So this also means Fed being too consistent hurt him even with the age gap.that's what happens in case of younger ATGs vs older ATGs typically (when they play sufficient # of matches). Which is why younger ATGs have the h2h advantage,
and if is further gap, obviously as well, like Fed-Agassi is 8-3
Clearly.
It's quite illustrated by the fact that Federer held his own in B03 and couldn't pass the barrier in B05
The fact that post-prime Fed was notching up big wins every year against prime Djokovic and running him super close at Wimbledon and the US Open... the answer’s pretty obvious tbh. Their grass H2H is a complete joke
Novak was older when he won Wimbledon in 2019 than Fed was in 14/15.What if confusing is that Federer won so many polls in here in even the Wim 14/15 Djokovic matches.
Not as many people mentioned his age in that context.
Obviously the matches had to be played out first.What if confusing is that Federer won so many polls in here in even the Wim 14/15 Djokovic matches.
Not as many people mentioned his age in that context.
No, he wasn't. Fed was one month shy of turning 33 and 34 in 2014 and 2015, while Djoker was 32 and 2 months.Novak was older when he won Wimbledon in 2019 than Fed was in 14/15.
Everyone thought what Fed was doing was unique or special then. lol
People still picked Fed to win though.Obviously the matches had to be played out first.
So he was 32 and 33? You can’t just say one month shy. lolNo, he wasn't. Fed was one month shy of turning 33 and 34 in 2014 and 2015, while Djoker was 32 and 2 months.
TTW people don't pick based on rationale, big surprise.People still picked Fed to win though.
And spoke so highly on the Murray match which gets less talked about now.
What difference does it make? He was closer to 33 and 34 anyway. Djoker was not older, which is what you were suggesting.So he was 32 and 33? You can’t just say one month shy. lol
Anyway, he was older when he won slams in 2020 and 2021.
AO 16 Fed or AO 21 Djokovic?What difference does it make? He was closer to 33 and 34 anyway. Djoker was not older, which is what you were suggesting.
And yes I know how old Djoker was in 2020 and 2021. Difference was Next Gen, not better ability at an advanced age (except for clay).
It wouldn't be a shellacking at least LOL.AO 16 Fed or AO 21 Djokovic?
You never answer directly lol.It wouldn't be a shellacking at least LOL.
Because I have no idea honestly. They're 2 GOATS equal in ability. When I know for sure who'd win, I say it outright.You never answer directly lol.
Let’s just give it to DjokovicBecause I have no idea honestly. They're 2 GOATS equal in ability. When I know for sure who'd win, I say it outright.
What if confusing is that Federer won so many polls in here in even the Wim 14/15 Djokovic matches.
Not as many people mentioned his age in that context.
It kinda shows that we can't predict matches lol and we always bang on about it.Djoko had not play great in the QF/SF vs Cilic/Dimi in Wim 14 SF. Had won 1 of the previous 9 slams from RG 12 to RG 14 (AO 13).
Unexpected that he raised his level in the Wim 14 final as much as he did.
As far as Wim 15 is concerned, some over-rating of Fed due to the Murray SF (&people not expecting Fed's stamina/level to go down after 2 hrs or so)
Fed Wim 14/15 vs Djokovic Wim 19/21 H2H?Novak was older when he won Wimbledon in 2019 than Fed was in 14/15.
Everyone thought what Fed was doing was unique or special then. lol
Novak was older when he won Wimbledon in 2019 than Fed was in 14/15.
Everyone thought what Fed was doing was unique or special then. lol
Yeah they kinda missed both the forest and the trees there.Fed was a little older. And Agererer played peak Djoko, while Old Egg played 38 year old Fraud.
Djokovic' mental strength took several slams from the graceful ballerina with girly arms.