anointedone said:Oh this stupid topic. YAAAAWWWWWNNNNN! Seles fans: Graf only won so many slams due to the stabbing. It was all Parche. It was all Parche. Graf won so many slams due to the stabbing. Graf is not that good because she won so many slams due to the stabbing. Parche gave her so many slams. Stop staying Graf is great. Graf fans: Graf won many more slams then Seles end of the story. You dont know what would have happened without the stabbing. Facts are facts, what ifs are what ifs.....
10 hours later, Seles fans: Graf slams, Gunther, Graf slams, Gunter, Graf slams stabbing. Graf fans: Graf won more, Seles won less, Graf won more, you dont know what would have happened, facts are Graf won more.
That is all I am going to say, I am not going to get into this STUPID STUPID STUPID debate.
Rabbit said:You wanna hear something really eerie? Federer and Seles both have personal assisstants named Lincoln......
There is essentially no way that Steffi Graf would have been the top women's tennis player of the 1990s without a fan of hers stabbing Monica Seles in the back with a knife.
Of course, Navratilova was the female player of the decade for the 1980s ... Monica Seles was well on her way to being the female player of the 1990s until a Graf fan stabbed Seles in the back with a knife.
I was a Seles fan myself, but I don't think it's fair to blame Steffi or disparage her. She was amazing before Seles. And, yes, Seles had her number for those two or three years, but that doesn't mean Steffi couldn't have rebounded at some point. Nadal and Nole have each had dominant runs over the other. Fed finally had a dominant run over Nadal after a decade of near futility. It SUCKS the world didn't get to five or six more years of Seles v Graf, but Steffi still deserves respect. I just think we need to NOT forget Seles. She should be talked about in the GOAT along with Serena and Steffi.Came across this thread just now when I was searching something in this forum.
I guess today 14-15 years down the line Federer and Monica Seles are at extremely opposite ends.
To end Federer's run a young Rival Nadal came up just like to Stop Stefi Graf a young rival Monica Seles came up, only difference is some ****** stabbed Monica with a knife and gave Stefi 7-8 extra slams that she would not have had otherwise, however Federer didn't have any such fortune/Rafa didn't suffer Seles's misfortune ...... today 15 years later Rafa is on 20 slams levelled with the great Federer and set to cross his tally.
Federer is the real GOAT while Stefi is a fake imposter, Glad Serena is the GOAT now !
cc @Sunny Ali Sir
People make the comparison between the rivalries a lot, but the real difference is that Nadal owned Federer, where as Seles I think beat Graf twice in a row maybe one time, and trailed the head to head even during her prime years. Graf fell off, Seles wasn't holding her down.
Imagine how it was for Steffi. She had had a fabulous career already before 1993. She was making slam finals again and pushing Seles all the way. She was beating Seles in non slam events and at Wimbledon. She was supremely fit with a new coach in Heinz Gunthardt and things were going well for her. It is is quite possible Seles would have had a blip between 1993 and 1996 and Graf would won a few more slams, and that she would have sneaked a couple of slams with Seles playing well anyway.
Then, Seles gets stabbed and it all changes. Graf is No.1 again and the slam favorite. And everyone is saying it is because of the stabbing. Graf had to carry a much blighted tour through 93 and the pressure told at RG 94, Wimbledon and the USO. She finally got herself back together for that incredible 95 and 96. Look how fit she was then compared to everyone else.
My point is, Graf did get more slams than she would have without the stabbing. But do not discount her work ethic and the determination and how having a rival like Seles pushed her to new levels. Steffi could always dig deep and she would have continued doing so without the stabbing.
People make the comparison between the rivalries a lot, but the real difference is that Nadal owned Federer, where as Seles I think beat Graf twice in a row maybe one time, and trailed the head to head even during her prime years. Graf fell off, Seles wasn't holding her down.
Imagine how it was for Steffi. She had had a fabulous career already before 1993. She was making slam finals again and pushing Seles all the way. She was beating Seles in non slam events and at Wimbledon. She was supremely fit with a new coach in Heinz Gunthardt and things were going well for her. It is is quite possible Seles would have had a blip between 1993 and 1996 and Graf would won a few more slams, and that she would have sneaked a couple of slams with Seles playing well anyway.
