Ultimate string of choice !

@TennisJrDad do you have access to labtests of 1.20 razor code vs 1.20 tour bite vs 1.20 confidential vs 1.23 tour hex and 1.20 poly tour rev ? :)

I like 1.23 tour hex and decided maybe it's worth to give it a fair shot for some other +/- 1.20 strings. This is my short list :)
Have you tried ice code? Tension maintenance is supposed to be superb. I used the 1.25 and found excellent control.
 
@galapagos Here you go. I can only compare 4 at a time, so I grabbed the 4 you mentioned. If you want to see them compared to Tour Hex, I can do 2 graphs of Tour Hex with 2 others. Let me know if you want to see that.

Screenshot-2023-04-09-174241.png


@TennisJrDad do you have access to labtests of 1.20 razor code vs 1.20 tour bite vs 1.20 confidential vs 1.23 tour hex and 1.20 poly tour rev ? :)

I like 1.23 tour hex and decided maybe it's worth to give it a fair shot for some other +/- 1.20 strings. This is my short list :)
 
@galapagos Here you go. I can only compare 4 at a time, so I grabbed the 4 you mentioned. If you want to see them compared to Tour Hex, I can do 2 graphs of Tour Hex with 2 others. Let me know if you want to see that.

Screenshot-2023-04-09-174241.png
you are now our chat gpt of tennis strings xd thank you!

leaning towards razor code and confidential :)
 
Last edited:
Played 2.5 hours today after 10+ days off. Started with TF40 315 16*19, then Nova FS 100 and played 45 minutes groundstrokes with the Black Ace 300. The Luxilon Alu Power Rough stringbed still felt stiff and the sweetspot TINY! Several misshits were my fault being tired. Just sharing my honest experience. Unforgiving towards the top of the hoop. I will use this setup once more, starting the next hitting session and see what's what. After that, I will put another string and will hit head to head with the Mithrandir Ki5.

TF40 315 16*19 x L-Tec Premium Celeste 1.25 felt stiffer than before. Lost 1 set 6-2.
The Nova x Mayami Magic Twist played the best. Won 1 set 7-5. Magic Twist plays better and better and I like it more than the first 2 hits. I'm pleasantly surprised. After the first 2 sessions, I thought I wouldn't like it to be honest.
 
Played 2.5 hours today after 10+ days off. Started with TF40 315 16*19, then Nova FS 100 and played 45 minutes groundstrokes with the Black Ace 300. The Luxilon Alu Power Rough stringbed still felt stiff and the sweetspot TINY! Several misshits were my fault being tired. Just sharing my honest experience. Unforgiving towards the top of the hoop. I will use this setup once more, starting the next hitting session and see what's what. After that, I will put another string and will hit head to head with the Mithrandir Ki5.

TF40 315 16*19 x L-Tec Premium Celeste 1.25 felt stiffer than before. Lost 1 set 6-2.
The Nova x Mayami Magic Twist played the best. Won 1 set 7-5. Magic Twist plays better and better and I like it more than the first 2 hits. I'm pleasantly surprised. After the first 2 sessions, I thought I wouldn't like it to be honest.
I also found TF40 305 stiff, to the surprise of one poster here.
 
I also found TF40 305 stiff, to the surprise of one poster here.
As I'm adding more top-spin on my forehand, I seem to enjoy the open 16*20 Diadem Elevate more and more and play more comfortable (thus better) compared to the Head Boom Pro and the TF40 315 now.

Could be the string setup. Kirschbaum Xplosive Speed was more comfortable / less overall stiff feel.

Balls used play crucial role on comfort too. Dunlop Fort Court and Head Tour XT are the balls I've been using these past 30 days. Fort Court have gotten less fluffy. I will try the Tnns Point balls and these will be the last ones. I've narrowed down to Dunlop Fort Court. The Dunlop AO all-blue can don't last as long as Fort Court.

Next string setup will be crucial for the TF40 315. I'm considering trying the Artengo TR960 16*19...
 
As I'm adding more top-spin on my forehand, I seem to enjoy the open 16*20 Diadem Elevate more and more and play more comfortable (thus better) compared to the Head Boom Pro and the TF40 315 now.

Could be the string setup. Kirschbaum Xplosive Speed was more comfortable / less overall stiff feel.

Balls used play crucial role on comfort too. Dunlop Fort Court and Head Tour XT are the balls I've been using these past 30 days. Fort Court have gotten less fluffy. I will try the Tnns Point balls and these will be the last ones. I've narrowed down to Dunlop Fort Court. The Dunlop AO all-blue can don't last as long as Fort Court.

Next string setup will be crucial for the TF40 315. I'm considering trying the Artengo TR960 16*19...
If you can find Fort clay balls...I've scourged both Canada and UK( none in US for 4 years now).
Got 3 cases left, use 8 balls at a time for at least a couple of weeks of almost daily playing.
 
