US Open 2015: Novak Djokovic (SRB) [1] vs. Feliciano Lopez (ESP) [18]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 740774
  • Start date Start date

Who wins?

  • Novak

    Votes: 15 30.0%

  • Feliciano

    Votes: 4 8.0%

  • Novak in 3

    Votes: 10 20.0%

  • Novak in 4

    Votes: 10 20.0%

  • Novak in 5

    Votes: 3 6.0%

  • Lopez in 3

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Lopez in 4

    Votes: 5 10.0%

  • Lopez in 5

    Votes: 3 6.0%
  • Total voters
    50
The_18th_Slam said:
Why do you care? If Djokovic had won more USOs, Nadal would be at 12 Slams.
Click to expand...

He lost alot of USO titles early on to Fed that he very well could have won.. Not just against Nadal. He blew the one in 2012 vs. Murray as well.

1 USO title is weird when you see he has 5 AO titles. Big discrepancy there. The courts aren't THAT Much different either as they were before
 
90's Clay said:
Wish Nole would let up on all the HC tournaments before the USO. Seems like every year his level is not what it SHOULD Be at Flushing. Its cost him some USO titles too. 1 USO title is not good for someone the caliber of Nole on HC's. He should have 3-4 by now
Click to expand...

he lost early last year in 3R at montreal to tsonga and in 3R at cincy to robredo ... didn't help him at the USO
 
Down_the_line said:
I don't know why Johnny Mac was complaining about people walking out of the stadium. It's almost midnight in New York and it's a weeknight. It's not disrespect, people have lives to get to.
Click to expand...
Euh what kind of stupid people want to walk out on watching #1 play live? Not tennis fans for sure... They can sleep tomorrow.
 
eebc627fe877b1b5eb697646865932b0-d4o03ia.jpg
 
90's Clay said:
He lost alot of USO titles early on to Fed that he very well could have won.. Not just against Nadal. He blew the one in 2012 vs. Murray as well.

1 USO title is weird when you see he has 5 AO titles. Big discrepancy there. The courts aren't THAT Much different either as they were before
Click to expand...
If anything, he should be happy he even has one, seeing as how close he was to losing that match against Federer.
 
90's Clay said:
He lost alot of USO titles early on to Fed that he very well could have won.. Not just against Nadal. He blew the one in 2012 vs. Murray as well.

1 USO title is weird when you see he has 5 AO titles. Big discrepancy there. The courts aren't THAT Much different either as they were before
Click to expand...

I agree ...he should've had 4 AOs ( got lucky to win AO 2008 due to fed's mono )

he should've had 3 USOs - should've won USO 2012 vs murray and USO 13 vs nadal....

;)
 
Down_the_line said:
People who have jobs and school? People for whom tennis is just a sport they love and not their entire being.
Click to expand...
Then they don't deserve to have tickets. Subway runs all night in NY. Totally agree with JohnnyMac.

ETA: on top of that, the match is going pretty fast...
 
abmk said:
I agree ...he should've had 4 AOs ( got lucky to win AO 2008 due to fed's mono )

he should've had 3 USOs as well - should've won USO 2012 and USO 13 ....

;)
Click to expand...


Hes a better player in Australia than Federer. Why would you consider him lucky to beat Fed there?

And thats what makes this weird. Why is he so much better in Australia vs. Flushing where there courts aren't that different. I would guess overloading his schedule. He should minimize it more after Wimbledon
 
abmk said:
I agree ...he should've had 4 AOs ( got lucky to win AO 2008 due to fed's mono )

he should've had 3 USOs - should've won USO 2012 vs murray and USO 13 vs nadal....

;)
Click to expand...
Djokovic got lucky at the 2013 AO. Wawrinka was screwed on a pivotal point with a bad call.
 
veroniquem said:
Then they don't deserve to have tickets. Subway runs all night in NY. Totally agree with JohnnyMac.

ETA: on top of that, the match is going pretty fast...
Click to expand...
ETA2: if they wanted to go to bed early, why did they get tickets for the NIGHT SESSION? Give me a break. Night session is already much shorter than day...
 
90's Clay said:
Hes a better player in Australia than Federer. Why would you consider him lucky to beat Fed there?
Click to expand...

because federer had mono and would've beat him otherwise in 2008 ...2008 was still part of fed's prime, unlike after 2010 and after ....

Nole's won more AOs than federer due to being lucky there ;)
 
veroniquem said:
Then they don't deserve to have tickets. Subway runs all night in NY. Totally agree with JohnnyMac.

ETA: on top of that, the match is going pretty fast...
Click to expand...

No offense, but spoken like someone who doesn't have a job, a family or any kind of responsibility. Just because people have to get to bed or get home to their kids on a weeknight doesn't mean they don't deserve tickets. Maybe there were hoping both matches would be done before midnight. That or they were just hoping to see as much as they could.

