We can't forget that I was injured for 6 months last year

pdcosta

Banned
(But we never remember your losses, right Rafa?)


An Interview with Rafael Nadal – 2015 Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters SF

Posted by Rafael Nadal Fans
Julian Finney/Getty Images
Julian Finney/Getty Images

Novak Djokovic def. Rafael Nadal 6‑3, 6‑3

THE MODERATOR: Questions in English, please.

Q. It is a defeat, but is not a terrible defeat.
RAFAEL NADAL: No. I think I played well for moments. Remain to be played a little bit more. As I say yesterday, maybe I don’t know if was too early. I was able to play at the right level for moments to compete against very, very tough player, best player of the world like Novak is today.
But I get a little bit tired and little bit too early. Then when you get little bit tired, you play little bit shorter. Then is impossible against him, no?
If I’m able to play like the beginning for three hours, I can do it, then is a different story, no?
But in general, I think I was not that far. For moments I was playing at very high level. Him, I think he played great. Just congratulate him for the way that he’s playing, the way that he’s winning almost every match of the year.
For me is a very positive week ‑ the most positive week of the season, without any doubt. I think if I am able to keep doing that in the next tournament in Barcelona, that I have a tough draw, I will say that I am very well again.
The way that I played yesterday and for moments today is the way that I want to play. Just with more matches playing like this, I will be enough confident to play. That level will not be the exception, will be the normal thing. That is the thing that I need to make happen.
But in general, from where I came one week ago, two weeks ago, after what happened in Miami, I go to the next tournament with the feeling that I make a big improvement in my game, in my mental part.
I hope this tournament is a key moment for my season.

Q. Do you think the game at 3‑All in the first set was kind of a turning point because you started very well. This game was super long, amazing.
RAFAEL NADAL: Yeah, that game was very important. Yes, is true. I had a breakpoint that he played unbelievable. That’s it.
Was 6‑3, 6‑3, but can’t be much closer. I know that. I think he knows that, too. Everybody knows that. 3‑All in the second, 40‑Love for me, too, for 4‑3, and let’s see.
But today was 6‑3, 6‑3. Just congratulate the opponent, congratulate Novak, accept. I know without a doubt if I’m able to keep going the same way that I was doing this week, I going to have my chances.

Q. Just looking at the numbers of this match, I notice that he played 12 winning forehands, and you just six.
RAFAEL NADAL: David or Novak?

Q. Yes, Novak. On the unforced errors with the forehand, you made 14 and he made nine. I want to know if you had the feeling that your forehand was today a little more problem than other times or not?
RAFAEL NADAL: No. I was hitting great the forehand. I had some mistakes when I lost little bit the intensity of my legs. When I was the right intensity, when I was playing with the right intensity in my legs, I was able to control the point all the time.
But when I lose little bit that speed, that extra movement on my legs, he’s a fantastic player, no? He’s phenomenal the way that he can move the ball to everywhere. If he take advantage from inside the court, you are dead. That’s what happened, no?
I had more mistakes, yes. I had less winners than him, yes. But at the beginning of the match, I was having enough winners with my forehand. I was having enough times the control of the point. That’s the way that I need to play.
No, I think was more in terms of movements. The forehand, in particular, I am happy the way the forehand moves. I was able to play, again, with that high topspin, changing directions.
Remain little bit more, but definitely I think the forehand is close to be back.

Q. How do you explain the drop in intensity? The fact that you are not used to playing big games since the beginning of the season?
RAFAEL NADAL: Probably. And I play a very tough match yesterday. We cannot forget that I get injury last year for six months. So for six months I didn’t play no one match of intensity because when I came back I played three tournaments ‑ well two tournaments. Shanghai we cannot count. The rest of the tournaments is the first come back after four months. Is difficult to have a feeling on that.
Then Basel, having that appendicitis, probably is like I was not playing also. So six months without. I started the season without playing that kind of level matches. Only once for me. That was Indian Wells against Raonic. That is a different story, different style, different thing. But was a long match, high‑level match, only that one. Then yesterday, before yesterday, two more. That’s it. Today another one. Even if it was 6‑3, 6‑3, the level of intensity and the level of tennis has been high again.
That’s what I need. I am sure that if I am able to keep going, as I said before, in Barcelona, keep playing at that level, I will have a chance to be competitive again. If that happens, will be a big improvement for the season.