Just came back playing 2nd day in a row. This time with a very advanced hitting partner, leftie.
Played 1 set (lost 4-6) with Angell V3 TC95 16*19 x Mayami Hit Pro. As soon as I find some spare time, I'll share my feedback about both Mayami strings I'm currently playing, 2nd is the Magic Twist with the Diadem Nova.
 
TECNIFIRBE RAZOR SOFT 1.25 review !

ISO-305-razor-soft.jpg


I was very excited to try this new gem from Tecnifibre. Especially if Medvedev switched to Razor Soft to "restart" his feel and found great form once again (even on clay?).
Sometimes it's good to change something to stay fresh and excited about the game but the change shoudn't be too big so it doesn't mess up with your play-style.
Razor Soft is still a "Razor" family so I can say that the change indeed is small but noticeable enough to make an impact.

First - reference strings that came to my mind while testing Razor Soft:
1. Tecnifibre Razor Code (obviously)
2. Tecnifibre Black Code 4s
3. Head Hawk Touch
4. Solinco Hyper G

That alone (if we should trust my hands) should give us a ballpark specs of stiffness between 195-220 and energy return between 87-90% (I hope to see the specs in TW database soon)

Black Code 4s, Head Hawk Touch and Solinco Hyper G have that similar slightly muted yet stiff, control oriented feeling.
Razor Soft (just like Solinco Hyper G / Black Code 4s / Hawk Touch) is far from mushy and far from soft yet they somehow fall into comfortable territory. It is similarly stiff and responsive yet with a tweaked formula to make the feel and response slightly different. To be honest comfort-wise I feel better with Razor Code - maybe because white color is more comfortable than carbon? Now I want to try Razor Code Carbon color to compare it 1 to 1 :) I've heard the spin potential with Carbon is better.

Spin:
The ball stays longer on Razor Code strings which helps me in spin potential. If I had higher RHS I can see myself taking advantage of Razor Soft and whenever I was trying to mimic fearless long swings "Medvedev" inspired - the ball suddenly became heavier and faster with similar control. Slower swings were lacking that "connection" I have with Razor Code.

Tension stability just like Razor Code - amazing. I think it needs maybe a tiny bit more time to settle down and perform at peak level.

Power:
I think it is very subtle and perhaps more feel-oriented. The harder I was swinging the less difference I was experiencing compared to Razor Code. Maybe due to dwell time being shorter with Razor Soft I also experience lower launch angle and this alone can give illusion of a faster ball since it is more "penetrating". When I took 3 different frames - 2x with Razor Code (already played for long time) and 1x with Razor Soft (almost fresh) I actually experienced more control and less power from Razor Soft and that was the string I decided to stick with for the rest of the practice.

That being said I think I perform better with Razor Code. There is something in that balance of control, spin, comfort, power that is really hard to get. The boost in power from Razor Soft is very small, it's not like I experienced a trampoline effect. The string itself is rather stiff and is crushing the force of the incoming ball. In comparison - I think Luxilon Alu Power has more of that "trampoline" effect especially when the tension drops. Head Hawk Touch is very very close I would say being "comfortable" with that control oriented stiffness... For some reason Razor soft feels a bit more complicated in production than Hawk Touch. Like it had some kind of additional layer of something. Might be placebo :)


I think the string is too close to Razor Code with my preference towards Razor Code. I would prefer it to be slightly more softer and "hotter" in response. Maybe it might perform better with different tension approach. Recently I am stringing at 22kg. Maybe stringing it at 22kg/21kg could activate the missing power and spin I was expecting to get. Maybe in fact Razor Soft is Tecnifibre's take on Alu Power (but stiffer with better tension stability?) while Razor Code is kinda 4g - but softer?

In that case I would have to try 1.30 Razor Soft as this could be an interesting tryout for those looking for a modern replacement for Luxilon Original (indeed something between Alu Power and 4g) - sounds like Razor Soft is also somewhere there and with 1.30 gauge I could drop the tension even more...

I liked serving with the razor soft. Lately I struggle quite a lot with serves and Razor Soft with it's slightly tweaked response is helping me be more aggresive.

Edit: after 3 weeks of playing it is still very control oriented and dare to say it spins the ball better. It ages well very surprising for a 1.25 gauge. For that I am giving extra point and it moves above the red code in my ranking. It likes different tensions compared to razor code IMO.

Conclusion: Yes, it has a bit more pop (especially fresh) but overall performs very similar to Razor Code and moves it a bit towards Alu Power and Head Hawk Touch. Transition should be easy if you are looking for a slight boost without changing too much in overall performance :) String it low as the string despite being labeled "soft" is very control oriented and is definitely not "mushy"
At some point I will probably try it with 1.30 gauge and string low (around 20kg) . Will come back with the final conclusion.

7.1 / 10
go to full strings list
say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
 
Last edited:
Quick takes on Mayami Magic Twist and Hit Pro.