I thought you had a greater perspective than this vero. I'm surprised.
 
Down_the_line said:
No offense, but spoken like someone who doesn't have a job, a family or any kind of responsibility. Just because people have to get to bed on a weeknight doesn't mean they don't deserve tickets. Maybe there were hoping both matches would be done before midnight. That or they were just hoping to see as much as they could.

I thought you had a greater perspective than this vero. I'm surprised.
Click to expand...
It is the NIGHT SESSION for god's sake. It's supposed to end late. And yes, I have a family and and a job but if I go to the USO NIGHT SESSION, I don't walk out after 1 set. That's a shame.
 
abmk said:
because federer had mono and would've beat him otherwise in 2008 ...2008 was still part of fed's prime, unlike after 2010 and after ....

Nole's won more AOs than federer due to being lucky there ;)
Click to expand...

Nole hasn't got to sidestep anyone in Australia. Hes faced and beaten the best the tour has had to offer for years. =
 
90's Clay said:
Nole hasn't got to sidestep anyone in Australia. Hes faced and beaten the best the tour has had to offer for years. =
Click to expand...

only after federer's prime ....and barely escaped murray, nadal in 12 and stan in 13 ...was lucky this year while throwing in a stinker in the SF vs stan as well ....

without mono, fed would be having 5 AOs and novak 4 ......;)

getting serious ,

Nole's been lucky at the AO and unlucky at the USO ...that's it , so stop whining ...
 
90's Clay said:
He lost alot of USO titles early on to Fed that he very well could have won.. Not just against Nadal. He blew the one in 2012 vs. Murray as well.

1 USO title is weird when you see he has 5 AO titles. Big discrepancy there. The courts aren't THAT Much different either as they were before
Click to expand...
You lay out the facts well.
 
veroniquem said:
It is the NIGHT SESSION for god's sake. It's supposed to end late. And yes, I have a family and and a job but if I go to the USO NIGHT SESSION, I don't walk out after 1 set. That's a shame.
Click to expand...

Yeah but the crowd doesn't control how long the matches go. It's not their fault if only one set of this match is done by the time they have to leave. It's unfortunate, yes, but most of them probably don't have the luxury of staying until it's done.

That's real life for you. If everyone who had a job, kids, families or whatever didn't get night session tickets during the week, we'd barely see anyone there. As it is, the stands are still mostly full. There's just a few people here and there that have to get going. It's not a crime.
 
veroniquem said:
It is the NIGHT SESSION for god's sake. It's supposed to end late. And yes, I have a family and and a job but if I go to the USO NIGHT SESSION, I don't walk out after 1 set. That's a shame.
Click to expand...

It's their rights to leave. Tennis is for entertainment. If they don't see the entertainment, they'll leave. There's no need to force themself to sit because the no.1 player is playing.
 
longnt80 said:
It's their rights to leave. Tennis is for entertainment. If they don't see the entertainment, they'll leave. There's no need to force themself to sit because the no.1 player is playing.
Click to expand...
It's their right to throw their money out the window but it's still a shame.
 
90's Clay said:
Hes a better player in Australia than Federer. Why would you consider him lucky to beat Fed there?

And thats what makes this weird. Why is he so much better in Australia vs. Flushing where there courts aren't that different. I would guess overloading his schedule. He should minimize it more after Wimbledon
Click to expand...
Isn't rebound ace significantly different. Lower bouncing I believe.
 
veroniquem said:
Then they don't deserve to have tickets. Subway runs all night in NY. Totally agree with JohnnyMac.

ETA: on top of that, the match is going pretty fast...
Click to expand...
I don't know man a lot of lines don't run really late, and I wouldn't want to be riding around on the subway past 2.
 
Err, I'm all for an underdog upset or at least a competitive match, but this is a bit gross. Very little crowd involvement or excitement and poor play all around. Ugh, finish this up Djokovic. I'm trying to fight my way out of an infinite recursion, and this match in the background is not helping me stay awake.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
  • Poll Poll
U.S. Open 2015 SF: Novak Djokovic ([1] - Marin Čilić [9]
17 18 19
Replies
939
Views
39K
merwy
M
3fees
  • Poll Poll
US Open 2015 Round 5 Novak Djokovic (SRB) [1] vs. Feliciano Lopez (ESP) [18]
Replies
4
Views
528
3fees
3fees
D
  • Poll Poll
U.S. Open 2015 R4 - Kevin Anderson - Andy Murray
27 28 29
Replies
1K
Views
39K
Towser83
Towser83
PinShot
Feliciano Lopez on Novak & Co.
2 3
Replies
110
Views
7K
swordtennis
swordtennis
Rafa4LifeEver
  • Poll Poll
2023 Paris Open ATP Master's 1000 Quarterfinal matchup - Novak Djokovic [1] (SRB) v/s Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune [6] (DEN)
10 11 12
Replies
582
Views
10K
Biotic
Biotic
Back
Top