Q. Don’t you think that the change of racquet at this stage of the season affected your game at all?
RAFAEL NADAL: Positive or negative?

Q. I’m asking you.
RAFAEL NADAL: I don’t know. I played the best tournament of the season this week, so I don’t believe. If I am having mistakes, it’s me, it’s not the racquet. I was having mistakes with the racquet that I was playing all my career the last couple of months.
The racquet is helping me. But the most important thing, what’s helping me really, is I am with the motivation, the right motivation, to play tennis, the right motivation to work hard every day, and with the right attitude. That’s why I was able to play better this week than the previous week.
I am working hard since I came back. But, you know, everything is a process. Arrives the moment that is a very important moment in my season, and I need to make that click that I need to be competitive again at 100%. This week was the first very positive news of my game after my comeback in the beginning of the season.
So the racquet, I don’t need to talk about the racquet. The racquet worked well. I was able to play at a very high level with that racquet.

Q. Compared to last year’s French Open final, do you think Novak has changed a little bit his way of playing on clay, or was it the same player you faced last year?
RAFAEL NADAL: You know, I don’t know. I am not in condition to answer that. Let’s see how the things are improving during the whole clay court season.
Always when somebody wins against the others, and the opposite is always the same thing: the opponent changed something. Novak was able to beat me in 2013 here in the final, too. He beat me in Rome last year, too.
He’s a fantastic player. He can beat me all the time. But I am confident that if I am able to keep playing at that level for more matches, I will have my chances in the next couple of weeks. I going to try it.

Q. How much would you be surprised if tomorrow Berdych is going to beat Djokovic?
RAFAEL NADAL: Well, one player is winning everything. That player lose, always going to be a surprise.

Q. But for you.
RAFAEL NADAL: I answered you. I don’t know how much. Oh, what a surprise! I don’t going to be like this (laughter).
But Berdych is a fantastic player. He’s playing very consistent. Almost in every tournament he is there fighting for the final rounds. But is obvious that Novak is the favorite.

Q. You said yourself in the beginning that Novak is winning pretty much every match at the moment. He’s won the only Grand Slam, all the Masters, on his way to another here. Is it possible for one player to win all the Masters and all the slams in one season?
RAFAEL NADAL: Yes.

Q. Do you think it’s possible in this season?
RAFAEL NADAL: Yeah, always is possible. Difficult, but possible (smiling).

Q. Will you be 100% for Paris, 100% fit?
RAFAEL NADAL: I don’t know what’s going to happen tomorrow. I don’t know what’s going to happen in three weeks, one month. I cannot predict the future. I am not that arrogant to say yes because tomorrow anything can happen in life. You have to respect all the things that can happen in this life to answer yes or no.
The right answer is that we’ll see. I will do all the things I can to be ready for Barcelona, then for Madrid, then for Rome, then for Paris, if I have the chance to do it. Every tournament is very important. We’ll see what’s going to happen.
 

booson

Professional
Excuses and excuses. Is he just repeating whatever he says privately to his sponsors? Or is he truly that insecure?
 

mightyrick

Legend
LOL. OP is like the Drudge Report for tennis.

The article could be about Nadal running into a burning house, risking his life, and rescuing children dying from smoke inhalation... and his title would be:

"Nadal storms house, brutally takes children, and leaves it in ashes."

News at 9!
 

Roddick85

Hall of Fame
I agree with Nadal, he's been out for 6 months, so he'll need time to re-adjust. Problem is, he missed something like 7 months in between 2012-2013, and when he came back, it took him a couple of weeks to start winning tournaments again, so people's expectation are higher. The season is 4 months old, and he still looks far from hitting top form, hence why people are "worried".
 
D

Deleted member 21996

Guest
if you enter the court you are Ready. if you are not ready GTFO... NO EXCUSES

this is Nadal just being himself...
 

JanowiczJ

Professional
rafael nadal: Probably. and i play a very tough match yesterday. We cannot forget that i get injury last year for six months. so for six months i didn’t play no one match of intensity because when i came back i played three tournaments ‑ well two tournaments. shanghai we cannot count. The rest of the tournaments is the first come back after four months. Is difficult to have a feeling on that.
then basel, having that appendicitis, probably is like i was not playing also. So six months without. i started the season without playing that kind of level matches. Only once for me. That was indian wells against raonic. that is a different story, different style, different thing. but was a long match, high‑level match, only that one. then yesterday, before yesterday, two more. That’s it. Today another one. even if it was 6‑3, 6‑3, the level of intensity and the level of tennis has been high again.

wow............................
 