Magic Twist 23kg x Diadem Nova FS 100: mute n' plasticky feedback on the first 1.5 hours of playing, reminded me Stringkong Banana Bite 1.19 and Solinco Hyper G round and Soft (unreleased) in terms of the sound. Playing more hours after almost 10 days off because of bad weather, the stringbed feels much better. Easy depth, great underspin, very good topspin, the "plasticky" feel is not completely gone and takes something away from the overall feel/confidence when playing against advanced hitting partners. Initially, I thought I wouldn't like it to be honest. Now, I can say that I really enjoy playing with it with beginner-intermediate hitting partners and improving aspects of my game (backhand slicing). Also, enjoy groundstroke warmups with advanced hitting partners, but not 100% dialed in when pace hits point-play level.

Hit Pro 23kg x Angell TC95 V3 16*19: better quality than the Magic Twist. Very good overall feel from everywhere on the court. Demanding frame this one, but really enjoy hitting with it and actually playing a couple of long sets with it. I will not go as far as saying that is an Alu Power level string, but it holds tension for longer for sure. I rarely blamed the stringbed on some forehand misshits. I'm hitting the best backhand slices of my life with this combo. I have a 2nd set that I will try on a 98 sq inch racket as it seems to be a competition level string.

* 1.5 year playing this intermediate level of self-taught tennis, I feel I hit the approach backhand slices better with round-profiled strings (Tier One Ghost Wire, Hit Pro etc). Shaped strings seem to keep have higher launch angle and the ball stays up for longer. My approach backhand slice is a more traditional motion with a forewards extension, while from the baseline I go completely across my body.
 
My feedback about the Mayami Magic Twist 1.25

http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/inde...s-string-review-database.736090/post-17274842

Mayami Magic Twist 1.25 (22kg) x Diadem Nova FS 100

Topspin > flat hitting. Slice, easy peasy!

Baseline: "Plasticky" and mute feel for the first hour or so. Almost impossible to overshoot! Flat shots were a bit inconsistent.

Forehands: After the first hour getting used to this "mute" sensation, I found out that consistency in my shots was much better achieved through topspin than flat hitting. The string is not agressively twisted, so it is not a spin-monster (that's good for slicing). The net clearence was medium-to-high. The more I played it the easier the Power delivery came. At no point did it feel stiff or uncomfortable.

Backhands: got to hit super easy backhand slices, with small need to input a forwards bodyweight transfer. Actually, slicing was so easy, that I rarerly used driving backhands! I could not only defend, but also attack with the Slice!

Netplay: comfortable hitting, but not its highlight in terms of Feel. Moderate connection with the stringbed here.

Conclusions: The Mayami Magic Twist 1.25 is blend of the Solinco Hyper G, Yonex Poly Tour Pro and Stringkong Banana Bite. At first, it felt "plasticky" and mute. From the 2nd hour on, it got more "poppy" and top-spin friendly. It was very hard to overshoot. Consistency on the forehand was found through topspin with moderate swing speed. Its highlight for me was the backhand slices! 2 "knocks" are the net play and the flat forehand hitting. I would pick it anyday for practices of medium instensity, playing with beginners and working on technique and new stuff.


Comfort: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐➖
Stiffness: ⭐⭐⭐➖➖➖
Power: ⭐⭐⭐⭐➖➖
Ball bite: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐➖
Spin: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐➖
Feel: ⭐⭐⭐⭐➖➖
 
Played 2.5 hours today after 10+ days off. Started with TF40 315 16*19, then Nova FS 100 and played 45 minutes groundstrokes with the Black Ace 300. The Luxilon Alu Power Rough stringbed still felt stiff and the sweetspot TINY! Several misshits were my fault being tired. Just sharing my honest experience. Unforgiving towards the top of the hoop. I will use this setup once more, starting the next hitting session and see what's what. After that, I will put another string and will hit head to head with the Mithrandir Ki5.

TF40 315 16*19 x L-Tec Premium Celeste 1.25 felt stiffer than before. Lost 1 set 6-2.
The Nova x Mayami Magic Twist played the best. Won 1 set 7-5. Magic Twist plays better and better and I like it more than the first 2 hits. I'm pleasantly surprised. After the first 2 sessions, I thought I wouldn't like it to be honest.
What string and tension in the tf40? It needs low tension!
 
What string and tension in the tf40? It needs low tension!
Agree . 21kg max in my case
I had the TF40 315 16*19 strung myself at 23kg with the Easy Stringer. I always assume 1.5kg less tension. So, it definitely feels like 22kg full-bed.
Felt great yesterday playing on a rain-sprayed slow carpet with sand court. Hitting flatter than before to get depth. Stringbed felt less stiff than the previous time.


On my last 2 stringjobs, my accuracy is better, as I use a better method to start the mains with the flying clamps. I also do a sound check with my fingers (like a guitar) is spot on right and left.
 
23kg way too much for this racquet imo. Also don't think you are the type of player to profit from that racquet.
Can't measure the actual tension, but in comparison to the stringjobs done for me last year at my local tennis club, my 23kg is most probably 21kg of his... That's the best I can do, so when I want actual 22kg, I make sure the Easy Stringer's gauge shows 24kg.
So, I'd bet yesterday's tension had to be near 20kg full-bed, since it's on the racket for almost a month.
 
