Yes, so if the more balance in closer to the head of racket (ex 33 cm) on both rackets the weight is the same, why one can have SW higher. Weight distribution is other words balance yep?2. Weight distribution.
●----●
--●●--
Also not sure about itDunlop cx200 foam filled??
TF40 and which PS is foam filled?1. Dunlop CX200 came to my mind. Tecnifibre TF40, Pro Staff also fit the bill, though I'm not sure if pro staffs are foam filled.
2. Shaft design. Box and oval shaft have difference drag cutting the air.
Not necessarily. That's why I did that illustration. Both can have same weight and balance, but the one that has more weight in the tip and handle (polarized) would have more swing weight.Yes, so if the more balance in closer to the head of racket (ex 33 cm) on both rackets the weight is the same, why one can have SW higher. Weight distribution is other words balance yep?
2. Weight distribution.
●----●
--●●--
Not necessarily. That's why I did that illustration. Both can have same weight and balance, but the one that has more weight in the tip and handle (polarized) would have more swing weight.
Why You thought it could be well suited?RF01 Pro seems like the obvious answer
Why You thought it could be well suited?
Haha sure!Suggesting the RF01 is a meme here.
Volkl Vostra V10 3201. Is there any spin&feel current or classic racket with foam filled, weight strung 320 - 340 g, balance strung max 31.5 cm?
2. Why it is possible that two rackets with same weight and same balance may have different swing weight?