RF-18

Talk Tennis Guru
wow............................

What does he mean by ''doesn't count''. What the hell, you showed up and entered the tournament = fit for fight. Basel didn't count either? LOL.

What about his AO? Didn't he get much match practice there, reaching the quarters and playing that 5 setter against Smyzcek? That seems to be forgotten.

I don't know if it's his english, wich can be misleading and he doesn't mean what he actually sais, but damn. :shock:
 

tennis_pro

Bionic Poster
"just congratulatae Novak, accept, (...) so for six months I didn’t play no one match" - that is so Nadal...

Anyway, I agree with a big part of this interview. I'm very curious about him getting tired in the Djokovic match, though. It's not like it lasted 5 hours but barely an hour and a half or so. If THAT'S the main issue I'm not sure he's gonna fix it soon. Can't wait to see how he does in Barcelona.
 

Algo

Hall of Fame
I don't know if it's his english, wich can be misleading and he doesn't mean what he actually sais, but damn. :shock:

Yeah, I'm starting to think he should do all his interviews in Spanish and if the media needs it in English, get a translator, because :shock:

Though his Spanish interviews don't come up much better anyway.
 

DRII

G.O.A.T.
What does he mean by ''doesn't count''. What the hell, you showed up and entered the tournament = fit for fight. Basel didn't count either? LOL.

What about his AO? Didn't he get much match practice there, reaching the quarters and playing that 5 setter against Smyzcek? That seems to be forgotten.

I don't know if it's his english, wich can be misleading and he doesn't mean what he actually sais, but damn. :shock:

you're obviously horrible at deciphering context :rolleyes:
 

RF-18

Talk Tennis Guru
you're obviously horrible at deciphering context :rolleyes:

Not easy trying to understand what he is saying. That's why my post is more of a question mark cause I'm not entirely sure what he is trying to say.
 

pdcosta

Banned
"just congratulatae Novak, accept, (...) so for six months I didn’t play no one match" - that is so Nadal...

Anyway, I agree with a big part of this interview. I'm very curious about him getting tired in the Djokovic match, though. It's not like it lasted 5 hours but barely an hour and a half or so. If THAT'S the main issue I'm not sure he's gonna fix it soon. Can't wait to see how he does in Barcelona.

I think he gets tired easily because he has been nervous and anxious lately. He admitted he had been paying with a lot of nerves (sic) during his match versus Verdasco before Monte Coarlo.

You get more tired when you are nervous and anxious because you spend more energy by being nervous and anxious... your heart would beat faster, you sweat more and you get dehydrated quicker too.
 

OddJack

G.O.A.T.
Apendicitis?

He is in big denial.

Lose intensity: He means he gets tired on his legs. This is what I have been saying all along. There was no confidence issue, he is weaker physically.
 

OddJack

G.O.A.T.
Yeah, I'm starting to think he should do all his interviews in Spanish and if the media needs it in English, get a translator, because :shock:

Though his Spanish interviews don't come up much better anyway.

No, his English is not good but you can tell what he is trying to say. Nothing was lost in translation.

I Lose intensity in leg.

I was out six months for Injury

Didnt get many high level matches

I will be enough confident to play

Those are the excuses do far.
 

reaper

Legend
He had 8 months off in 2012 then recaptured the intensity more quickly than after this shorter layoff. He might still make it back to the top this time, but I think the next long layoff is curtains.
 

OddJack

G.O.A.T.
Was 6‑3, 6‑3, but can’t be much closer. I know that. I think he knows that, too. Everybody knows that.

I watched the match and didnt feel like it was close at all
 

cc0509

Talk Tennis Guru
Not easy trying to understand what he is saying. That's why my post is more of a question mark cause I'm not entirely sure what he is trying to say.

He is trying to say he is not back to full form. We can see that from his matches. It is obvious. The end. What is difficult to understand? Why are you trying to put a negative slant on every word that Nadal utters?

