WB organiser group is full of snobs and people who bend rules for their favorites and who belittle the players that they dislike

NAS

Hall of Fame
This is not favouritism but bad scheduling, for favouritism see Wimbledon 2007 and Us open 2003.
One slam went against all odd for their adopted son and one slam for their two real son
 

skypadq

Hall of Fame
This is not favouritism but bad scheduling, for favouritism see Wimbledon 2007 and Us open 2003.
One slam went against all odd for their adopted son and one slam for their two real son
nas , can you explaine the how 2003 us open was the rigged for andy roddick ?
 

NAS

Hall of Fame
This year they kind of back themselves in the corner by not booking Struff vs Med or Med vs Cilic on CC but by booking Fed first two round on CC .
 
How many Slams would have Fed won if he wasn't recipient of perpetual blatant favouritism. 2007 Wimbledon first come to mind for example.
 

NAS

Hall of Fame
nas , can you explaine the how 2003 us open was the rigged for andy roddick ?
Not for Roddick but Americans , whenever ground was dry Americans was schedule to play first on whatever court while Hewitt , Nalbandian and Ferrero has to wait.
In the end Nalbandian end up playing three matches in three days and Ferrero 4 matches in four days
They even asked Ferrero to play two matches in a day but Ferrero declined
 

skypadq

Hall of Fame
Not for Roddick but Americans , whenever ground was dry Americans was schedule to play first on whatever court while Hewitt , Nalbandian and Ferrero has to wait.
In the end Nalbandian end up playing three matches in three days and Ferrero 4 matches in four days
They even asked Ferrero to play two matches in a day but Ferrero declined
wow ... shock info for sure
 

SonnyT

Hall of Fame
Their favoritism is too obvious. Federer-Sonego should be on C1. They have rules, but then waive them for Fed.
 

NAS

Hall of Fame
Their favoritism is too obvious. Federer-Sonego should be on C1. They have rules, but then waive them for Fed.
It's ok, Fed may be playing last Wimbledon, as I said this is case of bad schedule not favouritism
 

fedfan08

Professional
This year they kind of back themselves in the corner by not booking Struff vs Med or Med vs Cilic on CC but by booking Fed first two round on CC .
So Fed should be penalized because he’s popular and won the tournament 8 times? Does CC really play that differently from C1?
 

NAS

Hall of Fame
On merit it should be Med vs Hubert and Zed vs Faa on CC.
Then Shapo vs RBA on court 1
As their is only one men match on court 1
On court 2 Korda vs Karen and Fus vs Bweeh.
Remaining should be thrown on other courts as I am not even interested in sonego vs Fed and don't even want to talk about Novak vs Garin unless Garin and Sonego bring A level
 

fedfan08

Professional
On merit it should be Med vs Hubert and Zed vs Faa on CC.
Then Shapo vs RBA on court 1
As their is only one men match on court 1
On court 2 Korda vs Karen and Fus vs Bweeh.
Remaining should be thrown on other courts as I am not even interested in sonego vs Fed and don't even want to talk about Novak vs Garin unless Garin and Sonego bring A level
What does ‘on merit’ mean? The crowd favorites are always going to get CC billing. Plus it’s not like these courts play drastically different.
 

NAS

Hall of Fame
So Fed should be penalized because he’s popular and won the tournament 8 times? Does CC really play that differently from C1?
That's not how things work lol, playing one match on Court one for Fed is not disrespect while not playing single match till qf for number 2 seed is disrespect( assuming if Med do reach qf), I don't remember when did last time it happened, maybe Roddick 2004 but I think he did played on CC match in early rounds before final as his semi was rescheduled because of rain but don't remember exactly
When Rafa can play match on SL then anybody can play anywhere
 

NAS

Hall of Fame
What does ‘on merit’ mean? The crowd favorites are always going to get CC billing. Plus it’s not like these courts play drastically different.
But you are proving my point dear, as Fed is crowd favorite he will fill even court 18 seats, we don't need him on CC as rich will be buying CC tickets regardless whether Fed plays or don't.
 

NAS

Hall of Fame
Nothing to do with Fed , I think both Novak and Fed don't deserve CC tomorrow, that's my personal view.
Hubert vs Med and FAA vs Zed can be absolute blockbuster like Cilic vs Med
 

fedfan08

Professional
That's not how things work lol, playing one match on Court one for Fed is not disrespect while not playing single match till qf for number 2 seed is disrespect( assuming if Med do reach qf), I don't remember when did last time it happened, maybe Roddick 2004 but I think he did played on CC match in early rounds before final as his semi was rescheduled because of rain but don't remember exactly
When Rafa can play match on SL then anybody can play anywhere
As I said yesterday RG has a policy of putting the 1 and 2 seeds on SL for one match. The other slams don’t have a similar policy. In 2018 Fed was the #1 seed and lost to Anderson on C1 so it’s not like he’s never played off CC before.
 

fedfan08

Professional
Nothing to do with Fed , I think both Novak and Fed don't deserve CC tomorrow, that's my personal view.
Hubert vs Med and FAA vs Zed can be absolute blockbuster like Cilic vs Med
Here you’re going by what you think will be better matches. But there’s no way of knowing. People attending CC matches expect to see the most popular players. And when you have two popular players who have won this tournament numerous times they’re going to get CC billing. It’s not like Fed (or Djokovic) were playing on CC the day they turned pro.
 

socallefty

Legend
The more of a big business that tournaments become, there is a conflict of interest between making more money and putting on a fair contest for all players including those who are not popular. If Wimbledon can prevent Federer’s potential opponents like Medvedev, Zverev and Berettini from playing on centre court before they play him, they have increased the chance of Federer making the final and this is a highly popular outcome which will boost their ratings and media hype. Tournaments have an incentive to make popular players who are media darlings go further in the draw and increasingly they seem to try to make this happen instead of doing more fair scheduling.
 

NAS

Hall of Fame
As I said yesterday RG has a policy of putting the 1 and 2 seeds on SL for one match. The other slams don’t have a similar policy. In 2018 Fed was the #1 seed and lost to Anderson on C1 so it’s not like he’s never played off CC before.
Yes they have, lol I remember Novak playing on court arena in 2016, and in 2018 Novak made huge fuss about cc after that Fed was given court one and Fed struggled straight away on court one because of difference in speed, which Med will also struggle as he still have to play on CC .
 

Aabye5

Hall of Fame
Coco Gauff has had all these matches on CC. Frankly they should put Medvedev in her place in some of these matches so people won’t complain.

Apparently the cannot change men's match for a women's match. So put Raducanu on Centre, Med on Centre, and Fed and Gauff on Court 1.
 
Last edited:
Fed favoritism has been going on for most of his career. It is sad to see but unfortunately nothing will ever change about it. Medvedev should have at least played 1 match on CC before the QF and Fed should have played on Court 1 (in all honesty probably court 14) but alas Med will have to demolish Fed in the QFs.
 

DRII

G.O.A.T.
Coco Gauff has had all these matches on CC. Frankly they should put Medvedev in her place in some of these matches so people won’t complain.
uh, thats women's tennis vs men's tennis...

don't try and take the blatant favoritism off of Federer and place it on a 17 year old girl!
 

Open Stance

Semi-Pro
If they wanted to screw Djokovic they would've sped up the courts to lightning fast and given him a tough draw but they instead keep slowing the courts down and gave him the weakest draw possible.
The main person to blame for Novak's "easy draw" is Nadal. If he plays then he is in Djokovic's half.
 
If they did their job they would throw out the yobs in the stands shouting out trying to be funny.

Nothing a taser couldn’t fix
 
Top