Watching the top 3 winning everything is just getting boring

[maleyoyo]

It seems that no matter how their opponents play, they somehow manage to edge through.

I'm getting bored of watching Djokokic, Nadal and Federer winning absolutely everything.

Seriously, I'd rather have Tsonga, Delpo, Murray and AnyoneElse in the semis.

Would be alot more interesting, and would be nice to see someone else pick up a trophy for change.

I don’t see it that way because it makes me appreciate the top 3 even more. They are true champions for working the butts off to stay at the top. All the rest has to earn it. Unlike other team sports like soccer, baseball, basketball where they can buy championships and titles, the top 3 have nothing else to rely on but themselves to consistently win matches.

The men’s semis at RG showcase the 4 best clay court players. What’s not to like?
Would you prefer the up and down like yoyos of the WTA? It’s a complete joke in my opinion.

 

[jk175d]

I don’t see it that way because it makes me appreciate the top 3 even more. They are true champions for working the butts off to stay at the top. All the rest has to earn it. Unlike other team sports like soccer, baseball, basketball where they can buy championships and titles, the top 3 have nothing else to rely on but themselves to consistently win matches.

The men’s semis at RG showcase the 4 best clay court players. What’s not to like?
Would you prefer the up and down like yoyos of the WTA? It’s a complete joke in my opinion.

exactly, I always get the feeling that people who say Fed or Nadal winning all the time is boring aren't true fans of tennis. Why would you NOT want to see the BEST players play the game? Enjoy it while you still can! Same thing with Tiger when he was always winning in golf. When someone plays THAT great in a sport you love, how could you not be thrilled and entertained to watch it?

 

[sonicare]

I had high hopes for Murray until I saw him against Ferrer earlier. He's just so up and down and inconsistent. He can't seem to maintain a consistently high level of performance during a match, keep his foot on the glass, or at the very least raise the intensity and force the issue at key points of the match. He's got the game, just not the boldness or the belief and determination.

IMO. He doesn't have the game. He's missing the one thing that wins majors. A devastating forehand. Forehands win majors. Not backhands.

Just look at nole as an example. Always had a great bh but didn't start dominating until he developed a devastating forehand.

 

[timeisonmyside]

In three years when I have to sit through a Raonic vs Tomic Wimbledon final, I'll be longing for these days.

 

[timeisonmyside]

Also, with a busy Wimbledon-Olympics-USO summer schedule this year, I think we'll see some surprise finalists/winners.