Right now he is way behind Djokovic in terms of form but the reality is that Nadal, if he can get his act together physically and mentally, is the only player capable of challenging Djokovic at the slams. There is no other player out there who is good enough to do it. You know it and I know it.
 

reaper

Legend
This time last year Nadal was losing to the likes of Ferrer and Almagro, in the lead up to the French. It didn't stop him winning the French Open. In the Monte Carlo match Nadal lost concentration at 3-3/40-0 in the second set to lose his serve on a string of errors. I wouldn't count on such charity at Roland Garros.
 

veroniquem

Bionic Poster
I agree with Nadal, he's been out for 6 months, so he'll need time to re-adjust. Problem is, he missed something like 7 months in between 2012-2013, and when he came back, it took him a couple of weeks to start winning tournaments again.


In 2013, I felt like his game was in place right away. He made final of the very first event he played. And then just continued making all of them until grass. I was gobsmacked. I had always thought a period of adjustment was necessary after a very long absence from competition. But somehow, he didn't need any.
2015 has been the polar opposite: 7 events played, only 1 final and it was a 250.

So, what's the difference? Age? The type of operation he underwent? His mind frame? I would love to have his view on that (and his absence in 2012/2013 was much longer than in 2014)
 

JanowiczJ

Professional
This time last year Nadal was losing to the likes of Ferrer and Almagro, in the lead up to the French. It didn't stop him winning the French Open. In the Monte Carlo match Nadal lost concentration at 3-3/40-0 in the second set to lose his serve on a string of errors. I wouldn't count on such charity at Roland Garros.

If we are going to do this, lets do this propely:

He also won the 250 prep for the AUS Open and reached Won AUS Final in 2014; This year he lost to a nobody in the first round of the 250 prep. for the AUS Open, then was bagel'ed by Berdych in the QFs. Prior to that he was being pushed to 5 sets against a challenger level player in the second round.

Then he went to win the Rio500 on clay. This year he didn't even reach the final. Onto the March Masters: he made it to the final in Miami losing only to Djokovic there. In 2015 his best result on the American HC swing was a QF loss against Raonic.

His only improvement came on Monte Carlo, where he lost to Ferrer last year while in 2015 he beat his compatriot. But his results so far are abysmal for his standards. Only one final so far, on an ATP250 clay event played a week before the HC masters. Not even Ferrer went there.
 

Luckydog

Professional
Was 6‑3, 6‑3, but can’t be much closer. I know that. I think he knows that, too. Everybody knows that.

I watched the match and didnt feel like it was close at all

Yeap. The score looks close.There were many times of duce,right?But,that does not mean the situation on court was close.In that match, most of time, Djokovic was the guy who was aggressive,and Nadal was always being defensive. That was close? If Nadal did not move so so well,the result maybe 6:2 6:1 or even worse.
 

reaper

Legend
If we are going to do this, lets do this propely:

He also won the 250 prep for the AUS Open and reached Won AUS Final in 2014; This year he lost to a nobody in the first round of the 250 prep. for the AUS Open, then was bagel'ed by Berdych in the QFs. Prior to that he was being pushed to 5 sets against a challenger level player in the second round.

Then he went to win the Rio500 on clay. This year he didn't even reach the final. Onto the March Masters: he made it to the final in Miami losing only to Djokovic there. In 2015 his best result on the American HC swing was a QF loss against Raonic.

His only improvement came on Monte Carlo, where he lost to Ferrer last year while in 2015 he beat his compatriot. But his results so far are abysmal for his standards. Only one final so far, on an ATP250 clay event played a week before the HC masters. Not even Ferrer went there.

Nadal came off an extended break at the start of 2015. He didn't in 2014. The early season results aren't a like for like comparison.
 

xan

Hall of Fame
LOL. OP is like the Drudge Report for tennis.

The article could be about Nadal running into a burning house, risking his life, and rescuing children dying from smoke inhalation... and his title would be:

"Nadal storms house, brutally takes children, and leaves it in ashes."

News at 9!

lol. qft

people nitpick too much on these boards.
 

LETitBE

Hall of Fame
The poor lad cant seem to count.He had 3 months off after Wimbledon and then came back to take the Asian/Indoor swing by storm but it didnt work like that.He played 3 tournaments and got knocked out early in all 3,had his appendix out in november(he was walking around the next day unlike Muzza who layed in bed for 16 days after his back op)and started training on the 1st of december. Please tell me where the six months out comes from? And if its about "high intensity"matches against the top players,how many ranked in the top 20 or 30 are suffering from the same dillemma.?
 

veroniquem

Bionic Poster
Nadal came off an extended break at the start of 2015. He didn't in 2014. The early season results aren't a like for like comparison.


