US Open 2018 - Men’s singles discussion thread

  • Thread starter Deleted member 756486
  • Start date

Champion


  • Total voters
    124
  • Poll closed .

Sartorius

Hall of Fame
Fed:
R1 someone irrelevant.
R2 Benoit Paire
R3 Krygios
R4 Chung/Fabio
QFs Novak:eek:
SFs Cilic/Zverev
Final Nad/Delpo

200.gif
 

moonballs

Hall of Fame
Has Nadal EVER got Djoker in his half at USO? I don't remember.

Btw Fed got him in 08, 09, 10, 11 and again in 18. Five times.
These years you pointed out are pretty much most of fhe meaningful years in the sense all three are true contenders of the slams. 07 and earlier Nadal was not good enough on hard and Djoker not good enough on grass. 2015-16 Nadal was in a slump. Most of the years Nadal didn’t mind playing the other two on clay since he is so good there, but that one year where it was questionable we got Fed Djoker SF on clay as well (2011RG).

In hindsight, definitely something not random is happening with the draws.

If Our President was Fed’s manager, he would have tweeted 12 times already to ask Russian to hack into USTA for draw fixing evidence. :)
 

Red Rick

Bionic Poster
I think it shows consistency and how dominant a player is.

Can’t deny that. ;)
I think general title counts show that enough on their own.

Stratisfying stats and then using bullcrap arguments to imply Rafa's a one surface pony is one of the most bs things on this forum.

I'll give you another stat

Rafa is the only player in the OE who has won multiple Slams on every surface
 

TheGhostOfAgassi

Talk Tennis Guru
I think general title counts show that enough on their own.

Stratisfying stats and then using bullcrap arguments to imply Rafa's a one surface pony is one of the most bs things on this forum.

I'll give you another stat

Rafa is the only player in the OE who has won multiple Slams on every surface
Rafa had won every slam at the age of 23.
 

tennis_crazy

Semi-Pro
Stratifying by surface and then counting surfaces equally is in the top 5 dumbest things tennis fans do. And there's legions of dumb tennis fans
Defending a title outside of one's comfort zone where about 70% of the tour is played is one of the very least thing one can expect of a GOAT contender.....not simply bloating your resume with titles from your preferred surface
 

Doctor/Lawyer Red Devil

Talk Tennis Guru
Nadal is the only guy who has won three US Open titles in this decade but I am sure he is losing sleep because he didn't win them in succession.
According to this gem that made my IQ go lower, he probably is losing sleep. :eek::D
If you don't defend it means you probably got lucky that year with an easy draw.
 

stringertom

Bionic Poster
I think it shows consistency and how dominant a player is.

Can’t deny that. ;)
What does it mean when you defend slams 4x on two different surfaces pretty much concurrently???

Has anybody done that? I'm not sure about that because it really doesn't matter. I can't be bothered with meaningless accomplishments from an extremely weak era, like winning 11 slams in four years.

This place is a total zoo. I'll let you take over as ringmaster. Your paranoia will come in handy, along with a fair dose of schizophrenia.:eek:
 

Red Rick

Bionic Poster
What does it mean when you defend slams 4x on two different surfaces pretty much concurrently???

Has anybody done that? I'm not sure about that because it really doesn't matter. I can't be bothered with meaningless accomplishments from an extremely weak era, like winning 11 slams in four years.

This place is a total zoo. I'll let you take over as ringmaster. Your paranoia will come in handy, along with a fair dose of schizophrenia.:eek:
Nobody says winning 11 Slams in 4 year means nothing.

But I'm not entirely sure winning 11 Slams in 4 years means more than winning 11 Slams in 5 or 6 years, except for not winning more Slams in the longer period.

Slam counts are important enough on their own. Distribution across Slams and time makes no difference to me.
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
Being the youngest in history to have all slams

No, that is not true.

Don Budge won The Grand Slam, all four in a row while he was 23 years old.

Laver won The Grand Slam, all four slams in a row just days after his 24th birthday.

Nadal is the youngest in the open era, and also the youngest golden career slam winner in history.
 

buscemi

Legend
did fed do the cinci double in 2004 and 2006 too? what about 2007? 2008?

Years Federer Won the U.S. Open

2004: Lost to Hrbaty in the first round of Cincinnati (Hrbaty was actually 2-1 against Federer in his career)
2005: Won Cincinnati, beating Roddick in the final
2006: The break-fast 2nd round loss to Murray at Cincinnati
2007: Smoked Blake in the final to win Cincinnati
2008: Lost a 3 setter to Karlovic in the third round at Cincinnati, losing both tiebreak sets.
 

Poisoned Slice

Bionic Poster
Will it be better than G1? Of course not, it's not happening in Tokyo. hahaha Everybody is saying Djokovic, everybody is saying Nadal, some are saying Federer and a couple are mentioning a Muzziah guy I've never heard, you know, but I don't know, you know. Plans could change. hahaha I do hope that somebody here can go on an Ibushi style run and shock the world.
dave.jpg
 
Top