Time for the Mayami Hit Pro :)

This string can shake a bit the Luxilon dominance in round strings. I've been testing this string next to Luxilon Alu Power, Luxilon Original and Tourna Silver 7 Tour and I can say that it's up there fighting with the big guys :)

1. I like the color. Kinda milky yellow :) creamy. delicious. I also really like Original color (a bit more towards gold) Of course it shouldnt matter but I guess after 30+ strings you kinda start being more fussy
2. this string is all about the feel. Mayami even advertises it that way. I played my best touch shots with it. I think only Luxilon Original offered me that connection so far.

3. Performance is somewhere in between Luxilon Alu Power and Original. It's definitely not as responsive as Alu Power (less "dynamic spin potential") and it's slightly more responsive than Luxilon Original which is kinda dead and even boardy when fresh. I think that if you are a die-hard fan of Alu Power characteristics then Hit Pro might not be for you. But if you want a bit more control and move a bit towards string region of Luxilon Original then it's a must try.

4. It's around 70 usd cheaper than the already discounted Luxilon Original. $$$$$

5.
Spin potential - Alu Power offered me more and so far the biggest spin rates from all the round strings tested so far. That's why its the golden standard on tour. I wish Hit Pro could offer better spin potential. It's closer to Original. I might play with string tensions and see if it can be improved. I think thats the only thing I would like to see improved with Hit Pro (tensions used 24kg/23kg). It's not that the spin is bad but it's worse than with shaped strings while Alu Power somehow cheats the physics and the spin potential is same as I have with shaped strings. If we were discussing spin potential only within the group of round profiles then it's very good (more than Adrenaline, Poly Tour Pro or Ice Code for example). It depends how much spin you expect from a round string ??? I could still execute my kick serve which is my ultimate test :)

6. It's more comfortable than any Luxilon I tried. No elbow issues (my usual problem with Luxilon)

7. I love serving with this string. It's on par with Alu Power.

8. When the string's biggest trait is feel its obvious that volleys are top lvl.

9. It plays great when fresh and has very good playability duration.
Alu power plays great when fresh and looses the magic rather fast. Original plays very bad when fresh but GAINS magic after few training sessions. Hit Pro is magic right away with playability duration longer than Alu Power and similar to Original (Hit Pro eventually becomes more powerful than Original)

Also interesting fact is that I had some top practices with ITF 35+ top 10 players and I was switching between Tourna Silver 7 Tour (think control and spin) and Hit Pro (think feel, forgiveness and touch) and finished training with Hit Pro as my choice. Why ? I find Tourna SIlver 7 Tour a bit less forgiving. It's a stiff string (still comfortable enough) and therefore the sweet spot is smaller and when the ball is flying really fast then it's harder to unlock the string while with Hit Pro I could still control the rally. Conclusion - Hit Pro better for counter-punchers ? Silver 7 Tour better if you are the one dictating the pace ? Maybe... I will probably have to try them more as clearly they are my top 4 contenders strings.

Side note - I prefer 1.30 gauge. 1.25 had too high launch angle in my open pattern 16x19 racquet. I am very sensitive to string gauges (launch angle) it seems ^^ Rest of the characteristics were very similar so I can see this gauge playing great in tighter patterns like Prestige, Blade, Radical... I am a 1.30 die-hard fan now :)

I give Hit Pro a.... 7.3 rating. Many things were suggesting to give a higher rating but spin potential of course it's a big part of the game. I am a flat hitter anyway so maybe at the end it will not matter much. For now if I really like the string my max rating will be 7.3 I guess and let's see how it goes after my top 4 or top 6 strings are picked for another round of testing. Tourna offers also a lot of value and Original is crazy good as well but more expensive.... interesting lineup !

rest of the strings(click)

alu-hit-pro.jpg

say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
These are my first impressions about the Mayami Hit Pro 1.25 played with the Angell TC95 V3 (open) 16*19

(3 hours total play. 2 hours straight the first day and 1 more hour from last week)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Mayami Hit Pro 1.25 (22kg) x Angell TC95 V3 16*19

Easy power. Great access to spin for a round string. Top-notch feel from the baseline and at the net.

Baseline: getting back into hitting with the Angell after weeks, had to get used to the high launch angle from its open 16*19. First day and after the warm-up, my first flat forehands from the baseline would launch quite high. I had to hit with more top-spin and closer racket face than usual. As stiff as one string has to be to offer a very good connection with the stringbed and not being erratic.

Forehands: with fast swings and big cuts at the ball, the launch angle was still high, but the spin produced was more than I'd expect from a round string and most of my shots landed inside my partner's baseline with a good kick. From the mid-court it was easy to apply top-spin and aim towards the sides or hit a drop shot or slice. Power came easy and the sweet-spot felt like playing with a 98 sq inch.

Backhands: hit excellent slices with very easy depth. As with all round-shaped strings, the approach slices felt great.

