Well those detail numbers are hard to interpret but if they can convince the panel, they accepted the explanations, then it's done. Like I said, these two cases are exactly of the same nature - not my "own" fault! And what's more? Halep's contamination defense is actually a lot more convincing that Sinner's. Halep took the contaminated powders thus tested positive for banned ingredients (it's ok if you don't believe it), but it's relatively straightforward. If Sinner said I used the cream but I didn't know the cream has the clostebol, you don't have to believe it either, but it would be a comparable case like Halep. What happened in Sinner's case here, his trainer bought the cream in Italy and he wasn't unaware of clostebol (small chance incident!), his trainer bought the cream to USA and his trainer cut his finger and used the cream (another small chance incident!), a barehand massage transferred a tiny amount of clostebol to Sinner (incredibly small chance incident), for Sinner's defense to work, all those small chance incidents had to happen and they must happen in the right time for the chain of event to proceed, missing one or wrong timing (didn't put the cream in the luggage, finger not cut or healed before the massage, wearing the glove for the massage) , Sinner would not be able to blame it on the cream. Not to say it didn't happen the way as Sinner has claimed, but just too many twists and turns here, naturally many people don't believe it.