friendly with nice touch and feel. I would not string the frame higher than 23kg. The lower you can go the better.

I am rotating this frame with my other top picks. The biggest positive (and negative at the same time) thing about ISO 315 is that I am on the edge of being completely in tune with the frame but I am not yet there and not exactly sure what I want to improve and what I want to change to find this "golden sweet spot". I would like to keep the racquet fast as it is now with a slight boost in plow through. I appreciate easier power and spin. I miss a bit that connection from TF40 but I will take the hotter, improved overall performance.

edit: compared to ezone , tfight 315 is superior - more comfort, more feel, more consistent response, maybe power level goes to ezone only and that is making tfight more control oriented but still with some juice on top. I gave Ezone, Vcore 95 and Tfight 315 to my friend and he liked Tfight 315 most.
So it's 3:0 already :) Will be fighting against radical pro soon!


rating: 7.5 / 10

say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
 
Last edited:
TECNIFIBRE TFight ISO 315 16x19 REVIEW!

tfight-315.jpg


There is something in this new TFight line...everytime I look at the paintjobs and those shapes at home I have the urge to pick them up and swing just for fun xd

As a Tfight big fan I wanted to try 315 and compare it to previous RS model. I also have TF40 315 that I love but I miss some free power (it's a bit too control oriented probably). Also where does it stand next to ISO 305 but customized to be more headlight?

DNA of the racquet:
It's for the players that want some help from the frame but still have "control" oriented game-style preference. The closest competition racquets would be Yonex Ezone and Head Extreme Tour, maybe Radical Pro but I haven't tried it yet (BUT SOON!) and Wilson Pro Staff 97.

Positives:
it's foam filled! You know I love foam filled frames. They are solid, comfortable, muted but in a very good way without sacrificing feel.
By just my feel I would rate the stiffness between 64-66.
It's pretty much ready to play with in stock form - my ISO on a scale was 312g which is ok for me. It's stable in stock form and maneuverable. Plow through is ok - something between Radical Pro and Extreme Tour.

Regarding performance I really wasn't sure if I want something more from it. Frame is very fast but not "toy like" compared to Extreme Tour. I think those types of racquets should be fast through the air so I didn't want to kill it's potential. I am used to 'heavier in feel" setups so I obviously had to try out some mods :)

Just like from the Ezone or Radical - the frame itself is all-around complete frame with good access to power and spin without sacrificing control. The launch angle and response were all good for me even coming from 18x19 ISO 305.

I could also label this frame as "easier to play with Angell TC95" but with the drawback of it being less "dominating". Always a matter of finding the good balance of everything...

compared to TF40 I am getting a hotter response but less "traditional feel" both by about hmm... 15 % ? xd It's a gentle touch but noticeable. Compared to 305 I am getting more spin and it's easier to play with in stock form. 315 is more "complete" all around while 305 is a very specific weapon for a specific player.
I feel more "special" with 305 but my name is Danny so I gravitate towards Daniil's setups haha.
Compared to previous model (RS) I feel like this one is actually more control oriented with improved feel.

I will be comparing it head to head soon next to Radical Pro and Ezone 98. I think those are the closest frames in the lineup being "enough modern" and "enough traditional"

My modification story:
1. 2g at 12 - my serves didn't like it
2. 2g shifted down towards 10 and 2 - my serves didn't like it, not enough snap from the wrist - surprisingly my serves suffered the most with this setup
3. 3.2 g at 3&9 with VT advantec strips - this was a cool setup making the frame a bit heavier without making much changes in everything else - I was still missing something to be honest.
4. 3.2g at 3&9 with Tecnifibre leather grip - a bit too headlight and heavy but I noticed even more spin potential and overall solidness which I liked.
5. 3.2g at 3&9 with 4g at the bottom of the handle - this was very good from the baseline - almost exactly what I wanted but again something didn't work with my serves. Still too headlight probably and surprisingly heavier than rest of the setups I tried - kinda heavy and whippy at the same time.
6. removed 2 grams from the handle - again - a bit too "easy to move"

final thoughts about customization: I think it's a frame that shines the most with fast RHS and it should be fast. It's not a frame with what you can guide the ball - you need to hit it. It played pretty much the best overall in stock form so I removed VT strips and kept 2 grams at the handle (frame is stable anyway). I will try 2 grams at 12 with 2 or 4 grams at the bottom of the handle as my last experiment...maybe 4 grams at the top of the handle without anything else. We will see.

Strings used: Razor Code 1.25 at 22 kg - it's my reference string lately and It played very well in ISO 315. Very control oriented and spin friendly with nice touch and feel. I would not string the frame higher than 23kg. The lower you can go the better.

I am rotating this frame with my other top picks. The biggest positive (and negative at the same time) thing about ISO 315 is that I am on the edge of being completely in tune with the frame but I am not yet there and not exactly sure what I want to improve and what I want to change to find this "golden sweet spot". I would like to keep the racquet fast as it is now with a slight boost in plow through. I appreciate easier power and spin. I miss a bit that connection from TF40 but I will take the hotter, improved overall performance.

rating: 7.5 / 10

say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
That's the ONE racket I'm EAGER to try and compare head to head to the TF40 315 16*19 (compare and keep both)!

My TF40 seems to lack some "plough-through" and I'd like slightly better stability. Things have improved in these 2 areas with just 5 grams total at 9 and 3, which I think I'll remove now, that I'm getting to play much better than 2 weeks ago.

If the ISO 315 is what I think it is, a slightly more stable version of the TF40 with a bit more power, mainly because of the different, more round mold, I'm sold for it!