Netplay: top-notch feel at the net with great directional control both when blocking and hitting with underspin.

Conclusions: It was played with advanced hitting partners only, not with beginners, at a medium-to-high pace for my intermediate level, in short, hitting aggressively and not casually. I experienced inconsistency on flat forehands in terms of the launch angle (a 2nd try with a denser string pattern is needed). One of the best strings for finesse shots (drop shots, slices etc). The overall spin assistance was as good as shaped strings. Easily one of the best round-shaped strings on the market.

Comfort: ⭐⭐⭐⭐➖➖
Stiffness: ⭐⭐⭐⭐➖➖
Power: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐➖
Ball bite: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐➖
Spin: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐➖
Feel: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐➖

* Will edit when I play at least one more hour after a few days off this racket to see what's what.
 
Tecnifibre Black Code 1.24 and 1.28 review

We have a new winner in group B !

6CDCF639-3EB4-40DD-ADE7-C0BE02957D3C-750x400.jpeg


Tried 1.24 gauge in new Tecnifibre TF40 16x19 (but tight pattern) 315g and 1.28 in Angell TC95 16x19 (but open pattern)

I have to say, TF40 16x19 is my new top contender for ultimate racquet of choice (click) :) BUT let's focus on the strings now!

Black code is a 5-sided string with high stiffness rating but quite efficient energy return %. From my experience it's like trying to mix two different personalities. One that is cold and very calculative and second one hot-tempered and bitey :)
The dominant factor for power level is overall the stiffness while energy return % is like a "limiter" to your input.
How to understand it?

Let's take out the stiffness factor out for a while and focus just on energy return %. Let's say your swing acceleration has a force "input" from 1-10. Energy return % will take that number , adjust accordingly and launch the ball with some added info. The higher the energy return % the more info you are adding, increasing the final output.

Stiffness kinda adjusts the amount of your input and passes it on to energy return % lol

In short:
If you had a "tennis plugins/effects chain" it would look like this:
Your clean power just before the ball touches the strings (input 1) -> stiffness rating (increasing or decreasing input) -> energy return % ( how much of this input do you want to let through or maybe even add more signal?) -> final output

So if you look at for example Luxilon Original - It is relatively stiff (213 stiffness rating) with 85 % energy return which is making it a very very control oriented string. The amount of energy return combined with stiffness are encouraging me to speed up my swing because low energy return is keeping me safe from pushing the ball out. - it's more difficult to hit a too short ball than too long.

Now back to Black Code (let's start from 1.28 gauge) - stiffness is quite high at 250 with energy return at 87%. All I can say is that the performance is very interesting.
I noticed that there is a perfect sweet spot of my initial input (how hard I try to swing) where the ball is very heavy, controlled with rather linear response. The stiffness provides control but energy return is giving me the performance and actually I would say Black Code is a very comfortable string with a nice dwell time and pocketing sensation.

I can FEEL it. If I can feel something then I can adjust to it from shot to shot and replicate on demand :) And everytime I decrease my input (slow down my swing) or try to go for a crazy off the cuff winner then I am being punished for stepping out of that sweet zone (I loose control and the ball goes too short or too far).

To me - that's actually a very good quality because it teaches you to play "in the zone" and "learn" your swing. Look at Djokovic or Medvedev - they are not the attackers, they just contantly hit their targets and make it look easy. So relaxed but manages to play very deep over and over again. Black Code to me is for a playstyle like this.

Launch control is perfect. I was not surprised by anything. String listened to me and my intentions :)

It felt much more comfortable than Luxilon Original and Tourna Silver 7 Tour.
I can see why there are many brands trying to copy this formula (without pointing fingers)
I think Millman in the interview once said he prefers Black Code over Luxilon Alu Power because he is getting the same top performance BUT in a more comfortable package.

I usually prefer control oriented strings so no surprise that I am enjoying Black Code. I would prefer Black Code to be a bit more "tempered" (not sure if that's a good world?) so I could go a little bit crazy from time to time or so it could let me slow down my swing (push the ball) when under much bigger pressure. On the other hand it pushes me to play good.

1.24 Black Code is like a thinner brother of 1.28 gauge lol. Everything pretty much the same just "more".

So a bit more power, a bit more spin potential. Which one is better? For me it's down to string-racquet combination. People were noticing quite a lot of spin from my TF40 with 1.24 Black Code.

Compared to Mayami Big Spin (which was so far the leader in group B) Black Code has much more linear response with a bit more connected feel and better volleys while Big Spin is an ultimate spin machine.

Similar strings from different brands:
Solinco Confidential (Black Code has better tension maintenance and longer playability duration with control, rest is very similar)
Head Lynx Tour (Black Code is more comfortable, Lynx Tour has less power, rest is similar)
Mayami Hepta Power (Black Code less power, Hepta Power more comfort, rest is similar)

Griekspoor is using it and managed to win 8 record-breaking challengers in one season with his endorsed TFight RS305 18x19
gettyimages-1337961927-612x612-1.jpg

Compared to Tecnifibre Razor Code:
Razor Code offers even more feel,comfort and a bit more power with bigger "sweet spot" but a bit less spin.

