Krish872007
Talk Tennis Guru
Makes for great troll material though.
Does it? Haven't seen any world-class trolling in a while - can't keep peddling the same W.E. stuff and expect to come up with original material
Makes for great troll material though.
If I see **** posting from a pathetic troll then I will correct them.I think you should quote every single word of his and reply separately as you typically do. And if that's not enough then I suggest you kill him. They should be done with.
It's not meant to be fair. This is competitive sports.
It's okay.Its just a bad look for tennis
He wont ever be seen as the greatest of the sport its more so that its embarrassing to have a european surface specialist win real tennis titles again
Seems harsh!
Raonic is a symptom of a weak eraRaonic is good. He has at least beaten Rafa twice and has been as high as #3 in the world. Your silly uneducated bias is noted tho.
If I see **** posting from a pathetic troll then I will correct them.
No, it was in the second. The first set was very competitive. Second set he started to break down, and it was all over.
Not in general silly. Just at RG 2008Why? It padded Nadal's slam dominance over Fed, didn't it? If you think Federer is a worse player than Anderson, something's up somewhere.
Raonic is a symptom of a weak era
If I see **** posting from a pathetic troll then I will correct them.
no not really but big surprise you think that.LMFAO! its funny because its true.
Weakest AO 06? That Bagdhatis would be smashing today's gen all over the place. Heck, this Nadal might have lost to Davydenko.No title from 2003-2007 was as easy as this one.
*shrugs* i guess. i just poor anderson is already getting crapped on, i'm sure he knows he's not the one most people think is slam final worthy.
oh come on.. can you count the numbers of posts here trashing this possible GS of Nadal ? I can indulge in some banter with them..no?rme and here i thought you were a reasonable nadal fan...lol what a freaking joke and hypocritical.
What a turn of events. First we discover it's actually Nadal that is Imhotep after that pic from the FO final and now it's actually Nadal that is agent Smith.
Hell no!So did Anderson Beat Nadal on Clay court ??
Ahh ok thanks, I do indeed have a terrible memory
Bless. You're new to watching tennis, aren't you? That's the kind of thing my seven year old says.Why doesn't he just tap the ball gently over the net if Rafa is so far back? Then pass him.
oh come on.. can you count the numbers of posts here trashing this possible GS of Nadal ? I can indulge in some banter with them..no?
What a turn of events. First we discover it's actually Nadal that is Imhotep after that pic from the FO final and now it's actually Nadal that is agent Smith.
Very high level from Anderson. Not sure anyone else in the world would have won that set, only GOATDal.
In a way Nadal crushing Anderson here would be ideal, let Anderson know that he doesn't belong on the court with him, and that the only reason he is there, is because no one else was on his side of the draw. A humbling experience.
No, you're new to tennis with your constant garbage posting about 04-07 era. You obviously didn't watch tennis back then.Bless. You're new to watching tennis, aren't you? That's the kind of thing my seven year old says.
He was not only injured, he also had to deal with a huge blister in his left hand. I remember that very well.Nadal was injured in that final that Wawrinka.
Anderson is not that lucky.
Of course.Yes, and wasn't there someone here who was trying to convince us otherwise?
Oh dear.No, you're new to tennis with your constant garbage posting about 04-07 era. You obviously didn't watch tennis back then.
What would Rafa do against an underarm serve? Scramble forward and play a weak return, then Anderson is in control of the point.
By playing a normal serve, he's letting Rafa moonball it back to the baseline and neutralise the point.
Makes Nadal's 2010 draw look like the 12 Labors of Hercules!Nah it doesn't hurt. Just don't mention the "weak era" ever again.
No clay is not sorry I go by the ITF which has determined clay to be an 80s European **** invention
http://www.itftennis.com/technical/courts/other/history.aspx
Stick with what you know. Supporting dopers
Yup. Rafa 10-6 against fred and Djoker. Fed. 4-9 against Rafa and Djoker. Djoker 6-5 against those Fed and Rafa.Winning slam head to head against main rivals. Fed been beaten once too many times by Djoko and Nadal... he's not GOAT.
Why can't Mark Petchey just take all his clothes off and run onto the court?