That is not a credible excuse though. In 2013, he came back from an even more extensive injury time out and he won EVERYTHING.
Obviously, this year, there is something else. Is it physical? Mental? I would love to know the behind the scenes.
I agree with Janowiczj that so far his 2015 has been worse than his 2013 or 2014. Much worse actually. His worst start of the season as a top player. I hope he can put it behind him and come back strong but I don't think denial is going to help fix the problem(s)
 

Inanimate_object

Hall of Fame
That is not a credible excuse though. In 2013, he came back from an even more extensive injury time out and he won EVERYTHING.
Obviously, this year, there is something else. Is it physical? Mental? I would love to know the behind the scenes.
I agree with Janowiczj that so far his 2015 has been worse than his 2013 or 2014. Much worse actually. His worst start of the season as a top player. I hope he can put it behind him and come back strong but I don't think denial is going to help fix the problem(s)

Of course its an excuse and a valid one. That Nadal has bounced back before does not make it the norm. I can think of no more credible excuse than having spent the last 6 months on the side lines.
 

reaper

Legend
That is not a credible excuse though. In 2013, he came back from an even more extensive injury time out and he won EVERYTHING.
Obviously, this year, there is something else. Is it physical? Mental? I would love to know the behind the scenes.
I agree with Janowiczj that so far his 2015 has been worse than his 2013 or 2014. Much worse actually. His worst start of the season as a top player. I hope he can put it behind him and come back strong but I don't think denial is going to help fix the problem(s)

That's all fine...but what are the implications for Roland Garros? I think he showed significant improvement at Monte Carlo. I don't think he needs to improve much on what he showed there to win the French. Hot, humid conditions (if he gets them) and the highest bouncing court on the circuit might well be enough to get him a 10th title.
 

cc0509

Talk Tennis Guru
That's all fine...but what are the implications for Roland Garros? I think he showed significant improvement at Monte Carlo. I don't think he needs to improve much on what he showed there to win the French. Hot, humid conditions (if he gets them) and the highest bouncing court on the circuit might well be enough to get him a 10th title.

You have got to be kidding me? I am sorry but what I saw at Monte Carlo from Nadal is NOT enough for him to win RG this year. He will need to step it up big time and find his forehand, depth to his shots, improve his serve, etc., or else Djokovic or somebody else will eat him alive. He has big time work to do but I am sure he knows this already.

Seriously, let's not let fan bias cloud our rational judgement.
 

veroniquem

Bionic Poster
Of course its an excuse and a valid one. That Nadal has bounced back before does not make it the norm. I can think of no more credible excuse than having spent the last 6 months on the side lines.
But as far as I can tell he hasn't spent the last 6 months on the side lines. The last event he played was Basel in October 2014 and he came back for Doha at the beginning of January. That's 3 months. (It is true that he also skipped summer hard: beginning of July to beginning of September, so that's about 2 months but he came back for the Asian swing + Basel).
Oh well, whatever. He says he's feeling better now, so I hope good things will happen soon.
 

veroniquem

Bionic Poster
That's all fine...but what are the implications for Roland Garros? I think he showed significant improvement at Monte Carlo. I don't think he needs to improve much on what he showed there to win the French.


I disagree. He has to serve better and his forehand has to be more penetrating. He still has to gain some confidence on important points. His BH could be stronger too. He has time to work on his game though and I think he could do well in both Spanish events in the weeks to come.
 

reaper

Legend
You have got to be kidding me? I am sorry but what I saw at Monte Carlo from Nadal is NOT enough for him to win RG this year. He will need to step it up big time and find his forehand, depth to his shots, improve his serve, etc., or else Djokovic or somebody else will eat him alive. He has big time work to do but I am sure he knows this already.

Seriously, let's not let fan bias cloud our rational judgement.