I'm not sure which one I prefer Razor Code or Black Code - depends on the racquet.

RATING: 7.3
say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis

go to strings list (click)

Tried Black Code 1.28 @ 55lbs in TC 100.

It is an interesting string. My knock on it is that I can't feel a d*mn thing! It had some pocketing when fresh but that went away and became boardy quickly. "Control" was good (ie it tames power) but because the feel wasn't there I had no confidence with shot selection.

This sentence of yours sums up my experience:
"... everytime I decrease my input (slow down my swing) or try to go for a crazy off the cuff winner then I am being punished for stepping out of that sweet zone (I loose control and the ball goes too short or too far)."

Still prefer RPM or PTP. Red Code is next!
 
Tried Black Code 1.28 @ 55lbs in TC 100.

It is an interesting string. My knock on it is that I can't feel a d*mn thing! It had some pocketing when fresh but that went away and became boardy quickly. "Control" was good (ie it tames power) but because the feel wasn't there I had no confidence with shot selection.

This sentence of yours sums up my experience:
"... everytime I decrease my input (slow down my swing) or try to go for a crazy off the cuff winner then I am being punished for stepping out of that sweet zone (I loose control and the ball goes too short or too far)."

Still prefer RPM or PTP. Red Code is next!
In angells my overall favourites were tourna silver 7 tour, luxilon original, signum pro firestorm, volkl cyclone, solinco confidential, Alu powe ice blue - everything in 1.30

From thinner gauges I think mayami tour hex, tecnifibre razor code and solinco tour bite. - 1.25 but 1.30 still above in my preference.

Maybe i missed some strings but those came to my mind so there must be something special about them :)

@dandan.tennis
 
@galapagos - can you please review Volkl v square, in any gauge - its a stiff square poly - TW database have it as most spin frindly string
I can see it as a great string but so far the only square-shaped strings I "liked" and "remembered as something good/interesting" were from Solinco. Overall might not be my favourite shape to be honest. I've heard Solinco is indeed 5-sided which makes sense. Biggest challenge for a 4-sided string is launch angle, touch shots and volleys.
 
@galapagos - can you please review Volkl v square, in any gauge - its a stiff square poly - TW database have it as most spin frindly string
Just to add in my experience as I've played with Volkl V Square for a while and almost switched to it full time (albeit in a hybrid capacity).

Firstly, V Square is a soft poly (in fact in a full bed its rather mushy), so if you are after a stiff spin-based string then you'll be best to move towards something like Tour bite or similar rather than V Square. Due to this, V Squares suffers a lot from durability issues, primarily premature notching, as well as an inconstant string bed response and launch angle - everything else about this string was just ok apart from spin which was exceptional (particularly kick serves which were comical). For these reasons, and the high price tag, I wouldn’t switch to this string as there are much better options on the market. That said, I had a spare set of Yonex Poly Tour Fire from my Gut/Poly days so thought I would cross my last V Square set with this. What I found was that when you crossed V Square with a slick/stiffer round poly then it transformed the string and essentially all the negatives went away. The only things to note was that the notching with V Square still happened but due to the slickness of the round cross, the mains would still happily snapback increasing the strings lifespan by an extra couple of hours in comparison to V Square in a full bed. That said, once you got to about 50% or so notched the strings almost instantly stopped snapping back and the performance dropped off a cliff. This drastic change is something that I have never experienced before in any other string/hybrid combo, so its definitely something that you will need to keep an eye on if you go down this route.
I could have honestly switched full time to the V Square/YPTF hybrid, but the cost of both strings is too high to justify when you can get a similar response from a full bed of a cheaper shaped Poly (think Head Lynx Tour, Hyper-G etc).
 
Just to add in my experience as I've played with Volkl V Square for a while and almost switched to it full time (albeit in a hybrid capacity).

Firstly, V Square is a soft poly (in fact in a full bed its rather mushy), so if you are after a stiff spin-based string then you'll be best to move towards something like Tour bite or similar rather than V Square. Due to this, V Squares suffers a lot from durability issues, primarily premature notching, as well as an inconstant string bed response and launch angle - everything else about this string was just ok apart from spin which was exceptional (particularly kick serves which were comical). For these reasons, and the high price tag, I wouldn’t switch to this string as there are much better options on the market. That said, I had a spare set of Yonex Poly Tour Fire from my Gut/Poly days so thought I would cross my last V Square set with this. What I found was that when you crossed V Square with a slick/stiffer round poly then it transformed the string and essentially all the negatives went away. The only things to note was that the notching with V Square still happened but due to the slickness of the round cross, the mains would still happily snapback increasing the strings lifespan by an extra couple of hours in comparison to V Square in a full bed. That said, once you got to about 50% or so notched the strings almost instantly stopped snapping back and the performance dropped off a cliff. This drastic change is something that I have never experienced before in any other string/hybrid combo, so its definitely something that you will need to keep an eye on if you go down this route.
I could have honestly switched full time to the V Square/YPTF hybrid, but the cost of both strings is too high to justify when you can get a similar response from a full bed of a cheaper shaped Poly (think Head Lynx Tour, Hyper-G etc).
I trust smithie on this - he is a great playtester :) I've also heard from other friends that this string can be mushy.
 