I think it will all come down to the right string setup for you. The rackets (looks and) must be great overall!

* I hope I'll play with a guy I met in the next court who has 2 ISO 305.
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
That's the ONE racket I'm EAGER to try and compare head to head to the TF40 315 16*19 (compare and keep both)!

My TF40 seems to lack some "plough-through" and I'd like slightly better stability. Things have improved in these 2 areas with just 5 grams total at 9 and 3, which I think I'll remove now, that I'm getting to play much better than 2 weeks ago.

If the ISO 315 is what I think it is, a slightly more stable version of the TF40 with a bit more power, mainly because of the different, more round mold, I'm sold for it!

I think it will all come down to the right string setup for you. The rackets (looks and) must be great overall!

* I hope I'll play with a guy I met in the next court who has 2 ISO 305.
very possible, but TF40 is kinda more "packed" with feel and solidness which is also addictive. TF40 is one of the best in feel department actually
 

ClaudTT

Semi-Pro
TECNIFIBRE TFight ISO 315 16x19 REVIEW!

tfight-315.jpg


There is something in this new TFight line...everytime I look at the paintjobs and those shapes at home I have the urge to pick them up and swing just for fun xd

As a Tfight big fan I wanted to try 315 and compare it to previous RS model. I also have TF40 315 that I love but I miss some free power (it's a bit too control oriented probably). Also where does it stand next to ISO 305 but customized to be more headlight?

DNA of the racquet:
It's for the players that want some help from the frame but still have "control" oriented game-style preference. The closest competition racquets would be Yonex Ezone and Head Extreme Tour, maybe Radical Pro but I haven't tried it yet (BUT SOON!) and Wilson Pro Staff 97.

rating: 7.5 / 10

say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
Have you measured the beam thickness on these rackets ? The ISO 305 that am testing is way way out of specs !!!! 23.5 mm at the hoop... and tapering ... only 22.5 mm at the shaft. Veeeery disappointing on QC.
 

ClaudTT

Semi-Pro
BTW, I saw your video playing on IG: try using much more Aft weight and free up your wrist before contact, but maintain your elbow path around... (is kicking up now).
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
BTW, I saw your video playing on IG: try using much more Aft weight and free up your wrist before contact, but maintain your elbow path around... (is kicking up now).
thanks, sounds right. When I look at the slow-mo videos I can see that there is more room for wrist movement (lag) that should be able to achieve probably only through relaxation or I would have to change to some WTA forehand with already extremely fixed wrist ^^' this is not my prime so I still hope to find my rhythm :) will be waiting for your tips !
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
Have you measured the beam thickness on these rackets ? The ISO 305 that am testing is way way out of specs !!!! 23.5 mm at the hoop... and tapering ... only 22.5 mm at the shaft. Veeeery disappointing on QC.
sounds crazy surreal to have QC issues within the mold? I was never really bothered to meassure this things like beam thickness.
 

ClaudTT

Semi-Pro
sounds crazy surreal to have QC issues within the mold? I was never really bothered to meassure this things like beam thickness.
Very crazy... I do not know if there is a bad mold being used OR when they closured it was not fully closed... Since they are bladder type the material is cured anyway but passed inspection ??? if there is any. Zero (0.0) points for Tecnifibre.
 

ClaudTT

Semi-Pro
thanks, sounds right. When I look at the slow-mo videos I can see that there is more room for wrist movement (lag) that should be able to achieve probably only through relaxation or I would have to change to some WTA forehand with already extremely fixed wrist ^^' this is not my prime so I still hope to find my rhythm :) will be waiting for your tips !
:laughing: well... you crack me up... your swing is like a mix of 'old' Loop and some pronation... but the Body Momentum transfer is only 50% that way...unlike the ATP FH 'modern' which has that.
 
Played warm-up and lost 1 set 6-2 with TF40 315 16*19 yesterday. After 10 days off, it felt stiffer than I'd like. Like the stringbed got stiffer through time (?). Next string setup will be crucial to see if I keep it. Gave it to an advanced hitting partner who was playing on the next court, he found it too stiff too.
 
Things look good once again for the L-Tec Premium Celeste 1.25. Rain sprayed on the court, very slow surface today, had/could hit flat with more power than usual. Racket feels much better when hitting my shots flat than with topspin.

 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
Ultimate "tweener" yet feel oriented racquet?
List:
Yonex Ezone 100"
Yonex Vcore 100"
Yonex Vcore 98"
Head Extreme MP 100"
Tecnifibre IGA TEMPO 298 98"


had also yonex ezone 98 but it didnt make it to the picture xd
ultimate-tweener.jpg



cheers,
say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
 

amarg

New User
I would add Yonex vcore pro 100 and Dunlop CX 400 Tour to the list. More of a player's racquets, but (23mm beam and 100') frame brings them to tweener territory.
Great blend of both though and highly underrated imo
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
I would add Yonex vcore pro 100 and Dunlop CX 400 Tour to the list. More of a player's racquets, but (23mm beam and 100') frame brings them to tweener territory.
Great blend of both though and highly underrated imo
Behind the scenes I got info that Iga Swiatek was testing vcore pro 100 before deciding to go with tecnifibre. You are right it deserves a spot there
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
I think the pure aero has more feel than some of those.
Pure aero is imo too big departure. Babolat was never a feel oriented brand imo. Performance yea of course but comfort or feel? Maybe lately they are trying to mix things a little but still far behind the competition (imo)
 
Top