Verdasco new head racquet

Looks like Verdasco is back to his SPEED! :D

spains-fernando-verdasco-returns-the-ball-to-the-netherlands-robin-picture-id619445840

Man, this guy has some serial problems about racquets...
 
People who like trying out and discussing rackets?

Aren't you sick of always having something condescending to say? You know you have a serial racket problem too. You always have at least 1 up your butt.

What's your problem sargeinaz??? Say Chi was obviously cracking a joke. I personally found it hilarious how we call Verdasco a racquetholic but we do the same ourselves. Frames up the butt? Did he insult you or offend you? I'm in constant amazement at how low people will go because of a tennis post.

By the way, I saw Verdasco at the Basel Open last month. I can confirm he's back to the Speed XT paintjob, although I couldn't see his frame from up close.
 
What's your problem sargeinaz??? Say Chi was obviously cracking a joke. I personally found it hilarious how we call Verdasco a racquetholic but we do the same ourselves. Frames up the butt? Did he insult you or offend you? I'm in constant amazement at how low people will go because of a tennis post.

By the way, I saw Verdasco at the Basel Open last month. I can confirm he's back to the Speed XT paintjob, although I couldn't see his frame from up close.

If you knew the poster then you'd know it's not really a joke. He posts this kinda stuff all the time. He thinks he's better than most everyone else here.
 
Hi all,

I was trolled by a guy in tt forum keep telling me over and over that Verdasco's racquet is same mold and same layup as Djokovic's racquet!

However, I read somewhere that head made special mix material formula (which is layup) only for Djokovic's racquet. Because of that reason, nobody in this world can have same racquet layup as Djokovic's racquet layup.
 
Hi all,

I was trolled by a guy in tt forum keep telling me over and over that Verdasco's racquet is same mold and same layup as Djokovic's racquet!

However, I read somewhere that head made special mix material formula (which is layup) only for Djokovic's racquet. Because of that reason, nobody in this world can have same racquet layup as Djokovic's racquet layup.

Apparently, Radek Stepanek is (or was) allowed to use the same layup as Novak. Those in the know will prob chime in :-)
 
Hi all,

I was trolled by a guy in tt forum keep telling me over and over that Verdasco's racquet is same mold and same layup as Djokovic's racquet!

However, I read somewhere that head made special mix material formula (which is layup) only for Djokovic's racquet. Because of that reason, nobody in this world can have same racquet layup as Djokovic's racquet layup.

The ultimate expert for Head rackets in this forum is vsbabolat.
What he doesn´t know about Head rackets isn´t worth knowing. Maybe he will chime in.
 
Hi all,

I was trolled by a guy in tt forum keep telling me over and over that Verdasco's racquet is same mold and same layup as Djokovic's racquet!

However, I read somewhere that head made special mix material formula (which is layup) only for Djokovic's racquet. Because of that reason, nobody in this world can have same racquet layup as Djokovic's racquet layup.
That was correct a few years ago. Only Novak and Radek. It is different now. Verdasco is using the same frame so were a few other players that tested the frame. No one is trolling you. I am not sure why a well respected and most knowledgeable guy about tennis rackets on these boards is wasting his time trying to educate you...
 
That was correct a few years ago. Only Novak and Radek. It is different now. Verdasco is using the same frame so were a few other players that tested the frame. No one is trolling you. I am not sure why a well respected and most knowledgeable guy about tennis rackets on these boards is wasting his time trying to educate you...
Maybe he liked me.
 
This guy is using the same code with Djokovic!
Yea true, however you should look up and learn as much as you can on these boards and the internet before making assumptions. Learn who uses what racquet, which pro stock codes are what, how head and Wilson and Dunlop and Tecnifibremake clones of their frames, etc. It'll be very interesting.
 
The more I read about El Fiasco switching to yet another racquet, the more I'm convinced that he is on these boards.

Maybe he'll stumble across my Pro Staff 90 thread and we'll see him hitting with a 90 once or twice.