Just to add in my experience as I've played with Volkl V Square for a while and almost switched to it full time (albeit in a hybrid capacity).

Firstly, V Square is a soft poly (in fact in a full bed its rather mushy), so if you are after a stiff spin-based string then you'll be best to move towards something like Tour bite or similar rather than V Square. Due to this, V Squares suffers a lot from durability issues, primarily premature notching, as well as an inconstant string bed response and launch angle - everything else about this string was just ok apart from spin which was exceptional (particularly kick serves which were comical). For these reasons, and the high price tag, I wouldn’t switch to this string as there are much better options on the market. That said, I had a spare set of Yonex Poly Tour Fire from my Gut/Poly days so thought I would cross my last V Square set with this. What I found was that when you crossed V Square with a slick/stiffer round poly then it transformed the string and essentially all the negatives went away. The only things to note was that the notching with V Square still happened but due to the slickness of the round cross, the mains would still happily snapback increasing the strings lifespan by an extra couple of hours in comparison to V Square in a full bed. That said, once you got to about 50% or so notched the strings almost instantly stopped snapping back and the performance dropped off a cliff. This drastic change is something that I have never experienced before in any other string/hybrid combo, so its definitely something that you will need to keep an eye on if you go down this route.
I could have honestly switched full time to the V Square/YPTF hybrid, but the cost of both strings is too high to justify when you can get a similar response from a full bed of a cheaper shaped Poly (think Head Lynx Tour, Hyper-G etc).

While we're on the topic of square poly - any thoughts on Technifibre 4S? I just strung up a full bed in a '23 VCore 100 (47 / 44lbs) and was pretty happy with the first 1.5 hours. Not sure what to expect going forward. Interested as to why I never see it discussed (particularly with some of the deals Technifibre runs which make it pretty cheap).
 
While we're on the topic of square poly - any thoughts on Technifibre 4S? I just strung up a full bed in a '23 VCore 100 (47 / 44lbs) and was pretty happy with the first 1.5 hours. Not sure what to expect going forward. Interested as to why I never see it discussed (particularly with some of the deals Technifibre runs which make it pretty cheap).
i've playtested it like month ago. Now I noticed that I never updated my reviews... :) So I guess tomorrow another review alert hmm??? xd

I tried it in Tfight ISO 18x19. I prefer black code over 4s 1.25
 
Tecnifibre 4s 1.25 review

So this string was quite exciting as TW database rank it very high in spin potential. How did it go?

Spin:
So let's discuss spin potential first as this is perhaps the highlight point of why anyone should look at 4s - it's great, I admit - but I feel like the bite comes from the shape more than from the snapback. I would put that string on the same shelf with Solinco Hyper G - in fact the specs look almost identical and so the feel follows as well.

Feel:
just like Hyper G - this string is not for feel oriented players (imo). The response is very low powered and almost dead - like some kind of old string. I guess this is just a preference in feel as Hyper G is probably like top 1 string in US now? Well...so I found you guys an interesting alternative with less "flashy" color :) I strung it in my Tfight ISO 305 at 22/22kg and I would probably go 22/21 next time to find maybe a bit more of this pocketing sensation?

compared to other Tecnifibre tops:
Where Black Code maybe doesn't offer as much spin purely from it's shape, it reinforce the potential from the snapback while Razor Code is all about snapback. For me it means I need higher racquet head speed to really get something out of 4s that seems to be very rigid- maybe similarly to Razor Soft with the only difference that Razor Soft has some pop to offer and the launch is more neutral while 4s grabs a little bit upwards (not much - within the reference strings like Hyper G and Black Code)

What surprised me the most is that this string is very low powered. I was expecting something mushy like Mayami Big Spin but it's not so far away from Black Code, Razor Soft, Head Hawk Touch and especially Solinco Hyper G.

When I took Razor Soft for a playtest it seemed like Tecnifibre took 4s string, Razor Code string and created a combo that in some ways is similar to Hyper G, 4S and in some ways to Razor Code, output is kinda similar to Hawk Touch and everything in between :)

The feel and response is not within my preferences and my technique is probably too "traditional" to really make 4s shine in my racquets. Razor Code is probably still my #1 Tecnifibre string for it's versatility and feel without compromising spin and control.

rating: 6.3/10

say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
go to full strings list
 
Yes now i understand Luxilon Alu power much better now. It does go DEAD in just 4 hours or so and when that happens, it is unusable. Meaning, it becomes very hard to control, retains its power for little longer but Control goes out the window and becomes mushy. It is very odd feeling, shots start to fly long and becomes impossible to control to predict where the groundies will land... LOL:( but when its fresh,, it has it all.. precision control with massive power and RPM spin.

