LOL, being bad to stay bad? Maybe you are just bad at tennis? Ever think of that? LOL Every coach brings in their own style, preferences, successes, and failures. If a student is not connecting with a coach, by all means, check out Oscar's approach. That is not the issue I have with Oscar. I am attacking his claims. He has yet to answer. Here is a post at Oscar's forum. This was posted by TLM who frequents here on occasion. What TLM says in this is completely twisted. No one has said Oscars' methods are ALL wrong. We have said that a professional player DOES indeed prepare the backswing well before th bounce and can prove that on film. I have also gone on record and indicated that I have NO PROBLEMS with his method except for his claims and the fact that he denies evidence placed right in front of him. Here is TLM's post. This is typical of Oscar followers not really getting it: "Oscar i purchaced your book+videos 3 years ago+me+my wife learned a lot+really improved our games with your instruction. I get on TW discussion board often+when i would brag up your methods + defend your instruction,there would be a lot of opposition.They would say that you were teaching all wrong+i was a fool for listening to you." Now, look at this. The comment "are we being foolish for listening to you". This reminds of a cult follower doubting the divinity of his Guru and god. If you really believe in a method, a smart person would realize that it is a MAN-MADE method complete with flaws and tips that may or may not work with everyone. All coaches have this inherent trait. It is why a good coach will use SEVERAL methods to help a student learn the game of tennis. But for a Wegner follower to get on their knees in prayer, to seek wisdom from their Guru, is a bit odd don't you think? The other thing is the personal touch of "I DEFEND YOUR INSTRUCTION" and "YOU WERE TEACHING ALL WRONG". Can you believe this? Who has said that Oscar is teaching ALL WRONG? Let me help you guys out a bit. A long time ago a bet was made between Arthur Ashe and Vic Braden. Vic was studying the pronation of the arm in different types of serve (twist, slice, etc.). Arthur insisted that the arm supinated on the slice serve and that he did it ALL the time. He refused to accept Vic's film analysis and made the bet. Guess what, Arthur lost. The difference between Arhtur and Oscar is, Arthur saw the evidence, apoligized to Vic, and changed the way he was teaching the serve. DO YOU REALLY THINK OSCAR HAS DONE THAT? EVEN WITH PROOF THAT PROS PREPARE BEFORE THE BOUNCE?????? Or is he now changing his tune with no apoligy?