I want to believe.
 
Yea true, however you should look up and learn as much as you can on these boards and the internet before making assumptions. Learn who uses what racquet, which pro stock codes are what, how head and Wilson and Dunlop and Tecnifibremake clones of their frames, etc. It'll be very interesting.
What I heard is when Head pro players switched from Head to Wilson, Wilson copied Head racquets for that pros and so we had Wilson racquets with code H19, H22. H in the code stands for Head!

Next time, when Nadal switch from Babolat to Head, Head will do the same like Wilson! Head will copy Babolat racquets for Nadal and we will have Head racquets with the code B40, B52! B in the code stands for Babolat!
 
What I heard is when Head pro players switched from Head to Wilson, Wilson copied Head racquets for that pros and so we had Wilson racquets with code H19, H22. H in the code stands for Head!

Next time, when Nadal switch from Babolat to Head, Head will do the same like Wilson! Head will copy Babolat racquets for Nadal and we will have Head racquets with the code B40, B52! B in the code stands for Babolat!

Prince also made a copy of prestige MP - Rebal had exactly same head shape as prestige mp!!!
 
So copyright law does not apply to tennis racquet industry?
It does as long as it is in regards to sales. If Wilson copied the Prestige mould and sold it to the public there might be issues, and there especially are issues in regards to naming. It's a different matter when Wilson tries to make a copy that is then offered to pros so that they have an easier transition, as that does not relate to sales and thus market laws and regulations. Having said that, Wilson Pro Stocks are different from Prestiges (in mould as well as) in terms of feel and performance according to those who have played both (I believe @dr325i has played Wilson pro stocks and Head pro stocks and has compared the two somewhere, though I may be mistaken).
 
DR325i could you kindly once more

compare the PT113b to the wilson H22 57 flex and the 61 flex or so

is the 57 flex H22 very different to the pt113b or somewhat similar whereas the 61 flex h22 is very similar ?
 
So copyright law does not apply to tennis racquet industry?
They do.
Patents
cover items design, a copyright is for works of communication. So Prince or any other company can clone a Prestige or any other frame but cannot use the name,so long a design element covered by a patent is not used. An example is Head & Prince both have frames with fewer crosses but not less than the mains as Wilson has the patent on that design.
 
What I heard is when Head pro players switched from Head to Wilson, Wilson copied Head racquets for that pros and so we had Wilson racquets with code H19, H22. H in the code stands for Head!

Next time, when Nadal switch from Babolat to Head, Head will do the same like Wilson! Head will copy Babolat racquets for Nadal and we will have Head racquets with the code B40, B52! B in the code stands for Babolat!
Not sure if you're joking or serious, however, the "H" code in Wilson pro stock rackets probably has nothing to do with "H" in Head.
The Wilson pro stock version of the Blade retail stick (Raonic for example) is also an "H"-something code.
 
DR325i could you kindly once more

compare the PT113b to the wilson H22 57 flex and the 61 flex or so

is the 57 flex H22 very different to the pt113b or somewhat similar whereas the 61 flex h22 is very similar ?
The PT113B flexes different from both (or any racket I have used before). Seems like it flexes in the hoop (and throat) vs. H22 in the throat. Not sure how to explain it, however, the pt113B with flex of 61 (vs. let's say the H22 flex 61) feels softer than the others with the same flex.
 
So what you're saying is h22 flex 61 feels different or stiffer than a pt113b whereas h22 with a flex of around 57 has a more similar feeling .

What would be closer relatively a 57 flex h22 or a 61 flex h22 bearing in mind the differences where the racquet flexes ?
 
Not sure if you're joking or serious, however, the "H" code in Wilson pro stock rackets probably has nothing to do with "H" in Head.
The Wilson pro stock version of the Blade retail stick (Raonic for example) is also an "H"-something code.

Maybe H can stand for hairpin...or they copy original HEAD engineering code for MIA rackets, which all start with H22xxx if I recall well.
 
