my_forehand
Professional
I'm surprised no-one said he's JUST a serve.
Answer the question!
THE QUESTION, JERK!
Hang on, for a start, this is the world-wide-web. Did you think everybody here was American? Being American is hardly a prerequisite for bashing Roddick, just being human will do.
Secondly, are you suggesting that an American should never criticize another American, notwithstanding their behavior, and that if they do then the only possible reason is jealousy? Thats fcuked up.
British criticizing Henman is another matter.
I just wanted to say it nicely, but he is washed up. He's done. At least with winning grand Slams. Hes kind of like the Phil Mickleson of tennis. Everyone wants him to be the big rival, but he disappoints every time.
To seriously criticize and bash someones playing abilities, I think the criticizer should be better than the player himself...and Roddick's been no1 american for almost a decade. .. this is what I meant.
I never thought highly of Roddick. His highlights were when there was a gap in tennis. Sampras retiring or just retired and Federer not there yet. However, for that short period of time he was the best tennisplayer, or at least he made the most of his potential at that time. But I'm not a fan, I dislike him very much.
So the coaches should retire then also..?
As long as the criticism can be backed up with arguments and a little expertise or common sense about tennis, anybody may criticize Roddick or any other tennisplayer. Demanding that the criticizer is better than the player himself just doesn't make any sense..
Must be hard being James Blake's #1 fan
Zero Slam titles
Zero Master titles
Only 10 ATP titles to Roddick's 24
Best slam result: QF
I guess it is better to be washed up (although at 25 hard to say that) than a never was:?
Blake is hyped because we have no one but him and Andy as far as any hope goes. And Blake aint it. No better than a QF Slam appearance; not good.
Because we expect greatness, not mediocrity.
Where are you from Roberto, if I may ask ?
Not good ?????
He's top 10 in the WORLD.
I do no get it. Why cannot americans just be proud of these magnificent athletes.
Did you start with your president ?
Did you start with your president ?
Because we expect greatness, not mediocrity.
Who's critisizing their play ? Their results speak for themselves.
I respect them and pull for them in Slams, but it is what it is.
For a guy with a very good serve, only an above average forehand, horrible backhand, atrocious volleys, and mediocre movement, Roddick's accomplished quite a lot.
Everyones talent is limited...still to be as good as Roddick you have to be Extreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeely talented
Please explain the Mickelson analogy......not sure I follow.
Both were (over)hyped by Americans, if they weren't American, they'd be nothing special. Both win many smaller events, but shrink on the big stage. If anything, by comparing Roddick to Mickelson, I'm overating Roddick. Maybe he's the John Daly of tennis? Oh wait, John Daly won 2 majors, not just one. And John Daly's actually likable.
Uh- Phil Mickelson has won 3 majors
2004 Masters
2005 PGA Championship
2006 Masters
He is not overhyped. He just happened to play in the same era as Tiger.
Has the most weeks ranked in the top 10 for anyone not ranked #1
My point is, both are overhyped to be rivals of the top player (Fed, Tiger) but never live up to expectation in the majors. 3 majors in 15 years in golf is akin to 1 in 7 years for Roddick in tennis.
Both were (over)hyped by Americans, if they weren't American, they'd be nothing special. Both win many smaller events, but shrink on the big stage. If anything, by comparing Roddick to Mickelson, I'm overating Roddick. Maybe he's the John Daly of tennis? Oh wait, John Daly won 2 majors, not just one. And John Daly's actually likable.
Must be hard being James Blake's #1 fan
Zero Slam titles
Zero Master titles
Only 10 ATP titles to Roddick's 24
Best slam result: QF
I guess it is better to be washed up (although at 25 hard to say that) than a never was:?
James Blake was also out for pretty much 2 years and at some points not playing any tennis. Roddick has had a pretty much injury free career, besides some things here and there.
The biggest overhyped American I can think in recent memory is Donald Young.
James Blake is also 3 years older than Roddick.
Besides injury, personal issues that keep you from playing, drugs issues, ect. are all part of being a pro athlete. If you start making excuses for everybody who had issues or injuries all your left with is a bunch of "what ifs"
Absolutely agree. He also need to straighten out his effen cap. He looks like a moron.
Andy Roddick:
-Presently playing with the Babolat Pure Drive model and model Brooklyn Decker
-Plowed Mandy Moore
Man, I wish I were a fanboy. :neutral: . . . What a life~!
The part about Mickelson having won 3 majors and being very, very talented (but just unluck enough to be in the Tiger era) has already been addressed.
I will agree with you however that Phil is not well liked. The players call him:
FIGJAM
F*ck
I'm
Good
Just
Ask
Me
Andy Roddick:
-Won the US Open
-Played one heck of a final against RogerGod at Wimbledon
-Was once ranked #1 in the world (so what if it was for 10 minutes?)
-Presently playing with the Babolat Pure Drive model and model Brooklyn Decker
-Plowed Mandy Moore
Fanboy:
-Ridiculed Andy Roddick on a tennis message board
Man, I wish I were a fanboy. :neutral: . . . What a life~!
.
If it wasn't for Fed...
I think Roddick should do nothing but serve and volley; his footwork sucks, his net game attrocious.
His serve and bassline game are gifts from the gods.
Now work on becoming a complete player Andy.