Read my post again. Why is the player who loses earlier in the slams he didn't win the greater player? Because that's what it must mean in this scenario. He's basically worse against the field compared to the other player.If they both have the same slams, then yes, the guy with a 20-10 lead in the H2H is greater. That difference is too big, we are talking about double the wins. Just think about how would you feel watching them play through the years. When they played you would always favour the guy winning 2 out of 3 times.