Prince also made a copy of prestige MP - Rebal had exactly same head shape as prestige mp!!!
So Head pro stock racquet was copied by Prince and Wilson! It means that head lost pro players to competitors more than competitors lost pro players to head!
 
Your racquet knowledge > @dr325i's racquet knowledge!

Thank you for your kindness, but he is for sure more knowledgeable than me about tennis racquets...I just asked him some information about MG Radical MP 1st issue vs reissue and he was very kind to reply fast to me.
Mine was only an hypothesis since I often thought about it to try to find an answer to this doubt.
 
Thank you for your kindness, but he is for sure more knowledgeable than me about tennis racquets...I just asked him some information about MG Radical MP 1st issue vs reissue and he was very kind to reply fast to me.
Mine was only an hypothesis since I often thought about it to try to find an answer to this doubt.
Just joking only. I know @dr325i is legend here. He is very good guy. He did not involve in debates like @vsbabolat did. He helped noobs. @vsbabolat make use of his knowledge to debate with noobs.
 
Just joking only. I know @dr325i is legend here. He is very good guy. He did not involve in debates like @vsbabolat did. He helped noobs. @vsbabolat make use of his knowledge to debate with noobs.

I have to disagree with you about VS, to me he has been always kind as well and helped me many time answering to my private messages.
For sure both dr325i and VS are two of the greatest and much knowledgeable person here.

Ps. Have fun with your PT57 (I participated in the auction but you played "at home" since I lived in Italy [emoji1])
 
I have to disagree with you about VS, to me he has been always kind as well and helped me many time answering to my private messages.
For sure both dr325i and VS are two of the greatest and much knowledgeable person here.

Ps. Have fun with your PT57 (I participated in the auction but you played "at home" since I lived in Italy [emoji1])
So you are the one lost to me in the PT57A auction?

Thank you for let me won!

After I won, the seller asked me do I want to buy 2 first hand/brand new PT57A? he had 2 PT57A exactly the same.

And you know, I was stupid enough to answer I need only one of them!

I could not sleep that night after I answered.

Next morning, I emailed the seller to buy 2 brand new PT57A and he told me the other was sold one second after I rejected it!

Who is the person on earth bought my second PT57A?
 
The "22" part is the factory they make them in. Therefore, the "22" = Austria.
Newer PT57x's, PT113B, etc have H08xxxx codes, etc. since they moved production to China. My PT113Bs are H08113B
Good information! So 22=Austria, 08=China, how about 19?
 
So you are the one lost to me in the PT57A auction?

Thank you for let me won!

After I won, the seller asked me do I want to buy 2 first hand/brand new PT57A? he had 2 PT57A exactly the same.

And you know, I was stupid enough to answer I need only one of them!

I could not sleep that night after I answered.

Next morning, I emailed the seller to buy 2 brand new PT57A and he told me the other was sold one second after I rejected it!

Who is the person on earth bought my second PT57A?

Yes, I was the one who lost...I would have to pay also international shipment cost and custom duties so I stopped at 350$.
Unfortunately I did not know that he had another one identical, otherwise I would have bought it for sure...I'm looking for a PT57A MG Radical MP since a year now.
 
I still do not understand what Wilson H19 has to do with the Head under the pallets code that designates the country of manufacture?

We know Wilson's pro stock racquets H19 and H22 are copied from Head's pro stock racquets!

The logic is based on few assumptions below:

1. Head pro stock racquet has code H22xxxx.

2. When Wilson copied Head pro stock racquets for their pros, they dumb followed Head code on head's pro stock racquets and name their wilson's pro stock racquets as H19 and H22.

If H22 is copied from one head pro stock racquet that has H22xxxx code then H19 is also copied from another head pro stock racquet that has H19xxxx code.


So head may have a pro stock racquet that has H19xxxx code and nobody know about this head pro stock racquet. Only Wilson know and copy that head pro stock racquet.


You said head code 22 = Austria, 08 = China, so 19 = which country of manufacture?
 
Back
Top