Then, Seles gets stabbed and it all changes. Graf is No.1 again and the slam favorite. And everyone is saying it is because of the stabbing. Graf had to carry a much blighted tour through 93 and the pressure told at RG 94, Wimbledon and the USO. She finally got herself back together for that incredible 95 and 96. Look how fit she was then compared to everyone else.
My point is, Graf did get more slams than she would have without the stabbing. But do not discount her work ethic and the determination and how having a rival like Seles pushed her to new levels. Steffi could always dig deep and she would have continued doing so without the stabbing.
I think the op must be high. Federer similar to seles. Lol.
Seriously Federer s career trajectory was very similar to Graf, not Seles.
Dominated the whole tour with forehand, serve , movement, court sense etc. For 3-4 years. Only weakness was single handed backhand which nobody could exploit.
Until the left handed slayer came into scene i.e Seles and Nadal and toppled the king or queen.
Seles in RG 1992 and Nadal in W 2008. So far exactly similar, but what did not natch was a crazy Swiss didn't pluck out a knife and hit Nadal. The Swiss are very gentleman u know.
So while Graf utlilized Seles absence, Federer had to deal with Nadal and later Djokovic.
She would have been on 20-22 slams for sure and Stefi would have been on 13-14 slams if the stabbing never happened.
Please read more carefully, YOU are clearly so defensive that your reading skills are going out the window!!!
By the way, do you have selective reading skills? LOL!!! You are obviously a knife fan yourself judging by your very bias post. You are so predictable dude. I am not impressed with those who choose to follow her, her fanatics, so to speak. You can say alot about someone from their followers, and Graf's fans, to me, seem to be a very sad bunch. Thank goodness Federer fans are decent, knowledgeable and classy.
The truth was Poor PinocchiaGraf was on the verge of retiring back in 1993 before the stabbing of World number one player in the world Monica Seles came as a blessing for Graf's carreer. Back then, Graf was just the underdog, she could not even reach the finals in most of the big tournaments simply because she had lost her self-confidence because of Seles, she was like Hingis when Williams arrived on tour; In PinocchiaGraf's mind it must have been amazingly pleasant to realise in May 1993 that her main rival in big tournies would have been Arantxa instead of Monica. Did i say MAIN RIVAL? Well, there was no real rivalry in those years between Seles and Graf: 7 slams out of 9 (not competing in one of those and losing in the final of the other ) and 2 Masters for Seles and only 2 slams (one without Seles ) for Graf in 1991-January 1993: can you call this a rivalry?
Federer is GOAT in the men's game, Seles 10th in the women's game.
Not much similarity.
Imagine how it was for Steffi. She had had a fabulous career already before 1993. She was making slam finals again and pushing Seles all the way. She was beating Seles in non slam events and at Wimbledon. She was supremely fit with a new coach in Heinz Gunthardt and things were going well for her. It is is quite possible Seles would have had a blip between 1993 and 1996 and Graf would won a few more slams, and that she would have sneaked a couple of slams with Seles playing well anyway.
Then, Seles gets stabbed and it all changes. Graf is No.1 again and the slam favorite. And everyone is saying it is because of the stabbing. Graf had to carry a much blighted tour through 93 and the pressure told at RG 94, Wimbledon and the USO. She finally got herself back together for that incredible 95 and 96. Look how fit she was then compared to everyone else.
My point is, Graf did get more slams than she would have without the stabbing. But do not discount her work ethic and the determination and how having a rival like Seles pushed her to new levels. Steffi could always dig deep and she would have continued doing so without the stabbing.
Federer is GOAT in the men's game, Seles 10th in the women's game.
Not much similarity.
She already has the 6th most slams in the Open Era despite her career being destroyed in her prime. She’s tied for the 8th position in the all-time slams list. One can only imagine her positions on those lists had she been allowed to continue her normal career.
I don't know how Federer is GOAT but I'd rather not digress from the subject of this thread. Seles may be 10th but let this sink in ... she had climbed to that spot by the time she was 19! We can only imagine how far up she'd have climbed in another mere 2 or 3 years!
Maureen Connolly had done even more by the age of 19.
As you often say about claims made for Federer by his fans, we can't look at imaginary scenarios and rank people in history based on those.
![]()