If someone can make a poly that can play just as good as Alu power but last around 10 hours while retaining playability.... that would really Sell like crazy.
 
@galapagos Here you go. I can only compare 4 at a time, so I grabbed the 4 you mentioned. If you want to see them compared to Tour Hex, I can do 2 graphs of Tour Hex with 2 others. Let me know if you want to see that.

Screenshot-2023-04-09-174241.png
solico confidential looks like the best string here in this group. what the heck is Stability category ??
 
can you tell us the reasons why you prefer those over confidential ?? More power ? More spin ? what about head hawk power ?
Confidential was very good in speed pro, reason why I tested it in my artengo
Small disappointment but still a good string
It did not amaze me on spin, lost rapidly its tension ...
Hawk touch has a special feel, ''plastic'' but comfy, it stood the test against very hard serves that I could even sometimes attack, only string / racquet combo that allowed that
Cyclone gives me a very good spin, but I prefer the feeling of the Hawk
Do not go below 22 kgs with hawk or you will loose its feeling and you might spray as well
 
I've been searching for a string that plays as good for just 5 hours and can't find it.
have you tried hyper g?, how about the nnew string restring zero= everyone who uses it says it last very longest- the longest for any string.

How about volkl cyclone tour
Grapplesnake tour sniper
Volkl V square
 
have you tried hyper g?, how about the nnew string restring zero= everyone who uses it says it last very longest- the longest for any string.

How about volkl cyclone tour
Grapplesnake tour sniper
Volkl V square
I've tried Hyper G, Cyclone Tour, and V Square. But I haven't tried Restring Zero or Tour Sniper. I'm actually kind of interested in Tour Sniper. Might give it a try soon.
 
Confidential was very good in speed pro, reason why I tested it in my artengo
Small disappointment but still a good string
It did not amaze me on spin, lost rapidly its tension ...
Hawk touch has a special feel, ''plastic'' but comfy, it stood the test against very hard serves that I could even sometimes attack, only string / racquet combo that allowed that
Cyclone gives me a very good spin, but I prefer the feeling of the Hawk
Do not go below 22 kgs with hawk or you will loose its feeling and you might spray as well
I like hawk touch as well but the feel was a bit too weird.
 
I think I found my new favorite string!!! Just got some Lynx Touch 125 and absolutely LOVE the string in my TF40 315

Super comfortable, powerful and control is still good (especially in a tigh frame like TF40)
 
Time for another string review- Tecnifibre Red Code 1.30 !

Wohoo , this string is cool ! What makes it special ? Comfy feel but at the same time ultimate control.

I admit that this is not my first experience with Red Code. I used it in many other racquets: Blade, Pro staff 95 S , Angell TC95 18x20, Head IG prestige mp, Yonex Ezone.... It's a great round profile string that is very honest with you but at the same time not brutal.

Interesting thing is that in my life I had few setups (specific racquet+ string) that offered me BIGGEST spin ever. One setup was Pro Staff 95 S with Red Code, another was IG prestige MP with Red Code, another was IG Speed MP (18x20) with Alu Power, and another was with Ezone Dr 98 + Alu Power Rough.

No other setups offered me more spin with still so much control. Maybe TC95 16x19 with Mayami Big Spin or Volkl Cyclone.

So, why this is not my ultimate string ? Well it's because as you may notice, this magic combination was used with low SW racquets and the magic kinda disappeared with my higher SW racquets and overall I prefer my current specs (spin is not always everything). It was still my main choice in my 18x20 TC95 SW 335 but now switched to 16x19 pattern.

It is a control oriented string (it made 16x15 pattern play like a tight 16x19) and offers great connection with the ball. The feel is really addictive and I think that if Tecnifibre offered this string in some other color options then it might be more popular than it is currently.

It is control oriented but definitely not dead/boardy. This is a magic combination for every round string. It usually means that the string is responsive without trampoline effect (more spin but still amazing control).

The response consistency is at the top lvl ! I think that the consistency is even better than Alu Power and definitely hold tension longer (better value). Alu Power (blue) on the other hand plays a bit better in my higher SW racquets. If we compare prices then Red Code is the winner :)

I give this string a 7.1 rating. The value is great, it performs amazingly in lighter racquet setups , in heavier sticks I think I would prefer something even more bite or less power. Its a great tournament string with amazing touch. One of the best round string on the market and very comfortable for the control it offers. I am not a big fan of red color. May suit racquets like Prestige MP, Dunlop CX200 tour, Radical MP, Yonex Vcore Pro, Wilson Pro Staff. SW between 310-323. Just my opinion :)

say hello on IG ! (y) @dandan.tennis
Tried red code @ 55lbs in Angel tc 100. Much preferable to Black Code for me. Super comfy and predictable. It's got a slick surface as well which is nice! Its a great string.

I feel red code would be great as a cross for nat gut and/or players who have a linear stroke. Can't quite bend the ball as I'm used to and I find myself gravitating back to rpm blast after rediscovering it recently.
 
Back
Top