Let's not indeed. I'm not a Nadal fan (my favourite player is Federer and I prefer Djokovic to Nadal). Last year Nadal lost to Ferrer on clay pre French Open. This year he beat him in what looked to my untrained eye to be a high quality match, then lost to Djokovic. It was 3-3/40-0 in the 2nd set on Nadal's serve, he lost concentration (wild forehand then a double fault), lost that game, then the match. What are the chances of Nadal encountering similar brain fade when it matters at Roland Garros? Going on the evidence of the last decade, not very high.
 

cc0509

Talk Tennis Guru
Let's not indeed. I'm not a Nadal fan (my favourite player is Federer and I prefer Djokovic to Nadal). Last year Nadal lost to Ferrer on clay pre French Open. This year he beat him in what looked to my untrained eye to be a high quality match, then lost to Djokovic. It was 3-3/40-0 in the 2nd set on Nadal's serve, he lost concentration (wild forehand then a double fault), lost that game, then the match. What are the chances of Nadal encountering similar brain fade when it matters at Roland Garros? Going on the evidence of the last decade, not very high.

I don't think Ferrer was at his best in that MC match this year. He had a huge blister on his foot.

Re Nadal and RG this year, it feels different for some reason and IMO Nadal needs to improve a lot in many areas for him to win it but he has some time before RG to sort it out. Hopefully he does and he shows up at RG the way he has in the past.
 

tipsa...don'tlikehim!

Talk Tennis Guru
Thread title is shameful.
When you read the interview, question asked is:

Q. How do you explain the drop in intensity? The fact that you are not used to playing big games since the beginning of the season?
Answer: RAFAEL NADAL: Probably. And I play a very tough match yesterday. We cannot forget that I get injury last year for six months.

Journalist didnt ask about the loss but asked why a drop in intensity.
 

veroniquem

Bionic Poster
I don't think Ferrer was at his best in that MC match this year. He had a huge blister on his foot.

Re Nadal and RG this year, it feels different for some reason and IMO Nadal needs to improve a lot in many areas for him to win it but he has some time before RG to sort it out. Hopefully he does and he shows up at RG the way he has in the past.
The stats back you up. In 2015 compared to 2014, he has dropped from #1 to #6 in return games won on clay and from 10 to 24 in service games won. I believe he has a lot to improve by RG. Dubious he would win it with the stats as they are now.
 

LETitBE

Hall of Fame
Thread title is shameful.
When you read the interview, question asked is:

Q. How do you explain the drop in intensity? The fact that you are not used to playing big games since the beginning of the season?
Answer: RAFAEL NADAL: Probably. And I play a very tough match yesterday. We cannot forget that I get injury last year for six months.

Journalist didnt ask about the loss but asked why a drop in intensity.

AND he answered he had 6 months out injured which is false.
 
D

Deleted member 55539

Guest
The poor lad cant seem to count.He had 3 months off after Wimbledon and then came back to take the Asian/Indoor swing by storm but it didnt work like that.He played 3 tournaments and got knocked out early in all 3,had his appendix out in november(he was walking around the next day unlike Muzza who layed in bed for 16 days after his back op)and started training on the 1st of december. Please tell me where the six months out comes from? And if its about "high intensity"matches against the top players,how many ranked in the top 20 or 30 are suffering from the same dillemma.?

If we are going to do this, lets do this propely:

He also won the 250 prep for the AUS Open and reached Won AUS Final in 2014; This year he lost to a nobody in the first round of the 250 prep. for the AUS Open, then was bagel'ed by Berdych in the QFs. Prior to that he was being pushed to 5 sets against a challenger level player in the second round.

Then he went to win the Rio500 on clay. This year he didn't even reach the final. Onto the March Masters: he made it to the final in Miami losing only to Djokovic there. In 2015 his best result on the American HC swing was a QF loss against Raonic.

His only improvement came on Monte Carlo, where he lost to Ferrer last year while in 2015 he beat his compatriot. But his results so far are abysmal for his standards. Only one final so far, on an ATP250 clay event played a week before the HC masters. Not even Ferrer went there.


i wonder why these stupid journalists do not bring up these points and correct him.. when ordinary public (like me) reads this.. they would be like 'ok.. we shuold cut him some slack.. he has been out for 6 months.. but no one KNOWS he is a liar.. '
 

reaper

Legend
You won't have to put up with Nadal's dishonesty and immorality once he's exposed as a hopeless tennis player and gets knocked out early from Grand Slam tournaments on a consistent basis. I wouldn't be holding my breath.
 
Top